Gender heterogeneity and financial performance of listed Nigerian companies

Chia sẻ: Nguyễn Thảo | Ngày: | Loại File: PDF | Số trang:6

Thêm vào BST

Báo xấu

12
lượt xem 2
download

Download Vui lòng tải xuống để xem tài liệu đầy đủ

This study investigated the economic impact of gender diversity on Board composition of companies listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE).

Chủ đề:

Bình luận(0) Đăng nhập để gửi bình luận!

Lưu

Nội dung Text: Gender heterogeneity and financial performance of listed Nigerian companies

International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET) Volume 10, Issue 03, March 2019, pp. 1758-1763, Article ID: IJMET_10_03_177 Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/issues.asp?JType=IJMET&VType=10&IType=3 ISSN Print: 0976-6340 and ISSN Online: 0976-6359 © IAEME Publication Scopus Indexed GENDER HETEROGENEITY AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF LISTED NIGERIAN COMPANIES Adetula, D.T., Owolabi, F., Egbide, B.C. and Adeyemo, K. Department of Accounting, Covenant University, Canaan land, Nigeria ABSTRACT This study investigated the economic impact of gender diversity on Board composition of companies listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE). Based on the grouping of fifty most capitalized companies on the NSE into companies with no female on board and those with at least one female on the board, the firm performance was analyzed with Mann Whitney U -test over a three-year period. We also examined whether there was any significant difference between the performance of boards with only one female and those with more than one female. The results show no significant difference in the performance of both groups. This is due to moderately heterogeneous board composition as a result of few females in top level decision-making. We recommend a policy mandating listed companies to evaluate their employment and selection methods regarding nomination and promotion into boards and management teams. Key words: Economic Performance, Gender Diversity, Nigerian Stock Exchange Cite this Article: Adetula, D.T., Owolabi, F., Egbide, B.C. and Adeyemo, K., Gender Heterogeneity and Financial Performance of Listed Nigerian Companies, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology 10(3), 2019, pp. 1758–1763. http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/issues.asp?JType=IJMET&VType=10&IType=3 1. INTRODUCTION Nigeria is the most populous country in Africa with one hundred and seventy three million and six hundred people [1]. Of this number, women account for 49% but grossly under-represented on the senior executive and board positions in the one hundred and ninety-two (192) firms listed on The Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) as at 2013 [2]. This is however, contrary to developed world and a few developing world economies that strive to achieve an increased number of females’ participation in corporate board rooms [3]. Such countries aim at increasing females’ participation because directors in most boardrooms around the world are substantially males. In order to achieve increase in females’ participation, a number of capital market regulators have introduced legislations imposing gender quotas or mandatory disclosure of number of female for boards of listed companies [4]. http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1758 editor@iaeme.com
Adetula, D.T., Owolabi, F., Egbide, B.C. and Adeyemo, K. The motivation for the study was aroused from the empirical results of the previous research studies which are somewhat mixed [5], [6]. Some researchers claim that gender diversity has positive impact on company by enhancing growth and monitoring process [5],[6],[7] while others discovered that board gender heterogeneity has no impact on economic performance of organization [8],[9]. In spite of the importance of equality policies aimed at breaching the gap and many research associated with gender diversity in the developed world, there is still limited research on this area in Nigeria. The study fills this gap by evaluating relationship between gender heterogeneity and company’s performance of listed companies on the NSE. The sections of the paper are arranged in this order: section two is on literature review and theoretical background; section three describes research method and section four focuses on findings, recommendations and policy implications. 2. LITERATURE REVIEW In the study carried out by [10] in 2013, they claimed there had been scarcity of women occupying top positions in Nigerian organizations. This prevents their access to and control over resources which in turn limit women economic independence. Women comprise of greater part of informal sector workers in Nigeria [11]. The research on gender heterogeneity in Ghana and Nigeria banking sectors found a wider gender disparity against women [12]. The study of [13] revealed that women are under-represented in senior management positions. The results of examination of whether companies governed by female CEOs show the same performance as companies led by male CEOs reveal that the gender mix of the CEO is crucial to financial performance of organizations [14]. In addition, the study investigated whether the gender heterogeneity of the CEO influences the risk level of the firm and if the incentives given to female CEOs have reduced risky elements compared to those given to their male counterparts. They found that companies’ risk level is smaller when the CEO is a female compared to when the CEO is a male. [15] examined the influence of corporate board characteristics namely board size, board skill, board nationality, board gender heterogeneity, board ethnicity and CEO duality on the financial performance of Nigerian listed companies between 1991 and 2008. The study found that board size, CEO duality and gender heterogeneity have a negative relationship with firm performance. However, the emphasis of this study was not specifically on impact of gender heterogeneity and profitability of Kenyan banks. According to [16] who examined the relationship between board gender diversity and performance of commercial banks in Kenya, both variables have no relationship using banks in Kenya. The reason attributed to the result was because in the Kenyan banking sector, out of a typical board size female directors are only a mere 12.5% of the entire board. In Nigeria, the highest number of female representation on board is in the Alternative Security Market (ASeM) sector of the NSE classification and this is just estimated at 20% based on the NSE fact book of 2012/2013 reporting period. The next two sectors are the financial services and construction/real sector with just 13% women representation each which are moderately heterogeneous boards. The moderately heterogeneous board composition as a result of few females in top level decision-making may be one of the reasons for Nigeria’s underdeveloped stock market. The evidence from the research of team structures confirm that in a team setting, “highly heterogeneous teams will be more impactful than moderately heterogeneous ones” [17]. Applying this to gender diversity implies that an independent group of males or females or a team of an almost equal number of both sexes will have a better firm performance than just merely having a domination of one sex with just a few of the other. Thus, increasing percentage of women at top level management should be of paramount interest if Nigeria would not fall behind in an ever increasingly competitive world. The table below buttresses that women are grossly underrepresented in boards of quoted companies on http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1759 editor@iaeme.com
Gender Heterogeneity and Financial Performance of Listed Nigerian Companies the NSE. Table 1 presents the summary of board composition of the fifty (50) most capitalized companies as at the end of year 2013 as used in this study. Table 1 Gender Composition of Fifty Most Capitalized Companies in 2012/2013 Reporting Period No Of Male Female S/N Sector Companies Male Female Total % % 1 Agriculture 2 19 1 20 95 5 2 Conglomerates 2 16 3 19 84 16 3 Construction/Real Estate 3 28 2 30 93 7 4 Consumer Goods 14 127 15 142 89 11 5 Financial Services 16 193 31 224 86 14 6 Healthcare 1 9 1 10 90 10 7 Industrial Goods 5 31 3 34 91 9 8 Oil&Gas 6 49 6 55 89 11 9 Services 1 8 1 9 89 11 TOTAL 50 480 63 543 88 12 Source: Compiled from Factbook, 2012/2013 2.1. Theoretical background Economic performance is crucial to the stakeholders of companies because it could be used to attach value to the companies. Among the ways of measuring economic performance of firms are Return on Assets (ROA) and Tobin’s Q. ROA is a measure of the overall efficiency of management in generating returns to investors with its available total assets [18],[19]. The study used ROA to gauge company performance because ROA is the most commonly used proxy to test firm’s economic performance [20], [21]. Also, it may represent the interests of shareholders and measure performance better than other method in line with Signaling theory. Signaling theory states that those charged with day-to-day running of the organization have tendency to maintain dividend policy at desired level. This is because the dividend will be reacted to by foreign investors as a signal delivered by the company. Hence, the expectation would be that a high dividend rate brings about an increased future cash flow. By this, ROA can indicate improved future cash flow to attract external investors. ROA is obtained from the net profit after tax and issued as the basis for calculating net cash flow. Conversely, Tobin’s Q which is the ratio of market value to the total assets of a firm is used to measure the firm’s value [21], [22], [23]. 3. RESEARCH METHOD This study investigated the economic impact of gender diversity on the board of companies listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange. The companies investigated were the fifty most capitalized quoted companies on The NSE. The companies were grouped into two independent groups. The first group was made up of companies with no female on board while the other comprised of at least one female on board. The study also examined whether there is a significant difference between the performance of companies with only one female on board and those with more than one female on board. The performances of the groups were evaluated using the Return on Assets (ROA) and Tobin’s Q ratio. The data were analyzed with Mann- Whitney U test. This method of test was used because the study investigated whether or not there is a difference in the performance of two independent groups and to overcome the problems associated with t-test. http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1760 editor@iaeme.com
Adetula, D.T., Owolabi, F., Egbide, B.C. and Adeyemo, K. The period covered by the study was from 2011 to 2013. The choice of this period is necessitated by amendment in Corporate Governance codes in 2010 by some advanced countries requiring public companies to integrate gender diversity, among other factors, with board composition. Examples of such countries are Australia, Belgium, France, Germany and United Kingdom [4]. The year 2011 was the first full year after this amendment. 3. FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS Based on the results of the test which was conducted to compare the ROA and Tobin’s Q of quoted companies with no female on board and those with at least one female on board, the study found no significant difference between the performances of firms in the independent groups. The result of the statistics is presented in table 2. Furthermore, the study also found a non-significant difference between ROA and Tobin’s Q of firms with only one woman on board versus those with more than one woman on board for the period studied. The result is presented in table 3. These results are in line with results of research conducted by [24]. Table 2 Result of Analysis for no Female on Board Vs At Least One Female on Board ROA Tobin’s Q U 1623 1598 z -0.819 -0.945 p 0.413 0.345 r 0.07 0.08 Table 3 Result of Analysis for Only One Female on Board Vs More than One Female on Board ROA Tobin’s Q 859 922 U -1.853 -1.377 z 0.064 0.169 p 0.19 0.14 r The z values are -0.819 and -0.945 with a significance level of p=0.413 and p = 0.345 for ROA and Tobin’s Q respectively from table 1. Since the p values are not less than 0.05, it implies no statistical significant difference in the performance of boards with or without women. In addition, from table 2, the z values are -1.853 and -1.377 with significance level of p = 0.064 and 0.169 for ROA and Tobin’s Q respectively. The result also shows an insignificant difference in the performance of boards with only one female and those with more than one female. This may be as a result of gross under-representation of females on the senior executive and board positions of listed firms on the NSE [2]. This can be implied from the findings of [17], that in a team setting, heterogeneous teams will be more effective than moderately heterogeneous ones. Table 1 shows that listed firms on the NSE are moderately heterogeneous which may be the reason why the results are not significant. Consequently, qualified women should be given equal opportunities to sit on board positions as their male counterparts. We therefore recommend a policy that will mandate companies listed on the NSE to evaluate their employment and selection methods regarding nomination and promotion into boards and management teams so as to remove any gender bias, reduce male dominance in board composition and achieve a highly heterogeneous board composition for enhanced performance. Furthermore, the code of Corporate Governance should require that the appointment process of members of the board be gender sensitive and a statement must be given http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1761 editor@iaeme.com
Gender Heterogeneity and Financial Performance of Listed Nigerian Companies in the annual report justifying their claims. This is expected to breach the identified gap, improve the performance of the listed firms and by extension the NSE. REFERENCES [1] World Bank, “Country at a glance,”, Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/country/Nigeria, 2013 [2] The Nigerian Stock Exchange Factbook, 2012/2013 [3] Chimhowu, A. and Dada, O.A. “Improving the lives of girls in Nigeria,” Gender in Nigeria report, 2012, 2nd Edition. [4] Mordi, C. and Obanya, S. “Gender diversity on boards of publicly quoted companies,” Nigerian Observatory on Corporate Governance, 2014, 5, pp. 2-23 [5] Molero, E. “Are workplaces with many female in management run differently,” Journal of Business Research, 2011, 64, pp. 385–393. [6] Krishnan, G. and Parsons, L.” Getting to the bottom line: An exploration of gender and earnings quality,” Journal of Business Ethics, 2008,78, p.65-76. [7] Dwyera, S. , Richard, O. and Chadwick, K.“Gender diversity in management and firm performance: The influence of growth orientation and organizational culture,” Journal of Business Research, 2003,56, pp.1009–1019. [8] Chapple, L. and Humphrey, J.E. “Does Board Gender Diversity have a financial impact? Evidence using stock portfolio Performance,” Journal of Business Ethics, 2014, 122, pp.709-723. [9] Karayel, M. and Dogan, M. “Relationship between board gender diversity and financial performance,” The Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 2014,19(2),pp 75-88. [10] Adetula, D. Nwobu, O. and Owolabi, F. “Career Advancement of Female Accountants in Accounting Professional Practice in Nigeria,” IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 2014, 16(2), pp.14-18. [11] Gender in Nigeria Report, “Improving the lives of girls and women in Nigeria, ukaid, from the Department for International Development,” 2012 [12] Akomea, S. Y. and Adusei, M.“Gender Imbalance in Bank Governance: Some Evidence from Ghana and Nigeria,” Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of IAABD, Retrieved from http://www.iaabd.org/sites/default/files/Past%20Confrence/2013%20IAABD%20Proceedi ngs.pdf, 2013 [13] Liff, S. and Ward, K. (2001). “Distorted Views Through the Glass Ceiling: The Construction of Women’s Understandings of Promotion and Senior Management Positions.” Gender, Work and Organization, 8(1), pp.19-34. [14] Khan, W.A. and Vieito, J. P. “CEO gender and firm performance,’’ Journal ofEconomics and Business, 2013, 67, pp.55- 66 [15] Ujunwa, A.” Board characteristics and the financial performance of Nigerian quoted firms," Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 2012 12(5), pp.656 – 674. [16] Wachudi, E. and Mboya, J. “Effect of board gender diversity on the performance of commercial banks in Kenya,” European Scientific Journal, 2009, 8(7),pp 128-148. [17] Earley, C. and Mosakowski, E. “Creating hybrid team cultures: an empirical test of transnational team functioning,” Academy of Management Journal, 2000, 43(1). http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1762 editor@iaeme.com
Adetula, D.T., Owolabi, F., Egbide, B.C. and Adeyemo, K. [18] Megginson, W.S. and Brian, L. “Introduction of Corporate Finance,” Cengange Learning EMEA, London, 2008. [19] Oyerinde, D. “Financial Accounting Numbers and Emerging Nigerian Stock Market Market,” The Social Sciences, 2016, 11(14), 3434 – 3439. [20] Shahid, S. “Does Ownership Structure Affect Firm Value? Evidence from the Egyptian Stock Market,” Social Science Research Network (SSRN) Working Paper, 2003, pp.1–19 [21] Tian, G. G. and Zeitun, R. “Capital Structure and Corporate Performance: Evidence from Jordan,” Australasian Accounting Business & Finance Journal, 2007, 1 (4), pp. 40–61. [22] McConell, J.J. and Serveas, H. “Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value,” Journal of Financial Economics, 1990, 27, pp 595-612. [23] Zhou, X. “Understanding the Determinants of Managerial Ownership and the Link Between Ownership and Performance: Comment,” Journal of Financial Economics, 2001, 62, pp 559-612 [24] Dodd, J. L. and Chen, S. EVA: A New Panacea? B & E Review/July-Sept. 1996, pp. 26-28. http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1763 editor@iaeme.com