JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, Hue University, Vol. 70, No 1 (2012) pp. 63-70<br />
<br />
A STUDY OF FACTORS AFFECTING THE COMPETITVE CAPACITY OF<br />
“19 FORESTRY JOINT STOCK COMPANY” IN BINH DINH PROVINCE<br />
Tran Van Hoa1, Le Thi The Buu2<br />
1<br />
<br />
College of Economics, Hue University<br />
2<br />
<br />
Quang Trung University, Binh Dinh<br />
<br />
Abstract. Competitive capacity of an enterprise is a matter of business that<br />
managers are always interested in. This article aims to assess the current real<br />
competitiveness of the “19 forestry joint stock company” by analyzing the external<br />
and internal competitive factors of the company, thereby determining how strongly<br />
these factors affect the company’s competitive capacity. Applying the exploratory<br />
factor analysis (EFA) and multiple linear regression, the study has found 7 external<br />
factors and 5 internal factors that significantly affect the company’s competitive<br />
capacity. These findings are expected to be useful for the company in particular and<br />
for the whole sector in general to find out the appropriate strategies to improve<br />
their competitiveness.<br />
<br />
1. Introduction<br />
The wood processing industry of Vietnam has developed sharply during the last<br />
10 years. In fact, Vietnam has currently been ranked second (after Malaysia) in wood<br />
products exports in ASEAN [1].<br />
At present, the demand for wood products in the World has risen rapidly with an<br />
annual growth of 8% on average. To satisfy this, the wood processing and wood<br />
products industries in many countries have changed significantly, especially those in<br />
China and in several Asian countries such as Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia and<br />
Vietnam. They all develop quickly in terms of quality and quantity [6]. Therefore, the<br />
competition in the wood-processing sector increases more and more among domestic<br />
companies as well as between domestic and foreign companies.<br />
The “19 Forestry joint stock Company” was established in January 1990 with<br />
the name “19 Forestry Company” under the regulations of Ministry of Agriculture and<br />
Rural Development. The Company changed its name into the “19 Forestry joint stock<br />
Company” in October 2004. It has been one of the multi-sector companies, especially in<br />
the wood processing industry for export, in Binh Dinh province. Currently, this<br />
company has faced many difficulties resulting from keen competition in domestic as<br />
63<br />
<br />
64<br />
<br />
A study of factors affecting the competitve capacity of…<br />
<br />
well as international markets. Therefore, analyzing and assessing its current<br />
competitiveness to determine factors that affect this capacity has become urgent and<br />
necessary.<br />
2. Research methods<br />
The study used secondary data on current business activities of the company and<br />
its competitors, on legal regulations of wood products exports and doing a literature<br />
review to find out conceptual frameworks.<br />
In order to survive and develop, the company has to interact with the macro,<br />
micro and internal environments. To measure the influence of the macro factors on the<br />
company, the research adopted the P.E.S.T model developed by Michael Porter that<br />
include political, economic, socio-cultural and technological factors. On the other hand,<br />
the 5 forces model of Porter, with the forces being current competitors, customers,<br />
suppliers, potential competitors, and substitution products, was used to measure the<br />
microenvironments of the company. In addition, the internal factors that influence the<br />
company such as development strategy, capital, labor force and marketing management<br />
were also used to measure the competitive capacity of the company [4].<br />
The study also collected primary data from survey for a combined analysis of<br />
quantitative and qualitative methods. The questionnaire was constructed and finalized<br />
by interviewing experts and managers in the wood-processing sector of Vietnam and by<br />
conducting on-site field trip to assess current business activities, external and internal<br />
factors of the company. These factors were evaluated on Likert type scale of 5 points. A<br />
sample size of 201 for external factors and 201 for internal factors were randomly<br />
selected (more than 8 times of 24 observatory variables); however, there were 440<br />
questionnaires being sent to respondents and 402 (accounting for 91%) returned which<br />
were valid for data analysis. The respondents of the survey were the workers who work<br />
in the wood-processing companies, the managers of the wood-processing companies<br />
and the members of the Binh Dinh Wood Processing Associations. The study used SPSS<br />
16.0 tool for descriptive statistical analysis, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and<br />
multiple linear regression.<br />
The results of descriptive statistical analysis for survey data indicate that, the<br />
male accounts for 58.2% while female only accounts for 41.8%. In terms of age, among<br />
the 4 age groups, the age group of 41-50 has the highest proportion (37.3%). The group<br />
of 31-40 comes second (accounting for 33.3%) and the last group (12.4%) is 51-60. In<br />
terms of educational level, respondents who have Associate and/or Bachelor degrees or<br />
higher form the majority with a proportion of 48.8%, followed by people with<br />
vocational qualification (33.3%) and high school qualification (17.9%).<br />
<br />
TRAN VAN HOA, LE THI THE BUU<br />
<br />
65<br />
<br />
3. Results and discussion<br />
3.1. Company’s external factors - Exploratory Factor Analysis and Cronbach’s<br />
Alpha<br />
There were 24 observatory variables selected as inputs for Exploratory Factor<br />
Analysis (EFA) to determine the scale of the company’s external factors.<br />
As Barlett's test of spericity is significant with an observed significant level of<br />
0.000, the null hypothesis that the inter-correlation matrix involving these variables is<br />
an identity matrix is rejected. Thus, from the perspective of the Bartlett's test, factor<br />
analysis is feasible. As Bartlett's test is almost always significant, a more discriminating<br />
index of factor analyzability is the KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin). For this data set, it is<br />
0.703 (0.5 < KMO < 1), which is very large, so the KMO also supports factor analysis.<br />
The results of the EFA discover and determine seven new factors and all these<br />
factors have Cronbach’s Alpha indices which are greater than 0.9 and all factor loadings<br />
greater than 0.6. These new factors have been named as below (see Table 1):<br />
+ Factors related to Policy: (1) Policy Factor (PF);<br />
+ Factors related to Suppliers: (2) Suppliers Factor (SF)<br />
+ Factors related to Market potentials: (3) Market Factor (MF)<br />
+ Factors related to Economic environment: (4) Economic Factor (EF)<br />
+ Factors related to Competitors: (5) Competitors Factor (COF)<br />
+ Factors related to Customers: (6) Customers Factor (CUF)<br />
+ Factors related to Technique and Technology: (7) Technology and Technique<br />
Factor (TTF)<br />
Table 1. Factor analysis of the external factors influencing the competitive capacity of the<br />
Company<br />
Factors<br />
Variables<br />
<br />
1<br />
<br />
4. Customs policy<br />
<br />
0,989<br />
<br />
6.Political situations<br />
<br />
0,984<br />
<br />
5. Incentive policy<br />
<br />
0,981<br />
<br />
7. System of laws<br />
<br />
0,980<br />
<br />
2<br />
<br />
16. Price input increase<br />
<br />
0,934<br />
<br />
23. Numbers of input suppliers<br />
<br />
0,930<br />
<br />
24. Quota of bank credit<br />
<br />
0,921<br />
<br />
3<br />
<br />
4<br />
<br />
5<br />
<br />
6<br />
<br />
7<br />
<br />
A study of factors affecting the competitve capacity of…<br />
<br />
66<br />
15. Scarce materials<br />
<br />
0,647<br />
<br />
12. Consumers’ tendency<br />
<br />
0,960<br />
<br />
13.Wood market potentials<br />
<br />
0,945<br />
<br />
14. Increase in wood demand<br />
<br />
0,941<br />
<br />
11. Per capita income<br />
<br />
0,645<br />
<br />
2. Interest rates<br />
<br />
0,975<br />
<br />
1. Economic growth rate<br />
<br />
0,973<br />
<br />
3. Exchange rate fluctuations<br />
<br />
0,970<br />
<br />
17. Competitors<br />
<br />
0,941<br />
<br />
19. Number of enterprises<br />
<br />
0,924<br />
<br />
18. Growth rates of the industry<br />
<br />
0,900<br />
<br />
22. Customers’ pressure<br />
<br />
0,969<br />
<br />
21. Transaction costs<br />
<br />
0,961<br />
<br />
20. Strict requirement from customers<br />
<br />
0,936<br />
<br />
8. Technological development in industry<br />
<br />
0,950<br />
<br />
9. Development of IT and telecom<br />
<br />
0,944<br />
<br />
10. Life cycle of technique<br />
<br />
0,882<br />
<br />
Coefficient of Cronbach's Alpha<br />
<br />
0,996 0,929 0,926 0,993 0,969 0,972 0,951<br />
<br />
Eigen value<br />
<br />
6,901 4,069 3,152 2,637 1,952 1,835 1,602<br />
<br />
(Source: Authors’ analysis of survey data in SPSS).<br />
<br />
After conducting the EFA, the multiple linear regression was applied to assess<br />
the degree of effect that these external factors have on the company’s competitive<br />
capacity.<br />
The results of the ANOVA test show that with the critical F-value of 502.146 (at<br />
an observed significant level of 0.000), the linear regression model is appropriate or we find<br />
significant statistical evidence for a linear relationship between the dependent variable<br />
and the independent variables as a group. Furthermore, the R square value is equal to<br />
0.948 which means that 94.8% of variation in the dependent variable (that is NLCT) is<br />
explained by 7 new factors above (or this high R square value indicates that the data<br />
points fall very closely along the best-fit line and that the independent variables are<br />
good predictors of the dependent variable).<br />
The statistical results in Table 2 show that as all p-values are less than 0.05, at<br />
95% confidence level, we find significant statistical evidence for a relationship between<br />
the dependent variable and every independent variable: Policy Factor (PF); Suppliers<br />
<br />
TRAN VAN HOA, LE THI THE BUU<br />
<br />
67<br />
<br />
Factor (SF); Market Factor (MF); Economic Factor (EF); Competitors Factor (COF);<br />
Customers Factor (CUF); Technology and Technique Factor (TTF).<br />
Table 2. Coefficients – Multiple linear regression for effect of company’s external factors<br />
<br />
Variables<br />
<br />
Unstandardized<br />
Coefficients<br />
<br />
Standardized<br />
Coefficients<br />
<br />
t<br />
<br />
Sig.<br />
<br />
374.755<br />
<br />
0.00<br />
<br />
B<br />
<br />
Std. Error<br />
<br />
(Constant)<br />
<br />
3.771<br />
<br />
0.01<br />
<br />
PF<br />
<br />
0.044<br />
<br />
0.01<br />
<br />
0.072<br />
<br />
4.408<br />
<br />
0.00<br />
<br />
SF<br />
<br />
0.574<br />
<br />
0.01<br />
<br />
0.934<br />
<br />
56.901<br />
<br />
0.00<br />
<br />
MF<br />
<br />
0.061<br />
<br />
0.01<br />
<br />
0.099<br />
<br />
6.050<br />
<br />
0.00<br />
<br />
EF<br />
<br />
0.058<br />
<br />
0.01<br />
<br />
0.095<br />
<br />
5.797<br />
<br />
0.00<br />
<br />
COF<br />
<br />
0.100<br />
<br />
0.01<br />
<br />
0.163<br />
<br />
9.910<br />
<br />
0.00<br />
<br />
CUF<br />
<br />
0.069<br />
<br />
0.01<br />
<br />
0.112<br />
<br />
6.800<br />
<br />
0.00<br />
<br />
TTF<br />
<br />
0.066<br />
<br />
0.01<br />
<br />
0.108<br />
<br />
6.571<br />
<br />
0.00<br />
<br />
R2 = 0.948<br />
<br />
Beta<br />
<br />
F = 502.146 (Sig. = 0.000)<br />
<br />
Dependent variable: Competitive capability (COMCAP)<br />
(Source: Authors’ analysis of survey data in SPSS).<br />
<br />
The regression model identifying the cause-effect relationship between external<br />
factors and the company’s competitive capacity was formulated as below:<br />
COMCAP = 0.072*PF + 0.934*SF + 0.099*MF + 0.095*EF + 0.163*COF +<br />
0.112*CUF + 0.108*TTF<br />
The regression equation indicates that Suppliers Factor (SF) affect the<br />
company’s competitive capacity (COMCAP) the most (0.934), followed by Competitors<br />
Factor (COF) (0.163), Customers Factor (CUF) (0.112), Technology and Technique<br />
Factor (TTF) (0.108), Market Factor (MF) (0.099) and Economic Factor (EF) (0.095).<br />
3.2. Company’s Internal Factors – Exploratory Factor Analysis and<br />
Cronbach’s Alpha<br />
In this study, as the KMO is high (0.727) and the observed significant level of<br />
the Barlett’s test is lower than 0.05, it can be concluded that the data are appropriate for<br />
factor analysis. In fact, after conducting the EFA, the study identified 5 new factors with<br />
initial Eigen values greater than 1 (which is satisfactory). In addition, the Cronbach’s<br />
Alpha of these new factors are greater than 0.6 and the cumulative Eigen value (%)<br />
indicates that these factors explain 77.587% of total variance (more than 50% which is<br />
considered satisfactory).<br />
<br />