zunia.vn

Tuyển sinh 2024 dành cho Gen-Z

zunia.vn

» Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

» Báo cáo khoa học

báo cáo khoa học: " Correction: EGFR and COX-2 protein expression in non-small cell lung cancer and the correlation with clinical features"

Chia sẻ: Nguyen Minh Thang | Ngày: | Loại File: PDF | Số trang:2

Báo xấu

63
lượt xem 4
download

Download Vui lòng tải xuống để xem tài liệu đầy đủ

Tuyển tập báo cáo các nghiên cứu khoa học quốc tế ngành y học dành cho các bạn tham khảo đề tài: Correction: EGFR and COX-2 protein expression in non-small cell lung cancer and the correlation with clinical features

Chủ đề:

Bình luận(0) Đăng nhập để gửi bình luận!

Lưu

Nội dung Text: báo cáo khoa học: " Correction: EGFR and COX-2 protein expression in non-small cell lung cancer and the correlation with clinical features"

Li et al. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 2011, 30:32 http://www.jeccr.com/content/30/1/32 CORRECTION Open Access Correction: EGFR and COX-2 protein expression in non-small cell lung cancer and the correlation with clinical features Feng Li1, Yongmei Liu1, Huijiao Chen2, Dianying Liao2, Yali Shen1, Feng Xu1*†, Jin Wang1*† Correction Which should have been: “The positive rate of EGFR protein in NSCLC tumor In the article [1] there were errors in Tables three, four, cells were 46%, which was significantly higher than its five, six and seven. The incorrect values were produced expression in normal lung (p = 0.034) and paracancer- due to typographical errors during translation stage. ous (p = 0.020)” These errors affect neither the published discussion nor Under the heading “ Correlation between EGFR the conclusions of the paper. However, a few changes to expression and clinical features“ The second sentence the results section are detailed here. read: “It shows that the difference of EGFR expression In the Abstract, under “Results” the first two was only significant between the nodal positive and negative subgroups (56.4% vs.10%, p = 0.04).” sentences read But the passage should have been “The expression of “ The positive rate of EGFR protein in NSCLC tumor EGFR in different subgroups were compared and sum- cells was 46%, which was significantly higher than its marized in Table three. It shows that the difference of expression in normal lung (p = 0.0234) and paracancer- EGFR expression was only significant between the nodal ous tissues (p = 0.020). EGFR expression was signifi- positive and negative subgroups (56.4% vs. 9.1%, p = cantly higher in nodal positive than in nodal negative patients (p = 0.04).” 0.006). There is no significant difference between age (60 vs. under 60 ys), gender, adeno- vs. non-adenocarci- But should have been: noma, the differentiation of tumor, and staging.” “The positive rate of EGFR protein in NSCLC tumor This is the correct table three (table 1). cells was 46%, which was significantly higher than its Correct tables four (table 2), five (table 3) and six expression in normal lung (p = 0.034) and paracancer- (table 4). ous tissues (p = 0.020). EGFR expression was signifi- Under the heading “Correlation of EGFR and COX-2 cantly higher in nodal positive than in nodal negative expression “ The sentence reads: “ As shown in Table patients (p = 0.006).” seven, no correlation was found between COX-2 and In the main “Results” section of the article EGFR protein expression (Χ2 = 0.112, P = 0.555).” But should have read: “As shown in Table seven, no The sentence under the heading “EGFR protein expres- sion “ read: “ The positive rate of EGFR protein in correlation was found between COX-2 and EGFR pro- tein expression (P > 0.05).” NSCLC tumor cells were 46%, which was significantly Correct table seven (Table 5). higher than its expression in normal lung (p = 0.0234) and paracancerous (p = 0.020)” * Correspondence: Fengxuster@gmail.com; jinwang593@yahoo.com.cn † Contributed equally 1 Radiation Oncology, Tumor Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, PR China Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © 2011 Li et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Li et al. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 2011, 30:32 Page 2 of 2 http://www.jeccr.com/content/30/1/32 Table 1 (corrected table 3). EGFR expression and clinical Table 4 (corrected table six) 6 COX-2 expression and characteristics correlation with clinical features P P Clinical features EGFR Positive Clinical features COX-2 Positive expression rate value expression rate value negative positive negative positive Ages 0.448 Ages 0.599 ≤60 < 60 18 14 43.80% 3 30 90.90% ≥60 9 9 50% > 60 2 15 88.20% Sex 0.445 Sex 0.362 Male 16 15 48.40% Male 4 27 87.10% Female 11 8 42.10% Female 1 18 94.70% Pathologic type 0.543 Pathologic type 0.022* Squamous carcinoma 13 8 38.10% Squamous carcinoma 5 16 76.20% Adencarcinoma 13 13 50.0% Adencarcinoma 0 26 100% Mixed type 1 2 66.70% Mixed type 0 3 100% Tumor length 0.535 Tumor length 0.518 ≤3 cm ≤3 cm 9 7 43.80% 2 14 87.50% > 3 cm 18 16 47.10% > 3 cm 3 31 91.20% Level of Differentiation 0.474 Level of Differentiation 0.258 Poor Differentiated 6 4 40% Poor Differentiated 2 8 80% Moderate and Well 21 19 47.50% Moderate and Well 3 37 92.50% Differentiated Differentiated TNM Stage 0.194 TNM Stage 0.476 I-II 10 5 33.30% I-II 2 13 86.70% III-IV 17 18 51.40% III-IV 3 32 91.40% Lymph node 0.006* Lymph node 0.699 N0 10 1 9.10% N0 1 10 90.90% N1-3 17 22 56.40% N1-3 4 35 89.70% *P < 0.05. *P < 0.05. Table 5 (corrected table seven) Correlation of EGFR and COX-2 protein expression Table 2 (corrected table four) COX-2 expression in neoplastic and normal tissue EGFR Total Tissue type Number COX-2 Positive P negative Positive of cases rate(%) value COX-2 negative 3 2 5 positive negative positive 24 21 45 Neoplastic 50 45 5 90 0.000* Total 27 23 50 tissue There was no significant relationship between COX-2 and EGFR. P > 0.05. Normal 6 0 6 0 tissue Author details P < 0.05. 1 Radiation Oncology, Tumor Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, PR China. 2Department of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, PR China. Table 3 (corrected table five) COX-2 expression in tumor Received: 28 March 2011 Accepted: 28 March 2011 and paracancerous tissue Published: 28 March 2011 Tissue type Number of COX-2 Positive P Reference cases rate(%) value 1. Li Feng, Liu Yongmei, Chen Huijiao, Liao Dianying, Shen Yali, Xu Feng, positive negative Wang Jin: EGFR and COX-2 protein expression in non-small cell lung cancer and the correlation with clinical features. Journal of Experimental & Neoplastic 50 45 5 90 0.000* Clinical Cancer Research 2011, 30:27. tissue Paracancerous 7 1 6 14.3 doi:10.1186/1756-9966-30-32 tissue Cite this article as: Li et al.: Correction: EGFR and COX-2 protein expression in non-small cell lung cancer and the correlation with P < 0.05. clinical features. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 2011 30:32.

CÓ THỂ BẠN MUỐN DOWNLOAD

LV.09: Bộ Luận Văn Tốt Nghiệp Chuyên Ngành Quản Trị Kinh Doanh

81 tài liệu

1643 lượt tải

THÔNG TIN

TRỢ GIÚP

HỖ TRỢ KHÁCH HÀNG

Theo dõi chúng tôi

Chịu trách nhiệm nội dung:

Nguyễn Công Hà - Giám đốc Công ty TNHH TÀI LIỆU TRỰC TUYẾN VI NA

LIÊN HỆ

Địa chỉ: P402, 54A Nơ Trang Long, Phường 14, Q.Bình Thạnh, TP.HCM

Hotline: 093 303 0098

Email: support@tailieu.vn

Giấy phép Mạng Xã Hội số: 670/GP-BTTTT cấp ngày 30/11/2015 Copyright © 2022-2032 TaiLieu.VN. All rights reserved.