Tuyn tp Hi ngh Khoa hc thường niên năm 2024. ISBN: 978-604-82-8175-5
547
WILLINGNESS TO COLLABORATIVE LEARNING AMONG
ENGLISH-MAJOR STUDENTS AT THUYLOI UNIVERSITY
Nguyen Van Son
Thuyloi University, email: nvson@tlu.edu.vn
1. INTRODUCTION & RESEARCH
BACKGROUND
Collaborative learning (CL) is a frequently
used method in higher education. It is a
pedagogical approach in which students have
chances to work together and towards a
shared goal. There are various approaches to
CL implemented including cooperative
learning, problem-centered instruction,
writing groups, peer teaching, discussion
groups and seminars, and learning
communities (Almajed, 2015). The research
has indicated that CL facilitates cognitive,
pro-social and emotional development
(Järvelä et al., 2010). It is defined as
“students actively contribute to the
attainment of a mutual learning goal and try
to share the effort to reach this goal”
(Janssen, 2014, pp. 4-5). CL brings about
many benefits to students such as
development of cognitive and social skills,
learning experiences shared, and positive
learning atmosphere (Almajed, 2015;
Weinberger & Shonfeld, 2020). However,
there are several issues to concerns such as
inappropriate behaviors, interactions,
motivation, personalities, experiences, time,
evaluation, and types of topics (Almajed,
2015; Weinberger & Shonfeld, 2020).
In the context of tertiary education, CL
even becomes a more important strategy
because it makes students more well-prepared
for jobs which requires teamwork skills
(Slotte et al., 2004). Therefore, understanding
students’ willingness to practice CL is
preponderant so that relevant stakeholders can
prepare their students for the future with
necessary skills in the 21st century. This study
aims to investigate the second-year English-
major students’ willingness towards CL at
Thuyloi University. Specifically, the research
answers the following questions: What are
advantages and disadvantages of CL, from
students’ perspective? What are their attitudes
towards CL? Are they skilled and willing to
practice CL?
2. RESEARCH METHODS
The quantitative approach was utilized in
this research and data collection method was
survey questionnaires. To be more specific,
the study adapted the Collaborative Learning
questionnaire developed by Weinberger and
Shonfeld (2020). There was one multiple -
choice question about experience in
collaborative learning (1 = not at all, 2 = in
some classes, 3 = most classes, 4 = all
classes). In the next 19 items, participants
were asked to reflect their ideas by selecting
one of the options from 1- Strongly disagree
to 5- Strongly agree on a Likert scale. The 19
items were about advantages of CL (6 items),
disadvantages of CL (6 items), attitudes
toward CL (5 items), CL skills (1 item), and
willingness to use CL (1 item).
109 second-year students whose major is
English language and linguistics at Thuyloi
University participated in the research. They
had almost finished their second year with
English language skills and some other
English as a medium of instruction (EMI)
subjects such as linguistics and research
Tuyn tp Hi ngh Khoa hc thường niên năm 2024. ISBN: 978-604-82-8175-5
548
methodology. 86 of them (about 79%) were
female and the others (n = 23) were male.
The students completed the paper-and-
pencil questionnaire on a voluntary basis.
Among 115 questionnaires delivered, 109
were returned, which speaks around 95%
response rate.
Data were coded, entered into SPSS
version 24, and then analyzed to generate
descriptive statistics. Reliability analysis
showed that Cronbach’s alpha value was
0.873, which was very high, so the
questionnaire became a reliable instrument in
this research.
3. RESEARCH FINDINGS
3.1. CL experience
The findings in the first multiple choice
question showed that the majority of
participating second-year English-majors at
Thuyloi University had experiences in CL in
their tertiary education (M = 3.65; Sd =
0.67). Specifically, 76.1% of the students
experienced CL in all classes, 12.8% in most
classes, and the other 11.1% in some classes.
3.2. Advantages of CL
The results revealed that the respondents
gave high scores for items regarding the
advantages of CL. CL helped the students to
enhance communication skills (M = 4.65; Sd
= 0.88), foster exchange of knowledge and
experience (M = 4.42; Sd = 0.52), bring a
more relaxing atmosphere (M = 4.41; Sd =
0.82), make new friends (M = 4.36; Sd =
0.86), better comprehension of the topics (M
= 4.33; Sd = 0.94), and develop higher order
thinking skills (M = 3.73; Sd = 0.97).
3.3. Disadvantages of CL
The students expressed their opinions
about the drawbacks of CL. Specifically,
many of them believed that CL was not
appropriate for all the topics (M = 4.15; Sd =
0.79) and all types of students (M = 4.07; Sd
= 0.89), and students may depend on other
members (M = 3.81; Sd = 0.92). Some
portions of participants thought that there
may exist an unfair evaluation of members’
contribution (M = 3.26; Sd = 1.03) and it was
difficult to get all members to actively
participate in tasks (M = 3.14; Sd = 1.11). A
small number of students agreed that CL was
a waste of time (M = 2.49; Sd = 0.73).
3.4. Attitudes towards CL
The research findings pointed out
positivity towards CL. Most respondents
shared that they learned better in groups than
alone (M = 4.11; Sd = 0.93) and that they
participated in CL in all their courses (M =
3.84; Sd = 1.06), while only some students
preferred to conduct learning activities alone
(M = 2.33; Sd = 0.98). Moreover, a large
proportion of participants concurred that the
CL activities were important to their learning
experience (M = 4.07; Sd = 0.80) and their
future career (M = 3.95; Sd = 0.91).
3.5. CL skills and willingness to use CL
The majority of participants felt that they
were skilled enough to learn collaboratively
with their peers (M = 4.06; Sd = 0.97).
Besides, the students showed a high level of
willingness to incorporate CL in their
learning (M = 3.98; Sd = 0.81).
4. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION
The study explored 109 English-major
students’ willingness toward collaborative
learning at Thuyloi University employing the
survey questionnaire adapted from the
previous study. The findings indicated that
the sample of English-major students at
Thuyloi University all had experience in CL,
although in various degrees. The
undergraduates highly valued the advantages
of CL such as cultivating knowledge and skill
exchanges, enhancing communication skills,
making friends, and giving a relaxing learning
environment. However, a considerable number
of participants tend to deny the disadvantages
of CL including its unsuitability for different
Tuyn tp Hi ngh Khoa hc thường niên năm 2024. ISBN: 978-604-82-8175-5
549
types of students and topics, its unfair
evaluation of contribution, and its time-
wasting nature. Besides, the participants
expressed their positive attitudes toward CL
in the way that they recognized the
importance of CL activities, participated in
CL activities, and preferred to work in
groups. They felt confident about their skills
to get involved in CL. Notably, the
respondents showed a willingness to practice
CL in their learning. The results above are
aligned with those in previous studies (e.g.,
Sulaiman & Shahrill, 2015; Weinberger, &
Shonfeld, 2020) in which the students
highlighted the positive sides of CL and were
willing, to a certain extent, to incorporate CL
in their studies. The findings also reaffirm the
literature on how CL supports academic and
social performance as stated previously.
There are some implications in this
research. First, lecturers may consider
including CL more in the tasks students carry
out so that the students can enjoy the
advantages of CL and improve their
performances. The lecturers should plan,
design, implement, particularly facilitate, and
evaluate CL properly in order that CL can be
effective. Second, the students should be
informed of the disadvantages of CL. As a
result, they can have a better overview of both
strengths and weaknesses of CL to ensure the
effectiveness of CL in their learning.
The study has two main limitations. First,
it only employed the questionnaire to collect
data, so future research can consider more
research instruments such as observation and
interviews. Second, the number of
participants was limited and only focused on
the English-major students at Thuyloi
University, so the findings could not be
generalized to the broader population.
5. REFERENCES
[1] Almajed, A. (2015). Collaborative learning:
students’ perceptions and experiences
(Doctoral dissertation).
[2] Järvelä, S., Volet, S., & Järvenoja, H.
(2010). Research on motivation in
collaborative learning: Moving beyond the
cognitive-situative divide and combining
individual and social processes. Educational
Psychologist, 45(1), 15-27.
[3] Janssen, J. (2014). Opening the black box of
collaborative learning: A meta-analysis
investigating the antecedents and
consequences of collaborative interaction.
University of Utrecht.
[4] Slotte, V., Palonen, T., & Salminen, L.
(2004). Best practices for professional
competence development. Lifelong
Learning in Europe, 9(2), 95-105.
[5] Sulaiman, N., & Shahrill, M. (2015).
Engaging collaborative learning to develop
students’ skills of the 21st century.
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences,
6(4), 544-552.
[6] Weinberger, Y., & Shonfeld, M. (2020).
Students’ willingness to practice
collaborative learning. Teaching education,
31(2), 127-143.