A systematic mapping study of cloud business and legal implications

Chia sẻ: Nguyễn Thảo | Ngày: | Loại File: PDF | Số trang:23

Thêm vào BST

Báo xấu

17
lượt xem 5
download

Download Vui lòng tải xuống để xem tài liệu đầy đủ

This paper conducted a systematic mapping study of Cloud business and legal implications. The method utilized three classes which are topics, research and contribution facets.

Chủ đề:

Bình luận(0) Đăng nhập để gửi bình luận!

Lưu

Nội dung Text: A systematic mapping study of cloud business and legal implications

International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET) Volume 10, Issue 03, March 2019, pp. 1939–1961, Article ID: IJMET_10_03_197 Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/issues.asp?JType=IJMET&VType=10&IType=3 ISSN Print: 0976-6340 and ISSN Online: 0976-6359 © IAEME Publication Scopus Indexed A SYSTEMATIC MAPPING STUDY OF CLOUD BUSINESS AND LEGAL IMPLICATIONS Isaac Odun-Ayo, Adesola Falade, Tolulope Oladimeji, Temidayo Abayomi-Zannu Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria ABSTRACT Cloud computing can be considered a disruptive innovation or technology that is making life easier for Cloud users. Figuring out a focal point of research in a specific area of study particularly on cloud business and legal implications could sometimes be challenging. This paper conducted a systematic mapping study of Cloud business and legal implications. The method utilized three classes which are topics, research and contribution facets. The topics were extricated from the primary or essential studies, while research type like evaluation and contribution type namely tool was used in the analysis. The result indicated that there were more publications in relation to legal framework and tool with 3.2%, more papers in terms of legal framework and process with 4.0%, more work was done with respect to data protection and process with 5.6%, more papers on security and model with 14.4 %, more publications on privacy and model with 8%, and more papers on confidentiality and method with 6.4%. The findings of this work ascertained multiple gaps that will be beneficial to providers, practitioners and researchers. Key words: Cloud computing, Mapping study, Classification scheme, Data extraction, Data protection, Legal framework Cite this Article: Isaac Odun-Ayo, Adesola Falade, Tolulope Oladimeji, Temidayo Abayomi-Zannu, A Systematic Mapping Study of Cloud Business and Legal Implications, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology 10(3), 2019, pp. 1939–1961. http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/issues.asp?JType=IJMET&VType=10&IType=3 1. INTRODUCTION Cloud is a distributed and parallel computing technology composed of multiple virtualized and concatenated computers which can be dynamically provided and represented as a single or many incorporated computing resources which is dependent on the service level agreement acknowledged and accepted via a deliberation amongst the users and the service providers (Buyya et al., 2011). According to De Silva (2015), governing laws, intellectual property issues and jurisdiction, service credits and levels, and responsibility for service failure are some of the pivotal official problems relating to cloud computing. Liability provisions under the legal terms is perhaps the most confrontational and critically mediated requirements in any technological contract including cloud computing. The exact motive behind this step is the pressing monetary http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1939 editor@iaeme.com
A Systematic Mapping Study of Cloud Business and Legal Implications effect that a breach of contract has upon their businesses in which they support and most importantly, the degree of which the subsequent monetary impairment is incommensurate to the amount of money being spent by the clients under the cloud computing legal bindings. The service providers coupled with the clients appear to contrast tremendously in the degree to which they assume that the other party would deny the responsibility or take responsibility respectively. Clients are fervent that the service providers should be “responsible or accountable” for the likely damage which can be brought about by the flop or blunder of an organization’s critical or vital IT system or service. Alternatively, service providers disagree with some rationalization that it won’t be long before they go bankrupt if they consent to boundless liability on all transactions (De Silva, 2015). Under contact law, one of the contacting parties is eligible to damages or compromises for sensibly predictable loses that supposedly triggered or brought about by the other party’s violation or contravention of the contract. The court decides that money is to be paid for the damages by one individual to the other individual as remuneration for the damages or loses caused by the other individual as a repercussion of the activities or oversights of the first individual (Sclater, 2012). The seemingly complicated nature of the business and legal issues relating to cloud computing makes this study an interesting one. Cloud computing is provided as a utility and it is available as and when required while also being on a pay-as-you-go basis. This enables the user to consume what is needed per time and the Cloud Service Provider (CSP) also makes profit. Be that as it may, because of the procedure of multitenancy and virtualization on the cloud, security concerns are always unchanging (Odun-Ayo, et al., 2017a; Odun-Ayo, et al., 2017b). There are primarily three service types on the cloud; the Software–as–a–Service (SaaS), Platform-as-a-Services (PaaS) and Infrastructure-as-a-Services (IaaS). The entire application and infrastructure are provided by the CSP in SaaS which enables users to utilize the applications deployed by the CSP. In PaaS, the CSP allocates the infrastructure that enables the user to create and deploy their applications. The user has control of the data and applications, while the CSP controls the infrastructure. IaaS enables the CSP to provide computer services and storage facilities among others. The services are dynamically provisioned, elastic and available on demand. Cloud computing is turning out to be very beneficial and valuable, while the services being offered are embellishing, aggrandizing and proliferating constantly due to the sound fundamental applications and architecture running on the cloud (Odun-Ayo, et al., 2018a; Odun-Ayo, et al., 2018b). Despite the effectiveness of cloud services, privacy laws relating to the handling of patient’s confidentiality in the area of health care are issues of concern especially on the Cloud (Klein, 2011). Although the CSPs are striving to provide very efficient and reliable services on the cloud, there are additionally issues regarding trust (Odun-Ayo, et al., 2017c). In addition, there are concerns relating contractual agreements. Customers sign contracts online without examining details properly and lacking the understanding of technical terms involved (Rohrmann, and Cunha, 2015). It is important that Cloud computing contract should be as clear and as simple as possible. The clauses in the contract should take cognizance of the type of customer or corporation, and must be suited to the Cloud models or Cloud services (Rohrmann, and Cunha, 2015). In Cloud computing, the CSPs have their data centers across geographical boundaries, which has legal implications for criminal investigations by government agencies and civil litigation by businesses (Choo, 2014). Again, the laws in some countries may void contractual provisions. For example, the EU has stringent rules concerning movement of data across boundaries (Mills, 2009). There are regulatory and governance issues that affect Cloud operations. Such issues include the Patriot Act, United Kingdom Regulation of Investigatory power act, International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA) (Mills, 2009). For example, the Patriot Act enables the US http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1940 editor@iaeme.com
Isaac Odun-Ayo, Adesola Falade, Tolulope Oladimeji, Temidayo Abayomi-Zannu government to demand for the exposure of the data saved in any data center in whatever place in the world as long as the CSP is a US based company (Irion, 2012). Systematic mapping study allows for structured presentation of results and reports in an area such as Cloud business and legal implications. The reports and categorization are showed in a visual manner utilizing a map (Odun-Ayo et al., 2019a). This provides an understanding of the level of studies, research or publications in such field of endeavor. Many facets can be used for the mapping studies depending on what is being investigated. In this study, the research, contribution and topic facets were utilized. The research facet focused on work done in the area of Cloud business and legal implications. The contribution facet considered the model and method among others. The topics facet was used to extract core aspects of subject under consideration. The purpose of this paper is to carry out a systematic mapping study of Cloud business and legal implications. The remaining part of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 examination of related works; Section 3 focuses on the systematic mapping method. Section 4 involves the results and discussion. Section 5 concludes the paper and suggests future work. 2. RELATED WORK In Barros-Justo et al., (2017), the setup stage of a systematic mapping study was analyzed and showed that software routines as apparent amid the requirement-engineering stage of researches, bringing an understanding of the parts carried out by the above-mentioned routines dependent essential on parameters needed in the creation procedure. Guideline or step were created especially for research accompanied by rudimentary procedures to ensure that the iteration of their study by other researchers for an affirmation of the legitimacy of the work. The digital libraries utilized for the research were IEEExplore, Web of Science, ACM DL, and SCOPUS. The guidelines laid down by Peterssen et al., (2008) were adhered to for this work. The work of Kosar et al., (2016) for a systematic mapping study dwells on the depiction of the procedure as it correlates to a domain-specific languages (DSL). The research was directed in respect to an improved understanding of the DSL area of research with an emphasizes on research directions and subsequent tendencies. This research encompasses the span of July 2013 to October 2014, and it capitalizes on three standards for carrying out a systematic review which are reporting such, planning and carrying out the review. Santos et al., (2017) showed that systematic mapping study depends upon an examination as well as utilization of concept maps within Computer Science and the research conveys these effects of a systematic mapping study which focuses on the accumulation and assessment of previous works. Five digital libraries was utilized in this research. Manual approaches and backward snowballing were utilized in the searching procedure while the research showed a broad concentration and an exhaustive examination of concept maps, rooted on teaching and learning supports. Search strings utilized in their research were employed on ScienceDirect, ACM DL, SCOPUS, IEEExplore digital libraries and Compedex. In Souza et al., (2018), examined how games related techniques came to be made use of in software engineering education a systematic mapping study and by what method the above- mentioned strategies bolster explicit software engineering knowledge areas, with further areas being shown along with research gaps. The main studies of the research are firmly based on the utilization and assessment of games in software engineering education. Based on publications starting from 1974 to 2016, a total of 156 primary studies were highlighted in this research and the mapping process by the joint action of the research was carried out in accordance with the rules and guidelines in Peterssen et al., (2008). Fernandez-Blanco et al., (2017) completed a review of power system models and their applications utilized by the European organizations. Their examination pinpointed out the http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1941 editor@iaeme.com
A Systematic Mapping Study of Cloud Business and Legal Implications modeling gaps and there were 228 reviews carried out and 82 questionnaires were in the long run finalized and utilized for the mapping. Mernik (2017) carried out a systematic mapping study of domain-specific languages with essential enthusiasm for what kind of contribution, the focus area and type of work. The materials for the research incorporate assessment papers, theoretical or philosophical papers, experience papers, solution proposition and approved research materials. The research includes a thorough examination from trusted sources starting from 2006 to 2012 while the systematic mapping study was carried out dependent on the procedure characterizing research questions, carrying out the search, grouping, screening, and information extraction. Griffo et al., (2015) did a systematic mapping and the research based its search with respect to “legal theory” and “legal concepts”. Also, chosen studies were classified dependent on the contributions in terms of tool, language, model and method. Alternate procedures were examination of the utilized legal theories in legal core ontologies building process, examination of focus with an unmistakable proposal on the utilization of two ontologies and the examination of each research work for apt findings about legal and ontological research. Ahmad et al., (2017) work was a systematic mapping study that provides outlines of an empirical research in software cloud-based testing in the technique of creating a category design. The work made use of 69 main studies as found in 75 research publications and these studies wer utilized for a thorough factual investigation and an inevitable quantitative outcome. Both functional and non-functional testing techniques were explored with the applications of the procedures and their peculiarities. Larger part of the investigations utilized a particular experiment for the assessment of their suggested solution. From the literatures analyed, no research has been focused explicitly around systematic mapping study of Cloud business and legal implications. Alavi and Leidner, (2001) conducted an exhaustive review of knowledge management within organization with an emphasis on the likely roles of IT within the process. Multiple crucial issues verging on the role IT will partake in moving and assisting these procedures and the knowledge management processes were further examined. Accentuation was additionally made on the need to aid the creation, transfer, application and storage of knowledge in organizations. Boell and Cecez-Kecmanovic (2015) talked about the effectiveness and drawbacks of systematic literature review in social sciences and information system in their research and showed that systematic literature review giving a comprehensive and better methodology to literature review is not only debatable but also unacceptable. In their contention and support of this, they presumed that alert and controls ought to be practiced while choosing a systematic literature review as it can sometimes undermine critical engagement with the academic work and literature (Odun-Ayo et al., 2019b). Brereton et al., (2007) examined the exercises gained from implementing systematic literature review procedures to software engineering field and the authors abridged the systematic literature review procedure and furthermore portrayed numerous insites still undertaken by others, the authors, extricated and examined a few exercises about the appropriateness of this practice to software engineering domain. Cooper (1982) noted that article reviews must pay close consideration to thorough methodology and also further conceptualized research review as a scientific enquiry involving five phases that parallel those main researches which are data collection, problem formulation, data analysis and interpretation, evaluation of data points and finally, the presentation of the results. Every one of the functions, other potential and the sources of variance treats to the legitimacy of which each stage are discussed. http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1942 editor@iaeme.com
Isaac Odun-Ayo, Adesola Falade, Tolulope Oladimeji, Temidayo Abayomi-Zannu Galvan and Galvan (2017) gave valuable bits of knowledge for carrying out literature review and recommended integrating patterns and examples while getting ready to compose literature review which includes the reason and voice before starting to compose must be considered while then giving consideration on how to rearrange the notes in order to generate a topical outline that follows the contention in the literature review. These provide the rules to create a coherent and intensive literature review. Kitchenham et al., (2009) studied the effect of systematic literature review which are the prescribe evidence-based software engineering strategies for totaling proof or evidence. The authors utilized a manual search of 4 conference proceedings and 10 Journals. Altogether, of the 20 pertinent studies, eight addressed research trends instead of technique evaluation and seven systematic literature reviews tended to cost estimation. The integrity of systematic literature reviews was reasonable with only three scoring less than 2 out of 4. Petersen et al., (2015) concluded that there is a need to assess how researchers conduct the procedure of systematic mapping and show how the rules ought to be refreshed dependent on previous systematic literature review guidelines and systematic maps. The authors talked about certain practices of systematic review rules or guidelines and found that in the multiple number of the studies investigated, numerous rules were utilized and consolidated which lead to various or multiple ways in conducting a systematic mapping study. Vom et al., (2015) emphasized on the significance of literature review and the importance to abstain from conducting little literature search as serious issues for improving a compelling literature review. They also talked about the difficulties of literature search and furthermore, offer suggestions on how these problems could be managed or overcome. They additionally gave functional rules and agendas to help researchers in organizing and planning out their literature search. Odun-Ayo et al., (2018c) conducted a systematic mapping study which put together their work with respect to the ideas of [27]. The chosen studies were added to the contribution facet such as method, model and tool. Also, the chosen studies were utilized on the research facet which manage solution research, evaluation and validation. This examination gave six classes of studies in the domains of design and implementation, virtualization, architecture, optimization, performances and application in connection to the focus of the study. Odun-Ayo et al., (2019a) completed a systematic mapping and characterization plot in connection to resource management, discussed scalability, brokering, scheduling, capacity planning, elasticity, and resource sharing. The chosen studies were added on the contribution facet such as method, metric, model and tool. What's more, the chosen studies were added to this research. Odun-Ayo et al (2019b) research talked about different issues relating to cloud, edge and fog computing and made a systematic map which distinguished different gaps in these regions of study. 3. MATERIALS AND METHODS The systematic mapping process is a repetition method for obtaining and deciphering accessible materials identified with a research objective as stated in Muhammed and Muhammed (2014). This systematic study was carried out making use of the primary rules for systematic mapping study as shown in Figure 1. There are some critical steps that must be observed in a typical systematic study. There is a research question where by the scope or area of the review is discussed. A search is usually conducted on all papers available in that particular domain of study. Thereafter, the papers are sorted out to determine articles relevant to the study. Keywording using the abstracts on the relevant papers is carried out with a view to designing a classification scheme. The process of data extraction which results in the design of a systematic http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1943 editor@iaeme.com
A Systematic Mapping Study of Cloud Business and Legal Implications map concludes the process. All the stages mentioned above were added in the development of the systematic map for Cloud business and legal implications. Figure 1 The Systematic Mapping Process (Petersen et al. 2015) 3.1. Deﬁnition of Research Questions The essence of a systematic map is to give an overview of the quality and kind of research which has already been performed in a particular area of study. It’s sometimes important to know the place such study has been published. These issues determine the relevant research questions to be added in the research. In the study of Cloud business and legal Implications, the research questions are as listed below: RQ1: What areas in Cloud business and legal implications are tackled and how many papers cover the multiple areas? RQ2: What types of articles are publicized in the field and in most importantly what novelty and evaluation do they constitute? 3.2. Conduct of Search for Primary Studies The search for primary studies is usually done by exploring major digital libraries. This can be achieved by carrying out manual research on conferences and journals. With the aim of obtaining papers for this particular research, search for papers were performed on various scientific digital libraries that are accessible and available on the internet. For this particular study, the search focus was not on information from books and printed materials. All the papers selected for the primary studies are in the field of cloud computing, thereby all the facets took care of issues relating to cloud computing (Odun-Ayo et al., 2018c). The core idea of a systematic mapping study is key wording which is usually done on the abstract of the articles. Therefore, articles from newspapers, social networks and other sources were not considered suitable for conducting systematic studies, hence the need to utilize appropriate digital libraries. The search was focused on four (4) databases because of the high impact factor of the journal and conferences publication in these databases. Table 1 shows the digital libraries searched and their URL. Table 1 Digital libraries used for the systematic mapping study The search string was designed in terms of outcome, population, comparison and intervention. The keywords used in the search string was designed by taking note of every http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1944 editor@iaeme.com
Isaac Odun-Ayo, Adesola Falade, Tolulope Oladimeji, Temidayo Abayomi-Zannu aspect of the structure of the study area. For this study on Cloud business and legal implications, the search string used on the major databases are: (ALL (“Business Implication”) OR ALL (“Legal Implication”)) AND TITLE- ABS- KEY (“Cloud”) (ALL (“Business Implication”) OR ALL (“Legal Implication”)) AND TITLE (“Cloud”) (TITLE – ABS – KEY (“Business Implication”)) The searches were carried out using the above modified search strings on documents metadata to make sure that important studies were not missed out. For this research on Cloud business and legal implications, all the results from the relevant digital libraries relating to Cloud, computer science and legal issues were considered. In perspective of our paper’s choice criteria described by the research questions and requirements of the study’s objective, it was observed that 138 papers are joined in this study out of an underlying pursuit comprising 1,425 papers from 2008 to 2018. However, the limitation of the search was on core critical work in this area of study. These 138 selected studies are listed at the appendix. 3.3. Screening of Papers for Inclusion and Exclusion The essence of a selection criteria is to find and include all relevant articles to this review. Hence, the inclusion and exclusion criteria were utilized to eliminate articles that were not of outmost importance to the research question. Some abstracts usually mention the main focus without giving sufficient details, hence abstracts with only the main focus were excluded alongside papers on panel discussion and tutorials were also excluded. The inclusion criteria considered papers that had the primary focus, which also examined secondary aspects of the research. The main focus of this systematic mappings study is Cloud business and legal implications. Therefore, the inclusion and exclusion process are as explained in the table 2 below. Table 2 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria 3.4. Keywording of Abstracts There are steps for building a classification scheme for a systematic mapping study and the result of such classification scheme is the systematic map. Keywording is important for cutting down the time needed to develop the classification scheme for the study on Cloud business and legal implications. In addition, key wording ensures that the studies consider all relevant papers. This involves knowing the context of the study and applying it in the extraction process. Keywords from the different papers relating to Cloud business and legal implications were combined to provide the needed insight into the type and contribution of the research. This was used to determine the set of categories for the study. On the other hand, it was sometimes necessary to analyze the beginning and end of the added or selected papers to ensure reliable keywording for this research (Odun-Ayo et al., 2019a). Consequently, a bunch of keywords was finally utilized in order to know the categories used for the map of this research on Cloud business and legal implications. In this study, three main facets were applied. The first facet focused on the topics related to Cloud business and legal implications. The topics included are confidentiality, privacy, security, data protection, contracts and agreements, and legal frame work. The second facet examined the types of contribution concerning metric, model, tool, http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1945 editor@iaeme.com
A Systematic Mapping Study of Cloud Business and Legal Implications process and method employed in Cloud business and legal implications. The third facets involve the research type contributions. 3.5. Research Type Facet with Category and Description The third facet utilized for this study is the research aspect which is unassociated with the focus of this research and the classification of the study approaches in Wieringa et al., (2006) was utilized. The outcome has the following categories and explanation as discussed in Wieringa et al., (2006): Validation Research: The methods utilized in the study are unique but is yet to be implemented. Such techniques include experiments carried out in the lab. Evaluation Research: The methods have been added and evaluated. Also, the advantages and disadvantages of the outcome have also been discussed. Solution proposal: The technique indicates a special result has been found to an issue. The application and advantages of such solution is also present. Philosophical Paper: This is the technique used by researchers to examine a problem in terms of framework and concepts. Opinion Paper: A study of this nature does not rely on any known research methodology. It simply expresses the view of people. Experience Paper: The study relates to unique experiences of the authors while discussing how things can be done in practice. These research categories were considered sufficient and appropriate for this study on Cloud business and legal implications. The papers utilized for this review were monitored based on the study categories discussed above. The outcome of these classifications in the research category is discussed in details in the analysis section. 3.6. Data Extraction and Mapping of Study During the classification process, the important papers were sorted into a scheme and at this stage, data was gotten from the various articles that were included in the study. The included papers are provided as supplementary material to the main paper in the Appendix. The data extraction process determines the classification schemes. During the process, it was sometimes necessary to create new categories, while some categories were merged and those not considered sufficiently relevant were removed. The process of data extraction was done using a Microsoft Excel table. The Excel table contains each category of the classification scheme and the amount of publications in every class were obtained from a collective table containing either the research issues or contribution aspects (Odun-Ayo et al., 2019b). The analysis honed in on showing the frequency of publications derived from the results on the combined excel tables and the main idea is to show which aspects of Cloud business and legal implications were emphasized more in the study. This allows the recognition of gaps and provides an avenue for recommending further study. With the results on the excel tables, bubble plot was used to present the frequencies. This was displayed in form of a map. The map was created using a two x-y scatter plot with bubbles at the intersection of the categories. The bubble coordinate has bubble sizes that relates to the number of articles identified in such area. There are two quadrants because only three facets were utilized in this particular study and each quadrant provides a visual map based on the intersection of the topic’s categories with either the research or contribution category. Therefore, it is easy to visualize the multiple facets at the same time. In addition, summary details were added to the bubbles to provide a better understanding. Overall, the systematic map provides a quick overview of study in the area of business and legal implications of Cloud http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1946 editor@iaeme.com
Isaac Odun-Ayo, Adesola Falade, Tolulope Oladimeji, Temidayo Abayomi-Zannu computing, which is shown in Figure 2. Table 3 and Table 4 shows the selected primary studies as it relates to the topics, the contribution facet and the research facet. Table 3 and Table 4 treats the literature that fits within each class with a view to substantiating the percentages presented. 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The primary focus of the mapping study on business and legal implication of Cloud is classification, thematic analysis and possibly to identify the publication fora. From the analysis, gaps were pointed out using the graph, thus highlighting which research types and topic areas had insufficiency of publications. Also, the study ultimately showed which areas were well covered in terms of publication. Suffice to mention that in this systematic mapping study, high level categories were utilized to assess the papers included, in producing the frequencies and the subsequently creating the map. 4.1. Contribution Category On the x-axis of the left quadrant of Figure 2 is the result of the contribution facet. The contributions facets show the types of contribution to the focus of the study. The contributions facet for this study indicated that metric discussion in terms of business and legal implications on the Cloud had 8.8%, tool had 10.4% model had 29.6%, method had 27.2% and process had 24%. Table 3. Primary Studies for Topic and Contribution facet Contribution Metric Tool Model Method Process Facet Topic Confidentiality PS49, PS56, PS57, PS10, PS38, PS53, PS54, PS52, PS59, PS130 PS39, PS40, PS55, PS45, PS78, PS87, PS133 Contracts and PS95 PS116 PS100 PS35, PS36, Agreements PS37, PS41, PS92, Data Protection PS1, PS5, PS30, PS118 PS58, PS6, PS 9, PS25, PS26, PS2 PS68, PS69, PS27, PS71,PS90, PS70, PS91, PS109 Legal Frameworks PS17 PS19, PS20, PS132 PS20, PS137 PS13, PS14 PS21, PS136 Privacy PS106, PS122, PS15, PS18, PS108, PS110, PS93, PS104, PS107 PS131 PS22, PS42, PS120, PS105 PS43, PS48, PS50, PS51, PS83 Security PS7, PS62, PS11, PS64, PS65, PS125,PS126, PS23, PS24, PS8, PS16, PS66, PS72, PS129, PS28, PS44, PS9, PS112, PS67,PS128,PS81 PS72, PS73, PS46, PS47, PS113, , PS82, PS85, PS74, PS75, PS61, PS63, PS123, PS86, PS88, PS76, PS77, PS60, PS124, PS89, PS84, PS79,PS80,PS11 PS101, PS102, 7, PS119, PS103, PS111, PS134, PS138 PS127, PS135, Percentage 8.8% 10.40% 29.60% 27.20% 24% 4.1. Research Type Category http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1947 editor@iaeme.com
A Systematic Mapping Study of Cloud Business and Legal Implications On the x- axis of the right quadrant of Figure 2 is the result of the type of research conducted in the area of the Cloud business and legal implications. The results showed that evaluation research discussions in terms of business and legal implications on the Cloud is 30.43%, validation is 0%, solution is 40.58%, philosophical is 15.22%, experience is 13.77% and there were no opinions on the subject of study. Table 4 Primary studies for topic and research facets Research Evaluation Validati Solution Philosophic Experience Opinio Facet on al n Topic Confidentiality PS10, PS38, PS49, PS52, PS53, PS78, PS87, PS39, PS40, PS54, PS55, PS56, PS133 PS45 PS57, PS59, PS130 Contracts and PS12, PS31, PS97, PS98, PS99, PS96 PS94, PS95 Agreements PS32, PS33, PS100, PS114, PS115, PS34, PS35, PS116 PS36, PS37, PS41, PS92, Data PS1, PS2, PS3, PS6, PS29, PS68, PS30, PS58, PS25, PS26, Protection PS4, PS5, PS69, PS70, PS27, PS71, PS90, PS91, PS109,PS11 8, Legal PS13, PS14 PS17 PS19, PS20, PS132, Frameworks PS21 PS136, PS137 Privacy PS15, PS18, PS106, PS107, PS108, PS93, PS51, PS83 PS22, PS42, PS110, PS120, PS121, PS104, PS43, PS48, PS122, PS131 PS105 PS50, Security PS7,PS8,PS9, PS23, PS24, PS28, PS129,PS72 PS117,PS11 PS11,PS16,PS1 PS44, PS46, PS47, , PS73, 9, PS134, 12,PS113, PS61, PS63, PS60, PS74, PS75, PS138 PS123, PS124, PS62, PS64, PS65, PS76, PS77, PS125, PS126, PS66, PS67, PS79, PS80 PS127, PS135, PS128,PS81, PS82, PS85, PS86, PS88, PS89,PS84, PS101,PS102, PS103, PS111, Percentage 32.43% 0% 40.58% 15.22% 13.77% 0% 4.2. The Topics and Contributions Facet High level topics were extracted from the keywords during the data extraction process. The topics that were acquired during the classification in the area of business and legal implications on the Cloud are as follows:  Confidentiality.  Contracts and agreements. Data protection.  Data protection.  Legal framework.  Privacy.  Security. The left quadrant of Figure 2 shows the similarity between the topics and the contribution facet. The results indicated that publications that talked about model in respect to the business http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1948 editor@iaeme.com
Isaac Odun-Ayo, Adesola Falade, Tolulope Oladimeji, Temidayo Abayomi-Zannu and legal implications on the Cloud had 29.6% out of the 125 papers reviewed. In addition, the results showed that out of this 29.6%, 0.8% each were on legal framework, and contracts and agreements, 2.4% were on data protection, 14.4% were on security, 8% were on privacy and 3.2% were on confidentiality. Other aspects of the contribution category as it relates to the topics is in Figure 2. Clearly, there are gaps in the area of legal framework, and contracts and agreements. 4.3. Topic and Research Facet The right quadrant of Figure 2 shows the relationship between the topic facet and the research category. For example, the results shows that solution research relating to business and legal implications on the Cloud is 40.5.8% out of the 138 papers reviewed. The intersection showed that 0.72% of the solution research was on the legal framework, 5.07% was on the contracts and agreements, 3.62% was on data protection, 18.84% was on security, 5.8% was on privacy and 6.5% was on confidentiality. Other result on the topic and research categories are shown in the Figure 2. 4.4. The Systematic Map for Cloud Business and Legal Implications The comprehensive systematic map for study on Cloud business and legal implications beyond technology is shown in Figure 2. The first quadrant displays the two x-y scatter charts with bubbles at the intersection of the topic and contributions facet. The second quadrant is a visualization of the intersection of the topic and research facet also using a two x-y scatter plot with bubbles. As earlier mentioned, the results makes it possible to identify which aspect of the study has been emphasized more than others. From the left quadrant of Figure 2, it was observed that there were more publications in relation to legal framework and tools with 3.2%, more papers in terms of legal framework and process with 4.0%, more work done with respect to data protection and process with 5.6%, more papers on security and models with 14.4 %, more publications on privacy and model with 8%, and more papers on confidentiality and method with 6.4%. Figure 2 Systematic mapping for the study business and legal implication in the Cloud Similarly, the outcome of the topic and research types can be visualized on the right quadrant. Taking a look at the intersection, it can be seen that philosophical and experience http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1949 editor@iaeme.com
A Systematic Mapping Study of Cloud Business and Legal Implications research had 2.17% each in relation to legal framework. There was more work done on evaluation research in terms of contracts and agreements (7.25%), more publications on experience research in relation to data protection (5.8%), more papers on solution research with respect to security (18.84%), more work done in solution research with respect to privacy (5.8%) and there were more publications on solution research that deals with confidentiality (6.52%). Primary objectives of this review paper is to show gaps based on results, hence providing areas requiring further research in the field of study. From the map on business and legal implication in the Cloud, to the best of our knowledge, there were no studies on contracts and agreements, data protection and confidentiality in terms of tool as a means of contribution. Furthermore, contributions in terms of metric are generally low. On both the left and right quadrants, publications relating to legal framework were also low and there were no validation and opinion research in the area of the business and legal implications on the Cloud. As mentioned in literature, a systematic map without carrying out a consecutive systematic review has adequate value, because it easily enables us to identify research gaps in a topic area. It can be seen further in Figure 2, that apart from security, publications on philosophical research are also generally low. This paper has created a systematic map pointing to areas lacking in studies in terms of cloud business and legal implications. The importance of this is that researchers at all levels and industries professionals can utilize this as a beginning stage to lead further investigations. This study gives six classes of studies namely: confidentiality, privacy, security, data protection, contracts and agreements, and legal framework in relation to business and legal implications of cloud computing. Also, the six classes of study can be discussed either in terms of metric, tool, method, process and model or in terms of validation, philosophical, opinion research, evaluation and solution. These areas amongst others are in this manner prescribed for future research. The rundown of included references will likewise aid future researchers. The critical lessons learnt in this research is that research work is boundless and continuum. 5. CONCLUSION Cloud computing provides scalable, elastic, on-demand access to resources provided by the various Cloud types and models through the CSPs via the Internet with obvious business and legal issues. This has necessitated numerous researches in this area of study. The results from this particular study identified gaps in terms of model, tool, method, process and metric in relation to Cloud business and legal implications. In addition, the paper identified gaps in the area validation, solution, evaluation, philosophical and opinion research on business and legal implications of using the cloud. Furthermore, the topics of survey, framework, privacy, paradigms, accountability and reliability, and security were extracted on Cloud business and legal implications. From the systematic map created on business and legal implication in the Cloud, to the best of our knowledge, there are no studies on contract and agreement, data protection and confidentiality in terms of tool. Furthermore, contributions in terms of metric were generally low. In addition, publications relating to legal framework were also low and there are no validation and opinion research in the area of the business and legal implications on the Cloud. This mapping study has been able to show some places where there’s low to no priority in terms of business and legal implications on the Cloud based on the classes used in the scheme. This research has thus added to knowledge by indicating multiple areas of the research where there were gaps. The gaps that have been identified are recommended for further studies. It is likely that it will turn out to be a broad guide into topics that can be researched on in the field of business and legal implications on the Cloud. Further research could also be done to justify this research. In summary, this study created a systematic map of business and legal implication http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1950 editor@iaeme.com
Isaac Odun-Ayo, Adesola Falade, Tolulope Oladimeji, Temidayo Abayomi-Zannu in the Cloud that can be helpful to the cloud community and can aid the researchers to unveil the important gaps of cloud business and legal implication that multiple researchers weren’t able to cover thereby increasing the boundaries of understanding in cloud computing. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We acknowledge the support and sponsorship provided by Covenant University through the Centre for Research, Innovation and Discovery (CUCRID). REFERENCES [1] Ahmad, A., Brereton, P., Andras, P., 2017. A systematic mapping study of empirical studies on software cloud testing methods. In IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion, pp. 555-562. [2] Alavi, M., Leidner, D.E., 2001. Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 107-136. [3] Barros-Justo, J.L., Cravero-Leal, A.L., Benitti, F. B., Capilla-Sevilla, R., 2017. Systematic mapping protocol: the impact of using software patterns during requirements engineering activities in real-world settings, Cornell University Library, arXiv:1701.05747v1 [cs.SE]. [4] Boell, S.K., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., 2015. On being ‘Systematic’ in literature reviews. In Formulating Research Methods for Information Systems (pp. 48-78). Palgrave Macmillan, London. [5] Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B.A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Khalil, M., 2007. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(4), 571-583. [6] Buyya, R., Broberg, J., Goscinski, A., 2011. Cloud computing principles and paradigms. John Wiley and Son, pp. 4-10. [7] Choo, K.R., 2014. Legal issues in the Cloud. In IEEE Cloud Computing. 1(1). pp. 94-96 doi: 10.1109/MCC.2014.14 [8] Cooper, H.M., 1982. Scientific guidelines for conducting integrative research reviews. Review of educational research, 52(2), 291-302. [9] De Silva, S., 2015. Key Legal Issues with Cloud Computing: A UK Law Perspective. In I. Management Association (Ed.), Cloud Technology: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 2063-2077). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-6539- 2.ch096 [10] Fernandez-Blanco, C.R., Careri,F., Kavvadias, K., Hidalgo Gonzalez, I., Zucker, A., & Peteves, E., 2017. Systematic mapping of power system models: Expert survey, EUR 28875 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2017, ISBN 978-92-79- 76462-2, doi:10.2760/422399, JRC109123. [11] Galvan, J. L., Galvan, M. C., 2017. Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences. Routledge. [12] Griffo, C., Almeida, J.P.A., Guizzardi, G., 2015. A systematic mapping of the literature on legal core ontologies, In Brazilian Conference on Ontologies, ONTOBRAS 15, CEUR Workshop Proceedings,1442 [13] Irion, K., 2012. Government Cloud computing and national data sovereignty. Policy and Internet. 4(3). [14] Kitchenham, B., Brereton, O.P., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., Linkman, S., 2009. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering–a systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7-15. [15] Klein, C.A., 2011. Cloud confidentiality: clinical and legal implication of Cloud computing in healthcare. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 39(4). http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1951 editor@iaeme.com
A Systematic Mapping Study of Cloud Business and Legal Implications [16] Kosar, T., Bohra, S., Mernik, M.A., 2016. Protocol of a systematic mapping study for domain-specific languages, Journal of Information and Software Technology 21(C). pp. 77- 91. [17] Mernik, M., 2017. Domain-specific languages: A systematic mapping study, International Conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Informatics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, (Vol. 10139, pp. 464-472) Berlin, Germany: Springer. [18] Mills, L.H., 2009. Legal issues associated with Cloud computing. Nixon PeabodyLLP, Attorneys at Law. [19] Muhammed, A.B., Muhammed, A.C., 2014. A systematic Mapping study of software architectures for Cloud based systems. IT University Technical Report Series, TR- [2014- 175]. Copenhagen. [20] Odun-Ayo, I., Ananya, M., Agono, F., Goddy-Worlu, R., 2018a. Cloud computing architecture: A critical analysis”, In IEEE Proceedings of the 2018 18th International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (ICCSA 2018), pp. 1-7 doi: 10.1109/ICCSA.2018.8439638 [21] Odun-Ayo, I., Misra, S., Abayomi-Alli, O., Ajayi, O., 2017a. Cloud multi-tenancy: Issues and developments. UCC '17 Companion. Companion Proceedings of the10th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing. pp. 209 – 214. [22] Odun-Ayo, I., Misra, S., Omoregbe, N., Onibere, E., Bulama, Y., Damasevičius, R., 2017b. Cloud-based security driven human resource management system, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. 295, 96 – 106. doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-773-3-96 [23] Odun-Ayo, I., Odede, B., Ahuja, R., 2018b. Cloud applications management- Issues and developments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (LNCS) (Vol.10963, pp. 683- 694) Berlin, Germany: Springer. [24] Odun-Ayo, I., Omoregbe, N., Odusami, M., Ajayi, O., 2017c. Cloud ownership and reliability - Issues and developments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (LNCS) (Vol. 10658, pp. 231-240). Berlin, Germany: Springer. [25] Odun-Ayo, I., Goddy-Worlu, R., Ajayi, O.O., Grant, E. 2018c. A systematic mapping study of High Performance Computing and the Cloud. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 13 (24), pp. 9686-9700. [26] Odun-Ayo, I., Ajayi, O., Goddy-Worlu, R., Yahaya, J. 2019a. "A Systematic Mapping Study of Cloud Resources Management and Scalability in Brokering, Scheduling, Capacity Planning and Elasticity", Asian Journal of Scientific Research. Vol 12, No 2, pp. 151-166. doi: 10.3923/ajsr.2019.151.166 [27] Odun-Ayo, I., Goddy-Worlu, I., Geteloma, V., Grant, E. 2019b. "A Systematic Mapping Study of Cloud, Fog, and Edge/Mobile Devices Management, Hierarchy Models and Business Models", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, Vol 4, No 2, pp. 91-101 [28] Petersen, K., Vakkalanka, S., Kuzniarz, L., 2015. Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update. Information and Software Technology, 64, 1-18. [29] Rohrmann, C.A., Cunha, J.F.S.R., 2015. Some legal aspects of Cloud computing contracts. Journal of Introduction Commercial Law and Technology. 10(1). [30] Santos, V., Souza. E.F., Felizardo, K.R., Vijaykumar. N.L., 2017. Analyzing the Use of Concept Maps in Computer Science: A Systematic Mapping Study. Informatics in Education, 16(2) pp. 257–288. doi:10.15388/infedu.2017.13 [31] Sclater, N., 2012. Legal and Contractual Issues of Cloud Computing for Educational Institutions. In L. Chao (Ed.), Cloud Computing for Teaching and Learning: Strategies for http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1952 editor@iaeme.com
Isaac Odun-Ayo, Adesola Falade, Tolulope Oladimeji, Temidayo Abayomi-Zannu Design and Implementation (pp. 186-199). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1- 4666-0957-0.ch013 [32] Souza, M., Veado, L., Moreira, R.T., Figueiredo, E., Costa, H., 2018. A systematic mapping study on game-related methods for software engineering education. Information and Software Technology 95, pp. 201-218. [33] Vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Riemer, K., Niehaves, B., Plattfaut, R., Cleven, A., 2015. Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Challenges and Recommendations of Literature Search in Information Systems Research. CAIS, 37, 9. [34] Wieringa, R., Maiden, N.A., Mead, N.R., Rolland, C., 2006. Requirement engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria. A proposal and a discussion. Requirement Engineering. 11(1), pp. 102-107. APPENDIX: SELECTED PRIMARY STUDIES 1. Abdelhadi, A.M., Abdu, K., Awada, A., Monem, A.A. An Information Sharing Model for Construction Business Using Cloud Technology (2016) Proceedings - 2015 International Conference on Developments in Systems Engineering, DeSE 2015, art. no. 7563644, pp. 239- 244. 2. Accorsi, R., Lowis, L., Sato, Y. Automated certification for compliant cloud-based business processes (2011) Business and Information Systems Engineering, 3 (3), pp. 145-154. 3. Accorsi, R., Lowis, L., Sato, Y. Automated certification for compliant cloud-based business processes [Automatisierte compliance-zertifizierung cloud-basierter geschäftsprozesse] (2011) Business and Information Systems Engineering, 53 (3), pp. 139-149. 4. Aceto, G., Persico, V., Pescapé, A. The role of Information and Communication Technologies in healthcare: taxonomies, perspectives, and challenges (2018) Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 107, pp. 125-154. 5. Afify, Y.M., Badr, N.L., Moawad, I.F., Tolba, M.F. A comprehensive business domain ontology for cloud services (2018) 2017 IEEE 8th International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information Systems, ICICIS 2017, 2018-January, pp. 134-143. 6. Agostino, A., Søilen, K.S., Gerritsen, B. Cloud solution in business intelligence for SMEs - vendor and customer perspectives (2013) Journal of Intelligence Studies in Business, 3 (3), pp. 5-28. 7. Ahmed-Nacer, M., Kunal, K., Sellami, M., Gaaloul, W. Simulation of Configurable Resource Allocation for Cloud-Based Business Processes (2017) Proceedings - 2017 IEEE 14th International Conference on Services Computing, SCC 2017, art. no. 8034999, pp. 305-313. 8. Ahokangas, P., Juntunen, M., Myllykoski, J. Cloud computing and transformation of international E-business models (2014) Research in Competence-Based Management, 7, pp. 3- 28. 9. Akhmetov, B., Izbassova, N., Akhmetov, B. Developing and customizing university business intelligence cloud (2012) Proceedings of 2012 International Conference on Cloud Computing Technologies, Applications and Management, ICCCTAM 2012, art. no. 6488104, pp. 229-233. 10. Alreshidi, E., Mourshed, M., Rezgui, Y. Requirements for cloud-based BIM governance solutions to facilitate team collaboration in construction projects (2018) Requirements Engineering, 23 (1). 11. Alreshidi, E., Mourshed, M., Rezgui, Y. Factors for effective BIM governance (2017) Journal of Building Engineering, 10, pp. 89-101. http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1953 editor@iaeme.com
A Systematic Mapping Study of Cloud Business and Legal Implications 12. Azni, A.H., Rahman, A.F.A., Alwi, N.H.M., Seman, K. Measuring sensor to cloud energy consumption (2017) ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, art. no. a186. 13. Balboni, P., Pelino, E. Law Enforcement Agencies' activities in the cloud environment: A European legal perspective (2013) Information and Communications Technology Law, 22 (2), pp. 165-190. 14. Bartolini, C., El Kateb, D., Le Traon, Y., Hagen, D. Cloud providers viability: How to address it from an IT and legal perspective? (2018) Electronic Markets, 28 (1), pp. 53-75. 15. Beckers, K., Côté, I., Faßbender, S., Heisel, M., Hofbauer, S. A pattern-based method for establishing a cloud-specific information security management system: Establishing information security management systems for clouds considering security, privacy, and legal compliance (2013) Requirements Engineering, 18 (4), pp. 343-395. 16. Beckers, K., Faßbender, S., Schmidt, H. An integrated method for pattern-based elicitation of legal requirements applied to a cloud computing example (2012) Proceedings - 2012 7th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, ARES 2012, art. no. 6329218, pp. 463-472. 17. Bellini, F., D’Ascenzo, F., Ghi, A., Spagnoli, F., Traversi, V. Legal issues and requirements for cloud computing in e-Science (2013) Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, 2, pp. 61-70. 18. Benarous, L., Kadri, B. Ensuring privacy and authentication for V2V resource sharing (2017) Proceedings - 2017 7th International Conference on Emerging Security Technologies, EST 2017, art. no. 8090390, pp. 1-6. 19. Beorchia, S. Gastrointestinal video endoscopy imaging in 2013: The reality, the issues and the way ahead [L'imagerie vidéo-endoscopique digestive en 2013: réalités, enjeux et perspectives] (2013) Acta Endoscopica, 43 (5-6), pp. 248-256. 20. Bjornson, J., Hunter, A. Mobile forensics for cloud data: Practical and legal considerations (2016) 2016 14th Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust, PST 2016, art. no. 7906927, pp. 203-206. 21. Bowen, J.A. Legal Issues in Cloud Computing (2011) Cloud Computing: Principles and Paradigms, pp. 593-613. 22. Broucek, V., Turner, P. Technical, legal and ethical dilemmas: Distinguishing risks arising from malware and cyber-attack tools in the 'cloud'-a forensic computing perspective (2013) Journal in Computer Virology, 9 (1), pp. 27-33. 23. Bule, J., Peer, P. Technical, legal, economic and social aspects of biometrics for cloud computing (2014) Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences, 38 (2), pp. 83-95. 24. Chaka, C. Virtualization and cloud computing: Business models in the virtual cloud (2014) Cloud Technology: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 3, pp. 1687-1701. 25. Chan, R., Chow, K.-P., Chan, V., Kwan, M. The cloud storage ecosystem – A new business model for internet piracy? (2016) IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 484, pp. 237-255. 26. Chang, C., Srirama, S.N., Buyya, R. Mobile Cloud Business Process Management System for the internet of things: A survey (2016) ACM Computing Surveys, 49 (4), art. no. 70, . 27. Chang, V.Presenting Cloud Business Performance for Manufacturing Organizations (2017) Information Systems Frontiers, pp. 1-17. Article in Press. 28. Chang, V., Kuo, Y.-H., Ramachandran, M. Cloud computing adoption framework: A security framework for business clouds (2016) Future Generation Computer Systems, 57, pp. 24-41. http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1954 editor@iaeme.com
Isaac Odun-Ayo, Adesola Falade, Tolulope Oladimeji, Temidayo Abayomi-Zannu 29. Chang, V. A proposed cloud computing business framework (2015) A Proposed Cloud Computing Business Framework, pp. 1-288. 30. Chang, V. Corrigendum to "The business intelligence as a service in the cloud" [Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 37C (2014) 512-534] (2014) Future Generation Computer Systems, 41, p. 16. 31. Chang, V. The Business Intelligence as a Service in the Cloud (2014) Future Generation Computer Systems, 37, pp. 512-534. 32. Chang, V., Walters, R.J., Wills, G. The development that leads to the Cloud Computing Business Framework (2013) International Journal of Information Management, 33 (3), pp. 524- 538. 33. Chang, V., De Roure, D., Wills, G., Walters, R.J.Case studies and organisational sustainability modelling presented by cloud computing business framework (2011) International Journal of Web Services Research, 8 (3), pp. 26-53. 34. Chang, V., Wills, G., De Roure, D. A review of cloud business models and sustainability (2010) Proceedings - 2010 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing, CLOUD 2010, art. no. 5558011, pp. 43-50. 35. Chang, V., Bacigalupo, D., Wills, G., De Roure, D. A categorisation of cloud computing business models (2010) CCGrid 2010 - 10th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Cluster, Cloud, and Grid Computing, art. no. 5493445, pp. 509-512. 36. Charif, B., Awad, A.I. Business and government organizations' adoption of cloud computing (2014) Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 8669 LNCS, pp. 492-501. 37. Charif, B., Awad, A.I. Business and government organizations’ adoption of cloud computing (2014) Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 8669, pp. 492-501. 38. Chaudhri, A.A., Bajwa, I.S. Services based management of business processes using cloud computing (2012) European Journal of Scientific Research, 80 (3), pp. 303-310. 39. Chen, J., Li, X.-Y. Research on SLA-based business automatic deployment of private cloud platform (2017) Proceedings - 2016 International Conference on Information System and Artificial Intelligence, ISAI 2016, art. no. 7816684, pp. 104-108. 40. Chen, T.-Y. Exploring the systematic business model innovation: Designing architecture for a cloud-based collaboration support environment (2017) International Journal of e-Collaboration, 13 (2), pp. 45-63. 41. Chen, Y., Wu, Q., Nie, K., Liu, T., Ren, H. Electronic business of coal trading center based on cloud computing (2017) Revista de la Facultad de Ingenieria, 32 (10), pp. 139-143. 42. Chen, M., Qian, Y., Mao, S., Tang, W., Yang, X. Software-Defined Mobile Networks Security (2016) Mobile Networks and Applications, 21 (5), pp. 729-743. 43. Cheung, A.S.Y., Weber, R.H. Privacy and legal issues in cloud computing (2015) Privacy and Legal Issues in Cloud Computing, pp. 1-304. 44. Corbett, S. The retention of personal information online: A call for international regulation of privacy law (2013) Computer Law and Security Review, 29 (3), pp. 246-254. 45. Craig, T.S., Eshaghian-Wilner, M.M., Goli, N., Gupta, A., Navab, S., Pati, A.S.N., Ravicz, K., Sarkar, G., Shiroma, B. Nanocomputing and Cloud Computing (2016) Wireless Computing in Medicine: From Nano to Cloud with Ethical and Legal Implications, pp. 17-40. 46. Davis, A.W. Ethical issues for psychologists using communication technology: An Australian perspective on service provision flexibility (2014) Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45 (5), pp. 303-308. http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1955 editor@iaeme.com
A Systematic Mapping Study of Cloud Business and Legal Implications 47. Devereaux, R.L., Gottlieb, M.C. Record keeping in the cloud: Ethical considerations (2012) Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 43 (6), pp. 627-632. 48. Eric A., Figliola, P.M. Overview and issues for implementation of the federal cloud computing initiative: Implications for federal information technology reform management (2013) Federal Cloud Computing: Elements, Issues and Implementation Challenges, pp. 1-38. 49. Eshaghian-Wilner, M.M. Wireless Computing in Medicine: From Nano to Cloud with Ethical and Legal Implications (2016) Wireless Computing in Medicine: From Nano to Cloud with Ethical and Legal Implications, pp. 1-635. 50. Felici, M., Jaatun, M.G., Kosta, E., Wainwright, N. Bringing Accountability to the Cloud: Addressing Emerging Threats and Legal Perspectives (2013) Communications in Computer and Information Science, 182 CCIS, pp. 28-40. 51. Fernandez-Llatas, C., Pileggi, S.F., Ibañez, G., Valero, Z., Sala, P. Cloud computing for context- aware enhanced M-Health services (2015) Methods in Molecular Biology, 1246, pp. 147-155. 52. Fernandez-Llatas, C., Pileggi, S.F., Ibañez, G., Valero, Z., Sala, P. Cloud computing for context- aware enhanced m-Health Services (2014) Data Mining in Clinical Medicine, pp. 147-155. 53. Fitzpatrick, A., McGrath, M., Lennon, R.G. Legal issues surrounding Data Storage on the cloud (2012) Proceedings - 2012 5th Romania Tier 2 Federation Grid, Cloud and High-Performance Computing Science, RQ-LCG 2012, art. no. 6528244, pp. 53-56. 54. Fitzpatrick, A., McGrath, M., Lennon, R.G. Legal issues surrounding Data Storage on the cloud (2012) Proceedings - 2012 5th Romania Tier 2 Federation Grid, Cloud and High-Performance Computing Science, RQ-LCG 2012, art. no. 6528244, pp. 53-56. 55. Flick, C., Ambriola, V. The european strategy for cloud computing: Harmonization of technical and legal rules (2014) Mondo Digitale, 13 (49). 56. Flittner, M., Balaban, S., Bless, R. CloudInspector: A transparency-as-a-service solution for legal issues in cloud computing (2016) Proceedings - 2016 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering Workshops, IC2EW 2016, art. no. 7527822, pp. 94-99. 57. Fong, J.G. Legal issues regarding innovative museum services in a mobile and cloud computing environment: Examples of copyright and licensing issues for the National Palace Museum (2016) Managing Innovation and Cultural Management in the Digital Era: The Case of the National Palace Museum, pp. 110-129. 58. Fund, F., Hosseini, S.A., Panwar, S.S. Under a cloud of uncertainty: Legal questions affecting internet storage and transmission of copyright-protected video content (2016) IEEE Network, 30 (2), art. no. 7437022, pp. 32-38. 59. Garg, R., Naudts, B., Verbrugge, S., Stiller, B. Modeling legal and regulative requirements for ranking alternatives of cloud-based services (2015) 8th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law, RELAW 2015 - Proceedings, art. no. 7330208, pp. 25-32. 60. Gheorghiu, C., Panu, A., Alboaie, L. A semantic web platform for legal knowledge in cloud (2013) SoMeT 2013 - 12th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques, Proceedings, art. no. 6645652, pp. 121-126. 61. Godfrin Legal requirements and identifying data security for cloud service (2016) 2016 2nd International Conference on Science Technology Engineering and Management, ICONSTEM 2016, art. no. 7560948, pp. 185-190. 62. Goh, E. Clear skies or cloudy forecast?: Legal challenges in the management and acquisition of audiovisual materials in the cloud (2014) Records Management Journal, 24 (1), pp. 56-73. http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1956 editor@iaeme.com
Isaac Odun-Ayo, Adesola Falade, Tolulope Oladimeji, Temidayo Abayomi-Zannu 63. Gordon, D.G., Breaux, T.D. Managing multi-jurisdictional requirements in the cloud: Towards a computational legal landscape (2011) Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 83-94. 64. Graf, S., Eisele, J., Waldvogel, M., Strittmatter, M. A legal and technical perspective on secure cloud storage (2012) Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI), Proceedings - Series of the Gesellschaft fur Informatik (GI), P-203, pp. 63-72. 65. Graham, G. Lost in a cloud: Overview of legal obstacles to the growth of cloud computing (2012) Medijska Istrazivanja, 18 (2), pp. 21-32 66. Grandinetti, L., Pisacane, O., Sheikhalishahi, M. Pervasive cloud computing technologies: Future outlooks and interdisciplinary perspectives (2013) Pervasive Cloud Computing Technologies: Future Outlooks and Interdisciplinary Perspectives, pp. 1-376. 67. Griebel, L., Prokosch, H.-U., Köpcke, F., Toddenroth, D., Christoph, J., Leb, I., Engel, I., Sedlmayr, M. A scoping review of cloud computing in healthcare (2015) BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 15 (1), art. no. 17. 68. Harris, A.J.L., Lanfranco, M. Cloudburst, weather bomb or water bomb? A review of terminology for extreme rain events and the media effect (2017) Weather, 72 (6), pp. 155-163. 69. Haselmann, T., Vossen, G., Lipsky, S., Theurl, T. Cooperative community clouds for small and medium enterprises: Facilitating cloud computing for small and medium enterprises with the cooperative paradigm (2011) CLOSER 2011 - Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Cloud Computing and Services Science, pp. 104-109. 70. He, W., Ho, P.-H., Tapolcai, J. Beacon Deployment for Unambiguous Positioning (2017) IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 4 (5), art. no. 7934298, pp. 1370-1379. 71. Henkoǧlu, T., Külcü, O. Cloud computing as an information access platform: A study on threats and legal requirements [Bilgi Erişim Platformu Olarak Bulut Bilişim: Riskler ve Hukuksal Koşullar Üzerine Bir İnceleme] (2013) Bilgi Dunyasi, 14 (1), pp. 62-86. 72. Hill, E. Legal and policy implications of cloud computing (2011) Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 6765 LNCS (PART 1), pp. 478-483. 73. Hsieh, P.-J. An empirical investigation of patients' acceptance and resistance toward the health cloud: The dual factor perspective (2016) Computers in Human Behavior, 63, pp. 959-969. 74. Jaeger, P.T., Lin, J., Grimes, J.M. Cloud computing and information policy: Computing in a policy cloud? (2008) Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 5 (3), pp. 269-283. 75. Kandira, M., Mtsweni, J., Padayachee, K. Cloud security and compliance concerns: Demystifying stakeholders' roles and responsibilities (2013) 2013 8th International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, ICITST 2013, art. no. 6750284, pp. 653- 658. 76. Kemp, M.L., Robb, S., Deans, P.C. The legal implications of cloud computing (2014) Cloud Technology: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 4, pp. 2099-2114. 77. Kemp, M.L., Robb, S., Deans, P.C. The legal implications of cloud computing (2013) Cloud Computing Service and Deployment Models: Layers and Management, pp. 257-272. 78. Kemp, M.L., Robb, S., Deans, P.C. The legal implications of cloud computing (2012) Cloud Computing Service and Deployment Models: Layers and Management, pp. 301-321. 79. Kertesz, A., Varadi, S. Legal aspects of data protection in cloud federations (2014) Security, Privacy and Trust in Cloud Systems, 9783642385865, pp. 433-455. http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1957 editor@iaeme.com
A Systematic Mapping Study of Cloud Business and Legal Implications 80. Kierkegaard, S. Not every cloud brings rain: Legal risks on the horizon (2012) Strategic and Practical Approaches for Information Security Governance: Technologies and Applied Solutions, pp. 181-194. 81. Kiran, M. Legal issues surrounding connected government services: A closer look at G-clouds (2015) Cloud Computing Technologies for Connected Government, pp. 322-344. 82. Kirkham, T., Djemame, K., Kiran, M., Jiang, M., Armstrong, D., Kousiouris, G., Vafiadis, G., Evangelinou, A. Risk based SLA management in clouds: A legal perspective (2012) 2012 International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, ICITST 2012, art. no. 6470934, pp. 156-160. 83. Klein, C.A. Cloudy confidentiality: Clinical and legal implications of cloud computing in health care (2011) Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 39 (4), pp. 571-578. 84. Klein, C.A. Cloudy confidentiality: Clinical and legal implications of cloud computing in health care (2012) Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 40 (5), pp. 328-351. 85. Kotka, T., Kask, L., Raudsepp, K., Storch, T., Radloff, R., Liiv, I. Policy and legal environment analysis for E-government services migration to the public cloud (2016) ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 01-03-March-2016, pp. 103-108. 86. Kousiouris, G., Vafiadis, G., Corrales, M. A Cloud provider description schema for meeting legal requirements in Cloud federation scenarios (2013) IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 399, pp. 61-72. 87. Kousalya, A., Radhakrishnan, R. Optimization of task scheduling using improved clonal selection in K-level architecture (2016) International Journal of Control Theory and Applications, 9 (25), pp. 323-335. 88. Kuiper, E., Van Dam, F., Reiter, A., Janssen, M. Factors influencing the adoption of and business case for Cloud computing in the public sector (2015) eChallenges Conference, art. no. 7058154, . 89. Kull, H. Mass customization: Opportunities, methods, and challenges for manufacturers (2015) Mass Customization: Opportunities, Methods, and Challenges for Manufacturers, pp. 1-129. 90. Lennon, R. Bring your own device (BYOD) with cloud 4 education (2012) SPLASH'12 - Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Systems, Programming, and Applications: Software for Humanity, pp. 171-179. 91. Li, Y.-M., Chou, C.-L. Analyzing the picing models for outsourcing computing services (2012) Proceedings - Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2012. 92. Lillard, V.T, Garrison, P.C., Schiller, A.C., Steele, J. Digital Forensics for Network, Internet, and Cloud Computing (2010) Digital Forensics for Network, Internet, and Cloud Computing, 353 p. 93. Long, G.A. The legal implications of space weather awareness and the need for international dissemination of space weather forecasts (2014) Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress, IAC, 14, pp. 10294-10318. 94. Manap, N.A., Basir, S.M., Hussein, S.M., Tehrani, P.M., Rouhani, A. Legal issues of data protection in cloud computing (2013) International Journal of Soft Computing, 8 (5), pp. 371- 376. 95. Martini, B., Do, Q., Choo, K.-K.R. Digital forensics in the cloud era: The decline of passwords and the need for legal reform (2016) Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, (512), . 96. Manzalini, A., Crespi, N. SDN and NFV for Network Cloud Computing: A Universal Operating System for SD Infrastructures (2015) Proceedings - IEEE 4th Symposium on Network Cloud Computing and Applications, NCCA 2015, art. no. 7340044, pp. 1-6. http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1958 editor@iaeme.com