Giải pháp nâng cao chất lượng công tác quản lý hoạt động nghiên cứu khoa học sinh viên: nghiên cứu trường hợp Trường Đại học Nông Lâm Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh

Student scientific research is increasingly recognized as a cornerstone activity within higher education institutions, playing a vital role in enhancing academic quality and institutional prestige. In the evolving landscape of global scientific and technological development, fostering such activities among students is paramount for cultivating innovative thinking, problem-solving skills, and preparing a future workforce capable of contributing meaningfully to society. This academic endeavor, therefore, extends beyond individual learning to directly influence the scientific capacity and development of a nation. Understanding its effective management is crucial. This study aims to critically assess the current landscape of student scientific research management at Ho Chi Minh City University of Agriculture and Forestry and to propose practical solutions to improve its overall quality and effectiveness.

University administrators, academic staff, and educational policymakers focused on enhancing the management and quality of student scientific research activities.

This study comprehensively assesses the current state of student scientific research management at Ho Chi Minh City University of Agriculture and Forestry, aiming to enhance its quality and effectiveness through targeted solutions to improve existing practices. Utilizing a quantitative research methodology, the study gathered primary data through surveys administered to 274 administrators, lecturers, and students via online platforms like Google Forms, Facebook, and Zalo. This approach allowed for a nuanced understanding of perceptions across key stakeholder groups. The research delves into various facets of management, including organizational structure (university, faculty, and instructor levels), fostering awareness, effective resource allocation (human, physical, and financial), and the overall management process (planning, organizing, directing, and evaluating). Key findings reveal discrepancies in perceptions regarding the current effectiveness of management. While general management aspects (QLTT1, QLTT2) were rated highly across groups, significant differences emerged in the assessment of student participation (QLTT3), research completion rates (QLTT4), and the development of scientific research skills (QLTT5). Specifically, administrators and lecturers perceived lower student engagement and completion compared to students' self-perceptions, indicating a gap in understanding or communication. Based on these insights, the study proposes a series of practical recommendations. These include strengthening management capacity at all levels, intensifying efforts to raise awareness about the value of scientific research among all stakeholders, optimizing the utilization of available resources, and establishing robust mechanisms for the publication, dissemination, and application of research outcomes. The findings offer valuable implications for university administrators, policymakers, and educators seeking to refine strategies for promoting a vibrant and productive student scientific research environment, thereby contributing to the overall academic excellence and societal impact of higher education institutions.