
ATHEORYOFCOWORKING:
ENTREPRENEURIALCOMMUNITIES,IMMATERIAL
COMMONSANDWORKINGFUTURES
Athesissubmitted
infulfillmentoftherequirementsforthedegreeof
DoctorofPhilosophy
JulianMauriceWatersLynch
BachelorofArts(InternationalStudies)(Honours)(RMIT)
SchoolofManagement
CollegeofBusiness
RMITUniversity
Melbourne
April2018

Declaration
I certify that except where due acknowledgement has been made, the work is that of
the author alone; the work has not been submitted previously, in whole or in part, to
qualify for any other academic award; the content of the thesis is the result of work
which has been carried out since the official commencement date of the approved
researchprogram;anyeditorialwork,paidorunpaid,carriedoutbyathirdparty
isacknowledged;and,ethicsproceduresandguidelineshavebeenfollowed.I also
acknowledge the support I received through the provision of an Australian
Government Research Training Program Scholarship.
JulianMauriceWatersLynch,
April2018
1

Acknowledgements
This thesis proposes that creative works, even activities we view as iconic
expressions of individual effort, are suspended within webs of vital, but often
less visible, support from those around us. Over the course of many years,
this work has been bolstered by a myriad of such gossamer strands. For the
countless small acts and brief words of kindness, inspiration, support,
challenge and critique, I will be forever grateful. There are however, three
‘communitiesofsupport’thatIwouldliketoexplicitlyacknowledgehere.
First, I wish to acknowledge the Melbourne Coworking community and the
participants that feature in this study for welcoming me into their world. Your
ongoing experiments in new ways of working have been inspiring and many
of you have become good friends. I also would like to acknowledge the
Coworking space entrepreneurs and staff that sustain these experiments and
that opened their doors to enable this ethnography. Finally, it was through
Coworking that I met many past and present collaborators in entrepreneurial
work, thank you in particular to David Hood, Richard Harmer, Hamish Riddell,
Gaby Macdonald, Tim Winton, Neil Houghton, Ami Cook, Pete Holliday, John
Hibble, Nick Byrne and Kaj Lofgren for inspiring partnerships on many
fascinatingprojectsoverthepastfiveyears.
Second, I wish to acknowledge the scholarly community at RMIT University.
To Cameron Duff, my primary supervisor, thank you for your patience, and
the deft blend of encouragement and challenge that enabled me to complete
this work. I have never experienced such skillful guidance in a professional
endeavour, and I am excited about further intellectual collaborations in the
future. To John Postill, my secondary supervisor, thank you for your timely
provocations that refined many of the ideas presented here, your
mischievous sense of humour, and your work with the Centre for Digital
Ethnography. To Tim Butcher, an earlier supervisor, thank you for helping me
2

getstartedand for introducingmeto thecuriousfield of organisational
ethnography.ToJason Potts,thankyoufor yourresearchleadership,
inspirationalenergy,andconveningthecommunityofscholarsconnectedto
theBlockchainInnovationHub.ToPiaArenius,thankyouforyourpractical
wisdom and guidance, and to my other colleagues in the innovation and
entrepreneurship team for helping me find a home in this field.
Finally, there is a peculiar irony reserved for those of us that write long
books reflecting on the social consequences of the creeping
encroachment of creative knowledge work into all arenas of our lives. In
this respect, I wish to thank my wider family for your patience with
frequent frowns over laptops,and for graciously discontinuing the practice
of asking when the PhD will befinished. But most importantlyofall,thank
you to my partner Hannah and our daughter Aoife. This thesis has been
gestating longer than ouryoungfamily,and its completion has only been
possible because of your considerable patience and support. I know its
‘spillover effects’ have often been taxing on our family life, and I promise
that from now on ‘weekends’ and ‘holidays’ will mean something once
again.Thenextchapter,and the rest of my life,arededicatedtoyouboth.
3

Publications
Thefollowingthreearticles,bookchapterandconferenceproceedingwere
developedfrommaterialpresentedinthisthesis.
● WatersLynch,J.,Potts,J.,Butcher,T.,Dodson,J.,&Hurley,J.,(2016).
Coworking:Atransdisciplinaryoverview.Availableat:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2712217
● WatersLynch,J.,&Potts,J.(2017).ThesocialeconomyofCoworking
spaces:afocalpointmodelofcoordination.ReviewofSocialEconomy,75(4),
417433.
● WatersLynch,J.,&Duff,C.(2017).TheAffectiveCommons.Availableat:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3036727
● WatersLynch,J.,Coworking:challengesandopportunitiesforaprosperous
andfairneweconomy.(2016)InRamos,J.(Ed.)Thecityascommons,a
policyreader.Availableat:
https://cdn5blog.p2pfoundation.net/wpcontent/uploads/cityascommons.pdf
● WatersLynch,J.,(2016)‘It’smorelikeahivethanahub’:Stigmergicactivity
andgovernancedilemmasincontemporaryCoworkingspaces.Presentedat
SCOS(StandingConferenceonOrganisationalSymbolism),July14,2016in
Uppsala,Sweden.
4

