YOMEDIA
ADSENSE
Evolutionary programming method for modeling the EDM parameters for roughness
54
lượt xem 2
download
lượt xem 2
download
Download
Vui lòng tải xuống để xem tài liệu đầy đủ
(BQ) The method of electrical discharge machining (EDM), one of the processing methods based on non-traditional manufacturing procedures, is gaining increased popularity, since it does not require cutting tools and allows machining involving hard, brittle, thin and complex geometry
AMBIENT/
Chủ đề:
Bình luận(0) Đăng nhập để gửi bình luận!
Nội dung Text: Evolutionary programming method for modeling the EDM parameters for roughness
j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s p r o c e s s i n g t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 0 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 347–355<br />
<br />
Assab79PM, which<br />
demonstrates the<br />
chemical properties of<br />
the DIN 1.2379 cold<br />
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w tool l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / j m a t p r o t e c<br />
work w . e steel<br />
<br />
Evolutionary programming method for modeling<br />
the EDM parameters for roughness<br />
¨<br />
Ozlem Salman, M. Cengiz Kayacan ∗<br />
University of Suleyman Demirel, CAD/CAM Research and Application Center, 32300 Isparta, Turkey<br />
<br />
a r t i c l e<br />
<br />
i n f o<br />
<br />
a b s t r a c t<br />
<br />
Article history:<br />
<br />
The method of electrical discharge machining (EDM), one of the processing methods based<br />
<br />
Received 14 April 2006<br />
<br />
on non-traditional manufacturing procedures, is gaining increased popularity, since it does<br />
<br />
Received in revised form<br />
<br />
not require cutting tools and allows machining involving hard, brittle, thin and complex<br />
<br />
7 September 2007<br />
<br />
geometry.<br />
<br />
Accepted 10 September 2007<br />
<br />
By using different EDM parameters (current, pulse on-time, pulse off-time, arc voltage), the<br />
Ra (m) roughness value as a result of application of a number of copper electrode-hardened<br />
powder metals (cold work tool steel) to a work piece has been investigated, in this study. At<br />
<br />
Keywords:<br />
<br />
the same time, roughness values obtained from the experiments that have been modeled by<br />
<br />
Electrical discharge machining<br />
<br />
using the genetic expression programming (GEP) method and a mathematical relationship<br />
<br />
Genetic expression programming<br />
<br />
has been suggested between the GEP model and surface roughness and parameters affecting<br />
<br />
Surface roughness<br />
<br />
it. Moreover, EDM has been used by applying copper, copper–tungsten (W–Cu) and graphite<br />
electrodes to the same material with experimental parameters designed in accordance with<br />
the Taguchi method. Results obtained from this study have been compared among each<br />
other and similar studies in the literature.<br />
© 2007 Published by Elsevier B.V.<br />
<br />
1.<br />
<br />
Introduction<br />
<br />
The first EDM application was carried out by Mr. and Mrs.<br />
Lazarenko in the Technical Institute of Moscow during the<br />
Second World War. The fundamentals of EDM can be traced<br />
as far back as 1770, when English chemist Joseph Priestly discovered the erosive effect of electrical discharges or sparks.<br />
However, it was only in 1943 at the Moscow University that<br />
Mr. and Mrs. Lazarenko exploited the destructive properties<br />
of electrical discharges for constructive applications (Puertas<br />
and Luis, 2004). The EDM method, one of the methods used in<br />
the machining industry, is becoming a preferred manufacturing method as it does not require the use of cutting tools for<br />
materials that conduct electricity and ensures low production<br />
costs.<br />
<br />
∗<br />
<br />
Corresponding author.<br />
E-mail address: ckayacan@mmf.sdu.edu.tr (M.C. Kayacan).<br />
0924-0136/$ – see front matter © 2007 Published by Elsevier B.V.<br />
doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.022<br />
<br />
A non-traditional manufacturing method, the electro erosion process does not depend on the hardness of material and<br />
offers a way to process materials of very complex geometry<br />
with very fine and high precision by using cheap electrode<br />
materials, which makes it a preferred method.<br />
The most important advantage of this process is its independence of the machined material’s mechanical properties<br />
and independent from the cutting force. Thus, materials of<br />
high hardness, brittleness and strength that are difficult-tocut can be machined easily at desired shape (Tsai et al., 2003).<br />
EDM is a machining method based on the principle of controlled application of high-frequency electric discharge onto<br />
a work piece that conducts electricity thus detaching small<br />
particles from the work piece by melting and evaporating<br />
them. The machining performance in EDM processes consists<br />
<br />
348<br />
<br />
j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s p r o c e s s i n g t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 0 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 347–355<br />
<br />
of the material removal rate (MRR), electrode wear (EW), surface roughness (SR) and surface quality. The effort made in<br />
literature conducted so far has been to increase the material removal rate, with the studies aimed to erode as much<br />
material as possible. Technologies still face some difficulties<br />
in the increase of the MRR value. Studies to improve this proportion are going on (Puertas and Luis, 2004; Fuling et al., 2004;<br />
Amorim and Weingaertner, 2004; Valentincic and Junkar, 2004;<br />
˘<br />
Lin et al., 2000; Erden and Kaftanoglu, 1981).<br />
MRR depends on the properties of the dielectric fluid used<br />
in the EDM as much as it depends on the properties of the<br />
work piece material and the electrode. Minimum wear of the<br />
electrode that removes the materials from the work piece<br />
by conducting the current is required in EDM applications.<br />
A number of researches have been made by adding various<br />
additives to the dielectric fluid in order to decrease the electrode wear rate, obtaining better results compared to pure<br />
fluids (Valentincic and Junkar, 2004; Luis et al., 2005; Wang<br />
et al., 1999). Volumetric relative wear has been observed in<br />
addition to the EW/MRR rates (Amorim and Weingaertner,<br />
2004). Another performance indicator of the EDM process<br />
is the roughness formed on the surface of the work piece.<br />
One of the areas among studies involving the EDM most<br />
researches have been made on is the effort to decrease the<br />
surface roughness (Ho and Newman, 2003). While depending<br />
on the machining parameters during the EDM, the surface<br />
roughness is also greatly affected by the material properties of the work piece and the electrode (Fuling et al., 2004;<br />
Pecas and Henriques, 2003; Simao et al., 2003; Chow et al.,<br />
¸<br />
2000).<br />
Use of the artificial intelligent methods (ANN, Fuzzy logic,<br />
hybrid intelligent method) in modeling studies to model<br />
roughness values obtained as a result of experiments involving different materials and machining conditions is gaining<br />
demand (Valentincic and Junkar, 2004; Kaneko and Onodera,<br />
2004; Fenggou and Dayong, 2004; Wang et al., 2003; Tsai and<br />
Wang, 2001).<br />
Despite the effort to produce powder metal parts so as to<br />
give them final shape features, different methods have to be<br />
implemented due to the locations and form of the use of some<br />
parts. Different processing methods are implemented especially in the mold production to eliminate the negative impacts<br />
of distortion, etc. as a result of metal hardening. Probably the<br />
most important of such processing methods is the EDM process.<br />
In this study, powder material (Assab79PM, DIN 1.2379)<br />
which has reached 57-58 Rc hardness by vacuuming in similar chemical properties to cold work steel especially used in<br />
cutting mold production has been machined in EDM process.<br />
Copper was used as the electrode material due to its low cost<br />
and high conductivity. Besides, the EDM process was applied<br />
using copper–tungsten (25–75%) and graphite as electrode<br />
materials to determination the effect of different electrode<br />
materials on the surface roughness. Moreover, data obtained<br />
from the EDM modeled using the copper electrode was used<br />
in genetic expression programming (GEP), an artificial intelligence technique. The roughness equation was derived based<br />
on the EDM parameters by using the GEP model and the roughness values calculated by using this equation were compared<br />
to studies of various researchers.<br />
<br />
2.<br />
Fundamental principles of EDM and<br />
surface roughness<br />
One of the most important features of the EDM method is<br />
its ability to work independently of the mechanical properties of the machined material. Once voltage is applied to<br />
the electrode and the work piece, electrons detached from<br />
the electrode (cathode) move accelerated towards the work<br />
piece. At the destination, they hit neutral dielectric molecules,<br />
removing more electrons. These electrons, in turn, accelerate<br />
the electron flow towards the anode by similar collisions. This<br />
motion of electrons creates a leakage current in the dielectric, evaporating the dielectric fluid in this region. The current<br />
increases in the evaporating fluid. At the end, a “plasma” channel is created between the electrode and the work piece. Due to<br />
its high temperature, this channel melts/evaporates a “crater”<br />
on both the work piece and the electrode. After the plasma<br />
channel extinguishes, all of the evaporated and a part of the<br />
melted material is flushed away by the flow of dielectric fluid.<br />
A small “crater” is created on the surface of the electrode and<br />
the work piece. Craters created by a multitude of plasma channels allow the surface machining.<br />
One of the most important parameters in the EDM processing is surface roughness. To determine the most optimum<br />
material removal time, it should be ensured that the surface roughness stays within an acceptable range. Parameters<br />
affecting the surface roughness in the EDM are found to be<br />
discharge current, gap voltage, pulse on-time and pulse offtime.<br />
Basic parameters affecting the manufacture process are<br />
briefly defined as follows (Puertas and Luis, 2004):<br />
• Discharge current (I): value of the current applied to the electrode during pulse on-time in the EDM. Discharge current<br />
is one of the primary input parameters of an EDM process<br />
and together with discharge duration and relatively constant voltage for given tool and work piece materials (Lee,<br />
2001).<br />
• Gap voltage (V): voltage applied between the electrode and<br />
the work piece during the EDM.<br />
• Pulse on-time (ton ): time for which current is applied to the<br />
electrode during each EDM cycle. The material removed is<br />
directly proportional to the quantity of energy applied during pulse on-time. This energy is controlled by the current<br />
and the on-time.<br />
• Off-time (toff ): waiting interval during two pulse on-time<br />
periods. Melted and solidified particles are removed from<br />
the setting during this period.<br />
The parameters explained above used as experimental<br />
variables define the value of roughness occurring on the surface of the work piece. There are various simple surface<br />
roughness amplitude parameters used in industry, such as<br />
roughness average (Ra ), root-mean-square (rms) roughness<br />
(Rq ), and maximum peak-to-valley roughness (Ry or Rmax ), etc.<br />
(PDI Webmaster, 2000). The parameter Ra is used in this study.<br />
The average roughness (Ra ) is the area between the roughness profile and its mean line, or the integral of the absolute<br />
value of the roughness profile height over the evaluation<br />
<br />
349<br />
<br />
j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s p r o c e s s i n g t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 0 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 347–355<br />
<br />
length (Colak et al., 2007). Therefore, the Ra is specified by the<br />
¸<br />
following equation:<br />
1<br />
Ra =<br />
L<br />
<br />
Experimental parameters<br />
<br />
L<br />
<br />
Y(x) dx<br />
<br />
(1)<br />
<br />
0<br />
<br />
where Ra is the arithmetic average deviation from the mean<br />
line, L the sampling length, and Y is the ordinate of the profile curve. There are many methods of measuring surface<br />
roughness, such as image processing, microscopes, stylus type<br />
instruments, profile tracing instruments, etc. A Pocket Surf<br />
stylus type instrument (produced by Hommel Verke T500) was<br />
used in this study.<br />
<br />
3.<br />
<br />
Table 1 – Experimental machining settings for copper<br />
electrodes<br />
<br />
Genetic expression programming (GEP)<br />
<br />
GEP algorithm is a solution method which makes a global function search for the problem, developed as a resultant of genetic<br />
algorithm (GA) and genetic programming (GP) algorithms.<br />
Characteristic of GA algorithms is a linear array of constant<br />
length chromosomes. Despite of they could be manipulated by<br />
genetic operators easily these are not functional in non-linear<br />
problems. GP algorithms try to find a suitable solution using<br />
parse three which they create to define relations between different size and shape non-linear variables. Advantages of GA<br />
and GP algorithms are jointed in GEP algorithm. Relationships<br />
of non-linear variables which are characteristically in different size and shape are derived in order to convert constant<br />
size and linear arrays using suitable function genetic operators<br />
(Chiang et al., 1995).<br />
GEP algorithm can be handled as a common application of<br />
GA and GP algorithms. The genetic algorithm (GA) is applied to<br />
solve the expression tree. GEP can be applied to the application<br />
of conventional genetic algorithm and genetic programming<br />
(GP). GEP genes are composed of a list of operators, functions, constants and variable names as chromosomes. Firstly<br />
GEP is produced randomly program depends on this operators and data sets. The derived programs mutate until the<br />
program with best fitness value among them is found. The<br />
program with the best fitness value is taken as the last result.<br />
The results can be compared by applying the mathematical relation obtained from the program with the best fitness<br />
value in the proposed computer program (Chiang et al., 1995).<br />
Crossover is determined by choosing two ET (expression tree)<br />
based on fitness and generating for each ET the crossover point<br />
(node) at random. For example: consider the following ETs<br />
(Fig. 1) with crossover points 2 and 3. The sub-tree of ET 1 starting from crossover point 2 will be swapped with the sub-tree<br />
of ET 2 at crossover point 3.<br />
<br />
Current (I, A)<br />
Pulse on-time (ton , s)<br />
Pulse off-time (toff , s)<br />
Gap voltage (V)<br />
Electrode polarity<br />
<br />
4.<br />
<br />
Value<br />
7, 12, 22, 42<br />
6, 12, 25, 50, 100<br />
12, 25, 50, 100<br />
40, 60, 80, 100<br />
Positive (+)<br />
<br />
Design of the experiments<br />
<br />
In mold manufacturing, usage of powder metallurgy is gaining increased popularity. Powder metal is the material type<br />
preferred in manufacturing for its ability to yield the required<br />
mechanical properties. Despite the effort to produce powder<br />
metal parts so as to give them final shape features, different<br />
machining methods have to be implemented due to the usage<br />
area and functionality of some powder metal parts. Different<br />
processing methods are implemented especially in the mold<br />
production to eliminate the negative impacts of distortion, etc.<br />
as a result of metal hardening. Probably the most important<br />
of such processing methods is the EDM.<br />
In this study used to observe the surface properties formed<br />
as a result of the EDM, Assab79PM, which demonstrates the<br />
chemical properties of the DIN 1.2379 cold work tool steel,<br />
has been selected as the work piece. Hardness of the whole<br />
material has been brought to 57–58 Rc by heat treatment. The<br />
EDM has been applied on the surface of work pieces possessing<br />
this hardness. The EDM has been done using three different<br />
electrode materials different numbers of times, namely copper, graphite and copper–tungsten. As indicated in Table 1,<br />
320 tests have been designed using the copper electrode with<br />
different EDM parameters (discharge current, pulse on-time,<br />
pulse off-time and gap voltage) (Salman, 2005). The objective<br />
of the large number of EDM experiments using the copper<br />
electrode was to obtain sufficient data for more effective modeling of the data obtained from the experiment system in the<br />
artificial intelligence techniques (GEP). To be more precise, a<br />
high number of EDM experiments ensure that more realistic<br />
results are obtained in modeling a problem using the artificial<br />
intelligence techniques (Fuzzy logic, ANN, GEP). The process<br />
parameters for the hardened powder metal material using a<br />
copper electrode at the depth of 2 mm are indicated in Table 1.<br />
Taguchi method was used to employ a more economical<br />
and effective experiment design using the same parameters with copper–tungsten and graphite electrodes. Nine EDM<br />
experiments were scheduled for each electrode type with this<br />
design method.<br />
<br />
Fig. 1 – Example crossovers for GEP algorithm. (1) Program ET; (2) program ET; (3) crossover ET; (4) result program ET.<br />
<br />
350<br />
<br />
j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s p r o c e s s i n g t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 0 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 347–355<br />
<br />
Table 2 – Parameters of the EDM experiment using<br />
copper–tungsten and graphite as electrodes<br />
I (A)<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
22<br />
22<br />
22<br />
42<br />
42<br />
42<br />
<br />
ton (s)<br />
6<br />
50<br />
100<br />
6<br />
50<br />
100<br />
6<br />
50<br />
100<br />
<br />
toff (s)<br />
<br />
Gap V (V)<br />
<br />
12<br />
50<br />
100<br />
50<br />
100<br />
12<br />
100<br />
12<br />
50<br />
<br />
40<br />
60<br />
100<br />
100<br />
40<br />
60<br />
60<br />
100<br />
40<br />
<br />
and its average value was calculated and used in the GEP<br />
model.<br />
<br />
The quality design first proposed by Taguchi in the 1960s is<br />
widely applied because of its proven success in greatly improving industrial product quality (Taguchi et al., 1989; Bendell et<br />
al., 1989; Taguchi, 1981). Therefore, this study uses the Taguchi<br />
method to identify the optimum combination of machining<br />
parameters in EDM machining of powder metal. The method is<br />
used to formulate the experimental layout, analyze the effect<br />
of each machining parameter on the machining characteristics (Chang and Kuo, 2007).<br />
In the study, surface roughness was set as the objective<br />
function of the EDM experiment, and four factors – current,<br />
pulse on-time, pulse off-time and gap voltage – were considered the main machining parameters (Table 2). The number<br />
of experimental parameter levels was chosen based on the<br />
range of machining conditions, primarily current, pulse ontime, pulse off-time and gap voltage, resulting in different<br />
levels of each of the four controlled factors.<br />
The view of the tabulated electrodes used in the experiments is given in Fig. 2 on a specially prepared board. The<br />
EDM experiments have been done by on an AjanEDM machine<br />
produced by AjanCNC corporation. Machined work piece at<br />
the depth of 2 mm by EDM, were cut on any of the sides for<br />
roughness measurement. The roughness of the machined surface is measured by using the Hommel Verke T500 surface<br />
measurement equipment. In the measurement, the sampling<br />
length (Lc ) as 0.25 mm, measuring length (Lm ) as 1.25 mm<br />
(5.Lc) and traverse length (Lt ) as 1.5 mm is taken, respectively<br />
(Fig. 2). Surface roughness (Ra ) that occurred on each part as<br />
a result of each EDM experiment was measured three times<br />
<br />
5.<br />
<br />
Results and discussion<br />
<br />
Some of the 320 surface roughness values measured as a<br />
result of the EDM applied with the copper electrode based<br />
on parameters such as the discharge current, pulse on-time,<br />
pulse off-time and gap voltage have been indicated in Table 3.<br />
For graphite and copper–tungsten electrodes, the experiments numbers and parameters design with Taguchi method<br />
are shown in Table 4.<br />
<br />
5.1.<br />
Designing the GEP model for Ra value estimation<br />
for copper electrode EDM<br />
A GEP model was created using the data obtained from the 320<br />
EDM experiments done by using the copper electrodes. The<br />
main purpose of creating and using this model is to establish<br />
a mathematical relationship between the EDM parameters.<br />
In the GEP model design, the program parameters—<br />
number of terminals: 4; number of training values: 256; number of test values: 50 have been selected as a constant. The<br />
values, Number of Chromosomes, Number of Genes, Head<br />
Size, Selection Range, Fitness Cases and Max. Fitness varied<br />
in each model.<br />
Eighty percent of the data for each model established in the<br />
study was randomly selected and used for training data while<br />
20% was used for test data. The data used for test were not<br />
used during the training stage. Table 5+ lists the data used for<br />
test stage.<br />
A multitude of models was established using the EDM<br />
experiment by changing the GEP parameters to obtain the<br />
best trained model. The model reaching the highest regression<br />
(R2 ) value (0.95) was accepted as the solution from among the<br />
models constructed.<br />
The model accepted as the most suitable solution model<br />
had its values selected as follows: number of chromosomes:<br />
50; number of genes: 3; head size: 8; selection range: 100; fitness cases: 256; max. fitness: 25,600.<br />
The relationship between the EDM parameters and Ra has<br />
been transformed into the C++ program code based on the<br />
model yielding the best result as follows:<br />
<br />
Fig. 2 – Copper electrodes (∅10 mm × 10 mm) and roughness measurement.<br />
<br />
351<br />
<br />
j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s p r o c e s s i n g t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 0 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 347–355<br />
<br />
Table 3 – Results of the EDM experiment done by copper electrodes<br />
I (A)<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
42<br />
42<br />
.<br />
.<br />
.<br />
42<br />
42<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
12<br />
12<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
42<br />
42<br />
42<br />
42<br />
<br />
ton (s)<br />
<br />
toff (s)<br />
<br />
V (V)<br />
<br />
Ra (m)<br />
<br />
I (A)<br />
<br />
ton (s)<br />
<br />
toff (s)<br />
<br />
V (V)<br />
<br />
Ra (m)<br />
<br />
I (A)<br />
<br />
ton (s)<br />
<br />
toff (s)<br />
<br />
V (V)<br />
<br />
Ra (m)<br />
<br />
6<br />
12<br />
25<br />
50<br />
100<br />
12<br />
25<br />
100<br />
6<br />
12<br />
50<br />
12<br />
25<br />
50<br />
1<br />
12<br />
25<br />
12<br />
50<br />
<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
25<br />
25<br />
<br />
40<br />
40<br />
40<br />
40<br />
40<br />
60<br />
60<br />
60<br />
80<br />
80<br />
80<br />
80<br />
80<br />
80<br />
80<br />
100<br />
100<br />
60<br />
60<br />
<br />
1.7<br />
1.85<br />
2.14<br />
2.43<br />
2.64<br />
1.94<br />
2.4<br />
2.9<br />
1.9<br />
2.1<br />
2.69<br />
2.67<br />
2.88<br />
3.3<br />
3.96<br />
2.85<br />
3.2<br />
4.43<br />
5.56<br />
<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
22<br />
22<br />
22<br />
22<br />
<br />
12<br />
25<br />
50<br />
100<br />
12<br />
25<br />
100<br />
6<br />
12<br />
50<br />
100<br />
6<br />
12<br />
25<br />
100<br />
6<br />
12<br />
100<br />
12<br />
<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
50<br />
50<br />
<br />
40<br />
40<br />
40<br />
40<br />
60<br />
60<br />
60<br />
80<br />
80<br />
80<br />
80<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
40<br />
40<br />
40<br />
60<br />
<br />
1.68<br />
1.93<br />
2.28<br />
2.68<br />
1.85<br />
2.1<br />
3.77<br />
2.12<br />
2.46<br />
3.21<br />
3.82<br />
2.26<br />
2.63<br />
2.77<br />
3.94<br />
2.7<br />
3.15<br />
4.3<br />
3.26<br />
<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
22<br />
22<br />
22<br />
22<br />
22<br />
22<br />
22<br />
42<br />
42<br />
42<br />
42<br />
42<br />
7<br />
7<br />
22<br />
22<br />
<br />
12<br />
25<br />
100<br />
6<br />
12<br />
50<br />
100<br />
6<br />
12<br />
50<br />
50<br />
100<br />
12<br />
25<br />
50<br />
100<br />
6<br />
12<br />
50<br />
<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
100<br />
100<br />
<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
40<br />
40<br />
40<br />
40<br />
60<br />
60<br />
60<br />
40<br />
40<br />
60<br />
60<br />
60<br />
80<br />
100<br />
40<br />
40<br />
<br />
2.85<br />
3.2<br />
4.03<br />
2.76<br />
3.31<br />
4.65<br />
4.8<br />
3.06<br />
3.61<br />
4.8<br />
5.6<br />
5.83<br />
4.5<br />
5.14<br />
5.73<br />
3.0<br />
2.0<br />
2.86<br />
3.6<br />
<br />
100<br />
6<br />
50<br />
100<br />
6<br />
12<br />
25<br />
100<br />
6<br />
12<br />
25<br />
100<br />
6<br />
12<br />
50<br />
100<br />
6<br />
12<br />
25<br />
50<br />
25<br />
50<br />
100<br />
6<br />
<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
<br />
60<br />
80<br />
80<br />
80<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
40<br />
40<br />
40<br />
40<br />
60<br />
60<br />
60<br />
60<br />
80<br />
80<br />
80<br />
80<br />
40<br />
40<br />
40<br />
60<br />
<br />
5.9<br />
4.33<br />
2.41<br />
2.92<br />
1.7<br />
1.96<br />
2.14<br />
3.05<br />
2.01<br />
2.16<br />
1.79<br />
2.35<br />
1.4<br />
1.67<br />
2.2<br />
2.42<br />
1.44<br />
1.74<br />
2.14<br />
2.32<br />
4.41<br />
4.78<br />
5.3<br />
3.93<br />
<br />
22<br />
22<br />
22<br />
42<br />
42<br />
42<br />
42<br />
42<br />
42<br />
42<br />
42<br />
42<br />
42<br />
42<br />
12<br />
22<br />
22<br />
22<br />
22<br />
42<br />
42<br />
42<br />
22<br />
22<br />
<br />
25<br />
50<br />
12<br />
25<br />
50<br />
100<br />
12<br />
25<br />
50<br />
100<br />
100<br />
12<br />
25<br />
100<br />
100<br />
6<br />
25<br />
50<br />
100<br />
12<br />
60<br />
12<br />
100<br />
50<br />
<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
<br />
60<br />
60<br />
100<br />
60<br />
60<br />
60<br />
80<br />
80<br />
80<br />
80<br />
80<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
40<br />
80<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
40<br />
40<br />
40<br />
100<br />
100<br />
<br />
3.53<br />
3.86<br />
3.58<br />
4.46<br />
4.91<br />
5.64<br />
4.48<br />
4.7<br />
4.97<br />
5.72<br />
5.01<br />
4.45<br />
4.65<br />
5.16<br />
3.24<br />
2.9<br />
3.87<br />
4.3<br />
4.87<br />
4.06<br />
4.1<br />
4.2<br />
5.9<br />
5.12<br />
<br />
22<br />
22<br />
22<br />
22<br />
22<br />
22<br />
22<br />
42<br />
42<br />
42<br />
7<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
22<br />
22<br />
22<br />
22<br />
22<br />
22<br />
22<br />
<br />
100<br />
12<br />
100<br />
6<br />
12<br />
50<br />
100<br />
6<br />
12<br />
25<br />
100<br />
6<br />
25<br />
50<br />
6<br />
100<br />
6<br />
12<br />
25<br />
100<br />
6<br />
25<br />
<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
12<br />
<br />
40<br />
60<br />
80<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
40<br />
40<br />
40<br />
100<br />
40<br />
40<br />
40<br />
60<br />
60<br />
80<br />
80<br />
80<br />
80<br />
100<br />
100<br />
<br />
4.0<br />
3.1<br />
4.23<br />
3.03<br />
3.39<br />
3.9<br />
4.43<br />
3.61<br />
3.76<br />
3.96<br />
2.97<br />
1.8<br />
2.26<br />
2.6<br />
1.98<br />
5.29<br />
3.23<br />
3.61<br />
4.34<br />
5.53<br />
3.4<br />
4.67<br />
<br />
Table 4 – Experimental results obtained in this study with using graphite and W–Cu<br />
I (A)<br />
7<br />
7<br />
7<br />
22<br />
22<br />
22<br />
42<br />
42<br />
42<br />
<br />
ton (s)<br />
<br />
toff (s)<br />
<br />
Gap V (V)<br />
<br />
Cu–W Ra (m)<br />
<br />
Graphite Ra (m)<br />
<br />
6<br />
50<br />
100<br />
6<br />
50<br />
100<br />
6<br />
50<br />
100<br />
<br />
12<br />
50<br />
100<br />
50<br />
100<br />
12<br />
100<br />
12<br />
50<br />
<br />
40<br />
60<br />
100<br />
100<br />
40<br />
60<br />
60<br />
100<br />
40<br />
<br />
1.74<br />
2.93<br />
2.52<br />
2.6<br />
3.6<br />
4.04<br />
2.28<br />
3.6<br />
4.67<br />
<br />
1.49<br />
2.41<br />
3.14<br />
1.8<br />
3.44<br />
3.86<br />
1.3<br />
4.18<br />
5.04<br />
<br />
ADSENSE
CÓ THỂ BẠN MUỐN DOWNLOAD
Thêm tài liệu vào bộ sưu tập có sẵn:
Báo xấu
LAVA
AANETWORK
TRỢ GIÚP
HỖ TRỢ KHÁCH HÀNG
Chịu trách nhiệm nội dung:
Nguyễn Công Hà - Giám đốc Công ty TNHH TÀI LIỆU TRỰC TUYẾN VI NA
LIÊN HỆ
Địa chỉ: P402, 54A Nơ Trang Long, Phường 14, Q.Bình Thạnh, TP.HCM
Hotline: 093 303 0098
Email: support@tailieu.vn