Báo cáo: CÁC CHI TIÊU AVERAGE CỦA SINH VIÊN VÀ TRỢ CẤP CỦA CHÍNH PHỦ

Chia sẻ: Nguyen Tuan Viet | Ngày: | Loại File: PPT | Số trang:19

Thêm vào BST

Báo xấu

102
lượt xem 5
download

Download Vui lòng tải xuống để xem tài liệu đầy đủ

Thay vì in sách cho học sinh, có thể FMT đăng các sách điện tử của tất cả các sách giáo khoa và phác thảo trong học kỳ vào trang web của giảng viên. Do sinh viên FMT tìm thấy phương pháp này nhiều hơn

Chủ đề:

Bình luận(0) Đăng nhập để gửi bình luận!

Lưu

Nội dung Text: Báo cáo: CÁC CHI TIÊU AVERAGE CỦA SINH VIÊN VÀ TRỢ CẤP CỦA CHÍNH PHỦ

Statistics Project THE AVERAGE SPENDING OF STUDENTS AND THE GOVERNMENT’S SUBSIDY Tutor Tran Kim Anh Group name BH GROUP Group member Nguyen Thi Hong Nhung Pham Thi Quynh Trang Le Phuong Linh Le Thi Hong Nhung Nguyen Thi Thuy Nhi Khuong Ninh Trang Nguyen Thi Hoa Ha Thi Hue Tran Thi Thao Do Thi Kim Hue
Outline • Introduction • Research Methodology • Descriptive Results and Findings • Results and findings of hypothesis test • Project Evaluation • Conclusions and Recommendations
INTRODUCTION • Reason for research: The method FMT using to distribute the textbooks and outlines to students is not as effective as we expected. • Objective: Instead of printing books for students , FMT can post the e-books of all textbooks and outlines in the semester into the faculty’s website
INTRODUCTION (cont) • Research question: • Do FMT students find this method more convenient? • Is this method work effective if we applied it? • For the FMT students who didn’t buy books from FMT, will this new way bring the benefits to them?
METHODOLOGY 1. Population 425 FMT students course 08 374 FMT students course 09 799 students 2. Questionnaire 5 Y/N questions
METHODOLOGY (cont) 3. Sample size and sampling method n = 60 • Random sampling method using Excel =INT(RAND()*799) • Delivering questionnaire
METHODOLOGY (cont) 4. Data processing Excel software was used to support the job and calculate the complex statistics 5. Significant level We chose α =5%.
DESCRITIVE RESULTSand Findings Descriptive Results AND FINDINGS Figure 1: The amount of money students have each month 29% 24% 30 20% 18% 20 3% 10 6% 0 00 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 ,0 ,0 0,0 0, 0, 0, 00 00 50 00 50 50 1,0 2,5 1, 2, 2, < 0- 0- 0- 0- > 00 00 00 00 0, 0, 0, 0, 50 00 50 00 1, 1, 2,
DESCRITIVE RESULTS AND FINDINGS (cont) 25% 24% 24% 20% 4% 3%
DESCRITIVE RESULTS AND FINDINGS (cont) Firgure 3: The percentage of students running out of money 39% Yes 61% No
DESCRITIVE RESULTS AND FINDINGS (cont) 25% 24% 24% 20% 4% 3%
HYPOTHESIS TEST • Z-test for σ unknown, normal or not normal population, sample size n ≥ 30 • Approximation Method for grouped data:
HYPOTHESIS TEST (cont)
HYPOTHESIS TEST (cont) • Calculating the mean and standard variance of sample
HYPOTHESIS TEST (cont) Using z-test: • H0: µ = 860,000 • Ha: µ > 860,000 • Significant level: α = 0.05 • Decision rule: Critical value: z0.05 ≈ 1.645 Reject H0 if z >1.645
HYPOTHESIS TEST (cont) • The values of z • z = 3.385 > 1.96, we reject H0 • Conclusion: enough evidence to infer that the average spending of students exceed the government’s subsidy
PROJECT EVALUATION 1. Limitation - Unspecific answer 2. Implication - New policy - Financial management
CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION 1. Conclusion - Government’s subsidy is not enough - Get more from parents 2. Recommendation - Raising subsidy (if possible) - Getting more money from partime job
•Thanks for your listening