intTypePromotion=1
zunia.vn Tuyển sinh 2024 dành cho Gen-Z zunia.vn zunia.vn
ADSENSE

Dynamic effects of dipolar interactions on the specific loss power of Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4

Chia sẻ: Minh Vũ | Ngày: | Loại File: PDF | Số trang:9

7
lượt xem
2
download
 
  Download Vui lòng tải xuống để xem tài liệu đầy đủ

In this work, isothermal magnetization and initial dc susceptibility of spheroidal, nearly monodisperse Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 nanoparticles (typical diameter: 20 nm) prepared by a hydrothermal route have been measured between 10 and 300 K. The high-temperature inverse magnetic susceptibility was always found to follow a linearly temperature dependence. The deviation from the standard superparamagnetic behavior is related to dipolar interaction among nanoparticles.

Chủ đề:
Lưu

Nội dung Text: Dynamic effects of dipolar interactions on the specific loss power of Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4

Vietnam Journal of Science and Technology 56 (1A) (2018) 50-58<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> DYNAMIC EFFECTS OF DIPOLAR INTERACTIONS ON THE<br /> SPECIFIC LOSS POWER OF Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4<br /> <br /> Pham Hong Nam1, 2, *, Luong Le Uyen3, Doan Minh Thuy3, Do Hung Manh1,<br /> Pham Thanh Phong4, 5, Nguyen Xuan Phuc1<br /> <br /> 1<br /> Graduate University of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet Road, Cau Giay,<br /> Ha Noi, Viet Nam<br /> 2<br /> Institute of Materials Science, VAST, 18-Hoang Quoc Viet Road, Cau Giay, Ha noi, Viet Nam<br /> 3<br /> Department of Physics, Quy Nhon University; Binh Dinh Province, Viet Nam<br /> 4<br /> Theoretical Physics Research Group, Advanced Institute of Materials Science,<br /> Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam<br /> 5<br /> Faculty of Applied Sciences, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam<br /> <br /> *<br /> Email: namph.ims@gmail.com<br /> <br /> Received: 15 August 2017; Accepted for publication: 20 February 2018<br /> <br /> ABSTRACT<br /> <br /> In this work, isothermal magnetization and initial dc susceptibility of spheroidal, nearly<br /> monodisperse Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 nanoparticles (typical diameter: 20 nm) prepared by a<br /> hydrothermal route have been measured between 10 and 300 K. The high-temperature inverse<br /> magnetic susceptibility was always found to follow a linearly temperature dependence. The<br /> deviation from the standard superparamagnetic behavior is related to dipolar interaction among<br /> nanoparticles. The results are well explained using interacting superparamagnetic model, which<br /> is basically a mean field theory. As a consequence, the dipolar interaction affected the specific<br /> loss power of Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4<br /> <br /> Keywords: magnetic nanoparticles, interacting superparamagnetic model, spinel.<br /> <br /> 1. INTRODUCTION<br /> <br /> In recent years, magnetic fluid hyperthermia (MFH) therapy has been considered as a<br /> promising therapy for cancer treatment [1]. In the MFH therapy, energy dissipated from<br /> magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) in an alternating magnetic field can be used to locally raise the<br /> temperature more above physiological temperature (37oC), in targeted tumor tissues, thereby<br /> destroying them without harm to surrounding healthy tissue [2]. The large specific loss power<br /> (SLP) is the key required characteristic for clinical hyperthermia. The magnetic fluid containing<br /> MNPs with large SLP can minimize the dose of MNPs, which applied to the patient body, while<br /> maintaining enough heat to kill the cancer cell. Zinc ferrite (ZnFe2O4) and manganese ferrite<br /> (MnFe2O4) nanoparticles are among the most biocompatible agents for MFH. These particles are<br /> Dynamic effects of dipolar interactions on the specific loss power of Mn 0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> typically coated with a biocompatible polymer to prevent their aggregation and biodegradation<br /> for in vivo applications [3]. Up to now, theoretical descriptions of magnetic fluids are based on<br /> models consisting of non-interacting particles [4]. Therefore, such behavior has typically been<br /> not observed experimentally in both suspension [5] and biological systems [6]. In the absence of<br /> magnetic fields, interparticle interactions can produce clustering and formation of structures in<br /> suspension [4]. In fact, influence of dipolar interactions on the heating capacity is not so clear<br /> and apparently contradictory results have been reported [7]. The experimental studies regarding<br /> an increase [6], a decrease [8] or a non-monotonic [4] variation of SLP with dipolar interactions<br /> have been reported. From the point of view of theory, most theoretical works agree that SLP<br /> tend to decrease in the presence of strong interactions [4] although a limited increase in a<br /> restricted range of MNPs concentration has also been reported [8]. One of the existing<br /> approaches is the interacting superparamagnetic (ISP) model [9], which is particularly suitable to<br /> account for the effect of dipolar interactions on otherwise superparamagnetic nanoparticles. In<br /> this work, we show that the dynamical aspects of dipolar interaction actually play a major role<br /> on the specific loss power of Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 nanoparticles.<br /> <br /> 2. EXPERIMENTAL<br /> <br /> Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 nanoparticles (NPs) having mean diameter of about 20 nm were prepared<br /> by a hydrothermal process employing a Teflon lined stainless steel autoclave. More detailed<br /> information on the synthesis of Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 NPs is available in ref. [10]. FeCl3, MnCl2,<br /> ZnCl2, HCl and NaOH (Merck 99.9 %) were used as received. The FeCl3, MnCl2, and ZnCl2<br /> were dissolved in aqueous hydrochloric acid solution, and then the sodium hydroxide was<br /> slowly added into the solution. The reaction mixture was stirred for about 30 min. Finally, the<br /> solution was transferred into a Teflon lined stainless-steel autoclave with a filling degree of<br /> 80 %. After heating at 180oC for 12 h, the autoclave was cooled down to room temperature. The<br /> products were washed several times with hot de-ionized water and acetone and finally dried in<br /> an oven at 80 oC for 5 h. A X-ray diffractometer (XRD) D 5000 with CuK ( = 0.15406 nm)<br /> radiation was used to determine crystal structure and to estimate grain sizes of the samples. The<br /> particle size of sample was determined by using X-ray diffraction and transmission electron<br /> microscopy (TEM) (JEOL, JEM-1010). All magnetic measurements were carried out on<br /> Quantum Design Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS) system. A homemade unit, in<br /> which a RDO generator produced AC magnetic field with the amplitude in the range 50 – 80 Oe<br /> at a fixed frequency of 178 kHz, was utilized to measure the magnetic inductive heating of<br /> Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4. The temperature change of the fluid was directly monitored by dipping an<br /> optical sensor into the fluid. The concentrations of the fluid, NPs dispersed in water, were 3<br /> mg/mL, 5 mg/mL and 7 mg/mL.<br /> <br /> 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br /> <br /> The XRD pattern of Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 nanoparticles is shown in Fig. 1 where clear peaks<br /> corresponding to Bragg diffraction from (220), (311), (222) (400), (422), (333), (440), (620) and<br /> (533) planes. It is well concord with standard JCPDS (No. 10-0319). No other oxide (Fe2O3) or<br /> impurity peaks were observed which infers the phase purity of the Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4. In addition,<br /> the calculated lattice constant of 8.430 Å reveals the cubic structure of Mn 0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4. Using<br /> Scherrer’s equation, the calculated crystallite size is 20 nm for the high intensity (311) plane.<br /> The size, shape and morphologies of the Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 nanoparticles were further determined<br /> <br /> <br /> 51<br /> Pham Hong Nam, Luong Le Uyen, Doan Minh Thuy, Do Hung Manh, Pham Thanh Phong, Nguyen Xuan Phuc<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> by TEM. The TEM image (Fig. 2a) evidenced that the particles are having almost spherical in<br /> shape. The mean particle size was estimated to be 20 nm, which is close to that obtained from<br /> the XRD data, suggesting that each particle here is a single nano-crystallite.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> (311)<br /> Intensity (arb. units)<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> (440)<br /> (333)<br /> (220)<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> (400)<br /> <br /> <br /> (422)<br /> (222)<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> (533)<br /> (620)<br /> 20 30 40 50 60 70 80<br /> 2 (degrees)<br /> Figure 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of the Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 sample.<br /> <br /> a) b)<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Figure 2. TEM image and particle size histograms of the Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 sample.<br /> <br /> Figure 3a presents the zero-field-cooled (ZFC) magnetization profile of Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4<br /> nanoparticles under an applied field of 100 Oe. The Curie temperature (TC) was estimated to be<br /> 450 K. It should be noticed that TC value of our sample are much higher than the reported TC<br /> value of its bulk counterpart (343 K) [11]. However, no finding the appearance of blocking<br /> temperature (TB) in sample, which can be due to the existence of strong interparticle interactions<br /> origin from the multi-domain behavior of the sample. Therefore, to test this hypothesis of our<br /> system, we have estimated critical diameter for single domain by following equation [12],<br /> (1)<br /> in which Dcr is the critical diameter, wp is the energy density of the magnetic domain and Ms is<br /> the spontaneous magnetization. It is clear that the particles can be considered as single domain<br /> when particle size is smaller than Dcr. Because the Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 ferrite is a crystal with a<br /> <br /> <br /> 52<br /> Dynamic effects of dipolar interactions on the specific loss power of Mn 0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> cubic symmetry, the energy density of the magnetic domain can be calculated by following<br /> expression [12]<br /> (2)<br /> where kB is the Boltzmann constant, TC is the Curie temperature, K1 is the magnetocrystalline<br /> anisotropy constant, and a is the crystalline lattice constant. By substituting K1 = 3.8 × 104<br /> erg/cm3 [13], TC = 343 K [10], kB = 1.38 × 10-16 erg/K, and calculated lattice constant a = 8.45 ×<br /> 10-8 cm, we obtained wp = 0.226 erg/cm2. Putting in Ms = 418 G [14] into Eq. (2), Dcr =15.5 nm<br /> is obtained. The fact that this value is smaller than the experimental value (20 nm) indicates the<br /> multi-domain nature of the sample.<br /> <br /> 14<br /> 10 H = 100 Oe -1<br /> 12<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> (Oe g/emu)<br /> 8 10<br /> M (emu/g)<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> (b)<br /> (a) 8<br /> 6<br /> 6<br /> -1<br /> 4 4<br /> <br /> 2 T = 450 K 2<br /> C<br /> 0<br /> 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09<br /> 0 100 200 300 400 500 600<br /> 2 2 2<br /> T (K) T/M (K g/ emu )<br /> s<br /> <br /> Figure 3. The plot of dc magnetization vs. temperature (a) and inverse susceptibility plotted as a function<br /> of the quantity T/Ms2 for Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 sample (b). Straight lines are fits to high-temperature data.<br /> <br /> As known, in paramagnetic regime, where the magnitude of the magnetic moments<br /> associated to magnetic ions does not change with temperature, the physically significant<br /> information can be extracted plotting 1/ as a function of temperature by the Curie-Weiss law<br /> [9]:<br /> (3)<br /> <br /> in which, N is the number of MNPs per unit volume and the saturation magnetization is Ms =<br /> N . This was done in Fig. 3b for our sample. The curve shows that the ideal Curie-Weiss law<br /> correspondence for a linear behavior is indeed measured at high temperature and deviations from<br /> linearity at very low temperatures, which can be ascribed to some type of particle blocking. The<br /> straight line constantly intercept the temperature axis estimating the positive value of θ, implies<br /> a predominant ferromagnetic interaction among magnetic moments. The origin of the<br /> ferromagnetic interaction is attributed to dipolar coupling. Therefore, in this case, it could be of<br /> interest to check for the presence of dipolar interactions between the Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 MNPs to<br /> better predict the magnetic response of this sample. A comprehensive analysis of the possible<br /> presence of dipolar interactions was carried out with the help of a mean-field model, recently<br /> proposed by Allia et al. [9]. The use of this model could allow us to estimate dipolar interactions<br /> at a temperature region, in which the so-called interacting superparamagnetic (ISP) regime<br /> describes the behavior of interacting nanomagnets. It is well-known that in superparamagnetic<br /> nanoparticles, their hysteretic magnetization curves are well described in terms of Langevin<br /> functions and in some cases, the classical ‘‘superparamagnetic’’ scaling law of the reduced<br /> magnetization M/Ms with Ms(H/T) has been approximately observed; at low temperatures,<br /> <br /> <br /> 53<br /> Pham Hong Nam, Luong Le Uyen, Doan Minh Thuy, Do Hung Manh, Pham Thanh Phong, Nguyen Xuan Phuc<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> deviations from the Ms(H/T) law in samples containing chemically homogeneous particles are<br /> usually ascribed to single-particle blocking and of random, collective interactions among<br /> particles [15].<br /> 1.2 1.5<br /> 10 K 10 K<br /> 50 K 50 K<br /> 0.8 100 K<br /> 1 100 K<br /> 150 K 150 K<br /> 0.4 200 K 0.5 200 K<br /> 250 K 250 K fit<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> s<br /> s<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 300 K 300 K<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> M/M<br /> M/M<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 0 0<br /> <br /> -0.4 -0.5<br /> (b)<br /> -0.8 (a) -1<br /> <br /> -1.2 -1.5<br /> -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 -0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0 0.02 0.04 0.06<br /> 4 -1 -1<br /> M (H/T) (10 x erg. g K ) H/M (T.g/emu)<br /> s s<br /> <br /> <br /> Figure 4. Reduced magnetization for Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 sample, measured at seven different temperatures,<br /> and plotted as a function of Ms(H/T) (a) and H/Ms (b). Dark line is the fitting of M(H) curves to a Langevin<br /> function.<br /> <br /> Figure 4 shows the reduced magnetization as a function either of Ms(H/T) (Fig. 4a) and<br /> H/Ms (Fig. 4b). It is clearly that our sample don’t obey the classical ‘‘superparamagnetic’’<br /> scaling law. This analysis confirms the inner coherence of the ISP model. On the other hand, the<br /> ISP model could be used to describe for the real magnetic interaction behavior of<br /> Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 nanoparticles. In the case of magnetic nanoparticles with the interacting<br /> superparamagnetic behavior, the magnetization vs. magnetic field can be described by a<br /> modified Langevin function [9]:<br /> (4)<br /> in which Ms = Nμ is the saturation magnetization, kB is Boltzmann constant, T* is related to the<br /> dipolar energy εD through the relation [9],<br /> (5)<br /> The best fits with Eq. (4) to the data are shown by the lines in Fig. 4b, proving the validity<br /> of the ISP approach. However, in order to gain a deeper insight on this problem, we determined<br /> the value of the effective magnetic anisotropy constant (Keff) from the magnetization data at 10 K<br /> using the law of approach to saturation [16]:<br /> (6)<br /> where Ms is the saturation magnetization, f is the high-field susceptibility, and B is function of<br /> Ms and K, and is given by the following expression [15]:<br /> <br /> (7)<br /> <br /> From the magnetization curves near the saturation region, B may be deduced. Using Eq.<br /> (7), Keff may be calculated from the above expression. The values of Keff is found to be 1.13 x 106<br /> erg/cm3, which is larger than the estimated value for bulk ferrite (8.5 x 105 erg/cm3 [17]). This<br /> increase in the effective anisotropy can be associated with the enhanced surface anisotropies in<br /> <br /> 54<br /> Dynamic effects of dipolar interactions on the specific loss power of Mn 0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> the nanoparticles. A further confirmation of the veracity of the anisotropy constant value was<br /> obtained from the values of Hc at 10 K. For example, for an assembly of noninteracting<br /> randomly oriented single-domain cubic particles the value of coercivity can be determined by<br /> the expression Hc = 0.64Keff/ Ms, while for uniaxial particles Hc = 0.98Keff/Ms. The values of Hc<br /> are 1498 Oe and 2247 Oe by the law of approach to saturation, respectively. Variations with<br /> respect to these theoretical values can be associated, for example, with interparticle interactions<br /> [15].<br /> In order to study the AC magnetic heating characteristic of Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 nanoparticles,<br /> the dependence of the heat generation on altering the applied magnetic fields of the sample was<br /> measured at fixed frequencies of 178 kHz and under different magnetic field amplitudes from 40<br /> to 80 Oe. The strength and frequency of the applied AC magnetic field is chosen so that the<br /> high values of SAR is achieved maintaining the safety limit for application in hyperthermia<br /> treatment (Hf ≤ 5×109 Am‒ 1s‒ 1 ) [7]. The experiments were performed for 25 min with<br /> nanoparticles at three different conentrations, viz. 3.0, 5.0, and 7.0 mg/mL. The Specific<br /> Absorption Rate for the nanoparticles can be determined using the following expression,<br /> (8)<br /> th<br /> where Ci is the specific heat capacity of the i component in ferrofluid, mi is the mass of<br /> component (Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 nanoparticles and water, respectively), m is the mass of the<br /> Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 nanoparticles in ferrofluid and dT/dt is the initial slope of the time dependent of<br /> temperature curve. In these experiments, we used the linear relations in ranges 0 – 5 minutes<br /> intervals in order to calculate dT/dt. The results for temperature rise are shown in Fig. 5. It can<br /> be seen that in low applied field (40, 50 Oe), after about 20 minutes of heating, the temperature<br /> of the sample comes to saturation, however, a sharp increase in temperature is noticed for<br /> higher strength of the applied field. This shows that power loss due to Brownian relaxation<br /> dominates at smaller applied field (40, 50 Oe), while that due to Neel’s relaxation favors<br /> comparatively at larger applied field (60, 70 and 80 Oe). The initial temperature rising rate and<br /> SLP of samples was listed in Tab. 1.<br /> <br /> Table 1. The initial heating rate (dT/dt) and SLP of magnetic fluids at different particles concentration<br /> under applied fields (40 - 80 Oe) at fixed frequency 178 kHz of Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 ferrofluid samples.<br /> <br /> Applied field dT/dt (oC/s) SLP(W/g)<br /> (Oe)<br /> 3 mg/mL 5 mg/mL 7 mg/mL 3 mg/mL 5 mg/mL 7 mg/mL<br /> <br /> 40 0.0033 0.0132 0.0121 4.6 11.1 7.2<br /> 50 0.0131 0.0175 0.0216 18.3 14.6 12.8<br /> 60 0.0227 0.0319 0.0422 31.6 26.7 25.2<br /> 70 0.0338 0.0479 0.0527 47.1 40.2 31.5<br /> <br /> 80 0.0421 0.0545 0.0625 58.7 45.6 37.3<br /> <br /> As can be seen from Table 1, values of dT/dt for Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 NPs fluids increases as<br /> almost a linear trend with the ferrite concentration. In addition, it is interesting that when<br /> increasing Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 NPs concentration in fluids, the SLP values light decrease, which<br /> could be related to effect of interparticle interactions. To analyze the effect of dipolar interaction<br /> <br /> <br /> 55<br /> Pham Hong Nam, Luong Le Uyen, Doan Minh Thuy, Do Hung Manh, Pham Thanh Phong, Nguyen Xuan Phuc<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> between colloidal clusters on the SLP of magnetic fluids, we focus on fluids with low<br /> aggregation. As shown in Table 1, the highest SAR value is 58.7 W/g for Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 NPs<br /> fluids with concentration of 3 mg/mL and decreasing with the increasing of Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 NPs<br /> concentration. The increasing of SLP value when decreasing concentration of Mn 0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4<br /> NPs fluids was revealed in the recent report of Presa et al. [18]. They suggest that magnetic<br /> interactions take place inside a particle (magnetic cluster) seem to be responsible for the<br /> changing of SLP value. For superparamagnetic fluids, hysterisis is vanished, SLP value was<br /> dominated by Néel and Brown relaxation loss. The particle-particle interactions strongly effect<br /> on the Néel relaxation time of heating dissipation, resluting in decreasing SLP value when<br /> increasing strengh of interactions [19, 20]. In our case, we may imply that the heating capacity<br /> was effected by the interactions between magnetic colloidal clusters. These interactions not only<br /> affect on the relaxation of each moment in Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 particles (Néel relaxation), but also<br /> impact strongly on rotation of each clusters that mean impact on Brownian relaxation loss. When<br /> decreasing Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 concentration the distance between clusters increases and reduces<br /> strength of dipole interactions so that the rotation of clusters smoother that make the Brown<br /> relaxation processes more convenient. At this time the contribution of Brown relaxation loss on<br /> heating dissipation is dominated. The increasing of SLP value with the decreasing<br /> Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 NPs concentration is as consequence of Brown loss contribution. We imply that<br /> magnetic interaction between clusters plays an importance role in heating capacity of magnetic<br /> fluid because it affects directly on Brown loss. The effect of the dipolar interaction on the<br /> specific absorption rate of iron oxide nanoparticles have been described in previous works [21,<br /> 22]. Furthermore, there are also interesting reports on the impact of particle interactions on the<br /> collective behavior of multicore nanoparticles ferrofluids for hyperthermia [23, 24]. The<br /> magnetic ordering and exchange interactions within the multicore nanostructures may lead to<br /> increase a tenfold of SLP for multicore nanoparticle systems with respect to that of single core<br /> materials as recent report of Lartigue et al. [23]. However, further studies are necessary to<br /> describe how magnetic interaction between clusters effect on each heating dissipation loss.<br /> 55 60 80 Oe 70<br /> 80 Oe 80 Oe<br /> 50 70 Oe (a) 55 70 Oe (b) (c)<br /> 60 70 Oe<br /> 60 Oe 60 Oe<br /> 45 50 60 Oe<br /> T ( C)<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 50 Oe 50 Oe<br /> T ( C)<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 45 50 Oe<br /> T ( C)<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 40 Oe 50<br /> o<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 40 Oe<br /> o<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 40 40 Oe<br /> o<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 40<br /> 35 40<br /> 35<br /> 30 30 30<br /> 25 25<br /> 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 0 300 600 900 1200 1500<br /> t (s) t (s) t (s)<br /> Figure 5. (a)–(c) Temperature vs. time curves for Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 nanoparticles with different<br /> concentrations (3, 5, and 7 mg/ml). The fixed frequency is 178 kHz and the applied fields are 40, 50, 60,<br /> 70 and 80 Oe.<br /> <br /> <br /> 4. CONCLUSION<br /> <br /> In summary, we studied the role of the magnetic interaction between magnetic clusters on<br /> heating dissipation of magnetic fluid of prepared Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 nanoparticles in an alternating<br /> field. Our results implied that magnetic interactions between magnetic clusters affect directly to<br /> the large value of the SLP for Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 fluids. Reducing Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 nanoparticles<br /> concentration in fluid means decreasing dipolar interaction between colloidal particles and help<br /> <br /> <br /> 56<br /> Dynamic effects of dipolar interactions on the specific loss power of Mn 0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> colloidal particles move easier in fluid. Therefore, SAR achieved higher value at lower<br /> concentration. Maximum SAR of 58.7 W/g is achieved in the AC magnetic field of 80 Oe while<br /> the frequency is set to 178 kHz. Thus, these nanoparticles could also be used as effective heat<br /> mediator in AC induction heating.<br /> <br /> Acknowledgement. This study was supported by Vietnam National Foundation for Science and<br /> Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under grant number 103.02-2015.74 and Program of<br /> Development in the field of Physics by 2020 under grant number KHCBVL.03/18-19. The authors are<br /> thankful to Institute of Materials Science, Graduate University of Science and Technology and Ton Duc<br /> Thang University.<br /> <br /> <br /> REFERENCES<br /> <br /> 1. Wu W., He Q. and Jiang C. - Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis and surface<br /> functionalization strategies, Nanoscale Res. Lett. 3 (2008) 397-415.<br /> 2. Khandhar A. P., Ferguson R. M. and Krishnan K. M. - Monodispersed magnetite<br /> nanoparticles optimized for magnetic fluid hyperthermia: Implications in biological<br /> systems, J. Appl. Phys. 109 (2011) 07B310-1-3.<br /> 3. Qu Y., Li J., Ren J., Leng J., Lin C. and Shi D. - Enhanced magnetic fluid hyperthermia by<br /> micellar magnetic nanoclusters composed of Mn(x)Zn(1-x)Fe(2)O(4) nanoparticles for<br /> induced tumor cell apoptosis, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6 (2014) 16867-16879.<br /> 4. Branquinho L. C., Carriao M. S., Costa A. S., Zufelato N., Sousa M. H., Miotto R., Ivkov<br /> R. and Bakuzis A. F. - Effect of magnetic dipolar interactions on nanoparticle heating<br /> efficiency: implications for cancer hyperthermia, Sci. Rep. 3 (2013) 1-10.<br /> 5. Giustini A. J., Ivkov R. and Hoopes P. J. - Magnetic nanoparticle biodistribution following<br /> intratumoral administration, Nanotechnology 22 (2011) 345101-1-5.<br /> 6. Hedayati M., Thomas O., Abubaker-Sharif B., Zhou H., Cornejo C., Zhang Y., Wabler<br /> M., Mihalic J., Gruettner C., Westphal F., Geyh A., Deweese T. L., Ivkov R. – The effect<br /> of cell cluster size on intracellular nanoparticle-mediated hyperthermia: is it possible to<br /> treat microscopic tumors, Nanomedicine 8 (2013) 29-41.<br /> 7. Mehdaoui B., Tan R. P., Meffre A., Carrey J., Lachaize S., Chaudret B. and Respaud M. -<br /> Increase of magnetic hyperthermia efficiency due to dipolar interactions in low-anisotropy<br /> magnetic nanoparticles: Theoretical and experimental results, Phys. Rev. B 87 (2013)<br /> 174419-1-10.<br /> 8. Dennis C. L., Jackson A. J., Borchers J. A., Hoopes P. J., Ivkov R., Foreman A. R., Lau J.<br /> W., Goernitz E. and Gruettner G. - The influence of collective behavior on the magnetic<br /> and heating properties of iron oxide nanoparticles, J. Appl. Phys. 103 (2008) 07A319-1-3.<br /> 9. Allia P. and Tiberto P. - Dynamic effects of dipolar interactions on the magnetic behavior<br /> of magnetite nanoparticles, J. Nanopart. Res. 13 (2011) 7277-7293.<br /> 10. Pham Hong Nam, Tran Dai Lam, Nguyen Xuan Phuc, Do Hung Manh-Effect of Zn<br /> concentration on the magnetic properties and magnetic nductive heating characteristic of<br /> Mn1-xZnxFe2O4 ferrite nanoparticles, Vietnam Journal of Science and Technology 52 (3B)<br /> (2014) 136-143 (in Vietnamese).<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 57<br /> Pham Hong Nam, Luong Le Uyen, Doan Minh Thuy, Do Hung Manh, Pham Thanh Phong, Nguyen Xuan Phuc<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 11. Chandana R., Anand S., Das R. P., Sahu K. K., Kulkarni S. D., Date S. K. and Mishra N.<br /> C. - Dependence on cation distribution of particle size, lattice parameter, and magnetic<br /> properties in nanosize Mn–Zn ferrite, J. Appl. Phys. 91 (2002) 2211-2215.<br /> 12. Caizer C., Stefanescu M., Nanocrystallite size effect on rs and Hc in<br /> nanoparticleassemblies, Physica B 327 (2003) 129–134.<br /> 13. Bozorth R. M., Elizabeth F. T. and Albert J. W. - Anisotropy and Magnetostriction of<br /> Some Ferrites, Phys. Rev. 99 (1955) 1788-1798.<br /> 14. Zheng M., Wu X. C., Zou B. S. and Wang Y. J. - Magnetic properties of nanosized<br /> MnFe2O4 particles, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 183 (1998) 152-156.<br /> 15. Tartaj P., Gonzalez-Carreno T., Bomatı-Miguel O., Serna C. J. and Bonville P. - Magnetic<br /> behavior of superparamagnetic Fe nanocrystals confined inside submicron-sized spherical<br /> silica particles, Phys. Rev. B 69 (2004) 094401-1-8.<br /> 16. Jonsson T., Mattsson J., Djurberg C., Khan F. A., Norblad P. and Svedlindh P. - Aging in<br /> a Magnetic Particle System, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 4138-4141.<br /> 17. Yoon S. and Kannan M. K. - Temperature dependence of magnetic anisotropy constant<br /> in manganese ferrite nanoparticles at low temperature, J. Appl. Phys. 109 (2011) 07B534-<br /> 1-3.<br /> 18. de la Presa P., Luengo Y., Velasco V., Morales M. P, Iglesias M., Veintemillas-Verdaguer<br /> S., Crespo P. and Hernando A. - Particle Interactions in Liquid Magnetic Colloids by<br /> Zero Field Cooled Measurements: Effects on Heating Efficiency, J. Phys. Chem. C 119<br /> (2015) 11022-11030.<br /> 19. Salas G., Camarero J., Cabrera D., Takacs H., Varela M., Ludwig R., Dähring H., Hilger<br /> I., Miranda R, del Puerto Morales M. and Teran F. J. - Modulation of Magnetic Heating<br /> via Dipolar Magnetic Interactions in Monodisperse and Crystalline Iron Oxide<br /> Nanoparticles, J. Phys. Chem. C 118 (2014) 19985-19994.<br /> 20. Piñeiro-Redondo Y., Bañobre-López M., Pardiñas-Blanco I., Goya G., López-Quintela M.<br /> A. and Rivas J. - The influence of colloidal parameters on the specific power absorption of<br /> PAA-coated magnetite nanoparticles, Nanoscale Res. Lett. 6 (2011) 1-7.<br /> 21. Dennis C. L., Jackson A. J., Borchers J. A., Hoopes P. J., Ivkov R., Foreman A. R., Lau J.<br /> W., Goernitz E. and Gruettner G. - The influence of collective behavior on the magnetic<br /> and heating properties of iron oxide nanoparticles, J. Appl. Phys. 103 (2008) 07A319-1-3.<br /> 22. Hauser A. K., Mathias R., Anderson K. W. and Hilt J. Z. - The effects of synthesis method<br /> on the physical and chemical properties of dextran coated iron oxide nanoparticles, Mater.<br /> Chem. Phys. 160 (2015) 177-186.<br /> 23. Lartigue L., Hugounenq P., Alloyeau D., Clarke S. P., Lévy M., Bacri J. C., Bazzi R.,<br /> Brougham D. F., Wilhelm C. and Gazeau F. - Cooperative Organization in Iron Oxide<br /> Multi-Core Nanoparticles Potentiates Their Efficiency as Heating Mediators and MRI<br /> Contrast Agents, ACS Nano 6 (2012) 10935-10949.<br /> 24. Dutz S., Kettering M., Hilger I., Müller R. and Zeisberger M. - Magnetic multicore<br /> nanoparticles for hyperthermia-influence of particle immobilization in tumour tissue on<br /> magnetic properties, Nanotechnology 22 (2011) 265102-1-7.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 58<br />
ADSENSE

CÓ THỂ BẠN MUỐN DOWNLOAD

 

Đồng bộ tài khoản
2=>2