10 - RF Oscillators

The information in this work has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. The author does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information presented herein, and shall not be responsible for any errors, omissions or damages as a result of the use of this information.

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

1

Main References

• • •

• • •

[1]* D.M. Pozar, “Microwave engineering”, 2nd Edition, 1998 John-Wiley & Sons. [2] J. Millman, C. C. Halkias, “Integrated electronics”, 1972, McGraw-Hill. [3] R. Ludwig, P. Bretchko, “RF circuit design - theory and applications”, 2000 Prentice-Hall. [4] B. Razavi, “RF microelectronics”, 1998 Prentice-Hall, TK6560. [5] J. R. Smith,”Modern communication circuits”,1998 McGraw-Hill. [6] P. H. Young, “Electronics communication techniques”, 5th edition, 2004 Prentice-Hall. [7] Gilmore R., Besser L.,”Practical RF circuit design for modern wireless systems”, Vol. 1 & 2, 2003, Artech House. [8] Ogata K., “Modern control engineering”, 4th edition, 2005, Prentice-Hall.

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

2

1

Agenda

• Positive feedback oscillator concepts. • Negative resistance oscillator concepts (typically employed for RF oscillator). • Equivalence between positive feedback and negative resistance oscillator theory.

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

3

• Oscillator start-up requirement and transient. • Oscillator design - Making an amplifier circuit unstable. • Constant |G 1| circle. • Fixed frequency oscillator design. • Voltage-controlled oscillator design.

1.0 Oscillation Concepts

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

4

2

Introduction

• Oscillators are a class of circuits with 1 terminal or port, which produce a periodic electrical output upon power up. • Most of us would have encountered oscillator circuits while studying for our basic electronics classes. • Oscillators can be classified into two types: (A) Relaxation and (B) Harmonic oscillators.

• Relaxation oscillators (also called astable multivibrator), is a class of circuits with two unstable states. The circuit switches back-and-forth between these states. The output is generally square waves. • Harmonic oscillators are capable of producing near sinusoidal output, and is based on positive feedback approach. • Here we will focus on Harmonic Oscillators for RF systems.

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

5

Harmonic oscillators are used as this class of circuits are capable of producing stable sinusoidal waveform with low phase noise.

2.0 Overview of Feedback Oscillators

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

6

3

Classical Positive Feedback Perspective on Oscillator (1)

E(s)

Si(s)

+

Non-inverting amplifier So(s)

=

• Consider the classical feedback system with non-inverting amplifier, • Assuming the feedback network and amplifier do not load each other, we can write the closed-loop transfer function as:

(2.1a)

( ) s

A(s)

1

( ) sA ( )sFsA ( )

oS iS

+

High impedance

=

( ) sT

( )sFsA ( )

-

(2.1b)

High impedance

Feedback network F(s)

Positive Feedback

Loop gain (the gain of the system around the feedback loop)

( )sS

-=

i

( ) sS o

1

( ) sA • Writing (2.1a) as: ( ) ( ) sFsA • We see that we could get non-zero output at So, with Si = 0, provided

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

7

1-A(s)F(s) = 0. Thus the system oscillates!

Classical Positive Feedback Perspective on Oscillator (1)

• The condition for sustained oscillation, and for oscillation to startup from positive feedback perspective can be summarized as:

For sustained oscillation

Barkhausen Criterion (2.2a)

( ) sFsA

( ) 0 =

1

(

( )

For oscillation to startup

) 0 ( ) =sFsA

arg

-

(2.2b)

( ) 1>sFsA ( )

Note that this is a very simplistic view of oscillators. In reality oscillators are non-linear systems. The steady-state oscillatory condition corresponds to what is called a Limit Cycle. See texts on non-linear dynamical systems.

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

8

4

• Take note that the oscillator is a non-linear circuit, initially upon power up, the condition of (2.2b) will prevail. As the magnitudes of voltages and currents in the circuit increase, the amplifier in the oscillator begins to saturate, reducing the gain, until the loop gain A(s)F(s) becomes one. • A steady-state condition is reached when A(s)F(s) = 1.

Classical Positive Feedback Perspective on Oscillator (2)

E(s)

Si(s)

+

Inverting amplifier So(s)

=

( ) s

-A(s)

• Positive feedback system can also be achieved with inverting amplifier:

1

( ) sA ( )sFsA ( )

oS iS

-

Inversion

F(s)

-

• To prevent multiple simultaneous oscillation, the Barkhausen criterion (2.2a) should only be fulfilled at one frequency. • Usually the amplifier A is wideband, and it is the function of the

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

9

feedback network F(s) to ‘select’ the oscillation frequency, thus the feedback network is usually made of reactive components, such as inductors and capacitors. April 2012

Classical Positive Feedback Perspective on Oscillator (3)

• In general the feedback network F(s) can be implemented as a Pi or T network, in the form of a transformer, or a hybrid of these.

E(s)

+

So(s)

-A(s)

(

)

-=

+

X

X

X

• Consider the Pi network with all reactive elements. A simple analysis in [2] and [3] shows that to fulfill (2.2a), the reactance X1, X2 and X3 need to meet the following condition:

(2.3)

3

1

2

-

X3

If X3 represents inductor, then X1 and X2 should be capacitors.

X1

X2

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

10

5

Classical Feedback Oscillators

+

+

+

-

-

-

Colpitt oscillator

+

-

Hartley oscillator

Armstrong oscillator

Clapp oscillator

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

11

• The following are examples of oscillators, based on the original circuit using vacuum tubes.

Example of Tuned Feedback Oscillator (1)

2.0

1.5

A 48 MHz Transistor Common -Emitter Colpitt Oscillator

1.0

V

0.5

V

,

V_DC SRC1 Vdc=3.3 V

C CD1 C=0.1 uF

, L V

B V

0.0

R RC R=330 Ohm

-0.5

R RB1 R=10 kOhm

VC

VL

-1.0

-1.5

C Cc2 C=0.01 uF

VB

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

R RL R=220 Ohm

)w (

( ) w F A

pb_mot_2N3904_19921211 Q1

time, usec

C Cc1 C=0.01 uF

R RB2 R=10 kOhm

1

R RE R=220 Ohm

C CE C=0.01 uF

t

0

E(s)

Si(s)

So(s)

+

-A(s)

-

C C1 C=22.0 pF

C C2 C=22.0 pF

L L1 L=2.2 uH R=

F(s)

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

12

6

Example of Tuned Feedback Oscillator (2)

A 27 MHz Transistor Common-Base Colpitt Oscilator

600

400

V_DC SRC1 Vdc=3.3 V

C CD1 C=0.1 uF

200

R RC R=470 Ohm

V m

V m

R RB1 R=10 kOhm

,

0

,

VC

L V

E V

-200

VL C C1 C=100.0 pF

C Cc2 C=0.1 uF

VB

-400

pb_m ot_2N3904_19921211 Q1

VE

C Cc1 C=0.1 uF

-600

R R1 R=1000 Ohm

R RB2 R=4.7 kOhm

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

R RE R=100 Ohm

L L1 L=1.0 uH C R= C3 C=4.7 pF

time, usec

C C2 C=100.0 pF

E(s)

Si(s)

So(s)

+

A(s)

+

F(s)

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

13

Example of Tuned Feedback Oscillator (3)

A 16 MHz Transistor Common-Emitter Crystal Oscillator

V_DC SRC1 Vdc=3.3 V

C CD1 C=0.1 uF

R RC R=330 Ohm

R RB1 R=10 kOhm

VC

VL

C Cc2 C=0.1 uF

VB

R RL R=220 Ohm

pb_mot_2N3904_19921211 Q1

C Cc1 C=0.1 uF

R RB2 R=10 kOhm

R RE R=220 Ohm

C CE C=0.1 uF

C C1 C=22.0 pF

C C2 C=22.0 pF

sx_stk_CX-1HG-SM_A_19930601 XTL1 Fres=16 MHz

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

14

7

Limitation of Feedback Oscillator

• At high frequency, the assumption that the amplifier and feedback

network do not load each other is not valid. In general the amplifier’s input impedance decreases with frequency, and it’s output impedance is not zero. Thus the actual loop gain is not A(s)F(s) and equation (2.2) breakdowns.

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

15

• Determining the loop gain of the feedback oscillator is cumbersome at high frequency. Moreover there could be multiple feedback paths due to parasitic inductance and capacitance. It can be difficult to distinguish between the amplifier and the feedback paths, owing to the coupling between components and conductive structures on the printed circuit board (PCB) or substrate. • Generally it is difficult to physically implement a feedback oscillator once the operating frequency is higher than 500MHz.

3.0 Negative Resistance Oscillators

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

16

8

Introduction (1)

• An alternative approach is needed to get a circuit to oscillate reliably. • We can view an oscillator as an amplifier that produces an output when there is no input.

• Thus it is an unstable amplifier that becomes an oscillator! • For example let’s consider a conditionally stable amplifier. • Here instead of choosing load or source impedance in the stable

1 | > 1 or |G

2 | > 1.

regions of the Smith Chart, we purposely choose the load or source impedance in the unstable impedance regions. This will result in either |G

1

2 greater than one implies the corresponding port resistance R1 or

• The resulting amplifier circuit will be called the Destabilized Amplifier. • As seen in Chapter 7, having a reflection coefficient magnitude for G

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

17

or G R2 is negative, hence the name for this type of oscillator.

Introduction (2)

s | > 1 and oscillation will start up (refer back to

1

• For instance by choosing the load impedance ZL at the unstable region, 1 | > 1. We then choose the source impedance G we could ensure that |G properly so that |G Chapter 7 on stability theory).

2

1

L | > 1, enforcing either one will s | > 1

1 L | > 1 at the output port and vice versa).

2

1

s | > 1 only happens at one frequency (or a range of intended

G G G G • Once oscillation starts, an oscillating voltage will appear at both the input and output ports of a 2-port network. So it does not matter whether we enforce |G s | > 1 or |G cause oscillation to occur (It can be shown later that when |G at the input port, |G • The key to fixed frequency oscillator design is ensuring that the criteria G

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

18

9

|G frequencies), so that no simultaneous oscillations occur at other frequencies.

Recap - Wave Propagation Stability Perspective (1)

Zs or G

s

2

+

=

• From our discussion of stability from wave propagation in Chapter 7…

G G

Port 1

Port 2

...

G+ b s

2 1

s

1

s

a 1

b s

G+ b s b s

Source

=⇒ a 1

1

1

s

2-port Network

2

+

G G -

...

b1

a1

b 1

1

2 1

3 1

G= b s

G+ b s

G+ b s

s

s

1

1

b s

=⇒ b 1

bs

1

1

s

bs

1

1

1

b 1 =⇒ sb

bs

s

1

1

s

2

bs

s

1

2

2G

G G Z1 or G G G G - G G G G G G - G G

bs

s

1

Compare with equation (2.1a)

3

2G

bs

s

1

3

3G

G G

Similar mathematical form

bs

s

1

=

( ) s

4

1

( ) sA ( )sFsA ( )

bs

1

s

oS iS

3G April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

19

G - G

Recap - Wave Propagation Stability Perspective (2)

1| < 1.

s

G • We see that the infinite series that constitute the steady-state incident (a1) and reflected (b1) waves at Port 1 will only converge provided |G

1 | > 1.

s

• These sinusoidal waves correspond to the voltage and current at the Port 1. If the waves are unbounded it means the corresponding sinusoidal voltage and current at the Port 1 will grow larger as time progresses, indicating oscillation start-up condition. G

• Therefore oscillation will occur when |G • Similar argument can be applied to port 2 since the signals at Port 1

2 | > 1.

L

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

20

10

G and 2 are related to each other in a two-port network, and we see that the condition for oscillation at Port 2 is |G

Oscillation from Negative Resistance Perspective (1)

• Generally it is more useful to work with impedance (or admittance) when designing actual circuit.

0). • • Furthermore for practical purpose the transmission lines connecting ZL and Zs to the destabilized amplifier are considered very short (length fi In this case the impedance Zo is ambiguous (since there is no transmission line).

Very short Tline

Zs

Z1

Zo

Destabilized Amp. and Load

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

21

Z @

sZ

Z @

1Z

• To avoid this ambiguity, let us ignore the transmission line and examine the condition for oscillation phenomena in terms of terminal impedance.

Oscillation from Negative Resistance Perspective (2)

Amplifier with load ZL

Zs

Z1

jXs

jX1

Z2

ZL

V

Vamp

Source Network

Rs

R1

Port 2

Port 1

• We consider Port 1 as shown, with the source network and input of the amplifier being modeled by impedance or series networks.

1

• Using circuit theory the voltage at Port 1 can be written as:

(3.1)

=

=

V

V

s

V s

+ R 1 +

+

+

)

Z 1 +

jX ( Xj

R

Z

1

R 1

s

s

s

X Z 1  2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

April 2012

22

11

(cid:215)

Oscillation from Negative Resistance Perspective (3)

Zs

Z1

L1

Cs

Z2

ZL

V

Vamp

Rs

R1

Vs

=

• Furthermore we assume the source network Zs is a series RC network and the equivalent circuit looking into the amplifier Port 1 is a series RL network.

(cid:215)

(3.2a)

( ) sV

( )sV

s

+

1

1 sC

s

where

(3.2b)

sL 1 sL 1 w j

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

23

• Using Laplace Transform, (3.1) is written as: + R 1 + + RR s += s s

Oscillation from Negative Resistance Perspective (4)

=

=

• The expression for V(s) can be written in the “standard” form according

( ) s

2

(cid:215)

(3.3a)

s

) sL ) 1 +

( R s 1 w + 2

sC 2 s

) + w sL 1 d w + s

s

n

2 n 2 n

V V s

1 CL 1

s

s

+ RR 1

d

=

=

=

=

w Damping Factor

Natural Frequency

where

n

L 1

1 CL 1

s

to Control Theory [8]: ( + 1 Rs ( 1 + + RR L s 1 1 L 1

(3.3b)

2

C

s

-=

w

d

p1, p2 given by: • The transfer function V(s)/Vs(s) is thus a 2nd order system with two poles dw - –

(3.4)

12

p 2,1

n

n

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

24

12

is negative. This is • Observe that if (R1 + Rs) < 0 the damping factor d true if R1 is negative, and |R1| > Rs. • R1 can be made negative by modifying the amplifier circuit (e.g. adding local positive feedback), producing the sum R1 + Rs < 0.

Oscillation from Negative Resistance Perspective (5)

d

w

12 -

n

• Assuming |d |<1 (under-damped), the poles as in (3.4) will be complex and exist at the right-hand side of the complex plane. • From Control Theory such a system is unstable. Any small perturbation

Im

v(t)

A small disturbance or impulse ‘starts’ the exponentially growing sinusoid

Complex pole pair

will result in a oscillating signal with frequency that grows exponentially.

+

<

0

Rs

|1 R w

o

t

Re

0

·

Complex Plane

Time Domain

·

25

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

• Usually a transient or noise signal from the environment will contain a small component at the oscillation frequency. This forms the ‘seed’ in which the oscillation builts up.

Oscillation from Negative Resistance Perspective (6)

• When the signal amplitude builds up, nonlinear effects such as transistor saturation and cut-off will occur, this limits the b of the transistor and finally limits the amplitude of the oscillating signal. • The effect of decreasing b of the transistor is a reduction in the

–=

w

j

n

n,

2

w

w

=⇒=

=0 d o corresponds to w X

X

w

L 1

n

1

s

1 C sn

s

n =

p 2,1 • The steady-state oscillation frequency w ⇒= 1 CL 1 +⇒ X

0

1

sX

w

o

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

26

13

fi magnitude of R1 (remember R1 is negative). Thus the damping factor d 0. will approach 0, since Rs+ R1 • Steady-state sinusoidal oscillation is achieved when d =0, or equivalently the poles become

Oscillation from Negative Resistance Perspective (7)

• From (3.3b), we observe that the steady-state oscillation frequency is determined by L1 and Cs, in other words, X1 and Xs respectively. • Since the voltages at Port 1 and Port 2 are related, if oscillation occur at Port 1, then oscillation will also occur at Port 2. • From this brief discussion, we use RC and RL networks for the source

+

<

+

=

0

w

Rs

R |1

o

o

=

+

0 =

+

0

X

0

and amplifier input respectively, however we can distill the more general requirements for oscillation to start-up and achieve steady- state operation for series representation in terms of resistance and reactance:

(3.5a) (3.5b)

X s

o

(3.6a) (3.6b)

|1 w o Start-up

Rs |1 R w X s X |1 w Steady-state

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

27

Illustration of Oscillation Start-Up and Steady-State

1.4

1.2

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0

-0. 2

-0. 4

-0. 6

-0. 8

0

10

2 0

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

10 0

110

120

Zs

Z1

Steady-state

R1+Rs

Oscillation start-up

ZL

Zs

0

Destabilized Amplifier

t

We need to note that this is a very simplistic view of oscillators. Oscillators are autonomous non-linear dynamical systems, and the steady-state condition is a form of Limit Cycles.

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

28

14

• The oscillation start-up process and steady-state are illustrated.

Summary of Oscillation Requirements Using Series Network

Zs

Z1

jXs

jX1

Z2

ZL

V

Vamp

Source Network

Rs

R1

Port 2

+

<

+

=

0

w

Rs

R |1

o

o

• By expressing Zs and Z1 in terms of resistance and reactance, we conclude that the requirement for oscillation are.

Port 1 (3.6a)

0 =

+

=

+

0

0

(3.5a) (3.5b)

X s

o

(3.6b)

X |1 w o Start-up

Rs |1 R w |1 X s X w Steady-state

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

29

• A similar expression for Z2 and ZL can also be obtained, but we shall not be concerned with these here.

The Resonator

• The source network Zs is usually called the Resonator, as it is clear that equations (3.5b) and (3.6b) represent the resonance condition between the source network and the amplifier input.

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

30

15

• The design of the resonator is extremely important. • We shall see later that an important parameter of the oscillator, the Phase Noise is dependent on the quality of the resonator.

Summary of Oscillation Requirements Using Parallel Network

Port 1

Z2

V

jBs

G1

ZL

Gs

jB1

Vamp

• If we model the source network and input to the amplifier as parallel networks, the following dual of equations (3.5) and (3.6) are obtained.

<

=

• The start-up and steady-state conditions are:

(3.8a)

0

o

(3.7a)

o

0 =

=

0

0

w

+ GGs |1 w + Bs B |1 w

+ GGs |1 w + Bs B |1

o

(3.8b)

o

(3.7b)

Start-up

Steady-state

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

31

Series or Parallel Representation? (1)

• The question is which to use? Series or parallel network

representation? This is not an easy question to answer as the destabilized amplifier is operating in nonlinear region as oscillator. • Concept of impedance is not valid and our discussion is only an approximation at best. • We can assume series representation, and worked out the

corresponding resonator impedance. If after computer simulation we discover that the actual oscillating frequency is far from our prediction (if there’s any oscillation at all!), then it probably means that the series representation is incorrect, and we should try the parallel representation. • Another clue to whether series or parallel representation is more

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

32

16

accurate is to observe the current and voltage in the resonator. For series circuit the current is near sinusoidal, where as for parallel circuit it is the voltage that is sinusoidal.

Series or Parallel Representation? (2)

• Reference [7] illustrates another effective alternative, by computing the large-signal S11 of Port 1 (with respect to Zo) using CAD software. • 1/S11 is then plotted on a Smith Chart as a function of input signal magnitude at the operating frequency.

• By comparing the locus of 1/S11 as input signal magnitude is gradually increased with the coordinate of constant X or constant B circles on the Smith Chart, we can decide whether series or parallel form approximates Port 1 best.

• We will adopt this approach, but plot S11 instead of 1/S11. This will be illustrated in the examples in next section. • Do note that there are other reasons that can cause the actual

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

33

oscillation frequency to deviate a lot from prediction, such as frequency stability issue (see [1] and [7]).

4.0 Fixed Frequency Negative Resistance Oscillator Design

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

34

17

Procedures of Designing Fixed Frequency Oscillator (1)

o and extract S-

• Step 1 - Design a transistor/FET amplifier circuit. • Step 2 - Make the circuit unstable by adding positive feedback at radio frequency, for instance, adding series inductor at the base for common- base configuration. • Step 3 - Determine the frequency of oscillation w parameters at that frequency.

L in the unstable region.

• Step 4 – With the aid of Smith Chart and Load Stability Circle, make R1 < 0 by selecting G • Step 5 (Optional) – Perform a large-signal analysis (e.g. Harmonic

Balance analysis) and plot large-signal S11 versus input magnitude on Smith Chart. Decide whether series or parallel form to use.

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

35

• Step 6 - Find Z1 = R1 + jX1 (Assuming series form).

Procedures of Designing Fixed Frequency Oscillator (2)

o. We can

• Step 7 – Find Rs and Xs so that R1 + Rs<0, X1 + Xs=0 at w

use the rule of thumb Rs=(1/3)|R1| to control the harmonics content at steady-state.

• Step 8 - Design the impedance transformation network for Zs and ZL. • Step 9 - Built the circuit or run a computer simulation to verify that the

s in the unstable region so that R2 or G2 is negative at

o .

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

36

18

circuit can indeed starts oscillating when power is connected. • Note: Alternatively we may begin Step 4 using Source Stability Circle, select G w

Making an Amplifier Unstable (1)

• An amplifier can be made unstable by providing some kind of local positive feedback. • Two favorite transistor amplifier configurations used for oscillator

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

37

design are the Common-Base configuration with Base feedback and Common-Emitter configuration with Emitter degeneration.

Making an Amplifier Unstable (2)

At 410MHz

S-PARAMETERS

DC

This is a practical model of an inductor

DC DC1

Base bypass capacitor

SStabCircle

S_Param SP1 Start=410.0 MHz Stop=410.0 MHz Step=2.0 MHz

S_StabCircle S_StabCircle1 SSC=s_stab_circle(S,51)

StabFact

LStabCircle

V_DC SRC1 Vdc=4.5 V

StabFact StabFact1 K=stab_fact(S)

R Rb1 R=10 kOhm

L LC L=330.0 nH R=

L_StabCircle L_StabCircle1 LSC=l_stab_circle(S,51)

Vout

C Cc2 C=10.0 nF

Term Term2 Num=2 Z=50 Ohm

R RLB R=0.77 Ohm

C Cb C=10.0 nF

L LB L=22 nH R=

pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214 Q1

Vin

R Rb2 R=4.7 kOhm

C Cc1 C=10.0 nF

C CLB C=0.17 pF

L LE L=330.0 nH R=

An inductor is added in series with the bypass capacitor on the base terminal of the BJT. This is a form of positive series feedback.

Term Term1 Num=1 Z=50 Ohm

R Re R=100 Ohm

Common Base Configuration

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

38

19

Positive feedback here

Making an Amplifier Unstable (3)

s22 and s11 have magnitude > 1

freq 410.0MHz

K -0.987

freq 410.0MHz

S(1,1) 1.118 / 165.6...

S(1,2) 0.162 / 166.9...

S(2,1) 2.068 / -12.723

S(2,2) 1.154 / -3.535

L Plane

s Plane

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

39

G Unstable Regions G

Making an Amplifier Unstable (4)

S-PARAMETERS

DC

DC DC1

SStabCircle

S_Param SP1 Start=410.0 MHz Stop=410.0 MHz Step=2.0 MHz

S_StabCircle S_StabCircle1 SSC=s_stab_circle(S,51)

StabFact

LStabCircle

V_DC SRC1 Vdc=4.5 V

R Rb1 R=10 kOhm

StabFact StabFact1 K=stab_fact(S)

L LC L=330.0 nH R=

L_StabCircle L_StabCircle1 LSC=l_stab_circle(S,51)

Vout

C Cc2 C=1.0 nF

Term Term2 Num=2 Z=50 Ohm

pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214 Q1

C Cc1 C=1.0 nF

Feedback

C Ce1 C=15.0 pF

R Rb2 R=4.7 kOhm

Term Term1 Num=1 Z=50 Ohm

R Re R=100 Ohm

C Ce2 C=10.0 pF

Common Emitter Configuration

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

40

20

Positive feedback here

Making an Amplifier Unstable (5)

S22 and S11 have magnitude > 1

freq 410.0MHz

K -0.516

S(1,2)

freq 410.0MHz

S(1,1) 3.067 / -47.641

0.251 / 62.636

S(2,1) 6.149 / 176.803

S(2,2) 1.157 / -21.427

L Plane

s Plane

G G

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

41

Unstable Regions

Precautions

• The requirement Rs= (1/3)|R1| is a rule of thumb to provide the excess gain to start up oscillation. • Rs that is too large (near |R1| ) runs the risk of oscillator fails to start up due to component characteristic deviation.

Clipping, a sign of too much nonlinearity

• While Rs that is too small (smaller than (1/3)|R1|) causes too much non- linearity in the circuit, this will result in large harmonic distortion of the output waveform.

V2

t

V2

Rs too small

t

For more discussion about the Rs = (1/3)|R1| rule, and on the sufficient condition for oscillation, see [6], which list further requirements.

Rs too large

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

42

21

G G G

|G

Aid for Oscillator Design - Constant 1| Circle (1)

L to make |G

L | > 1, we would like to know the

L that would result in a specific |G

1 |.

1 |, the range of load reflection coefficient that

L .

D

L

=

1

S

S 11 1

22

L

In choosing a suitable G range of G It turns out that if we fix |G result in this value falls on a circle in the Smith chart for G • The radius and center of this circle can be derived from: G - G G -

1 |:

By fixing |G

1 | and changing G

L .

2

r

+

• Assuming r = |G

=

T

=

r

center

Radius

-

(4.1a)

(4.1b)

S 2

* SD 11 2

2

2

2

* 22 r

21 2

D

S

SS 12 r

22

S

D

22

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

43

- -

G G G

|G

Aid for Oscillator Design - Constant 1| Circle (2)

1 | Circle is extremely useful in helping us to choose a

L that

1 | = 1.5 or larger.

• The Constant |G

2 | Circle can also be plotted for the source

suitable load reflection coefficient. Usually we would choose G would result in |G • Similarly Constant |G

s . See Ref [1] and [2] for details of derivation.

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

44

22

G reflection coefficient. The expressions for center and radius is similar to the case for Constant |G 1 | Circle except we interchange s11 and s22, L and G

Example 4.1 – CB Fixed Frequency Oscillator Design

• load will be connected to the output of the

In this example, the design of a fixed frequency oscillator operating at 410MHz will be demonstrated using BFR92A transistor in SOT23 package. The transistor will be biased in Common-Base configuration. It is assumed that a 50W oscillator. The schematic of the basic amplifier circuit is as shown in the following slide.

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

45

• The design is performed using Agilent’s ADS software, but the author would like to stress that virtually any RF CAD package is suitable for this exercise.

Example 4.1 Cont...

• Step 1 and 2 - DC biasing circuit design and S-parameter extraction.

S-PAR AME T ER S

DC

S t ab F ac t

D C D C1

StabFact StabFact 1 K=st ab_f act (S )

S_Param SP1 Start=410. 0 MH z Stop=410.0 MHz Step=2. 0 MH z

LSt abCircle

V_DC SR C1 Vdc =4.5 V

R Rb1 R=10 kO hm

L LC L=330.0 nH R=

L_St abCircle L_St abCircle1 load_s tabcir=l_s tab_c irc le(S, 51)

C C c 2 C =1. 0 nF

SStabCircle

Term Term 2 Num=2 Z=50 Ohm

S_StabCircle S_StabCircle1 source_s tabc ir=s_st ab_c irc le(S ,51)

C C b C =1.0 nF

L LB L=12. 0 nH R =

pb_phl_BF R 92A_19921214 Q1

R Rb2 R=4.7 kOhm

C C c 1 C =1. 0 nF

L LE L=220.0 nH R=

Port 1

Term Term 1 Num=1 Z=50 O hm

Port 2

Amplifier

R R e R =100 Ohm

L and G

Port 2 - Output

46

LB is chosen care- fully so that the unstable regions in both G s planes are large enough. April 2012

23

Port 1 - Input  2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

Example 4.1 Cont...

freq 410.0MHz

K -0.987

freq 410.0MHz

S(1,1) 1.118 / 165.6...

S(1,2) 0.162 / 166.9...

S(2,1) 2.068 / -12.723

S(2,2) 1.154 / -3.535

Unstable Regions

Load impedance here will result in |G

Source impedance here will result in |G

1| > 1

2| > 1

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

47

Example 4.1 Cont...

L that cause |G

1 | > 1 at 410MHz. We

1 | circles on the G

L plane to assist us in choosing

• Step 3 and 4 - Choosing suitable G

plot a few constant |G a suitable load reflection coefficient.

1 |=1.5

This point is chosen because it is on real line and easily matched.

LSC

1 |=2.0

L = 0.5<0

1 |=2.5

ZL = 150+j0

|G |G G

L Plane

G

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

48

24

|G Note: More difficult to implement load impedance near edges of Smith Chart

Example 4.1 Cont...

• Step 5 – To check whether the input of the destabilized amplifier is

LSSP

Var Eqn

VAR VAR1 Poutv=-10.0

V_DC SRC1 Vdc=4.5 V

Large-signal S-parameter Analysis control in ADS software.

LSSP HB1 Freq[1]=410.0 MHz Order[1]=5 LSSP_FreqAtPort[1]= SweepVar="Poutv" Start=-20 Stop=-5 Step=0.2

L LC L=330.0 nH R=

R RB1 R=10 kOhm

R RL R=150 Ohm

C Cc2 C=1.0 nF

C CB C=1.0 nF

L LB L=12.0 nH R=

pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214 Q1

We are measuring large-signal S11 looking towards here

R RB2 R=4.7 kOhm

C Cc1 C=1.0 nF

L LE L=220.0 nH R=

P_1Tone PORT1 Num=1 Z=50 Ohm P=polar(dbmtow(Poutv),0) Freq=410 MHz

R RE R=100 Ohm

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

49

closer to series or parallel form. We perform large-signal analysis and observe the S11 at the input of the destabilized amplifier.

Example 4.1 Cont...

Compare

Region where R1 or G1 is negative

Direction of S11 as magnitude of P_1tone source is increased

Boundary of Normal Smith Chart

) 1 , 1 (

S

Region where R1 or G1 is positive

Poutv (-20.000 to -5.000)

Locus of S11 versus P_1tone power at 410MHz (from -20 to -5 dBm)

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

50

25

• Compare the locus of S11 and the constant X and constant B circles on the Smith Chart, it is clear the locus is more parallel to the constant X circle. Also the direction of S11 is moving from negative R to positive R as input power level is increased. We conclude the Series form is more appropriate.

Example 4.1 Cont...

D

L -=

+

=

.1

422

j

.0

479

1

L = 0.5<0: S 11 1

L

=

+

Z

.10

257

j

.7

851

o

Z 1

• Step 6 – Using the series form, we find the small-signal input impedance Z1 at 410MHz. So the resonator would also be a series network. • For ZL = 150 or G G - G G -

S 22 G+ 1 1

1 -= 1

X1

R1

G -

=

42.3

R s

R 1

Xs=0: @

X

X

.7

851

s

1

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

51

• Step 7 - Finding the suitable source impedance to fulfill R1 + Rs<0, X1 + 1 3 -= - @

Example 4.1 Cont...

Port 1

Port 2

Zs = 3.42-j7.851

ZL = 150

• The system block diagram:

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

52

26

Common-Base (CB) Amplifier with feedback

Example 4.1 Cont...

Zs= 3.42-j7.851

ZL=150

49.44pF

27.27nH

• Step 5 - Realization of the source and load impedance at 410MHz.

3.42

3.49pF

CB Amplifier

=

851.7

w

1 C

=

=

C

pF

44.49

Impedance transformation network

1 w 851.7

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

53

50 @ 410MHz

Example 4.1 Cont... - Verification Thru Simulation

Vpp = 0.9V V = 0.45V

BFR92A

Power dissipated in the load:

2

=

P L

1 2

V R

L 2

=

=

5.0

025.2

45.0 50

mW 54

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

27

Vpp

Example 4.1 Cont... - Verification Thru Simulation

The waveform is very clean with little harmonic distortion. Although we may have to tune the capacitor Cs to obtain oscillation at 410 MHz.

484 MHz

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

55

• Performing Fourier Analysis on the steady state wave form:

Example 4.1 Cont... – The Prototype

1.4

1.2

1.0

Vbb

0.8

0.6

0.4

V

0.2

0.0

-0.2

Vout

-0.4

Voltage at the base terminal and 50 Ohms load resistor of the fixed frequency oscillator:

-0.6

-0.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

Startup transient

ns

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

56

28

Output port

Example 4.2 – 450 MHz CE Fixed Frequency Oscillator Design

0

0

-100

S-PARAMETERS

-500

i

-200

,

V_DC SRC1 Vdc=3.0 V

-300

-1000

Selection of load resistor as in Example 4.1.

,

S_Param SP1 Start=100.0 MHz Stop=800.0 MHz Step=10.0 MHz

-400

) ) 1 1 ( Z ( l a e r

m a g ( Z ( 1 1 ) )

-1500

L LC L=220.0 nH R=

R RB R=47 kOhm

-500

-600

-2000

R RL R=150 Ohm

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

C Cc2 C=330.0 pF

freq, MHz

DC_Block DC_Block1

pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214 Q1

0.000

0.020

C C1 C=2.2 pF

Term Term1 Num=1 Z=50 Ohm

0.015

i

-0.005

,

0.010

) ) 1 1 ( Y

C C2 C=4.7 pF

R RE R=220 Ohm

,

-0.010

( l a e r

There are simplified expressions to find C1 and C2, see reference [5]. Here we just trial and error to get some reasonable values.

m a g ( Y ( 1 1 ) )

0.005

-0.015

0.000

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Destabilized amplifier

freq, MHz

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

57

• Small-signal AC or S-parameter analysis, to show that R1 or G1 is negative at the intended oscillation frequency of 450 MHz.

Example 4.2 Cont…

LSSP

Var Eqn

VAR VAR1 Poutv=-10.0

V_DC SRC1 Vdc=3.0 V

LSSP HB1 Freq[1]=450.0 MHz Order[1]=7 LSSP_FreqAtPort[1]= Sw eepVar="Poutv" Start=-5 Stop=15 Step=0.2

L LC L=220.0 nH R=

Since the locus of S11 is close in shape to constant X circles, and it indicates R1 goes from negative value to positive values as input power is increased, we use series form to represent the input network looking towards the Base of the amplifier.

R RB R=47 kOhm

S11

R RL R=150 Ohm

C Cc2 C=330.0 pF

DC_Block DC_Block1

) 1

,

pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214 Q1

C C1 C=2.2 pF

1 ( S

Compare

P_1Tone PORT1 Num=1 Z=50 Ohm P=polar(dbmtow (Poutv),0) Freq=450 MHz

C C2 C=4.7 pF

R RE R=220 Ohm

Boundary of Normal Smith Chart

Poutv (-5.000 to 15.000)

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

58

Direction of S11 as magnitude of P_1tone source is increased from -5 to +15 dBm

29

• The large-signal analysis to check for suitable representation.

Example 4.2 Cont…

VtPWL SRC2 V_Tran=pw l(time, 0ns,0V, 2ns,0.1V, 4ns,0V)

1.0

t

TRANSIENT

0.5

V_DC SRC1 Vdc=3.0 V

0.0

Tran Tran1 StopTime=100.0 nsec MaxTimeStep=1.0 nsec

V

vL(t)

,

L V

L LC L=220.0 nH R=

-0.5

R RB R=47 kOhm

VC

VL

-1.0

R RL R=150 Ohm

VB

C Cc2 C=330.0 pF

-1.5

0

20

40

60

80

100

C Cc1 C=1.0 nF

pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214 Q1

time, nsec

C C1 C=2.2 pF

L L1 L=39.0 nH R=10

Eqn VfL=fs(VL)

m1 450.0MHz freq= mag(VfL)=0.733

m1

0.8

0.6

C C2 C=4.7 pF

R RE R=220 Ohm

|VL(f)|

) L f V

0.4

( g a m

Large coupling capacitor

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

59

freq, GHz

• Using a series RL for the resonator, and performing time-domain simulation to verify that the circuit will oscillate.

Example 4.3 – Parallel Representation

Var Eqn

LSSP

VAR VAR5 Poutv=1.0 fo=2300

LSSP HB1 Freq[1]=fo MHz Order[1]=8 LSSP_FreqAtPort[1]=fo MHz SweepVar="Poutv" Start=-7 Stop=12 Step=0.2

C Cdec1 C=100.0 pF

V_DC VCC Vdc=3.3 V

L LC L=2 nH R=0.2

) 1

,

1 (

R RB1 R=1000 Ohm

S

S11

C Cc2 C=1.0 pF pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214 Q1

R RL R=50 Ohm

Compare

C Cc1 C=1.2 pF

Direction of S11 as magnitude of P_1tone source is increased from -7 to +12 dBm

C C1 C=0.6 pF {t}

P_1Tone PORT1 Num=1 Z=50 Ohm P=polar(dbmtow(Poutv),0) Freq=fo MHz

R RB2 R=1000 Ohm

Poutv (-7.000 to 12.000)

R RE R=100 Ohm

C C2 C=0.7 pF {t}

S11 versus Input power

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

60

30

• An example where the network looking into the Base of the destabilized amplifier is more appropriate as parallel RC network.

Frequency Stability

• The process of oscillation depends on the non-linear behavior of the negative-resistance network.

• The conditions discussed, e.g. equations (3.1), (3.8), (3.9), (3.10) and (3.11) are not enough to guarantee a stable state of oscillation. In particular, stability requires that any perturbation in current, voltage and frequency will be damped out, allowing the oscillator to return to it’s initial state.

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

61

• The stability of oscillation can be expressed in terms of the partial derivative of the sum Zin + Zs or Yin + Ys of the input port (or output port). • The discussion is beyond the scope of this chapter for now, and the reader should refer to [1] and [7] for the concepts.

Some Steps to Improve Oscillator Performance

• To improve the frequency stability of the oscillator, the following steps can be taken. • Use components with known temperature coefficients, especially capacitors. • Neutralize, or swamp-out with resistors, the effects of active device variations due to temperature, power supply and circuit load changes.

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

62

31

• Operate the oscillator on lower power. • Reduce noise, use shielding, AGC (automatic gain control) and bias- line filtering. • Use an oven or temperature compensating circuitry (such as thermistor). • Use differential oscillator architecture (see [4] and [7]).

Extra References for This Section

• Some recommended journal papers on frequency stability of oscillator: • Kurokawa K., “Some basic characteristics of broadband negative

resistance oscillator circuits”, Bell System Technical Journal, pp. 1937- 1955, 1969. • Nguyen N.M., Meyer R.G., “Start-up and frequency stability in high-

frequency oscillators”,IEEE journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol 27, no. 5 pp.810-819, 1992.

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

63

• Grebennikov A. V., “Stability of negative resistance oscillator circuits”, International journal of Electronic Engineering Education, Vol. 36, pp. 242-254, 1999.

Reconciliation Between Feedback and Negative Resistance Oscillator Perspectives

V_DC VCC Vdc=3.0 V

V_DC VCC Vdc=3.0 V

Negative Resistance Oscillator

Amplifier

L LC L=2.2 nH {t} R=0.2

L LC L=2.2 nH {t} R=0.2

R RB1 R=10000 Ohm {t}

VL

VL

R RB1 R=10000 Ohm {t}

C Cc2 C=1.0 pF

R RL R=50 Ohm

C Cc2 C=1.0 pF

pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214 Q1

R RL R=50 Ohm

R RE R=100 Ohm {t}

pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214 Q1

C Cc1 C=4.7 pF

C C1 C=1.0 pF {t}

L L1 L=15.0 nH {t} R=0.1

C Cc1 C=4.7 pF

C C1 C=1.0 pF {t}

C C2 C=0.8 pF {t}

C C2 C=0.8 pF {t}

R RE R=100 Ohm {t}

Feedback Network

L L1 L=15.0 nH {t} R=0.1

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

64

32

It must be emphasized that the circuit we obtained using negative resistance approach can be cast into the familiar feedback form. For instance an oscillator circuit similar to Example 4.2 can be redrawn as:

5.0 Voltage Controlled Oscillator

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

65

About the Voltage Controlled Oscillator (VCO) (1)

• A simple transistor VCO using Clapp-Gouriet or CE configuration will be designed to illustrate the principles of VCO. • The transistor chosen for the job is BFR92A, a wide-band NPN transistor which comes in SOT-23 package. • Similar concepts as in the design of fixed-frequency oscillators are

employed. Where we design the biasing of the transistor, destabilize the network and carefully choose a load so that from the input port (Port 1), the oscillator circuit has an impedance (assuming series representation is valid):

)

)

( w

=

( w

+

)w (

jX

R 1

1

Z 1

1 to w

2.

Lower

Upper

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

66

33

• Of which R1 is negative, for a range of frequencies from w

About the Voltage Controlled Oscillator (VCO) (2)

Clapp-Gouriet Oscillator Circuit with Load

Zs ZL

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

67

Z1 = R1 + jX1

About the Voltage Controlled Oscillator (VCO) (3)

1 to w

2:

=

+

jX

R

Z

)

( w

( w

=

( w ( w

) )

) )

s ( w

<

If we can connect a source impedance Zs to the input port, such that within a range of frequencies from w ( w s ( w

)

X

X s

1

R 1

s Rs

R 1

)w ( ) 0 < • The circuit will oscillate within this range of frequencies. By changing

The rationale is that only the initial spectral of the noise signal fulfilling Xs = X1 will start the oscillation.

the value of Xs, one can change the oscillation frequency.

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

68

34

• • For example, if X1 is positive, then Xs must be negative, and it can be generated by a series capacitor. By changing the capacitance, one can change the oscillation frequency of the circuit. If X1 is negative, Xs must be positive. A variable capacitor in series with a suitable inductor will allow us to adjust the value of Xs.

Schematic of the VCO

T R ANS IE NT

P ARAM ET ER SWEEP

DC

D C D C1

Initial noise source to start the oscillation

Tran Tran1 StopTim e=100. 0 ns ec MaxTimeS tep=1.2 nsec

VtP WL Vtrig V_Tran=pwl(t ime, 0ns , 0V, 1ns,0. 01V, 2ns ,0V)

t

L Lc L=220.0 nH R=

R Rb R=47 k Ohm

V ar E qn

ParamSweep Sweep1 SweepVar="R load" SimI ns tanc eNam e[1] ="Tran1" SimI ns tanc eNam e[2] = SimI ns tanc eNam e[3] = SimI ns tanc eNam e[4] = SimI ns tanc eNam e[5] = SimI ns tanc eNam e[6] = St art=100 St op=700 St ep=100

VAR VAR 1 X=1. 0 R load=100

V_DC Vcc Vdc =3.0 V

R Rout R=50 O hm

C C c2 C =330. 0 pF

L L2 L=47. 0 nH R =

R RL R=Rload

pb_phl_BF R92A_19921214 Q1

C Cb1 C=2. 2 pF

Variable capacitance tuning network

C Cb3 C=4. 7 pF

R Re R=220 O hm

C Cb2 C=10. 0 pF

di_s ms _bas 40_19930908 D1

R R1 R=4700 Ohm

V _D C S RC1 V dc=-1.5 V

2-port network

C C b4 C =4.7 pF

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

69

More on the Schematic

• L2 together with Cb3, Cb4 and the junction capacitance of D1 can produce a range of reactance value, from negative to positive. Together these components form the frequency determining network. • Cb4 is optional, it is used to introduce a capacitive offset to the junction capacitance of D1. • R1 is used to isolate the control voltage Vdc from the frequency

determining network. It must be a high quality SMD resistor. The effectiveness of isolation can be improved by adding a RF choke in series with R1 and a shunt capacitor at the control voltage. • Notice that the frequency determining network has no actual

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

70

35

resistance to counter the effect of |R1(w )|. This is provided by the loss resistance of L2 and the junction resistance of D1.

Time Domain Result

1.0

0.5

0.0

-0.5

-1.0

-1.5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Vout when Vdc = -1.5V

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

71

Load-Pull Experiment

5

4

3

Vout(pp)

2

1

100

200

300

500

600

700

800

400 RLoad

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

72

36

• Peak-to-peak output voltage versus Rload for Vdc = -1.5V.

Controlling Harmonic Distortion (1)

• Since the resistance in the frequency determining network is too small,

Vout

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

73

large amount of non-linearity is needed to limit the output voltage waveform, as shown below there is a lot of distortion.

Controlling Harmonic Distortion (2)

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

74

37

• The distortion generates substantial amount of higher harmonics. • This can be reduced by decreasing the positive feedback, by adding a small capacitance across the collector and base of transistor Q1. This is shown in the next slide.

Controlling Harmonic Distortion (3)

TRANSIENT

DC

Capacitor to control positive feedback

DC DC1

Tran Tran1 StopTime=280.0 nsec MaxTimeStep=1.2 nsec

VtPWL Vtrig V_Tran=pwl(time, 0ns, 0V, 1ns,0.01V, 2ns,0V)

t

L Lc L=220.0 nH R=

R Rb R=47 kOhm

I_Probe Iload

I_Probe IC

R Rout R=50 Ohm

C Cc2 C=330.0 pF

V_DC Vcc Vdc=3.0 V

C Ccb C=1.0 pF

L L2 L=47.0 nH R =

R RL R=50 Ohm

C Cb1 C=6.8 pF

pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214 Q1

The observant person would probably notice that we can also reduce the harmonic distortion by introducing a series resistance in the tuning network. However this is not advisable as the phase noise at the oscillator’s output will increase ( more about this later).

C Cb3 C=4.7 pF

R Re R=220 Ohm

C Cb2 C=10.0 pF

Control voltage Vcontrol

R R1 R=4700 Ohm

V_DC SRC1 Vdc=0.5 V

di_sms_bas40_19930908 D1 C Cb4 C=0.7 pF

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

75

Controlling Harmonic Distortion (4)

Vout

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

76

38

• The output waveform Vout after this modification is shown below:

Controlling Harmonic Distortion (5)

• Finally, it should be noted that we should also add a low-pass filter

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

77

(LPF) at the output of the oscillator to suppress the higher harmonic components. Such LPF is usually called Harmonic Filter. • Since the oscillator is operating in nonlinear mode, care must be taken in designing the LPF. • Another practical design example will illustrate this approach.

The Tuning Range

410

405

f

MHz

D1 is BB149A, a varactor manufactured by Phillips Semiconductor (Now NXP).

400

395

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

Vdc Volts

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

78

39

• Actual measurement is carried out, with the frequency measured using a high bandwidth digital storage oscilloscope.

Phase Noise in Oscillator (1)

• Since the oscillator output is periodic. In frequency domain we would

=

( w

q ++

q

( ) t

( + mV

v

( ) ) t

cos

t

)t ( )

o

osc

noise

noise

expect a series of harmonics. In a practical oscillation system, the instantaneous frequency and magnitude of oscillation are not constant. These will fluctuate as a function of time.

t

f

Ideal oscillator output

fo

2fo

3fo

Smearing

t

Real oscillator output

f

fo

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

79

2fo

3fo

• These random fluctuations are noise, and in frequency domain the effect of the spectra will ‘smear out’.

Phase Noise in Oscillator (2)

Leeson’s expression

T = 1/fo

v(t)

f

o

• Mathematically, we can say that the instantaneous frequency and magnitude of oscillation are not constant. These will fluctuate as a function of time.

[

]2 )

10

log

PML

FkT A

1 Q

8

f

L

offset

t

f

fo

Large phase noise

v(t)

Contains both phase and amplitude modulation of the sinusoidal waveform at frequency fo

t

f

fo

Small phase noise

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

80

40

• As a result, the output in the frequency domain is ‘smeared’ out. ( (cid:215) (cid:215) (cid:181)

Phase Noise in Oscillator (3)

Signal level

q ++

• Typically the magnitude fluctuation is small (or can be minimized) due to the oscillator nonlinear limiting process under steady-state. • Thus the smearing is largely attributed to phase variation and is known as Phase Noise. • Phase noise is measured with respect to the signal level at various

t

)t ( )

V o

v osc

noise

v(t)

- 90dBc/Hz

t

100kHz

f

fo

• Phase noise is measured in dBc/Hz @ foffset. • dBc/Hz stands for dB down from the carrier (the ‘c’) in 1 Hz bandwidth. • For example -90dBc/Hz @ 100kHz offset from a CW sine wave at 2.4GHz.

Assume amplitude limiting effect Of the oscillator reduces amplitude fluctuation

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

81

@ offset frequencies. ( ( ) w q cos t

Reducing Phase Noise (1)

• Requirement 1: The resonator network of an oscillator must have a high

Xtune

Variation in Xtune due to environment causes small change in instantaneous frequency.

X1

X1

Tuning Network with High Q

Tuning Network with Low Q

Q factor. This is an indication of low dissipation loss in the tuning network (See Chapter 3a – impedance transformation network on Q factor). Xtune

f

f

f

f

2D

-X1

|X1|

2D

|X1|

-X1 Ztune = Rtune +jXtune

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

82

41

D D

Reducing Phase Noise (2)

• A Q factor in the tuning network of at least 20 is needed for medium

performance oscillator circuits at UHF. For highly stable oscillator, Q factor of the tuning network must be in excess or 1000.

• We have looked at LC tuning networks, which can give Q factor of up to 40. Ceramic resonator can provide Q factor greater than 500, while piezoelectric crystal can provide Q factor > 10000. • At microwave frequency, the LC tuning networks can be substituted with transmission line sections.

• See R. W. Rhea, “Oscillator design & computer simulation”, 2nd edition 1995, McGraw-Hill, or the book by R.E. Collin for more discussions on Q factor. • Requirement 2: The power supply to the oscillator circuit should also

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

83

be very stable to prevent unwanted amplitude modulation at the oscillator’s output.

Reducing Phase Noise (3)

• Requirement 3: The voltage level of Vcontrol should be stable. • Requirement 4: The circuit has to be properly shielded from electromagnetic interference from other modules. • Requirement 5: Use low noise components in the construction of the

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

84

42

oscillator, e.g. small resistance values, low-loss capacitors and inductors, low-loss PCB dielectric, use discrete components instead of integrated circuits.

Example of Phase Noise from VCOs

VCO output with high phase noise

VCO output with low phase noise

*The spectrum analyzer internal oscillator must of course has a phase noise of an order of magnitude lower than our VCO under test.

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

85

• Comparison of two VCO outputs on a spectrum analyzer*.

More Materials

• This short discussion cannot do justice to the material on phase noise. • For instance the mathematical model of phase noise in oscillator and

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

86

43

the famous Leeson’s equation is not shown here. You can find further discussion in [4], and some material for further readings on this topic: – D. Schere, “The art of phase noise measurement”, Hewlett Packard RF & Microwave Measurement Symposium, 1985. – T. Lee, A. Hajimiri, “The design of low noise oscillators”, Kluwer, 1999.

More on Varactor

• The varactor diode is basically a PN junction optimized for its linear

Vj

Reverse biased

Cj

Linear region

Cjo

Forward biased

• As we increase the negative biasing voltage Vj , Cj decreases, hence the oscillation frequency increases. • The abrupt junction varactor has high Q, but low sensitivity (e.g. Cj varies little over large voltage change). • The hyperabrupt junction varactor has low Q, but higher sensitivity.

Vj

0

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

87

• junction capacitance. It is always operated in the reverse-biased mode to prevent nonlinearity, which generate harmonics.

A Better Variable Capacitor Network

• The back-to-back varactors are commonly employed in a VCO circuit, so that at low Vcontrol, when one of the diode is being affected by the AC voltage, the other is still being reverse biased.

• When a diode is forward biased, the PN junction capacitance becomes

nonlinear.

• The reverse biased diode has smaller junction capacitance, and this dominates

the overall capacitance of the back-to-back varactor network. • This configuration helps to decrease the harmonic distortion.

To negative resistance amplifier

To suppress RF signals

Vcontrol

To suppress RF signals

+

Vcontrol

+ Vcontrol

Symbol for Varactor

At any one time, at least one of the diode will be reverse biased. The junction capacitance of the reverse biased diode will dominate the overall capacitance of the network.

Sep 2013

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

88

44

Example 5.1 – VCO Design for Frequency Synthesizer

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

89

• To design a low power VCO that works from 810 MHz to 910 MHz. • Power supply = 3.0V. • Output power (into 50Ω load) minimum -3.0 dBm.

Example 5.1 Cont…

S-PARAMETERS

DC

DC DC1

S_Param SP1 Start=0.7 GHz Stop=1.0 GHz Step=1.0 MHz

V_DC SRC1 Vdc=3.3 V

b82496c3120j000 LC param=SIMID 0603-C (12 nH +-5%)

R RB R=33 kOhm

100pF_NPO_0603 Cc2

pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214 Q1

4_7pF_NPO_0603 Cc1

2_2pF_NPO_0603 C1

R RL R=100 Ohm

Term Term1 Num=1 Z=50 Ohm

3_3pF_NPO_0603 C2

R RE R=100 Ohm

Z11

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

90

45

• Checking the d.c. biasing and AC simulation.

Example 5.1 Cont…

809.0MHz

775.0MHz

m2 freq= m2=-84.412

m1 freq= m1=-89.579

-40

-50

-60

-70

m2

-80

m1

) ) 1 , 1 ( Z ( l a e r

) ) 1 , 1 ( Z ( g a m

i

-90

-100

-110

-120

0.70

0.72

0.74

0.76

0.78

0.80

0.82

0.84

0.86

0.88

0.90

0.92

0.94

0.96

0.98

1.00

freq, GHz

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

91

• Checking the results – real and imaginary portion of Z1 when output is terminated with ZL = 100Ω.

Example 5.1 Cont…

S-PARAMETERS

PARAMETER SWEEP

Var Eqn

VAR VAR1 Vcontrol=0.2

S_Param SP1 Start=0.7 GHz Stop=1.0 GHz Step=1.0 MHz

ParamSweep Sweep1 SweepVar="Vcontrol" SimInstanceName[1]="SP1" SimInstanceName[2]= SimInstanceName[3]= SimInstanceName[4]= SimInstanceName[5]= SimInstanceName[6]= Start=0.0 Stop=3 Step=0.5

L L1 L=10.0 nH R=

Vvar

C C3 C=0.68 pF

Term Term1 Num=1 Z=50 Ohm

V_DC SRC1 Vdc=Vcontrol V

BB833_SOD323 D1

L L2 L=33.0 nH R= 100pF_NPO_0603 C2

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

92

46

• The resonator design.

Example 5.1 Cont…

-X1 of the destabilized amplifier

120

882.0MHz

100

m1 freq= m1=64.725 Vcontrol=0.000000

80

) ) 1 , 1 ( Z

m1

60

. . c a _ O C V

) ) 1 , 1 ( Z ( g a m

i

40

( g a m

i -

The theoretical tuning range

20

0

Resonator reactance as a function of control voltage

0.70

0.75

0.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

freq, GHz

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

93

• The resonator reactance.

Example 5.1 Cont…

t

TRANSIENT

DC

Low-pass filter

DC DC1

VtPWL Src_trigger V_T ran=pwl(time, 0ns,0V, 1ns,0.1V, 2ns,0V)

Tran Tran1 StopT ime=1000.0 nsec MaxTimeStep=1.0 nsec

V_DC SRC1 Vdc=3.3 V

b82496c3120j000 L3 param=SIMID 0603-C (12 nH +-5%)

R RB R=33 kOhm

b82496c3150j000 L4 param=SIMID 0603-C (15 nH +-5%)

100pF_NPO_0603 Cc2

b82496c3100j000 L1 param=SIMID 0603-C (10 nH +-5%)

pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214 Q1

4_7pF_NPO_0603 Cc1

0_47pF_NPO_0603 C9

C C6 C=2.2 pF

R RL R=100 Ohm

2_7pF_NPO_0603 C8

b82496c3330j000 L2 param=SIMID 0603-C (33 nH +-5%)

C C5 C=0.68 pF

Vvar

BB833_SOD323 D1

C C7 C=3.3 pF

R R1 R=100 Ohm

V_DC SRC2 Vdc=1.2 V

R RE R=100 Ohm

100pF_NPO_0603 C4

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

94

47

• The complete schematic with the harmonic suppression filter.

Example 5.1 Cont…

VCO

Harmonic suppression filter

Fundamental -1.5 dBm

- 30 dBm

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

95

• The prototype and the result captured from a spectrum analyzer (9 kHz to 3 GHz).

Example 5.1 Cont…

-0.42 dBm

Span = 500 kHz RBW = 300 Hz VBW = 300 Hz

300Hz

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

96

48

• Examining the phase noise of the oscillator (of course the accuracy is limited by the stability of the spectrum analyzer used).

Example 5.1 Cont…

V_DC SRC1 Vdc=3.3 V

b82496c3120j000 L3 param=SIMID 0603-C (12 nH +-5%)

R RB R=33 kOhm

b82496c3150j000 L4 param=SIMID 0603-C (15 nH +-5%)

100pF_NPO_0603 Cc2

b82496c3100j000 L1 param=SIMID 0603-C (10 nH +-5%)

Variable power supply

R Rattn R=50 Ohm

Spectrum Analyzer

Port Vout Num=2

pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214 Q1

4_7pF_NPO_0603 Cc1

0_47pF_NPO_0603 C9

C C6 C=2.2 pF

2_7pF_NPO_0603 C8

C C5 C=0.68 pF

Vvar

BB833_SOD323 D1

C C7 C=3.3 pF

R Rcontrol R=1000 Ohm

Port Vcontrol Num=1

R RE R=100 Ohm

April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

97

• VCO gain (ko) measurement setup:

Example 5.1 Cont…

fVCO / MHz

950

900

850

= =

74.40 74.40

MHz/Volt MHz/Volt

@ok @ok

800

55 55 35.1 35.1

MHz MHz Volt Volt

750

Vcontrol/Volts

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

0.0 April 2012

 2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

98

49

• Measured results: