Development of participation banks and evaluation of participation banks in terms of performance: an application in Turkey and Malaysia

Chia sẻ: Huỳnh Ngọc Toàn | Ngày: | Loại File: PDF | Số trang:10

Thêm vào BST

Báo xấu

13
lượt xem 1
download

Download Vui lòng tải xuống để xem tài liệu đầy đủ

Performances of participation banks in the Turkish financial system and performances of participation banks in Malaysia are evaluated within this study, between 2000 and 2015. Relationship between profitability of participation banks and macroeconomic characteristics and indicators peculiar to banks operating in Turkey and Malaysia are examined.

Chủ đề:

Bình luận(0) Đăng nhập để gửi bình luận!

Lưu

Nội dung Text: Development of participation banks and evaluation of participation banks in terms of performance: an application in Turkey and Malaysia

International Journal of Management (IJM) Volume 7, Issue 7, November–December 2016, pp.181–190, Article ID: IJM_07_07_019 Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijm/issues.asp?JType=IJM&VType=7&IType=7 Journal Impact Factor (2016): 8.1920 (Calculated by GISI) www.jifactor.com ISSN Print: 0976-6502 and ISSN Online: 0976-6510 © IAEME Publication DEVELOPMENT OF PARTICIPATION BANKS AND EVALUATION OF PARTICIPATION BANKS IN TERMS OF PERFORMANCE: AN APPLICATION IN TURKEY AND MALAYSIA Eda ORUÇ ERDOĞAN Assistant Professor, Akdeniz University, Business Administration Department, Turkey Abdullahi Mohamed NUR Phd Student, Akdeniz University, Business Administration Department, Turkey ABSTRACT Banks fall within the financial institutions, which play an important role in financial system and effect national economies. Stability of economy is basically based on performances of banks. As traditional banks in financial system are such banks that collect bank deposits or a specified rate of interest from depositors with fund surplus and extend them to those requesting funds in exchange of specified rate of interest, the most important issue differentiating participation banking from traditional banking is that they provide with share instead of interest. Participation banks, which operate based on interest-free basis, become more effective in financial systems day by day. Accordingly, it is an important issue to determine the performances of participation banks. Performances of participation banks in the Turkish financial system and performances of participation banks in Malaysia are evaluated within this study, between 2000 and 2015. Relationship between profitability of participation banks and macroeconomic characteristics and indicators peculiar to banks operating in Turkey and Malaysia are examined. According to the results obtained, it is concluded that capital adequacy, size of bank, management quality and macroeconomic indicators are effective in the Turkish participation banks; management quality, income quality, size of bank, liquidity and macroeconomic indicators are effective in the Malaysian participation banks. Key words: Participation Banks, Financial Ratios, Multiple Regression Analysis Cite this Article: Eda ORUÇ ERDOĞAN and Abdullahi Mohamed NUR. Development of Participation Banks and Evaluation of Participation Banks In Terms of Performance: An Application In Turkey and Malaysia. International Journal of Management, 7(7), 2016, pp. 181– 190.http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/issues.asp?JType=IJM&VType=7&IType=7 http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 181 editor@iaeme.com
Eda ORUÇ ERDOĞAN and Abdullahi Mohamed NUR INTRODUCTION Interest-free banking, which was started to feel its presence at the end of 1960's in the world, found field of activity in many countries by drawing attention with utilization of passive funds and its impact on development. Participation banks came to the fore at the beginning of 1980's and it has approximately 25 years of experience (Eskici, 2007). Participation banks, which became popular in the name of "interest-free banking", emerged as a result of accumulation of substantial savings and utilization need of these savings, mostly in the Gulf countries where Muslim population live. We can find Participation Banks in many countries around the world, which can be incorporated as partnerships and autonomous establishments as a result of "interest-free banking" initiative led by the Islamic development Bank. This kind of institutions exists in countries, where Muslim communities or minorities live. Participation Banks play a supportive role for real sector, preventing underground economy and increasing employment and competition with original methods to include passive funds to financial and banking system by filling this gap with interest-free instruments. By the economic crisis in 2008 which affected the whole world economies, some researches have started for new systems in capital markets, financial services and products. One of the alternative systems, which was seen as a way out of crisis, is "Islamic Finance". The goal of this study is to search how financial performance, factors belonging to the bank and macroeconomic factors of Participation Banks operating in Turkey and Malaysia affect their profitability. This study uses quantitative research methodology. For evaluating the financial performances of such banks, financial ratio scale will be applied. 1. AN OVER VIEW ON PARTICIPATION BANKING The willing of Muslims in the world to maintain their financial activities in accordance with Islamic rules had been the leading motive of emergence of Islamic banking as the most important factor of Islamic finance concept and Islamic financial sector. In general, Participation Banks are institutions providing that people utilize their under-the-mattress savings or domestic and overseas savings else than money (gold, foreign currency etc.) for participating in profit/loss participation (Ayrıçay, Ada and Kaya, 2013). Islamic finance concept is a system that all financial activities and transactions are done in accordance with Islamic rules. Islamic finance, which is considered as an alternative to modern financial understanding since interest is deemed as forbidden by religion, has developed as an alternative field in global finance markets in consideration of recent developments. In this regard, all methods of Islamic finance are based on principles of transactions with no interest and Islamic business ethics (Tekbaş, 2013). Participation banks with the principle of Islamic banking (interest-free banking) play an effective role in forming a market where interest does not exist and commerce methods, which are not against Islamic rules, have control over (Özulucan and Deran, 2009). In other words, essential objective of Participation banking is to bring in foreign capital and financial values, which cannot be added to economy for several reasons, by getting out of them from under-the-mattress with the principles of interest-free finance. At the present time, participation banks aimed at providing with a variety of financial instruments, which are effective in all developed countries' financial markets, and at providing with alternative institutions and tools to uni-dimensional traditional banking system, and at giving various banking services in accordance with Islamic principles. And they achieved that goal albeit partially (Özulucan and Deran, 2009) http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 182 editor@iaeme.com
Development of Participation Banks and Evaluation of Participation Banks In Terms of Performance: An Application In Turkey and Malaysia 2. LITERATURE REVIEW ABOUT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF PARTICIPATION BANKS When literature about Participation Banking is reviewed, it is seen that some of the studies evaluate the performances of Participation Banks, whereas some compare Participation Banks and traditional banking activities or performances. Iqbal (2001) compared the performances of 12 Islamic and traditional banks form nine countries (Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, United Arab Emirates, Bangladesh, Malaysia and Turkey). He examined these banks in terms of profitability, liquidity, risk and capital adequacy in his study, between 1990 and 1998. At the end of his study, he concluded that almost every year, Islamic banks are more productive in terms of liquidity and profitability. Loghod (2010) compared the performances of Islamic and traditional banks, which operate in countries having members in Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf. He found out that there is not a meaningful difference between the performances of Islamic banks and traditional banks. However, it is concluded that credit risk of participation banks are higher than those of traditional banks. Kader and Asarpota (2007) evaluated the performances of Islamic and traditional banks in United Arab Emirates comparatively. At the end of his study, he concluded that for the years of 2006-2007 liquidity and profitability of Islamic banks are higher than those of traditional banks. Ansari and Rehman (2010) compared Islamic banks and traditional banks in Pakistan in terms of profitability, liquidity, credit risk, asset structure. At the end of their study, in which they benefited from data of 2007-2010, they concluded that Islamic banks are less effective than traditional banks. In the study conducted by Aras ve Öztürk (2011), fund allocation shares of participation banks in Turkey were evaluated. It was seen that the fund utilization rate based on profit/loss is low for the periods examined. Bağcı (2013) examined performances of participation banks and conventional banks based on profitability. According to the results, it was concluded that participation banks are more profitable than conventional banks. Jaffar and Manarvi (2011) examined the performances of Islamic and traditional banks in Pakistan, comparatively by using CAMEL analysis method. As a result of the study, they concluded that Islamic banks perform better in terms of liquidity and capital adequacy, on the other hand traditional banks perform better in terms of profitability. Parlakkaya and Çürük (2011) tried to determine whether a distinction can be drawn between participation banks and traditional banks operating in Turkey based on their financial characteristics. As a result of the research, they concluded that participation banks have a higher profitability and risk than those of traditional banks. Nonetheless, they concluded that asset quality indicators and liquidity values are in favor of traditional banks. Esmer and Bağcı (2016) evaluated the financial performance of participated banks. They analysed the 2005-2014 period. And they used several financial indicators to investigated the performance of banks. Onour and Abdalla (2011) used the Data Envelopment Analysis technique to investigate the performance of Islamic banks in Sudan during the 2007-2008 period. As a result of studying on 12 Islamic banks with private capital and public funds, it has been revealed that bank size is an important factor for scale efficiency, as there is no restriction of ownership, management and scale efficiency. Safiullah (2010) evaluated the financial performance of the participation banks for Bangladesh in terms of profitability ratios, liquidity ratios, productivity ratios and economic conditions. According to the results obtained, it was determined that participation banks were more efficient than commercial banks in terms of profitability and liquidity. Moin (2008) compared Pakistan's participation banks with commercial banks and in terms of profitability, liquidity, risk and efficiency and it was concluded that participation banks are less profitable and less efficient compared to commercial banks. http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 183 editor@iaeme.com
Eda ORUÇ ERDOĞAN and Abdullahi Mohamed NUR Samad (2004) examined the performances of Islamic and traditional commercial banks comparatively operating in Bahrain between 1991 and 2001. According to the results of research, he concluded that there is no any important difference between Islamic and traditional banks in terms of profitability and liquidity. Siraj and Pillai (2012) examined the performances of Islamic banks and traditional banks operating in the Gulf Arab States. They concluded that liquidity, deposit increase and growth rate in profitability of Islamic banks are faster. Besides, they concluded that leverage ratio of Islamic banks are higher than those of traditional banks. Parlakkaya and Çürük (2011) examined 24 traditional banks and 4 participation banks operating in Turkey between 2005 and 2008. According to the research results, profitability and liquidity ratios can be used as a distinctive factor between two types of banks. Buğan (2015) aimed at identifying whether participation banks use their sources more effectively compared to traditional banks in his study. Accordingly, activity performances of deposit banks and participation banks operating in Turkey between 2006 and 2012 are measured with the data envelopment analysis. As a result of this analysis, it is concluded that participation bans use their sources more effectively compared to conventional banks. Usman and Khan (2012) evaluated the performances of Islamic and traditional banks in Pakistan comparatively. As a result of the analysis, it is concluded that Islamic banks have a higher growth rate and profitability than those of traditional banks. In addition, writers concluded that liquidity levels of Islamic banks are higher than those of traditional banks. Sakarya and Kaya (2013) try to determine in which fields participation banks differentiate, by analyzing deposit banks and participation banks operating in Turkey, in their study. As a result of the study, including the data between 2005 and 2012, participation banks do not differentiate from other banks in terms of efficiency and profitability as they focus on financial intermediation activities by working with higher resources. 3. DATA AND METHOD Variables of banks, which are compiled to be evaluated in the analysis, were obtained from activity reports of Participation Banks and financial statement tables reached from Bankscope. Macroeconomic variables are gathered from the Global Finance website. 12 banks are evaluated in this research. While 8 of these banks are participation banks operating in Malaysia, 4 of them are participation banks operating in Turkey. Banks included in the analysis are as mentioned in table 1. Evaluation period is concluded as 2000-2015. Table 11 The Banks in Analysis No. Participation Banks in Malaysia Participation Banks in Turkey 1 Affin islamic bank Albaraka Türk Katılım Bankası 2 Bank islam malaysia Bank Asya Katılım 3 Hong Leong bank berhad Küveyt Türk Bank 4 RHB islamic bank berhad Türkiye Finans 5 Ambank islamic berhad 6 CIM islamic bank 7 Public islamic bank 8 SCSB Berhad http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 184 editor@iaeme.com
Development of Participation Banks and Evaluation of Participation Banks In Terms of Performance: An Application In Turkey and Malaysia Dependent variables expressing the performances of banks are return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE). While independent variables specific to banks are capital adequacy, management quality, income quality, liquidity and size of bank; independent variables related to macroeconomic indicators are growth rate of gross domestic product, average annual inflation rate and dummy variable, which represents the periods with economic difficulty. Calculations related to used variables are mentioned in Table 2. Table 2 The Measurement Used in the Study and Explanatory Indicators Dependent Variables Calculating Return on Assets Net Profit / Total Assets (ROA) Return on Equity Net Profit/ Total Equity (ROE) Independent Variables Calculating Capital Adequacy Total Equity/Total Assets (CA) Management Quality Credit/Deposits (MQ) Return Quality Total Expenses/Total Income (RQ) Liquidity Liquid Assets/ Total Assets (LI) Bank Size Natural Logarithm of Total Assets (BS) Macroeconomic Variables Calculating Gross National Product Growth of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Inflation Rate Average Annual Inflation Rate (ENFO) Dummy Variable Crisis Periods (1), None Crisis Periods (0) (D) Below mentioned regression models will be used as determinants of profitability for testing in this study. ROA = β0 + β1 (CA) + β2 (MQ) + β3 (RQ) + β4 (Lİ) + β5 (BS) + β6 (GDP) + β7 (IR) + β8 (D) + ε (Model1) ROE = β0 + β1 (CA) + β2 (MQ) + β3 (RQ) + β4 (LI) + β5 (BS) + β6 (GDP) + β7 (IR) + β8 (D) + ε (Model2) 4. FINDINGS Findings obtained as a result of the models, which were formed to compare the performances of the Malaysian participation Banks operating in Malaysia and performances of the Turkish participation Banks operating in Turkey, are mentioned in Table 3 and Table 4. Hereunder, when variables effecting the performances of participation banks operating in each of the countries are examined, it is seen that meaningful variables for the Turkish participation banks in model 1 are CA, BS, GDP, IR, D; for the Malaysian participation banks are MQ, Lİ, BS, GDP and IR. When relations are evaluated, CA, BS and GNP effects the profitability of the Turkish participation banks positively; ER and D effect the profitability of banks negatively. In the Malaysian participation banks, GDP effects the profitability of banks positively; MQ, Lİ, BS and IR effect profitability of banks negatively. http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 185 editor@iaeme.com
Eda ORUÇ ERDOĞAN and Abdullahi Mohamed NUR Table 3 Regression Analysis Results for Turkey and Malaysian Turkey Malaysian Dependent Variable: ROA Dependent Variable:ROA Variables Coefficient t-statistics p-value Variables Coefficient t-statistics p-value C 0.166078 0.310181 0.7655 C 1.102.384 1.978.159 0.0884 CA 0.232062 2.321.760 0.0433 CA 0.031630 1.111.125 0.3032 MQ -0.006086 -0.978772 0.3603 MQ -0.014278 - 5.738.680 0.0007* RQ -3.84E-07 -0.008711 0.9933 RQ 0.005121 0.249218 0.8103 Lİ 0.117188 1.344.015 0.2209 Lİ -0.141855 -2.709.963 0.0302* BS 0.019351 5.028.961 0.0015* BS 0.001479 2.844.607 0.0249* GDP 0.026994 2.466.670 0.0430* GDP 0.066451 4.497.610 0.0028* IR -0.148083 -3.599.746 0.0087* IR -0.455533 -3.838.865 0.0064* D -4.430.522 -2.729.545 0.0294* D 2.290.313 1.237.387 0.2558 0.880960 R-squared 0.915969 R-squared 0.744914 Adjusted R-squared 0.819934 Adjusted R-squared 1.350.133 S.E. of regression 2.124.405 S.E. of regression 1.276.001 Sum squared resid 3.159.168 Sum squared resid -2.089.283 Log likelihood -2.814.546 Log likelihood 6.475.464 F-statistic 9.537.862 F-statistic 0.011679 Prob(F-statistic) 0.003768 Prob(F-statistic) When Model 2 is examined, MQ and BS Effect the capital profitability of the Turkish participation banks positively; RQ effects the profitability of the Malaysian participation banks negatively, but BS effects profitability of the Malaysian participation banks positively. While the explanatory power of models created for Turkey is respectively 91% and 86%; the explanatory power of models created for Malaysia is respectively 88% and 78%. http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 186 editor@iaeme.com
Development of Participation Banks and Evaluation of Participation Banks In Terms of Performance: An Application In Turkey and Malaysia Table 4 Regression Analysis Results for Turkey and Malaysian Turkey Malaysian Dependent Variable : ROE Dependent Variable: ROE Variables Coefficient t-statistics p-value Variables Coefficient Variables Coefficient C 0.893722 0.220529 0.8318 C 3.570964 3.560586 0.0092 CA 0.093492 0.123581 0.9051 CA -0.154452 -0.301484 0.7718 MQ 0.218448 4.641597 0.0024 MQ 0.010079 0.225111 0.8283 RQ -4.52E-05 -0.135541 0.8960 RQ -1.338965 -3.620573 0.0085* Lİ -0.401187 -0.607893 0.5625 Lİ -1.594071 -1.692135 0.1345 BS 0.086879 2.982989 0.0204* BS 0.027536 2.943296 0.0216 GDP 0.040091 0.484013 0.6432 GDP -0.413114 -1.553666 0.1642 IR -0.046304 -0.148712 0.8860 IR -2.609446 -1.221911 0.2613 D -1.049821 -0.854498 0.4211 D -1.520597 -0.456492 0.6619 R-squared 0.868892 R-squared 0.783081 Adjusted R-squared 0.719053 Adjusted R-squared 0.535173 S.E. of regression 1.607967 S.E. of regression 2.429788 Sum squared resid 1.809891 Sum squared resid 4.132710 Log likelihood -6.053048 Log likelihood -6.713582 F-statistic 5.798865 F-statistic 3.158756 Prob(F-statistic) 0.015878 Prob(F-statistic) 0.007367 When analysis results are evaluated, capital adequacy ratio effects the performance of the Turkish participation banks; accordingly increase in capital of banks will increase the profitability of banks. Relationship concluded for the Turkish participation banks reminds similar results of the study made by Olalekan and Adeyinka, 2013. On the other hand, for the research sample group and period, a meaningful relationship could not be concluded between the performances and capital adequacy ratios of the Malaysian participation banks. When performances of banks and management quality are evaluated, it is seen that there is no any meaningful relationship with ROA in the Turkish participation banks, but there is a meaningful relationship with ROE; it is also seen that there is a negative relationship with ROA in the Malaysian participation banks, but there is no any meaningful relationship with ROE. Obtained results show consistency with the findings of Haroon's (2014) study, which is about a negative relationship between profitability of banks and higher credit rates. Correlation coefficient between expense-income-ratio (RQ) of Islamic banks in Turkey and return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE) is negative and it does not have any statistical importance. On the other hand, correlation coefficient between expense-income-ratio (RQ) and return on assets is positive and it does have a statistical importance; while there is a negative relationship between expense-income- ratio (RQ) and return on equity (ROE), which has 5% statistical importance. This finding shows that increase in expense-income-ratio decreases return on equity (ROE) of the Malaysian Islamic banks, but it is seen that it does not have any impact on return on assets (ROA) in both countries' participation banks. http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 187 editor@iaeme.com
Eda ORUÇ ERDOĞAN and Abdullahi Mohamed NUR While a meaningful relationship between liquidity and profitability of the Turkish Islamic banks could not be concluded; a negative relationship has been concluded between liquidity and profitability in the Malaysian participation banks. Findings about the Malaysian Islamic banks coincide with the findings of previous studies showing that there is a negative relationship between liquidity and profitability (İzhar and Austy, 2007 and Srairi, 2009). There is a positive relationship between size of banks (BS) and return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE) of Islamic banks in Turkey, which has a statistical importance at the level of 5%. Correlation coefficient between size of banks (BS) and return on assets (ROE) of the Malaysian Islamic banks is negative and statistically meaningful. At the same time, there is a positive and meaningful statistical relationship between size of banks and return on assets of the Malaysian Islamic banks. In studies made by Akhavein et al. (1997) and Smirlock (1985), it is mentioned that there is a positive and meaningful relationship between size of banks and profitability. One of the effective variables in profitability of banks in both countries is gross domestic product. Analysis results show that gross domestic product has a positive impact on profitability of participation banks operating in both countries. As a result of increase in gross domestic product, finance actors transfer funds to investment fields by borrowing from banks or using credits. It is seen that profitability of banks increases in these periods. Inflation rate is one of the variables effecting profitability of participation banks of both countries negatively. It is expected that profitability of banks decreases when inflation rate increases. While dummy variables, which represent periods with economic difficulties, are effective in profitability of the Turkish participation banks, it is not effective in the profitability of the Malaysian participation banks. CONCLUSION Like in traditional banks, determining financial performances for participation banks, named as interest- free banking, are also important to continue their activities and gain competitive skills. For this purpose, the relationship between performances of participation banks operating in Turkey and Malaysia between 2000 and 2015, and macroeconomic indicators and indicators peculiar to banks have been tried to be explained in this study. This relation is evaluated by multiple regression model. When the results obtained are evaluated, it is concluded that capital adequacy, size of bank, management quality and macroeconomic indicators are effective in the Turkish participation banks; management quality, income quality, size of bank, liquidity and macroeconomic indicators are effective in the Malaysian participation banks. According to the research findings, when variables effecting financial performances of participation banks operating in Turkey and those in Malaysia are compared, while management quality is positive for Turkey, it is negative for Malaysia. It is concluded that effect of size of bank is positive for both countries. Making financial performance analysis will be instructive for forward decision-making for every financial actor interested in participation banks. REFERENCES [1] Ansari, S. & Rehman, A. (2010). Financial Performance of Islamic and Conventional Banks in Pakistan: A Comparative Study. 8th International Conference on Islamic Economics and Finance, http://conference.qfis.edu.qa/app/media/287. [2] Akhavein, J D, A N Berger & D B Humphrey (1997). The effects of megamergers on efficiency and prices: evidence from a bank profit function. Review of Industrial Organization, 12, 95–139. [3] Aras, O. N.& Öztürk, M. (2011), Reel Ekonomiye Katkıları Bakımından Katılım Bankalarının Kullandırdığı Fonların Analizi, Ekonomi Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt.3, Sayı.2, (167-179). [4] Ayrıçay, Y., Ada, Ş. & Kaya, A., (2013). Katılım Bankacılığının Gelişiminin Önündeki Engeller Bir araştırması. KSÜ İİBF Dergisi, 121. http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 188 editor@iaeme.com
Development of Participation Banks and Evaluation of Participation Banks In Terms of Performance: An Application In Turkey and Malaysia [5] Bağcı, H. (2013), Ticari Bankalar ile Katılım Bankalarının Kârlılık Performanslarının Topsis Yöntemi İle Karşılaştırılması, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü MuhasebeFinansman Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi ,İzmir. [6] Buğan, M., (2015). Katılım Bankaları ile Konvansiyonel Bankaların Etkinliklerinin VZA ve Malquist TFV Endeksi ile karşılaştırılması. Gaziantep Üniversitesi. Gaziantep. [7] Eskici, M. M. (2007). Türkiye’de Katılım Bankacılığı Uygulaması ve Katılım Bankaları’nın Müşteri Özellikleri, Yüksek Lisans Tezi Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi. [8] Esmer, Y. & Bağcı, H., (2016). Katılım Bankalarında Finansal Performans Analizi: Türkiye Örneği, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt.8, Sayı.15, 17-30. [9] Haroon J. (2014). Determinants of Banks Profitability, IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM) 16(1). Ver. IV (Jan. 2014), PP 109-113. [10] Iqbal, M. (2001). Islamıc and Conventıonal Bankıng In The Nınetıes: A Comparatıve Study, Islamic Economic Studies, 8(2), 1–27. [11] Izhar, H., & Asutay, M. (2007). Estimating the Profitability of Islamic Banking: Evidence from Bank Muamalat Indonesia. Review of Islamic Economics, 11(2): 17–29. [12] Jaffar, M. & Manarvi, I. (2011). Performance comparison of Islamic and Conventional banks in Pakistan, Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 11(1). [13] Kader, J. M. & Asarpota, A. K. (2007). Comparative Financial Performance of Islamic vis-à-vis Conventional Banks in the UAE, Paper presented at 2006-2007 Annual Student Research Symposium & First Chancellor’s Undergraduate Research Award at UAE University. [14] Loghod, H. A. (2010). Do Islamic Banks Perform Better than Conventional Banks? Evidence from Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Working Paper Series, http://www.arab-api.org /jodep/products/delivery/wps1011.pdf. [15] Moin M. S., (2008). Performance of Islamic Banking and Conventional Banking in Pakistan: A Comparative Study, Master Degree Project in Finance, University of Skövde, School of Technology and Society. [16] Onour, I. A., & Abdalla, A. M.A. (2011). Efficiency of Islamic Banks in Sudan: A Non-parametric Approach. Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance, Cilt.7, Sayı.4, (79-92). [17] Özulucan, A. & Deran, A. (2009). Katılım Bankacılığı ile Geleneksel Bankaların Bankacılık Hizmetleri ve Muhasebe Uygulamaları Acısından Karşılaştırılması. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute. 6(11) pp. 85–108. [18] Safiullah Md. (2010), Superiority of Conventional Banks & Islamic Banks of Bangladesh: A Comparative Study, International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(3), pp.199-207. [19] Sakarya, B., & Kaya, Y. (2013). Katılım Bankaları Mevduat Bankalarından Farklı Mı Çalışıyor?.EY International Congress on Economics I, Europe and Economic Rebalancing, October 24- 25. [20] Samad, A., (2004), Performance of Interest-free Islamic banks vis-à-vis Interest-based Conventional Banks of Bahrain, IIUM Journal of Economics and Management, 12(2): 1–15. [21] Serpam (2013). İslami Finans: İslam kavramı, Ürünler, Dünyada ve Türkiye'de Gelişimi ve Geleceği: s; 3 [22] Siraj, K.K. & Pillai, P. S. (2012). Comparative Study on Performance of Islamic Banks and Conventional Banks in GCC region, Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 2(3): 123–161. [23] Smirlock, M. (1985). Evidence on the (Non) relationship between concentration and profitability in banking. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 17 (1): 69–83. [24] Srairi, S.A. (2009). Factors Influencing the Profitability of Conventional and Islamic Commercial Banks in GCC Countries. Review of Islamic Economics, 13(1): 5–30 http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 189 editor@iaeme.com
Eda ORUÇ ERDOĞAN and Abdullahi Mohamed NUR [25] Tekbaş, M. Ş. (2013), SERPAM Araştırma Notları - 1, İslamî Finans Kavramı, Ürünler, Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Gelişimi ve Geleceği, Mayıs 2013. [26] P. K. Gupta and Dr. U. M. Kinange, A Study of Financial Literacy and its Impact on Customer Satisfaction with Special Reference to Banks of Bagalkot District. International Journal of Management, 7(6), 2016, pp. 43–50. [27] Dr. M. Parveen and Ms. S. Sameera. Problems and Challenges On Indian Banking Sector In Pre and Post Globalisation Period. International Journal of Management, 7(2), 2016, pp. 785-794. [28] Kesari Singh and Nitin Gupta, Customer’s Perception and Satisfaction towards Services of Public & Private Sector Banks. International Journal of Management, 7(6), 2016, pp. 77–88. [29] Usman, A. & Khan, M. K. (2012), Evaluating the Financial Performance of Islamic and Conventional Banks of Pakistan: A Comparative Analysis, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3: 253–257. http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 190 editor@iaeme.com