MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING            MINISTRY OF NATIONAL DEFENCE

VIETNAM MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY

NGUYEN THANH NAM

STUDY ON CAUSES, RISK FACTORS AND

TREATMENT OUTCOME OF

RESPIRATORY DISTRESS NEWBORNS IN

PEDIATRICS DEPATMENT BACH MAI

HOSPITAL

Specialized : INTERNAL MEDICINE Code : 972 01 07

SUMMARY OF DOCTORAL THESIS

THE STUY ARE COMPLETED AT

VIETNAM MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY

Scientific Supervisor:

1. Assoc. Prof. Nguyen Tien Dung

2. Prof. Dong Khac Hung

Reviewer 1: ……………………………….

Reviewer 2: ……………………………….

Reviewer 3: ……………………………….

The Thesis will be presented at the Military Medical

Academy

At the time :    /

/2018

Can find the thesis at:

1. The National Library

1

ABBREVIATIONS

Birth weight BW 1

Continuous positive airway pressure CPAP 2

High flow nasal oxygen HFNO 3

Oxygenation index OI 4

Patent ductus arteriosus PDA 5

Respiratory distress RD 6

7 SIMV Synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation

8 VI Ventilation index

THE THESIS BACKGROUND

1. Introduction

Respiratory distress is common disease in neonatal period, and the

newborn  admit to the neonatal intensive care unit on the increase.

Term newborn respiratory distress rate is also up to 7%.  There are

some   causes:  hyaline   membrane   disease,   meconium   aspiration

syndrome,   pneumonia,   preterm,   congenital   heart   disease,  transient

tachypnoea of newborn, asphyxia... There are many risk factors of

respiratory   distress:   previous   history   of   pregnancy,   mother   had

internal disease, diabetes in pregnancy, heart disease in pregnancy,

cesarean delivery without labour, risk factor from fetal: threatening

premature, fetus asphyxia…

There   are   many   risk   factos   that   affect   treatment   of   respiratory

distress and ventilator treatment. Evaluation the common causes of

respiratory   distress,   risk   factors,   predictors   index   in   treatment,

ventilator treatment are still being studied in clinical practice.

Co­operation in neonatal resuscitation immediaterly after birth is

very   important   to   decrease   morbidity   for   newborn..The   report   in

2

2016, the rate of newborn needed respiratory support was still 4­10%

in term and near­term and needed to rescue 0.1­0.3% to live out.

We study with two objectives:

 Identify   some   common   causes   and   risk   factors   of   respiratory

distress newborn in Pediatricsdepartment ­ Bach Mai Hospital.

 Initially evaluate the results of respiratory distress treatment in

newborn in Pediatricsdepartment ­ Bach Mai Hospital.

2. The need of the subject

Respiratory   distress   is   common   disease   in   newborn   and   the

incidence is not reduced. There are many causes and risk factors of

disease.. Knowing these factors will provide intervention to reduce

complications after birth for newborn, especially respiratory distress.

The routine co­operation resuscitation after birth was not contribution

widely   so   the   goal   doing   neonatal   resuscitation   program   is   very

necessary   in   the   country.   Observing   some   influence   factors,

prognostic   outcome   factors   that   help   the   treatment   process

reasonable, timely and necessary.

3. The new contributions of the thesis are as follow  Describe   some  common   causes   of   respiratory   distress   newborn

and risk factors of respiratory distress in Pediatrics department ­

Bach Mai Hospital.

 Initially   evaluated   the   treatment   results   of   respiratory   distress

newborns in Pediatrics department ­ Bach Mai Hospital and some

factors affecting the outcome of respiratory distress treatment.

4. The composition of the thesis

3

The Thesis has 128 pages: Introduction 2 pages; Overview

30   pages;   Objects   and   methods   26   pages;   Results   30   pages;

Discussion 36 pages; Conclusion 02 pages; Request 01 pages. 150

references:  32 Vietnamese references and 118 English references.

CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW

1.1. RESPIRATORY DISTRESS NEWBORN DIAGNOSIS 1.1.1. Characteristics of respiratory distress newborn

Respiratory distress is a disorder of respiratory functional, the

gas exchange process is disturbanced, insufficient oxygen leads to

hypoxia and is not excreted carbon dioxide causing hypercarbia.

Respiratory distress is common syndrome, the leading cause of

death in newborn, requiring immediately emergency and doing right

management. 1.1.2. Causes of respiratory distress newborn   Upper   airway   obstruction:   choanal   atresia;   tracheoesophageal

fistula; tracheal stenosis  ...

 Lower   airway   disease:   congenital   (pulmonary   ageneisis   and

hypoplasia, congenital lobar emphysema) or acquired (meconium

aspiration   syndrome; hyaline   membrane   disease; transient

tachypnoea of newborn; pulmonary hemorrhage; pneumonia)

 Congenital   heart   disease:   transposition   of   great   arteries,

pulmonary hypertension, patent ductus arteriosus.

 Neurological   disorder,   metabolic   abnormal:   intraventricular

hemorrhage; hypoglycemia.

 Others: congenital diaphragmatic hernia; anemia ...

4

1.1.3. Common risk factors of respiratory distress newborn

Risk factors might either be from the mother or from the fetus.

Birth trauma is also factors that cause the newborn not to breathe

after birth  (brain injury, cerebral hemorrhage, brain edema). It can

also   caused   by   prolapsed   umbilical   cord,   premature   separation   of

placenta,   hypertonic  uterine  contractions   interrupting  the  perfusion

respiratory   center   was   inhibited   and

for the placenta or due to anesthesia when caesarean section affect  respiratory   depression  (cid:0) consequenced hypoxia.

Risk factors of respiratory distress can be identified early in the

fetus: prenatal history of preterm had respiratory distress, maternal

diabetes, multiple pregnancy, caesarean section …, early detection

will have plan follow up to reduce risk of respiratory distress after

birth.

Mother’s   disease   before   pregnancy   can   affect   respiratory

distress for baby after birth: intenal diseases (hypertension, diabetes,

lupus, renal disease, heart disease, thyroid disease …); In pregnancy:

maternal diabetes, disorders of amniotic fluid, maternal hypertension,

not   take   care   of   during   pregnancy…);   In   labour:   eclampsia,

preeclampsia,  HELLP   syndrome,   fetal   distress,   caesarean   without

labour …

Fetal problems can increase respiratory distress: fetal distress,

preterm,  intrauterine growth restriction …

1.1.4. RESPIRATORY DISTRESS DIAGNOSIS

1.1.4.1. Clinical symptoms

5

 Based   on   one   or   more   symptoms:   Tachypnea   (>60/min)   or

bradypnea   (<30/min);   intercostals,   subcostal   retraction,   see­saw

chest movement; nasal flaring; grunting or apnea; cyanosis in air.  Evaluate the newborn adaptation after birth by Apgar score at 1

minute, 5 minute:: If Apgar score:  ≤   3: severe asphyxia; 4­ 6:

mild asphyxia and ≥ 7: normal.

Laboratory symptoms

1.1.4.2.  Blood   gas   monitor:   Sa02  <   90%,   Pa02  <   60mmHg,   PaC02  >

50mmHg and/or pH < 7.2 .

1.2. RESPIRATORY DISTRESS TREATMENT

1.2.1. Specific treatment  Respiratory   distress   management:   oxygen   therapy,   ventilation  support CPAP, nSIMV, HFNO, invasive mechanical ventilation.

 Manage blood gas and electrolyte disorders  Prevention and treatment of infections  Ensure nutrition  Keeping   the   body   temperature   stable,   especially   avoid

hypothermia.

1.2.2. Invasive mechanical ventilation ­ Indication  Apnea, breathe disorder; Did not breathing after birth, asphyxia,

or must be intubated immediately.

 Failure when ventilated with CPAP, nSIMV, HFNO: prolonged

apnea; severe hypoxia : Sp02 < 85% or Pa02 < 50 mmHg; severe

increase C02 : PaC02 > 60 mmHg and pH < 7.2.

CHAPTER 2: OBJECTS AND METHODS

2.1. STUDY OBJECTS

6

2.1.1.Selection criteria

Newborns 0­ 28 days have criteria:

 Born in Obstetric department – Bach Mai hospital  Treated   in   Neonatal   unit   –   Pediatric   department   –   Bach   Mai

hospital:

+ Respiratory distress group: diagnosed respiratory distress: based

on   clinical   symptoms:   dyspnea,   respiratory   distress   and/or

laboratory symptoms.

+ Group have other diseases and don’t have clinical of respiratory

distress.

+   Respiratory   distress   treated   invasive   mechanical   ventilation:

Symptoms respiratory distress; hypoxia: Pa02 < 50mmHg when

oxygen therapy Fi02 > 60%; hypercapnia C02: PaC02 > 60mmHg

and/or pH < 7.2; Although treaded with CPAP, HFNO, nSIMV

but the baby not improve; very extreme premature < 28 weeks.

The   baby   had   be   resuscitation   and   intubated   transfered   from

delivery room to neonatal room.

2.1.2. Exclusion criteria

Newborns   who   do   not   complete   the   treatment   or   want   to

transfer to another hospital with some reasons.

2.2. STUDY METHODS 2.2.1.Research design  For object 1: Descriptive research methods, determining the rate

and   causes   of   respiratory   distress   and   the   case­control   study:

identification of risk factors.

 For   object   2:   Continuous   follow­up  the  outcome  of   respiratory

distress therapy.

7

(cid:0)

p

p

)

2

(cid:0)

)2/

1(

2.2.2. Sample size      Sample selection formula: (cid:0) (cid:0)

Zn

2

1( d Calculation: n = 1.96 ×1.96 × 0.3 × 0.7 / 0.052 = 323.

Calculate the theoretical sample size = 126 newborns

The newborns who need treat with mechanical ventilation were

30% of respiratory distress newborns. According to the theoretical

sample   size,   there   were   30   respiratory   distress   newborns   need

invasive mechanical ventilation.

2.2.3. Research Method

2.2.3.1. Clinical, laboratory evaluate method Each newborn had a research document with research data:  Clincal evaluate:

+Geography, sexual, gestational age, birth weight.

+Apgar score at 1 minute and 5 minute.

+Resuscitation high risk fetus, methods of birth.

+Condition   of   hospitalization:   temperature,   clinical   signs   of

respiratory distress, respiratory support.

+Duration of and timing of mechanical ventilation

+Timing of feeding by digestive tract

+Treatment: antibiotics, inotropic agents drugs, surfactant.

 Laboratory evaluate

+Laboratory: Troponin T,  glucose

+Blood gas: pH, Pa02, PaC02

+Relevant indicators and mechanical ventilation: OI, VI

+Evaluation functions: echocardiography, cranial ultrasound

2.2.3.2. Determining the cause of respiratory distress, risk

factors

8

Assessments of respiratory distress Patient   was   diagnosed   respiratory   distress   through   clinical

symptoms,   laboratory   symptoms   and   function   tests   (Xray,   blood

cultures, ultrasound …) to determine the cause of respiratory distress.

Risk factors assessment

 Sexual, gestational age, birth weight and respiratory distress

 Role of resuscitation in delivery room

 Methods of birth, asphyxia and risk of respiratory distress

 Mother disease, age of mother, job risk of respiratory distress

 Hypothemia and risk of respiratory distress

2.2.3.3. Treatment evaluation method  Treatment results in the number of patients died   Common causes of death  Evaluate the information and signs when hospitalization

+Gestational age, birth weight

+Role of resuscitation in delivery room, asphyxia and result

+Hypothemia and result

+Duration   of   mechanical   ventilation,   timing   of   mechanical

ventilation and result.

+Evaluate   Troponin   T ;   Blood   gas   (pH,   Pa02,   PaC02);   OI

(oxygenation index) and VI (ventilation index).

+Evaluate echocardiography, cranial ultrasound, used antibiotics,

inotropic agent drugs, surfactant and result.

+Timing of feeding by digestive tract and result.

2.3. DATA COLLECTION AND HANDLING

9

 Information collected through medical document research.  The data is encrypted and processed by SPSS 20.0 software

CHAPTER 3: RESULTS

There were 417 patients, in which respiratory distress is 139

patients   (68  patients   had  to  invasive  ventilator)   in  the  study  from

January 2013 to December 2015. The rate of respiratory distress in

study is 33.3%. 3.1. CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF  CASES GROUP

The group of respiratory distress the ratio boy:girl is 1.36. The

mean gestational age (GA) of cases group was 34.02 ± 4.27 weeks (<

37 weeks was 70.5%), lower than controls group was 38.13 ± 2.09 (p

<0.001).   The   mean   birth   weight   (BW)   of   the   respiratory   distress

group was 2,056.9g ± 939.3g (<2,500g was 65.5%) was lower than

the controls group was 2,893.3g ± 608.6g (p <0.001).

The rate of patients needed respiratory support (oxygen, bag

with mask) was 67.6%, the highest was oxygen therapy 46.8%.

Dyspnea is 80.6% (tarchypnea, grunting, intubated).

3.2. CAUSES, RISKS OF RESPIRATORY DISTRESS

3.2.1. Causes of respiratory distress Table 3.2: Causes of respiratory distress (n=139)

Causes of RD (139 patients) n Ratio (%)

Hyaline membrane disease 15 10.8%

Asphyxia 22 15.8%

Transient tachypnoea of newborn 14 10.1%

Pneumonia 3 2.2%

PDA 22 15.8%

Pulmonary hypertension 5 3.6%

10

Others congenital heart disease 1 0.7%

Sepsis 4 2.9%

Intraventricular hemorrhage 1 0.7%

Hypoglycemia 7 5%

Others 45 32.2%

Apsphyxia,   PDA   have   high  rates   in  respiratory   diseases.   There  is

10.8% that diagnose hyaline membrane disease. 3.2.2.Risk factors of respiratory distress  Birth weight <2,500g and premature < 37 weeks had risk of RD

were   5.324 times and 7.527 times, respectively (p<0.001).

 High risk fetus had increase risk of RD with OR=4.101(95%CI,

2.665­6.31).

 Caesarean  without   labour  had  risk  of   RD   was  76.06  (95%   CI,

29.37­212.819)   times   compare   with  Caesarean  after  labour

(p<0.001).

 In pregnant period, mother had been internal disease (pneumonia,

nephritis, Lupus, encephalitis ...) had risk of RD were 3.486 (95%

CI, 1.538­7.903) times, p=0.002.

Table   3.12:  Relative  some   maternal   diseases   in   labour   and   respiratory distress newborrn (n=417)

Study’s group RD Non­RD OR (139 ) (278 ) p (95%CI) n (%) n (%)

Yes (25) 13 (9.4) 12 (4.3) 0.041

Maternal disease Cardiovascular  disease 2.287 (1.015­5.155) No 126 (90.6) 266 (95.7)

11

(392)

Yes (29) 20 (14.4) 9 (3.2)

<0.001 5.023 (2.222­11.357) 119 (85.6) 269 (96.8) No  (388) Eclampsia,  preeclampsia,  HELLP  syndrome

Pregnance had disease in labour (cardiovascular disease; eclampsia,

preeclampsia,  HELLP syndrome),  risk of RD was higher (p<0.05).

Risk of RD is 2.287 times and 5.023 times.

Table 3.14: Hypothermia and risk of respiratory distress(n=415)

Study’s group RD Non RD OR (139) (276) p 95%CI n (%) n (%) Temperature

55 (39.6) 21 (7.6) 7,951 (4,542­13,919) <0.001 < 360C (76) (cid:0) 360C (339) 84 (60.4) 255 (92.4)

The risk of RD in newborrn with hypothermia at admission is 7.951

(95%CI;4.542­13.919) times (p<0.001).

Table   3.15:   Multivariate logistic   analysis   some   risk

factors:premature (<37 weeks); birth weight < 2,500g; mother's job,

caesarean   without   labour;  internal   disease   in   pregnant   period;

cardiovascular disease in labour; eclampsia, preeclampsia, HELLP

2; p * OR correction; 95%CIOR; p **

Factors

syndrome;hypothermia and risk of respiratory distress OR; 95%CIOR; c 7.527(4.768­11.883) ; 4.859(1.729 ­13.654) ; 0.003 Premature   <   37  weeks (Yes/No)

83.445 ; <0.001 5.324(3.429­8.267); 0.901(0.326­2.487); 0.84 Birth weight <2,500g (Yes/No) 59.703; <0.001

12

1.295(0.489­3.427); 0.603

4.101(2.665­6.31);  43.434; < 0.001 76.06(29.37­212.819); 73.688(24.359­222.917);

<0.001

0.729(0.156­3.419); 0.689 149.215; < 0.001 3.486(1.538­7.903);  9.927; 0.002

1.194(0.251­5.679); 0.823 2.287(1.015­5.155);  4.17; 0.041

0.611(0.114­3.282); 0.565 5.023(2.222­11.357);  17.807; <0.001

1.199(0.38­3.786); 0.757

1.883(0.667­5.316); 0.232 High   risk   fetus  (Yes/No) Caesarean   without  labour (Yes/No) Disease in pregnant  period (Yes/No) Cardiovascular  disease in labour  (Yes/No) Eclampsia,  preeclampsia,  HELLP (Yes/No) Mother worked  hard (Yes/No) Hypothermia   <360  (Yes/No) 3.875(2.189­6.859);  23.701;  <0.001 7.951(4.542­13.919);  63.119; <0.001

* Single variable analysis/ ** Multivariate analysis Multivariate   logistic   analysis:   premature   <   37   weeks,   caesarean

without labour predict risk of RD newborn with p=0.003 and <0.001,

respectively.   OR   is 4.859(1.729 ­13.654)   và   73.688(24.359­

222.917), respectively.  3.3. TREATMENT RESULTS AND FACTORS AFFECTING 3.3.1. Treatment result of respiratory distress

+ Death + Survivor­discharge

13

Chart 3.4: Treatment result of respiratory distress (n=139)

The ratio of survivor­discharge (successful) was 84.9%, there

were 21 patients died (15.1%). The common causes of death were

hyaline membrane disease, followed by birth asphyxia, others cause

were heart disease (PDA, Pulmonary hypertension), sepsis.

68   patients   treated   invasive   mechanical   ventilator.   The   common

causes were asphyxia (29.4%), hyaline membrane disease (20.6%).

Death ratio was 31%. 3.3.2. Factors affecting the result of respiratory distress  Severe   asphyxia   at   5   minutes   afer   birth,   risk   of   death   is

7.467(95%CI, 2.132­26.149) times, p=0.003.

 Pediatricians who participated resuscitation have survivors were

higher but not statistically significant

 Hypothermia has increase risk of death 3.756 times, p=0.006.  BW < 1,500g has risk of dead 8.426 (95%CI, 2.979­23.83) times,

p<0.001.

Table 3.21: Relative premature < 32 weeks and result

Result Death Survivor OR (21) (118) p 95% CI Gestational age n (%) n (%)

< 32 weeks (39) 16 (76.2) 23 (19.5) 13,217 < 0,001 (4,388­39,813) ‡ 32 weeks (100) 5 (23.8) 95 (80.5)

Gestational   age   <   32   weeks   increased   risk   of   death   when

treated RD 13.217(4.388­39.813) times compare with Gestational age

> 32 weeks (p<0.001).

14

Table   3.23: Multivariate logistic   analysis   some   risk

factors:premature (<32   weeks); birth   weight <

1,500g;hypothermia,severe asphyxia at 5 minutes;ventilator support

(ventilator with mask­intubated) and results

2; p * OR correction; 95%CIOR; p **

Factors

Severe asphyxia at OR; 95%CIOR; c 7.467 (2.132­26.149); 2.11 (0.475­9.365); 0.326

5 minutes (Yes/No) Ventilator support 12.467; 0.003 6.111 (2.265­16.489); 2.978 (0.915­9.691); 0.07

(Yes/No) Premature < 32 14.883; < 0.001 13.217 (4.388­39.813); 7.856 (1.288­47.909) ; 0.025

weeks (Yes/No) BW < 1,500g 28.392; < 0.001 8.426 (2.979­23.83); 1.172 (0.189­7.28); 0.326

(Yes/No) Hypothermia <360 19.926; < 0.001 3.756 (1.405­10.04); 1.024 (0.288­3.648); 0.97 (Yes/No) 7.597; 0.006

* Single variable analysis/ ** Multivariate analysis The   mortality   risk   increased   7.856   (95%   CI;   1.288­47.909)   in

respiratory   distress   newborns   that   was   premature   <   32   weeks

(p=0.025). 3.3.3.Factors affecting the result of invasive ventilator support  Troponin   T   >   0.089   ng/ml   predicts   risk   of   have   to   treat   with

invasive ventilator support.

 Abnormal   cranial   ultrasound   when   treated   with   mechanical

ventilator predicts risk of death 14.4 times.

 Patients didn’t have feeding by the gastrointestinal tract within the

first   24   hours   after   admission,   the   risk   of   death   increased

16.875(95%CI, 3.211­88.683) times, p < 0.001

15

Values of VI, OI and mechanical ventilation result  Evaluate the value of VI in the 2nd time by the ROC curve and the

risk of death, results: Area under curve 0.725; p = 0.008. Cut off

point   VI   =   33.093   with   a   sensitivity   76.5%,   a   specificity   66.7%

predict risk of mortality when treated mechanical ventilation.

 Evaluate the value of OI in the 3rd time by the ROC curve and the

risk of death, we had results: Area under curve 0.865; p < 0.001. Cut

off   point   OI   =  6.72  with  a   sensitivity  83.3%,   a  specificity  84.4%

predict risk of mortality when treated mechanical ventilation.

OI value

Chart 3.10. Change in OI value during mechanical ventilation

The   OI   value   of   the   respiratory   distress   group   treated   with

ventilated patients that was survivor was reduced and  lower than the

death group with p=0.009; <0.001; <0.001 and 0.003, respectively.

16

CHAPTER 4: DISCUSSION

4.1. CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF  CASES GROUP

Study 417 newborns, the prevalence   of   RD is 33.3%. The

result is the same as report of Nguyen Thi Xuan Huong (2010) the

rate of asphyxia, hyaline membrane disease, premature was 33.1%.

Mathai   S.C.S.   reported   that   had   30­40%   patients   with   RD

hospitalization. 139 patients in study, the ratio of  boy/girl was 1.36.

This   result   is   similar   other   authors   studies.   The   prevalence   of

respiratory rate disorder (tachypnea, grunting, apnea need ventilator

with mask)  80.6% similar other authors when evaluate respiratory

distress newborns.

4.2. CAUSES, RISKS OF RESPIRATORY DISTRESS

4.2.1. Causes of respiratory distress  Respiratory  diseases   :  Our   study,   asphyxia  was   highest   15.8%,

followed   by  hyaline   membrane   disease  10.8%   (table   3.2),

transient   tachypnoea   of   newborn  10.1%.   This   results   different  with Mamta Bajad (2016) and Arit Parkash (2015) were the 1 st

hyaline membrane disease and next asphyxia. Thus, asphyxia and

hyaline membrane disease  still the common cause of respiratory

distress from respiratory disease and also require the co­ordination  of neonatal resuscitation to  reduce morbidity.

 Heart disease: there was 15.8% diagnosed PDA (table 3.2). Dice

(2007) reported that the rate of PDA in newborns was 5­10% of  congenital   heart   diseases.   Pumonary   hypertension   was   the   2nd

cause of heart disease 3.6% (table 3.2). Our results was lower than

Robin H. Steinhorn’s (2010) had about 10% secondary pulmonary

hypertension   complication   in   respiratory   distress   newborns   and

17

severe pulmonary hypertension was about 0.2% in term newborns.

This   is   also   one   of   the   severe   disease   that   may   primarily   or

secondary by asphyxia, sepsis, others congenital heart disease ….  Others disease: sepsis, intraventricular hemorrhage, hypoglycemia

(table 3.2) had in our study. Hany Aly (2004) and Reuter (2014)

said that the less others cause of respiratory distress was septic,

metabolic disorder, neurological disease similar our study.

4.2.2. Risk factors of respiratory distress

4.2.2.1. Premature, low birth weight, high risk fetus  Gestation   age   (GA):   In   our   result   GA<37   weeks   was   70.5%.

Reuter   (2014)   said   that   newborns<34   weeks   had   higher

respiratory distress rate. The mean GA in cases group was 34.02 – 4.27 weeks really lower than controls group was 38.13 – 2.09

(p<0.001).  Premature < 37 weeks has risk factor of death 7.527

times. Prematuare also independent factor when used multivariate

logistic analysis, risk factor of RD is OR=4.859(95%CI, 1.729 ­

13.654), p=0.003. This is the predictive risk of respiratory distress

newborns.

 Birth   weight:   In   417   newborns   has   139   respiratory   distress

939.3g really lower than controls group was 2,893.3 (cid:0)

(BW<2,500g   was   65.5%).   The   mean   BW   in   cases   group   was  2,056.9 (cid:0) 608.6g (p < 0.001). Risk of newborns < 2,500g had be respiratory

distress was 5.324 times compare with controls group. Our results

are similar other authors. So that, low birth weight is risk factor of

respiratory   distress   newborn,   we   need   well   control   during

18

pregnancy   period,   chronic  disease,   maternal   disease,   disease  in

labour…

 High risk fetus: risk of RD is  4.101 (95%CI, 2.665­6.31) times

compare with non high risk fetus. Reuter S. and partner (2014)

detail   risk   factors   of   RD   (transient   tachypnoea   of   newborn,

pneumonia,  hyaline   membrane   disease,   meconium   aspiration

syndrome)   were:   gestational   diabetes,   mother   use   drug   or

anesthesia,   mother   had   infected   streptococcus   group   B,

premature ....    Liu J. and partner (2014) studied in China about

RD   in   term   babies   showed   that   risk   factors   of   RD:   severe

asphyxia,   smaller   than   gestation   age,   infection   mother­fetal,

abnormal   sugar   absorption   during   pregnancy   and   low   birth

weight.

4.2.2.2. Methods of birth and risk of respiratory distress

Analysis the risk of respiratory distress (RD), we had result:

Caesarean   without   labour  was   an   independent   prognostic   factor

affects   RD   newborns   (p<0.001),   and   OR=73.688(95%CI,   24.359­

222.917) with multivariate logistic analysis. Similar conclusion, Liu

(2014) studied 205 RD newborns had 34.6% was caesarean without

labour higher than controls group only had 20.5%. 4.2.2.3. Mother disease and risk of respiratory distress

Mother   disease   in   labour:   cardiovascular   disease,   pregnancy

toxicity ­ preeclampsia ­ HELLP syndrome are associated with risk

of respiratory distress newborns with p = 0.041; <0.001, respectively

(table   3.15).   Risk   of   respiratory   distress   is   2.287;   5.023   times,

respectively.   Susana   Machado   (2012),   Aisha   Lateef   and   Michelle

Petri   (2012),   Panagiotis   Pateinakis   (2014)   said   that   mothers   had

Lupus disease, acute kidney damage during pregnancy were suffer

19

from   pregnacy   complication   such   as   preeclampsia,   HELLP

syndrome, hypertension and affect to premature, asphyxia ....  4.2.2.4. Hypothermia and risk of respiratory distress

Rate of hypothermia (<360C) in respiratory distress group was

higher   than   non­respiratory   distress   group   (36.9%   and   7.6%,

respectively)   (p   <0.001).   Risk   of   respiratory   distress   increased   8

times   when   the   newborn   had   hypothermia   (Table   3.15).   Nayeri

(2005) found that the complications of hypothermia were respiratory

distress   within   6h   after   birth.   Hypothermia   should   be   monitored

during resuscitation and in the following hours.

4.3. TREATMENT RESULTS AND FACTORS AFFECTING 4.3.1. Treatment result of respiratory distress

139   respiratory   distress   newborns   in   study,   68   of   whom

received   invasive   mechanical   ventilation.   The   mortality   rate   of

respiratory distress was 15.1% (Figure 3.4). The Wadi (2012) study

in   Iraq   on   167   newborns   showed   a   mortality   rate   of   9%   for

respiratory distress, which was lower than our study, but in Wadi's

study   only   the   term   newborn.   Compared   two   recent   reports   of

respiratory distress in India, Swarnkar (2015) and Bajad (2016), the

mortality   of   their   respiratory   distress   were   22.86%   and   22.33%,

respectively, higher than our study. Thus, respiratory distress is still

high   mortality.   Therefore,   determining   causes,   risk   factors,

resuscitation   co­ordination   after   birth,   reasonable   treatment   will

improve the results.

Invasive   mechanical   ventilation   result   mortality   were   21/68

patients (31%). Reported by Vu Thi Thu Nga (2017) at the National

20

Hospital   of   Paediatrics,   the   mortality   rate   when   treated   with

mechanical ventilation was 34.8% similar our results.  4.3.2.Factors affecting the result of respiratory distress 4.3.2.1. Relative preterm, low birth weight, asphyxia and

result

The babies were more lower gestation age (GA), the mortality

was more increase when treated RD,   GA < 32 weeks has risk of

death   OR=13.217(95%CI,   4.388­39.813)   (table   3.21).   VuThi   Thu

Nga said that the babies 28­ < 32 weeks had treated with mechanical

ventilation mortality rate 41.4% and increased 74.6% if gestation age

< 28 weeks. Nguyen Thi Xuan Huong reported the ratio of premature

dead was 46.29%. We analysis multivariate logistic factors: severe

asphyxia, ventilator with mask­intubated, premature < 32 weeks, low

birth weight < 1,500g and hypothermia the result shown that only

premature   <   32   weeks   was   risk   factor   of   death   with

OR=7.856(95%CI,1.288­47.909), p =0.025 (table 3.23).

The   mortality   increased   8.426   (95%CI,2.979­23.83)   times

when the birth weight was < 1,500g (p<0.001). Tang Chi Thuong

from Nhi dong 1 hospital (2010) reported that patients < 1,000g the

mortality was 31.8% in the same group, group had BW 1,000­1,499g

the mortality was 11.3% in this group. That prevalence was lower

than us. The prevalence of our study is similar with Vu Thi Thu Nga

(2017) in ventilator group: BW < 1,000g the mortality upto 84.9%,

BW 1,000­1,499g the mortality was 38.5%.

The baby still was in severe asphyxia when evaluated Apgar

score   at   5   minute,   the   risk   of   death   is   OR=7.467(95%CI,2.132­

26.149). Antonucci R. (2014) showed the role of evaluation Apgar

score associated brain damage after hypoxia in preterm, mother had

21

to anesthesia, infection, and said that asphyxia before birth caused

nerve damage  or   high  mortality.  Oliveira T.G.   and  partner   (2012)

said that the lower BW, the lower Apgar score were higher mortality.  4.3.2.2. Ventilation   Index   (VI),   oxygenation   Index   (OI)

and  ventilator treatment results

In the 2nd time (T2), the prognostic value of VI by the ROC

curve resulted: VI> 33.093 increased mortality risk with sensitivity  76.5%, specificity 66.7% (p = 0.008). Thus, when VI ≥ 34 in the 2nd

time taken blood gas predict increased risk of death when mechanical

ventilation treatment.

In the 3rd time (T3), the prognostic value of OI by the ROC

6,72 increased mortality risk with sensitivity

curve resulted: OI  (cid:0) 83.3%, specificity 84.4% (p<0.001).

When follow up the value of OI in treatment: survivor group

had OI value decrease during the treatment, dead group had OI value

increase (chart 3.10).

Subhedar N.V. and partner (2000) evaluated 155 RD preterm

babies  said that OI value of dead group higher than survivor group

was 38.8 (22.0–98.9)  and 10.0 (5.6–19.1), respectively, p<0.001 and

recommendation   used   OI   value   for   prognosis   outcome.   Trivedi

(2009) published the results of study on mortality risk factors when

treatment in neonatal intensive care unit in India with 50 ventilated

newborns: OI> 10 predicted increase mortality rate when mechanical

ventilation   treatment.   This   study   showed   that   the   ventilation

treatment  mortality with VI > 30 (63.3%) higher than group with VI £ 30 (41%), but the difference was not clear because of p>0.05.

Our   study   suggested   using   OI,   VI   to   predict   patient   status

when ventilator treatment combine with clinical evaluate.

22

4.3.2.3. Brain damage and  ventilator treatment results

Ancora   (2007)   showed   the   relationship   between   cranial

ultrasound   abnormalities   and   treatment   outcomes   in   CMV   infants

infection. Our results are similar with the author. Cranial ultrasound

abnormal   had   risk   of   mortality   was   14.4   times   when   treated

mechanical ventilator.

4.3.2.4. Feeding by the gastrointestinal tract and results

Our   study   results:   68   ventilator   patients   were   not   feeding

within 24 hours after hospitalization, the rate of dead increased with

OR=16.875(95%CI,3.211­88.683)   (p<0.001).   Lee   P.L.   and   partner

(2017)   recommended   early   feeding   reducing   the   risk   of   ventilator

acquired pneumonia in low birth weight newborns, which is similar

our results.

CONCLUSION Study 417 patients included 139 respiratory distress newborns treated

in   neonatal   unit­Pediatric   department­Bach   mai   hospital     from

01/2013 to 12/2015  showed that: 1. Causes, some risk factors of respiratory distress 1.1. Causes of respiratory distress  The ratio of RD in our study was 33.3%  Causes of respiratory distress newborns are: respiratory diseases:

hyaline membrane disease (10.8%), asphyxia (15.8%),  transient

tachypnoea   of   newborn  (10.1%),   pneumonia   (2.2%);   heart

diseases:   patent   ductus   arteriosus   (15.8%), pulmonary

hypertension (3.6%); others:  hypoglycemia, cerebral hemorrhage,

sepsis…

1.2. Risk factors of respiratory distress

23

 Premature < 37 weeks, risk of RD is 4.859(1.729 ­13.654) times  Caesarean section without labour, risk of RD  is higher 74 times

than Caesarean section with labour.

 High risk fetus has risk of RD increased 4.101(2.665­6.31) times.  Mother has internal disease during pregnant, risk of RD increased

is 3.486(1.538­7.903) times.

 In   labour,   mother   has   cardiovascular   disease,  preeclampsia­

eclampsia­HELLP syndorme risk of RD increased with p=0.041

and p<0.001, respectively.

 Hypothermia <360C risk of  RD is increased 8 times. 2. Treatment results and factors affecting 2.1. Treatment result of respiratory distress  The mortality rate of respiratory distress was 15.1%.  Common causes of ventilator treatment were: asphyxia (29.4%),

hyaline membrane disease  (20.6%) and patent ductus arteriosus

16.2%.

 Common   cause   of   death:  hyaline   membrane   disease  (42.9%),

asphyxia (23.8%).

2.2. Factors affecting the result of respiratory distress  Severe asphyxia, Apgar score < 4 risk of death is increased 7.467

times.

 Pediatricians   who   done   resuscitation   risk   in   delivery   room

improved   the   rate   of   survivor­discharge   but   no   significant

difference.

 Preterm < 32 weeks, risk of death increased 7.856 (1.288­47.909)

times.

 Hypothermia is risk of treatment failure upto 3.756(1.405­10.04)

times compare with non­hypothermia.

24

6.72, ventilator (VI)  (cid:0) 33.1 predict risk

 Oxidation Index (OI)  (cid:0) of treatment failure.

 Cranial ultrasound abnormalities were risk of mortality.  Enteral   feeding   within   24   hours   after   admission   improves

treatment outcomes.

COMMENTS

 Studies   to  find   causes   of   respiratory   distress   due   to  congenital

diseases, must be surgical intervention.

 Conduct other studies to assess the risk of each maternal disease

to   determine   which   disease   most   affected   risk   of   respiratory

distress newborns.

 Continuing   deployment   effectively   neonatal   resuscitation

program.

 There   should   be   information   about   advantages,   disadvantages,

complications when caesarean section without lobour delivered to

the public

LIST OF JOURNAL ARTICLES

THE RESULTS OF THESIS

ả   Nguy n   Thành   Nam,   Cao   Th   Bích   H o,

1.

ư

ế

(2016).

Đ ng   Kh c   H ng,   Nguy n   Ti n   Dũng

ế ố

ơ ử

ở ẻ ơ

Nguyên nhân và y u t

nguy c  t

vong

tr  s  sinh

ẻ Vietnam

ị b  suy hô h p n ng c n th  máy ngay sau đ .

Medical Journal, 449(1): 74­78.

Nguyen   Thanh   Nam,   Cao   Thi   Bich   Hao,

2.

Pham Van Đem, et al. (2017). Causes, risk factors and

outcomes in neonates with respiratory failure.  Journal

of Military Pharmaco­medicine, 42 (9/2017): 662­668.