Ảnh hưởng của địa tô 2 đến tiến độ thi công công trình giao thông đường bộ trọng điểm ở Việt Nam

The rapid pace of public investment and infrastructure development in Vietnam has inadvertently led to significant challenges, particularly concerning the construction progress of major road transportation projects. This study addresses the critical issue of land rent type II, which represents the increase in land value not attributable to user investment, but rather to external factors like zoning and public infrastructure. Focusing on key projects such as the North-South Expressway, Ring Road 3 in Ho Chi Minh City, and Ring Road 4 in the Hanoi Capital Region, this paper aims to elucidate the intricate relationship between escalating land pricing and recurrent delays in site clearance. Understanding these dynamics is paramount for fostering social stability, ensuring equitable compensation policies, and accelerating essential infrastructure development in Vietnam.

Policy-makers in urban planning and transportation, land management authorities, legal professionals, real estate developers, academics in land economics and public administration, and community advocacy groups affected by infrastructure development projects.

This research systematically investigates the detrimental impact of land rent type II on the construction progress of major road transportation projects across Vietnam, specifically examining the North-South Expressway (Eastern section), Ring Road 3 in Ho Chi Minh City, and Ring Road 4 in the Hanoi Capital Region. The study employs a mixed-method approach, combining qualitative methods including legal document analysis, expert interviews, and public surveys, with quantitative methods that analyze land price differentials, land handover timelines, and public complaints. Key findings indicate that significant compensation price discrepancies, ranging from 30% to 50% across different periods, are a primary driver of social discontent, disputes, and subsequent disruptions to project schedules. The paper reveals that while existing legislation recognizes the state's authority to regulate land rent type II, there is a notable absence of specific provisions for projects not subject to land auctions or those facing prolonged land acquisition processes. To mitigate these challenges and ensure fairness, the authors propose actionable recommendations. These include establishing a flexible compensation pricing mechanism responsive to market fluctuations, enacting tailored legal and regulatory provisions for land rent type II, and implementing a comprehensive benefit-sharing mechanism among the state, enterprises, and affected residents. By addressing these critical gaps, the research provides a framework to enhance social stability, improve the efficiency of site clearance, and accelerate the delivery of vital infrastructure, thereby maximizing the returns on public investment and minimizing negative social impacts.