Chapter 6: International Trade and Investment Theory
International Business, 4th Edition Griffin & Pustay
6-1 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Chapter Objectives_1
Understand the motivation for international
trade
Summarize and discuss the differences
among the classical country-based theories of international trade
Use the modern firm-based theories of international trade to describe global strategies adopted by businesses
6-2 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Chapter Objectives_2
Describe and categorize the different forms of international investment Explain the reasons for foreign direct
investment
Summarize how supply, demand, and
political factors influence foreign direct investment
6-3 ©2004 Prentice Hall
International Trade
Trade: voluntary exchange of goods,
services, assets, or money between one person or organization and another International trade: trade between
residents of two countries
6-4 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Figure 6.2 Sources of the World’s Merchandise Exports, 2001
37%
40%
European Union United States Japan Canada Other countries
4%
12%
7%
6-5 ©2004 Prentice Hall
The largest component of the annual $1.5 trillion trade in international services is travel and tourism
6-6 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Classical Country-Based Trade Theories
Mercantilism Absolute Advantage Comparative Advantage Comparative Advantage with Money Relative Factor Endowments
6-7 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Mercantilism
A country’s wealth is measured by its
holdings of gold and silver
A country’s goal should be to enlarge
holdings of gold and silver by – Promoting exports – Discouraging imports
6-8 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Modern Mercantilism
Neomercantilists or protectionists
– American Federation of Labor-Congress
of Industrial Organizations
– Textile manufacturers – Steel companies – Sugar growers – Peanut farmers
6-9 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Disadvantages of Mercantilism
Confuses the acquisition of treasure with
the acquisition of wealth
Weakens the country because it robs
individuals of the ability – To trade freely – To benefit from voluntary exchanges Forces countries to produce products it
would otherwise not in order to minimize imports
6-10 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Absolute Advantage
Export those goods and services for
which a country is more productive than other countries
Import those goods and services for which other countries are more productive than it is
6-11 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Table 6.1 The Theory of Absolute Advantage: An Example
OUTPUT PER HOUR OF LABOR France Japan
Wine
2
1
3
5
Clock radios
6-12 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Absolute Advantage’s Flaw
What happens to trade if one country has an absolute advantage in both products?
No trade would occur
6-13 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Comparative Advantage
Produce and export those goods and
services for which it is relatively more productive than other countries
Import those goods and services for which other countries are relatively more productive than it is
6-14 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Differences between Comparative and Absolute Advantage
Absolute versus relative productivity
differences
Comparative advantage incorporates the
concept of opportunity cost – Value of what is given up to get the good
6-15 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Table 6.2 The Theory of Comparative Advantage: An Example
OUTPUT PER HOUR OF LABOR France Japan
Wine
4
1
6
5
Clock radios
6-16 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Comparative Advantage with Money
One is better off specializing in what one
does relatively best
Produce and export those goods and services one is relatively best able to produce
Buy other goods and services from people
who are better at producing them
6-17 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Table 6.3 The Theory of Comparative Advantage with Money: An Example
Cost of Goods in France Cost of Goods in Japan
French Made
Japanese Made
French Made
Japanese Made
€8
¥375
¥1,000
€3
Wine
€1.6
¥250
¥200
€3
Clock Radios
6-18 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Relative Factor Endowments
Heckscher-Ohlin Theory What determines the products for which
a country will have a comparative advantage? – Factor endowments vary among countries – Goods differ according to the types of factors that are used to produce them
6-19 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Relative Factor Endowments_2
A country will have a comparative
advantage in producing products that intensively use resources (factors of production) it has in abundance – China: labor – Saudi Arabia: oil – Argentina: wheat
6-20 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Figure 6.3 U.S. Imports and Exports, 1947: The Leontief Paradox
6-21 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Modern Firm-Based Trade Theories
Country Similarity Theory Product Life Cycle Theory Global Strategic Rivalry Theory Porter’s National Competitive
Advantage
6-22 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Growth of Firm-Based Theories
Growing importance of MNCs Inability of the country-based theories to explain and predict the existence and growth of intraindustry trade Failure of Leontief and others to
empirically validate country-based Heckscher-Ohlin Theory
6-23 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Firm-Based Trade Theories
Incorporate additional factors into
explanations of trade flows – Quality – Technology – Brand names – Customer quality
6-24 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Country Similarity Theory
Explains the phenomenon of
intraindustry trade – Trade between two countries of goods
produced by the same industry • Japan exports Toyotas to Germany • Germany exports BMWs to Japan
6-25 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Country Similarity Theory_2
Trade results from similarities of preferences among consumers in countries that are at the same stage of economic development
Most trade in manufactured goods should be between countries with similar per capita incomes
6-26 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Product Life Cycle Theory
Describes the evolution of marketing
strategies
Stages
– New product – Maturing product – Standardized product
6-27 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Figure 6.4 The International Product Life Cycle: Innovating Firm’s Country
6-28 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Figure 6.4 The International Product Life Cycle: Other Industrialized Countries
6-29 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Figure 6.4 The International Product Life Cycle: Less Developed Countries
6-30 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Global Strategic Rivalry Theory
Firms struggle to develop sustainable
competitive advantage
Advantage provides ability to dominate
global marketplace
Focus: strategic decisions firms use to
compete internationally
6-31 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Sustaining Competitive Advantage
Owning intellectual property rights Investing in research and development Achieving economies of scale or scope Exploiting the experience curve
6-32 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Porter’s National Competitive Advantage
Success in trade comes from the
interaction of four country and firm specific elements – Factor conditions – Demand conditions – Related and supporting industries – Firm strategy, structure, and rivalry
6-33 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Figure 6.5 Porter’s Diamond of National Competitive Advantage
Firm Strategy, Structure, and Rivalry
Factor Conditions
Demand Conditions
Related and Supporting Industries
6-34 ©2004 Prentice Hall
The intense competitiveness of Japanese market forces manufacturers to continually develop and fine- tune new products
6-35 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Figure 6.6 Theories of International Trade
Firm-Based Theories Firm is unit of analysis Emerged after WWII Developed by business school
professors
Country-Based Theories Country is unit of analysis Emerged prior to WWII Developed by economists Explain interindustry trade Include
Explain intraindustry trade Include
– Mercantilism – Absolute advantage – Comparative advantage – Relative factor endowments
– Country similarity theory – Product life cycle – Global strategic rivalry – National competitive
advantage
6-36 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Types of International Investments
Does the investor seek an active
management role in the firm r merely a return from a passive investment? – Foreign Direct Investment – Portfolio Investment
6-37 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Figure 6.7 Stock of Foreign Direct Investment, by recipient
6-38 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Table 6.4 Sources of FDI for the U.S., end of 2002
United Kingdom
283.3
France
170.6
Netherlands
154.8
Japan
152.
Germany
137.0
Switzerland
113.2
Canada
92.0
Luxembourg
34.3
Bermuda, Bahamas, Caribbean islands
32.5
Other European countries
113.3
All other countries
65.0
Total 6-39
1,348.0 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Table 6.4 Destinations of FDI for the U.S., end of 2002
United Kingdom
255.4
Canada
152.5
Netherlands
145.5
Bermuda, Bahamas, Caribbean islands
98.1
Switzerland
70.1
Japan
65.7
Germany
64.7
Mexico
58.1
France
44.0
Other European countries
217.2
All other countries
349.7
Total 6-40
1,521.0 ©2004 Prentice Hall
International Investment Theories
Ownership Advantages Internalization Dunning’s Eclectic Theory
6-41 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Ownership Advantages
A firm owning a valuable asset that creates a competitive advantage domestically can use that advantage to penetrate foreign markets through FDI
Why FDI and not other methods?
6-42 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Internalization Theory
FDI is more likely to occur when
transaction costs with a second firm are high
Transaction costs: costs associated with negotiating, monitoring, and enforcing a contract
6-43 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Dunning’s Eclectic Theory
FDI reflects both international business activity and business activity internal to the firm
3 conditions for FDI – Ownership advantage – Location advantage – Internalization advantage
6-44 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Table 6.5 Factors Affecting the FDI Decision
Supply Factors
Demand Factors
Political Factors
Production costs
Customer access
Avoidance of trade barriers
Logistics
Marketing advantages
Economic development incentives
Resource availability
Exploitation of competitive advantages
Access to technology
Customer mobility
6-45 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Ikea aggressively exports its furniture to other countries
6-46 ©2004 Prentice Hall