intTypePromotion=1
zunia.vn Tuyển sinh 2024 dành cho Gen-Z zunia.vn zunia.vn
ADSENSE

Evolutionary programming method for modeling the EDM parameters for roughness

Chia sẻ: Đăng Xuân Phương | Ngày: | Loại File: PDF | Số trang:9

54
lượt xem
2
download
 
  Download Vui lòng tải xuống để xem tài liệu đầy đủ

(BQ) The method of electrical discharge machining (EDM), one of the processing methods based on non-traditional manufacturing procedures, is gaining increased popularity, since it does not require cutting tools and allows machining involving hard, brittle, thin and complex geometry

Chủ đề:
Lưu

Nội dung Text: Evolutionary programming method for modeling the EDM parameters for roughness

j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s p r o c e s s i n g t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 0 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 347–355<br /> <br /> Assab79PM, which<br /> demonstrates the<br /> chemical properties of<br /> the DIN 1.2379 cold<br /> j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w tool l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / j m a t p r o t e c<br /> work w . e steel<br /> <br /> Evolutionary programming method for modeling<br /> the EDM parameters for roughness<br /> ¨<br /> Ozlem Salman, M. Cengiz Kayacan ∗<br /> University of Suleyman Demirel, CAD/CAM Research and Application Center, 32300 Isparta, Turkey<br /> <br /> a r t i c l e<br /> <br /> i n f o<br /> <br /> a b s t r a c t<br /> <br /> Article history:<br /> <br /> The method of electrical discharge machining (EDM), one of the processing methods based<br /> <br /> Received 14 April 2006<br /> <br /> on non-traditional manufacturing procedures, is gaining increased popularity, since it does<br /> <br /> Received in revised form<br /> <br /> not require cutting tools and allows machining involving hard, brittle, thin and complex<br /> <br /> 7 September 2007<br /> <br /> geometry.<br /> <br /> Accepted 10 September 2007<br /> <br /> By using different EDM parameters (current, pulse on-time, pulse off-time, arc voltage), the<br /> Ra (␮m) roughness value as a result of application of a number of copper electrode-hardened<br /> powder metals (cold work tool steel) to a work piece has been investigated, in this study. At<br /> <br /> Keywords:<br /> <br /> the same time, roughness values obtained from the experiments that have been modeled by<br /> <br /> Electrical discharge machining<br /> <br /> using the genetic expression programming (GEP) method and a mathematical relationship<br /> <br /> Genetic expression programming<br /> <br /> has been suggested between the GEP model and surface roughness and parameters affecting<br /> <br /> Surface roughness<br /> <br /> it. Moreover, EDM has been used by applying copper, copper–tungsten (W–Cu) and graphite<br /> electrodes to the same material with experimental parameters designed in accordance with<br /> the Taguchi method. Results obtained from this study have been compared among each<br /> other and similar studies in the literature.<br /> © 2007 Published by Elsevier B.V.<br /> <br /> 1.<br /> <br /> Introduction<br /> <br /> The first EDM application was carried out by Mr. and Mrs.<br /> Lazarenko in the Technical Institute of Moscow during the<br /> Second World War. The fundamentals of EDM can be traced<br /> as far back as 1770, when English chemist Joseph Priestly discovered the erosive effect of electrical discharges or sparks.<br /> However, it was only in 1943 at the Moscow University that<br /> Mr. and Mrs. Lazarenko exploited the destructive properties<br /> of electrical discharges for constructive applications (Puertas<br /> and Luis, 2004). The EDM method, one of the methods used in<br /> the machining industry, is becoming a preferred manufacturing method as it does not require the use of cutting tools for<br /> materials that conduct electricity and ensures low production<br /> costs.<br /> <br /> ∗<br /> <br /> Corresponding author.<br /> E-mail address: ckayacan@mmf.sdu.edu.tr (M.C. Kayacan).<br /> 0924-0136/$ – see front matter © 2007 Published by Elsevier B.V.<br /> doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.022<br /> <br /> A non-traditional manufacturing method, the electro erosion process does not depend on the hardness of material and<br /> offers a way to process materials of very complex geometry<br /> with very fine and high precision by using cheap electrode<br /> materials, which makes it a preferred method.<br /> The most important advantage of this process is its independence of the machined material’s mechanical properties<br /> and independent from the cutting force. Thus, materials of<br /> high hardness, brittleness and strength that are difficult-tocut can be machined easily at desired shape (Tsai et al., 2003).<br /> EDM is a machining method based on the principle of controlled application of high-frequency electric discharge onto<br /> a work piece that conducts electricity thus detaching small<br /> particles from the work piece by melting and evaporating<br /> them. The machining performance in EDM processes consists<br /> <br /> 348<br /> <br /> j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s p r o c e s s i n g t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 0 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 347–355<br /> <br /> of the material removal rate (MRR), electrode wear (EW), surface roughness (SR) and surface quality. The effort made in<br /> literature conducted so far has been to increase the material removal rate, with the studies aimed to erode as much<br /> material as possible. Technologies still face some difficulties<br /> in the increase of the MRR value. Studies to improve this proportion are going on (Puertas and Luis, 2004; Fuling et al., 2004;<br /> Amorim and Weingaertner, 2004; Valentincic and Junkar, 2004;<br /> ˘<br /> Lin et al., 2000; Erden and Kaftanoglu, 1981).<br /> MRR depends on the properties of the dielectric fluid used<br /> in the EDM as much as it depends on the properties of the<br /> work piece material and the electrode. Minimum wear of the<br /> electrode that removes the materials from the work piece<br /> by conducting the current is required in EDM applications.<br /> A number of researches have been made by adding various<br /> additives to the dielectric fluid in order to decrease the electrode wear rate, obtaining better results compared to pure<br /> fluids (Valentincic and Junkar, 2004; Luis et al., 2005; Wang<br /> et al., 1999). Volumetric relative wear has been observed in<br /> addition to the EW/MRR rates (Amorim and Weingaertner,<br /> 2004). Another performance indicator of the EDM process<br /> is the roughness formed on the surface of the work piece.<br /> One of the areas among studies involving the EDM most<br /> researches have been made on is the effort to decrease the<br /> surface roughness (Ho and Newman, 2003). While depending<br /> on the machining parameters during the EDM, the surface<br /> roughness is also greatly affected by the material properties of the work piece and the electrode (Fuling et al., 2004;<br /> Pecas and Henriques, 2003; Simao et al., 2003; Chow et al.,<br /> ¸<br /> 2000).<br /> Use of the artificial intelligent methods (ANN, Fuzzy logic,<br /> hybrid intelligent method) in modeling studies to model<br /> roughness values obtained as a result of experiments involving different materials and machining conditions is gaining<br /> demand (Valentincic and Junkar, 2004; Kaneko and Onodera,<br /> 2004; Fenggou and Dayong, 2004; Wang et al., 2003; Tsai and<br /> Wang, 2001).<br /> Despite the effort to produce powder metal parts so as to<br /> give them final shape features, different methods have to be<br /> implemented due to the locations and form of the use of some<br /> parts. Different processing methods are implemented especially in the mold production to eliminate the negative impacts<br /> of distortion, etc. as a result of metal hardening. Probably the<br /> most important of such processing methods is the EDM process.<br /> In this study, powder material (Assab79PM, DIN 1.2379)<br /> which has reached 57-58 Rc hardness by vacuuming in similar chemical properties to cold work steel especially used in<br /> cutting mold production has been machined in EDM process.<br /> Copper was used as the electrode material due to its low cost<br /> and high conductivity. Besides, the EDM process was applied<br /> using copper–tungsten (25–75%) and graphite as electrode<br /> materials to determination the effect of different electrode<br /> materials on the surface roughness. Moreover, data obtained<br /> from the EDM modeled using the copper electrode was used<br /> in genetic expression programming (GEP), an artificial intelligence technique. The roughness equation was derived based<br /> on the EDM parameters by using the GEP model and the roughness values calculated by using this equation were compared<br /> to studies of various researchers.<br /> <br /> 2.<br /> Fundamental principles of EDM and<br /> surface roughness<br /> One of the most important features of the EDM method is<br /> its ability to work independently of the mechanical properties of the machined material. Once voltage is applied to<br /> the electrode and the work piece, electrons detached from<br /> the electrode (cathode) move accelerated towards the work<br /> piece. At the destination, they hit neutral dielectric molecules,<br /> removing more electrons. These electrons, in turn, accelerate<br /> the electron flow towards the anode by similar collisions. This<br /> motion of electrons creates a leakage current in the dielectric, evaporating the dielectric fluid in this region. The current<br /> increases in the evaporating fluid. At the end, a “plasma” channel is created between the electrode and the work piece. Due to<br /> its high temperature, this channel melts/evaporates a “crater”<br /> on both the work piece and the electrode. After the plasma<br /> channel extinguishes, all of the evaporated and a part of the<br /> melted material is flushed away by the flow of dielectric fluid.<br /> A small “crater” is created on the surface of the electrode and<br /> the work piece. Craters created by a multitude of plasma channels allow the surface machining.<br /> One of the most important parameters in the EDM processing is surface roughness. To determine the most optimum<br /> material removal time, it should be ensured that the surface roughness stays within an acceptable range. Parameters<br /> affecting the surface roughness in the EDM are found to be<br /> discharge current, gap voltage, pulse on-time and pulse offtime.<br /> Basic parameters affecting the manufacture process are<br /> briefly defined as follows (Puertas and Luis, 2004):<br /> • Discharge current (I): value of the current applied to the electrode during pulse on-time in the EDM. Discharge current<br /> is one of the primary input parameters of an EDM process<br /> and together with discharge duration and relatively constant voltage for given tool and work piece materials (Lee,<br /> 2001).<br /> • Gap voltage (V): voltage applied between the electrode and<br /> the work piece during the EDM.<br /> • Pulse on-time (ton ): time for which current is applied to the<br /> electrode during each EDM cycle. The material removed is<br /> directly proportional to the quantity of energy applied during pulse on-time. This energy is controlled by the current<br /> and the on-time.<br /> • Off-time (toff ): waiting interval during two pulse on-time<br /> periods. Melted and solidified particles are removed from<br /> the setting during this period.<br /> The parameters explained above used as experimental<br /> variables define the value of roughness occurring on the surface of the work piece. There are various simple surface<br /> roughness amplitude parameters used in industry, such as<br /> roughness average (Ra ), root-mean-square (rms) roughness<br /> (Rq ), and maximum peak-to-valley roughness (Ry or Rmax ), etc.<br /> (PDI Webmaster, 2000). The parameter Ra is used in this study.<br /> The average roughness (Ra ) is the area between the roughness profile and its mean line, or the integral of the absolute<br /> value of the roughness profile height over the evaluation<br /> <br /> 349<br /> <br /> j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s p r o c e s s i n g t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 0 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 347–355<br /> <br /> length (Colak et al., 2007). Therefore, the Ra is specified by the<br /> ¸<br /> following equation:<br /> 1<br /> Ra =<br /> L<br /> <br /> Experimental parameters<br /> <br /> L<br /> <br /> Y(x) dx<br /> <br /> (1)<br /> <br /> 0<br /> <br /> where Ra is the arithmetic average deviation from the mean<br /> line, L the sampling length, and Y is the ordinate of the profile curve. There are many methods of measuring surface<br /> roughness, such as image processing, microscopes, stylus type<br /> instruments, profile tracing instruments, etc. A Pocket Surf<br /> stylus type instrument (produced by Hommel Verke T500) was<br /> used in this study.<br /> <br /> 3.<br /> <br /> Table 1 – Experimental machining settings for copper<br /> electrodes<br /> <br /> Genetic expression programming (GEP)<br /> <br /> GEP algorithm is a solution method which makes a global function search for the problem, developed as a resultant of genetic<br /> algorithm (GA) and genetic programming (GP) algorithms.<br /> Characteristic of GA algorithms is a linear array of constant<br /> length chromosomes. Despite of they could be manipulated by<br /> genetic operators easily these are not functional in non-linear<br /> problems. GP algorithms try to find a suitable solution using<br /> parse three which they create to define relations between different size and shape non-linear variables. Advantages of GA<br /> and GP algorithms are jointed in GEP algorithm. Relationships<br /> of non-linear variables which are characteristically in different size and shape are derived in order to convert constant<br /> size and linear arrays using suitable function genetic operators<br /> (Chiang et al., 1995).<br /> GEP algorithm can be handled as a common application of<br /> GA and GP algorithms. The genetic algorithm (GA) is applied to<br /> solve the expression tree. GEP can be applied to the application<br /> of conventional genetic algorithm and genetic programming<br /> (GP). GEP genes are composed of a list of operators, functions, constants and variable names as chromosomes. Firstly<br /> GEP is produced randomly program depends on this operators and data sets. The derived programs mutate until the<br /> program with best fitness value among them is found. The<br /> program with the best fitness value is taken as the last result.<br /> The results can be compared by applying the mathematical relation obtained from the program with the best fitness<br /> value in the proposed computer program (Chiang et al., 1995).<br /> Crossover is determined by choosing two ET (expression tree)<br /> based on fitness and generating for each ET the crossover point<br /> (node) at random. For example: consider the following ETs<br /> (Fig. 1) with crossover points 2 and 3. The sub-tree of ET 1 starting from crossover point 2 will be swapped with the sub-tree<br /> of ET 2 at crossover point 3.<br /> <br /> Current (I, A)<br /> Pulse on-time (ton , ␮s)<br /> Pulse off-time (toff , ␮s)<br /> Gap voltage (V)<br /> Electrode polarity<br /> <br /> 4.<br /> <br /> Value<br /> 7, 12, 22, 42<br /> 6, 12, 25, 50, 100<br /> 12, 25, 50, 100<br /> 40, 60, 80, 100<br /> Positive (+)<br /> <br /> Design of the experiments<br /> <br /> In mold manufacturing, usage of powder metallurgy is gaining increased popularity. Powder metal is the material type<br /> preferred in manufacturing for its ability to yield the required<br /> mechanical properties. Despite the effort to produce powder<br /> metal parts so as to give them final shape features, different<br /> machining methods have to be implemented due to the usage<br /> area and functionality of some powder metal parts. Different<br /> processing methods are implemented especially in the mold<br /> production to eliminate the negative impacts of distortion, etc.<br /> as a result of metal hardening. Probably the most important<br /> of such processing methods is the EDM.<br /> In this study used to observe the surface properties formed<br /> as a result of the EDM, Assab79PM, which demonstrates the<br /> chemical properties of the DIN 1.2379 cold work tool steel,<br /> has been selected as the work piece. Hardness of the whole<br /> material has been brought to 57–58 Rc by heat treatment. The<br /> EDM has been applied on the surface of work pieces possessing<br /> this hardness. The EDM has been done using three different<br /> electrode materials different numbers of times, namely copper, graphite and copper–tungsten. As indicated in Table 1,<br /> 320 tests have been designed using the copper electrode with<br /> different EDM parameters (discharge current, pulse on-time,<br /> pulse off-time and gap voltage) (Salman, 2005). The objective<br /> of the large number of EDM experiments using the copper<br /> electrode was to obtain sufficient data for more effective modeling of the data obtained from the experiment system in the<br /> artificial intelligence techniques (GEP). To be more precise, a<br /> high number of EDM experiments ensure that more realistic<br /> results are obtained in modeling a problem using the artificial<br /> intelligence techniques (Fuzzy logic, ANN, GEP). The process<br /> parameters for the hardened powder metal material using a<br /> copper electrode at the depth of 2 mm are indicated in Table 1.<br /> Taguchi method was used to employ a more economical<br /> and effective experiment design using the same parameters with copper–tungsten and graphite electrodes. Nine EDM<br /> experiments were scheduled for each electrode type with this<br /> design method.<br /> <br /> Fig. 1 – Example crossovers for GEP algorithm. (1) Program ET; (2) program ET; (3) crossover ET; (4) result program ET.<br /> <br /> 350<br /> <br /> j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s p r o c e s s i n g t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 0 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 347–355<br /> <br /> Table 2 – Parameters of the EDM experiment using<br /> copper–tungsten and graphite as electrodes<br /> I (A)<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> <br /> ton (␮s)<br /> 6<br /> 50<br /> 100<br /> 6<br /> 50<br /> 100<br /> 6<br /> 50<br /> 100<br /> <br /> toff (␮s)<br /> <br /> Gap V (V)<br /> <br /> 12<br /> 50<br /> 100<br /> 50<br /> 100<br /> 12<br /> 100<br /> 12<br /> 50<br /> <br /> 40<br /> 60<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 40<br /> 60<br /> 60<br /> 100<br /> 40<br /> <br /> and its average value was calculated and used in the GEP<br /> model.<br /> <br /> The quality design first proposed by Taguchi in the 1960s is<br /> widely applied because of its proven success in greatly improving industrial product quality (Taguchi et al., 1989; Bendell et<br /> al., 1989; Taguchi, 1981). Therefore, this study uses the Taguchi<br /> method to identify the optimum combination of machining<br /> parameters in EDM machining of powder metal. The method is<br /> used to formulate the experimental layout, analyze the effect<br /> of each machining parameter on the machining characteristics (Chang and Kuo, 2007).<br /> In the study, surface roughness was set as the objective<br /> function of the EDM experiment, and four factors – current,<br /> pulse on-time, pulse off-time and gap voltage – were considered the main machining parameters (Table 2). The number<br /> of experimental parameter levels was chosen based on the<br /> range of machining conditions, primarily current, pulse ontime, pulse off-time and gap voltage, resulting in different<br /> levels of each of the four controlled factors.<br /> The view of the tabulated electrodes used in the experiments is given in Fig. 2 on a specially prepared board. The<br /> EDM experiments have been done by on an AjanEDM machine<br /> produced by AjanCNC corporation. Machined work piece at<br /> the depth of 2 mm by EDM, were cut on any of the sides for<br /> roughness measurement. The roughness of the machined surface is measured by using the Hommel Verke T500 surface<br /> measurement equipment. In the measurement, the sampling<br /> length (Lc ) as 0.25 mm, measuring length (Lm ) as 1.25 mm<br /> (5.Lc) and traverse length (Lt ) as 1.5 mm is taken, respectively<br /> (Fig. 2). Surface roughness (Ra ) that occurred on each part as<br /> a result of each EDM experiment was measured three times<br /> <br /> 5.<br /> <br /> Results and discussion<br /> <br /> Some of the 320 surface roughness values measured as a<br /> result of the EDM applied with the copper electrode based<br /> on parameters such as the discharge current, pulse on-time,<br /> pulse off-time and gap voltage have been indicated in Table 3.<br /> For graphite and copper–tungsten electrodes, the experiments numbers and parameters design with Taguchi method<br /> are shown in Table 4.<br /> <br /> 5.1.<br /> Designing the GEP model for Ra value estimation<br /> for copper electrode EDM<br /> A GEP model was created using the data obtained from the 320<br /> EDM experiments done by using the copper electrodes. The<br /> main purpose of creating and using this model is to establish<br /> a mathematical relationship between the EDM parameters.<br /> In the GEP model design, the program parameters—<br /> number of terminals: 4; number of training values: 256; number of test values: 50 have been selected as a constant. The<br /> values, Number of Chromosomes, Number of Genes, Head<br /> Size, Selection Range, Fitness Cases and Max. Fitness varied<br /> in each model.<br /> Eighty percent of the data for each model established in the<br /> study was randomly selected and used for training data while<br /> 20% was used for test data. The data used for test were not<br /> used during the training stage. Table 5+ lists the data used for<br /> test stage.<br /> A multitude of models was established using the EDM<br /> experiment by changing the GEP parameters to obtain the<br /> best trained model. The model reaching the highest regression<br /> (R2 ) value (0.95) was accepted as the solution from among the<br /> models constructed.<br /> The model accepted as the most suitable solution model<br /> had its values selected as follows: number of chromosomes:<br /> 50; number of genes: 3; head size: 8; selection range: 100; fitness cases: 256; max. fitness: 25,600.<br /> The relationship between the EDM parameters and Ra has<br /> been transformed into the C++ program code based on the<br /> model yielding the best result as follows:<br /> <br /> Fig. 2 – Copper electrodes (∅10 mm × 10 mm) and roughness measurement.<br /> <br /> 351<br /> <br /> j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s p r o c e s s i n g t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 0 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 347–355<br /> <br /> Table 3 – Results of the EDM experiment done by copper electrodes<br /> I (A)<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> .<br /> .<br /> .<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> <br /> ton (␮s)<br /> <br /> toff (␮s)<br /> <br /> V (V)<br /> <br /> Ra (␮m)<br /> <br /> I (A)<br /> <br /> ton (␮s)<br /> <br /> toff (␮s)<br /> <br /> V (V)<br /> <br /> Ra (␮m)<br /> <br /> I (A)<br /> <br /> ton (␮s)<br /> <br /> toff (␮s)<br /> <br /> V (V)<br /> <br /> Ra (␮m)<br /> <br /> 6<br /> 12<br /> 25<br /> 50<br /> 100<br /> 12<br /> 25<br /> 100<br /> 6<br /> 12<br /> 50<br /> 12<br /> 25<br /> 50<br /> 1<br /> 12<br /> 25<br /> 12<br /> 50<br /> <br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> <br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> 60<br /> 60<br /> 60<br /> 80<br /> 80<br /> 80<br /> 80<br /> 80<br /> 80<br /> 80<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 60<br /> 60<br /> <br /> 1.7<br /> 1.85<br /> 2.14<br /> 2.43<br /> 2.64<br /> 1.94<br /> 2.4<br /> 2.9<br /> 1.9<br /> 2.1<br /> 2.69<br /> 2.67<br /> 2.88<br /> 3.3<br /> 3.96<br /> 2.85<br /> 3.2<br /> 4.43<br /> 5.56<br /> <br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> <br /> 12<br /> 25<br /> 50<br /> 100<br /> 12<br /> 25<br /> 100<br /> 6<br /> 12<br /> 50<br /> 100<br /> 6<br /> 12<br /> 25<br /> 100<br /> 6<br /> 12<br /> 100<br /> 12<br /> <br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 50<br /> 50<br /> <br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> 60<br /> 60<br /> 60<br /> 80<br /> 80<br /> 80<br /> 80<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> 60<br /> <br /> 1.68<br /> 1.93<br /> 2.28<br /> 2.68<br /> 1.85<br /> 2.1<br /> 3.77<br /> 2.12<br /> 2.46<br /> 3.21<br /> 3.82<br /> 2.26<br /> 2.63<br /> 2.77<br /> 3.94<br /> 2.7<br /> 3.15<br /> 4.3<br /> 3.26<br /> <br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> <br /> 12<br /> 25<br /> 100<br /> 6<br /> 12<br /> 50<br /> 100<br /> 6<br /> 12<br /> 50<br /> 50<br /> 100<br /> 12<br /> 25<br /> 50<br /> 100<br /> 6<br /> 12<br /> 50<br /> <br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> <br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> 60<br /> 60<br /> 60<br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> 60<br /> 60<br /> 60<br /> 80<br /> 100<br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> <br /> 2.85<br /> 3.2<br /> 4.03<br /> 2.76<br /> 3.31<br /> 4.65<br /> 4.8<br /> 3.06<br /> 3.61<br /> 4.8<br /> 5.6<br /> 5.83<br /> 4.5<br /> 5.14<br /> 5.73<br /> 3.0<br /> 2.0<br /> 2.86<br /> 3.6<br /> <br /> 100<br /> 6<br /> 50<br /> 100<br /> 6<br /> 12<br /> 25<br /> 100<br /> 6<br /> 12<br /> 25<br /> 100<br /> 6<br /> 12<br /> 50<br /> 100<br /> 6<br /> 12<br /> 25<br /> 50<br /> 25<br /> 50<br /> 100<br /> 6<br /> <br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 25<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 50<br /> 50<br /> 50<br /> 50<br /> <br /> 60<br /> 80<br /> 80<br /> 80<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> 60<br /> 60<br /> 60<br /> 60<br /> 80<br /> 80<br /> 80<br /> 80<br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> 60<br /> <br /> 5.9<br /> 4.33<br /> 2.41<br /> 2.92<br /> 1.7<br /> 1.96<br /> 2.14<br /> 3.05<br /> 2.01<br /> 2.16<br /> 1.79<br /> 2.35<br /> 1.4<br /> 1.67<br /> 2.2<br /> 2.42<br /> 1.44<br /> 1.74<br /> 2.14<br /> 2.32<br /> 4.41<br /> 4.78<br /> 5.3<br /> 3.93<br /> <br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> 12<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> <br /> 25<br /> 50<br /> 12<br /> 25<br /> 50<br /> 100<br /> 12<br /> 25<br /> 50<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 12<br /> 25<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 6<br /> 25<br /> 50<br /> 100<br /> 12<br /> 60<br /> 12<br /> 100<br /> 50<br /> <br /> 50<br /> 50<br /> 50<br /> 50<br /> 50<br /> 50<br /> 50<br /> 50<br /> 50<br /> 50<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 50<br /> 50<br /> 50<br /> 50<br /> 50<br /> 50<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> <br /> 60<br /> 60<br /> 100<br /> 60<br /> 60<br /> 60<br /> 80<br /> 80<br /> 80<br /> 80<br /> 80<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 40<br /> 80<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> <br /> 3.53<br /> 3.86<br /> 3.58<br /> 4.46<br /> 4.91<br /> 5.64<br /> 4.48<br /> 4.7<br /> 4.97<br /> 5.72<br /> 5.01<br /> 4.45<br /> 4.65<br /> 5.16<br /> 3.24<br /> 2.9<br /> 3.87<br /> 4.3<br /> 4.87<br /> 4.06<br /> 4.1<br /> 4.2<br /> 5.9<br /> 5.12<br /> <br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> 7<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> <br /> 100<br /> 12<br /> 100<br /> 6<br /> 12<br /> 50<br /> 100<br /> 6<br /> 12<br /> 25<br /> 100<br /> 6<br /> 25<br /> 50<br /> 6<br /> 100<br /> 6<br /> 12<br /> 25<br /> 100<br /> 6<br /> 25<br /> <br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 50<br /> 50<br /> 50<br /> 50<br /> 50<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> 12<br /> <br /> 40<br /> 60<br /> 80<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> 100<br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> 40<br /> 60<br /> 60<br /> 80<br /> 80<br /> 80<br /> 80<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> <br /> 4.0<br /> 3.1<br /> 4.23<br /> 3.03<br /> 3.39<br /> 3.9<br /> 4.43<br /> 3.61<br /> 3.76<br /> 3.96<br /> 2.97<br /> 1.8<br /> 2.26<br /> 2.6<br /> 1.98<br /> 5.29<br /> 3.23<br /> 3.61<br /> 4.34<br /> 5.53<br /> 3.4<br /> 4.67<br /> <br /> Table 4 – Experimental results obtained in this study with using graphite and W–Cu<br /> I (A)<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 7<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 22<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> 42<br /> <br /> ton (␮s)<br /> <br /> toff (␮s)<br /> <br /> Gap V (V)<br /> <br /> Cu–W Ra (␮m)<br /> <br /> Graphite Ra (␮m)<br /> <br /> 6<br /> 50<br /> 100<br /> 6<br /> 50<br /> 100<br /> 6<br /> 50<br /> 100<br /> <br /> 12<br /> 50<br /> 100<br /> 50<br /> 100<br /> 12<br /> 100<br /> 12<br /> 50<br /> <br /> 40<br /> 60<br /> 100<br /> 100<br /> 40<br /> 60<br /> 60<br /> 100<br /> 40<br /> <br /> 1.74<br /> 2.93<br /> 2.52<br /> 2.6<br /> 3.6<br /> 4.04<br /> 2.28<br /> 3.6<br /> 4.67<br /> <br /> 1.49<br /> 2.41<br /> 3.14<br /> 1.8<br /> 3.44<br /> 3.86<br /> 1.3<br /> 4.18<br /> 5.04<br /> <br />
ADSENSE

CÓ THỂ BẠN MUỐN DOWNLOAD

 

Đồng bộ tài khoản
2=>2