Lecture Advanced Econometrics (Part II) - Chapter 11: Seemingly unrelated regressions
lượt xem 2
download
Lecture "Advanced Econometrics (Part II) - Chapter 11: Seemingly unrelated regressions" presentation of content: Model, generalized least squares estimation of sur model, kronecker product, two case when sur provides no eficiency gain over, hypothesis testing.
Bình luận(0) Đăng nhập để gửi bình luận!
Nội dung Text: Lecture Advanced Econometrics (Part II) - Chapter 11: Seemingly unrelated regressions
- Advanced Econometrics Chapter 11: Seemingly unrelated regressions Chapter 11 SEEMINGLY UNRELATED REGRESSIONS I. MODEL Seemingly unrelated regressions (SUR) are often a set of equations with distinct dependent and independent variables, as well as different coefficients, are linked together by some common immeasurable factor. Consider the following set of equations: there are β1, β2, …βM, such that = Y1 X β + ε1 1 1 country 1 (T ×1) (T ×k ) ( k ×1) (T ×1) = Y2 X β + ε2 2 2 country 2 (T ×1) (T ×k ) ( k ×1) (T ×1) … YM X M β M + ε M = country M (T ×1) (T ×k ) ( k ×1) (T ×1) • Assume each 𝜀⃗𝑖 (i = 1, 2, …, M) meets classical assumptions so OLS on each equation separately in fine. • Although each of M equations may seem unrelated, the system of equations may be linked through their mean – zero error structure. • We use cross-equation error covariance to improve the efficiency of OLS. M equations are estimated as a system. E (ε= iε i ) ' σ=2 i IT σ ii IT E (ε iε 'j ) = σ ij IT Where σij: contemporaneous covariance between errors of equations i and j Nam T. Hoang University of New England - Australia 1 University of Economics - HCMC - Vietnam
- Advanced Econometrics Chapter 11: Seemingly unrelated regressions X1 0 0 Y1 (T ×k ) β1 ε1 (T ×1) 0 X2 0 ( k ×1) (T ×1) Y = (T ×k ) β ε 2 2 + 2 Y 0 0 XM β ε (TM×1) (T ×k ) ( k ×N1) (T ×N1) ( MT ×1) (TM ×kM ) ( kM ×1) ( NT ×1) Assumption: there is a β such that: Y Xβ +ε (1) ↔= σ 11 I σ 12 I σ 1M I σ I σ 22 I σ 2 M I E (εε ′) = 21 = Σ⊗I ( MT × MT ) σ M 1 I σ M 2 I σ MM I σ 11 σ 12 σ 1M σ σ 22 σ 2 M 21 Where: Σ = σ M 1 σ M 2 σ MM II. GENERALIZED LEAST SQUARES ESTIMATION OF SUR MODEL (GLS) The equation (1) can be estimated by GLS if E(εε’) is known: βˆSUR = [ X '( E (εε ')) −1 X ]−1[ X '( E (εε ')) −1Y ] βˆSUR = [ X '(Σ ⊗ I ) −1 X ]−1[ X '(Σ ⊗ I ) −1Y ] GLS is the best linear unbiased estimator: ( ) VarCov βˆSUR = [ X '( E (εε ')) −1 X ]−1 Advantages of SUR over single-equation OLS 1. Gain in efficiency: Because βˆSUR will have smaller varriance than βˆOLS Nam T. Hoang University of New England - Australia 2 University of Economics - HCMC - Vietnam
- Advanced Econometrics Chapter 11: Seemingly unrelated regressions βˆ1( OLS ) ( k ×1) β βˆOLS = 2( OLS ) β M ( OLS ) ( k ×1) (TM ×1) Note that βˆi (OLS ) is efficient estimator for βi, but βˆOLS is not efficient estimator for β, and βˆSUR is efficient estimator for β. 2. Test or impose cross-section restriction (Allowing to test or impose) Usually E(εε’) unknown Feasible GLS estimation 1. Estimate each equation by OLS, save residuals ei , i = 1, 2, …, M. (T ×1) 2. Compute sample variances and covariances T ∑e e it jt σˆ ij = t =1 all ij pairs T −k σˆ11 σˆ12 σˆ1M e1/ e1 e1/ e2 e1/ eM σˆ / σˆ 22 σˆ 2 M 1 / e2 e1 e2 e2 e2/ eM Σ = 21 = T −k / σˆ M 1 σˆ M 2 σˆ MM eM e1 eM e2 eM/ eM / E (εε ′) = Σˆ ⊗ I ( MT × MT ) ( M ×M ) (T ×T ) 3. βˆFGLS = [ X '(Σˆ ⊗ I ) −1 X ]−1[ X '(Σˆ ⊗ I ) −1Y ] → Σˆ is a consistent estimator of ∑ It is also possible to interate 2 & 3 until convergence which will produce the maximum likelihood estimator under multivariate normal errors. In other words, βˆFGLS and βˆML will have the same limiting distribution such that: asy βˆML , FGLS N ( β , ϕ ) Nam T. Hoang University of New England - Australia 3 University of Economics - HCMC - Vietnam
- Advanced Econometrics Chapter 11: Seemingly unrelated regressions Where 𝜑 is consistently estimated by ϕˆ [ X '(Σˆ ⊗ I ) −1 X ]−1 = III. KRONECKER PRODUCT: Definition: For any two matrices A,B A ⊗ B is defined by the matrix consisting of each element of A time the entire second matrix B. Propositions: (1) ( A ⊗ B )( C ⊗ D ) = AC ⊗ BD a11 B a12 B c11 D c12 D ∑ (a1 j c j1 ) BD ∑ (a 1j c j 2 ) BD a B a B c D c D = 21 22 21 22 ∑ (a2 j c j1 ) BD ∑ (a = 2 j c j 2 ) BD AC ⊗ BD ( A ⊗ B) −1 (2) =A−1 ⊗ B −1 if inverses are defined. Because: ( A ⊗ B ) ( A−1 ⊗ B −1 ) = ( AA −1 ) ⊗ BB −1 = I → ( A ⊗ B ) =A−1 ⊗ B −1 −1 ( A ⊗ B) / (3) =A/ ⊗ B / (you show). IV. TWO CASE WHEN SUR PROVIDES NO EFFICIENCY GAIN OVER SINGLE OLS: 1. When σij = 0 for all i≠j: the equations are not linked in any fashion and GLS does not provide any efficiency gains → we can show that βˆOLS = βˆSUR VarCov βˆSUR ( ) = [ X '(Σ ⊗ I ) −1 X ]−1 Nam T. Hoang University of New England - Australia 4 University of Economics - HCMC - Vietnam
- Advanced Econometrics Chapter 11: Seemingly unrelated regressions 1 σ I 0 0 11 1 0 I 0 (Σ ⊗ I ) −1 = Σ −1 ⊗ I = = σ 22 0 1 0 I σ MM ( VarCov βˆSUR = ) −1 1 X 1/ 0 0 σ I 0 0 (T × k ) 11 X1 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 1 X I 0 0 X2 = 2 (T × k ) σ 22 X M/ 0 0 X M 0 0 1 0 (T × k ) 0 I σ MM −1 X 1/ X 1 0 0 σ 11 X 2/ X 2 0 0 = σ 22 X M/ X 1 0 σ MM 0 ( X 1/ X 1 ) −1σ 11 0 0 0 ( X 2 X 2 ) −1σ 22 / 0 = 0 0 ( X M/ X M ) −1σ MM ( ) VarCov βˆiOLS = ( X i/ X i ) −1σ ii ( ) ( ) → VarCov βˆSUR (i ) = VarCov βˆi → no efficiency gains at all. βˆ1OLS βˆ2OLS Exercise: Show: βˆSUR = in this case. βˆ MOLS Nam T. Hoang University of New England - Australia 5 University of Economics - HCMC - Vietnam
- Advanced Econometrics Chapter 11: Seemingly unrelated regressions Note: 1. The greater is the correlation of disturbance, the greater is the gain in efficiency in using SUR & GLS. 2. The less correlation then is in between the X matrices, the greater is gain in using GLS. 3. When X 1= X 2= ...= X M= X ( ) VarCov βˆSUR = [ X '(Σ −1 ⊗ I ) X ]−1 = [( I ⊗ X ) / (Σ −1 ⊗ I )( I ⊗ X )]−1 = [Σ −1 ⊗ ( X / X )]−1 = Σ ⊗ ( X / X ) −1 σ 11 ( X / X ) −1 σ 12 ( X / X ) −1 0 σ ( X / X ) −1 σ 22 ( X / X ) −1 0 = 21 → no efficiency gain. 0 σ MM ( X / X ) −1 ( ) VarCov βˆiOLS = σ ii ( X / X ) −1 X 0 0 0 X 0 X= 0 0 X V. HYPOTHESIS TESTING: 1. Contemporaneous correlation (spatial correlation): σ ij 0 0 0 σ 0 E (ε iε j ) = / ij 0 0 σ ij H0: σ ij = 0 for all i≠j HA: H0 false. M i −1 LM test statistic: λ = T ∑∑ rij2 χ M2 ( M −1) =i 2=j 1 2 Where rij is calculated using OLS residuals: Nam T. Hoang University of New England - Australia 6 University of Economics - HCMC - Vietnam
- Advanced Econometrics Chapter 11: Seemingly unrelated regressions ei/ e j rij = (ei/ ei )(e /j e j ) Under H0 → λ χ M2 ( M −1) . If accept H0 → no efficiency gain. 2 2. Restrictions on coefficients: H0: R β = 0 HA: H0 false. The general F test can be extended to the SUR system. However, since the statistic requires using Σˆ , the test will only be valid asymptotically. Where β = ( β1 , β 2 ,..., β M ) . Within SUR framework, it is possible to test coefficient restriction across equations. One possible test statistic is: ( R βˆFGLS − q ) / [ R VarCov( βˆFGLS ) R / ]−1 ( RβˆFGLS − q ) W= ( m×k ) ( k ×1) ( m×1) ( m×k ) k ×k ) ( k ×m ) ( ( m×1) ((1×m ) ( m×m ) asy W χ m2 under H0. VI. AUTOCORRELATION: Heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation are possibilities within SUR framework. I will focus on autocorrelation because SUR systems are often comprised of time series observations for each equation. Assume the errors follow: ε i ,t ρiε i ,t −1 + uit = Where uit is white noise. The overall error structure will now be: σ 11Σ11 σ 12 Σ12 σ 1M Σ1M σ Σ σ 22 Σ 22 σ 2 M Σ MM E (εε ′) = 21 21 σ M 1Σ M 1 σ M 2 Σ M 2 σ MM Σ MM MT ×MT 1 ρj ρ Tj −1 ρj 1 ρ Tj −1 Where: Σij = T −1 ρ j ρ Tj − 2 1 T ×T Nam T. Hoang University of New England - Australia 7 University of Economics - HCMC - Vietnam
- Advanced Econometrics Chapter 11: Seemingly unrelated regressions ε i1 ε E (ε iε j ) = i 2 ε j1 ε j 2 ε jT / ε iT Estimation: 1. Run OLS equation by equation by equation. Compute consistent estimate of ρi: T ∑e e it it −1 ρˆ i = t =2 T ∑e t =1 2 it Transform the data, using Cochrane-Orcutt, to remove the autocorrelation. 2. Calculate FGLS estimates using the transformed data. • Estimate Σ using the transformed data as in GLS. • Use Σˆ to calculate FGLS. Nam T. Hoang University of New England - Australia 8 University of Economics - HCMC - Vietnam
CÓ THỂ BẠN MUỐN DOWNLOAD
-
Lecture Advanced Econometrics (Part II) - Chapter 3: Discrete choice analysis - Binary outcome models
18 p | 62 | 6
-
Lecture Advanced Econometrics (Part II) - Chapter 13: Generalized method of moments (GMM)
9 p | 84 | 4
-
Lecture Advanced Econometrics (Part II) - Chapter 5: Limited dependent variable models - Truncation, censoring (tobit) and sample selection
13 p | 62 | 4
-
Lecture Advanced Econometrics (Part II) - Chapter 6: Models for count data
7 p | 80 | 3
-
Lecture Advanced Econometrics (Part II) - Chapter 4: Discrete choice analysis - Multinomial models
13 p | 72 | 3
-
Lecture Advanced Econometrics (Part II) - Chapter 6: Dummy varialable
0 p | 70 | 2
-
Lecture Advanced Econometrics (Part II) - Chapter 2: Hypothesis testing
7 p | 54 | 2
-
Lecture Advanced Econometrics (Part II) - Chapter 7: Greneralized linear regression model
0 p | 65 | 2
-
Lecture Advanced Econometrics (Part II) - Chapter 8: Heteroskedasticity
0 p | 104 | 2
-
Lecture Advanced Econometrics (Part II) - Chapter 9: Autocorrelation
0 p | 44 | 2
-
Lecture Advanced Econometrics (Part II) - Chapter 10: Models for panel data
0 p | 83 | 2
-
Lecture Advanced Econometrics (Part II) - Chapter 12: Simultaneous equations models
0 p | 73 | 2
-
Lecture Advanced Econometrics (Part II) - Chapter 1: Review of least squares & likelihood methods
6 p | 65 | 2
Chịu trách nhiệm nội dung:
Nguyễn Công Hà - Giám đốc Công ty TNHH TÀI LIỆU TRỰC TUYẾN VI NA
LIÊN HỆ
Địa chỉ: P402, 54A Nơ Trang Long, Phường 14, Q.Bình Thạnh, TP.HCM
Hotline: 093 303 0098
Email: support@tailieu.vn