YOMEDIA
ADSENSE
Chapter 5: Inverse functinons – Section 5.8: Indeterminate forms and l’hospital’s rule
51
lượt xem 4
download
lượt xem 4
download
Download
Vui lòng tải xuống để xem tài liệu đầy đủ
Mời các bạn tham khảo bài giảng Chapter 5: Inverse functinons – Section 5.8: Indeterminate forms and l’hospital’s rule sau đây. Bài giảng dành cho đối tượng sinh viên ngành Công nghệ thông tin. Tham khảo nội dung bài giảng để nắm bắt nội dung chi tiết.
AMBIENT/
Chủ đề:
Bình luận(0) Đăng nhập để gửi bình luận!
Nội dung Text: Chapter 5: Inverse functinons – Section 5.8: Indeterminate forms and l’hospital’s rule
- SECTION 5.8 INDETERMINATE FORMS AND L’HOSPITAL’S RULE
- INDETERMINATE FORMS Suppose we are trying to analyze the behavior of the function ln x F ( x) = x −1 Although F is not defined when x = 1, we need to know how F behaves near 1. In particular, we would like to know the value of the limit ln x lim x 1 x −1 5.8 P2
- INDETERMINATE FORMS In computing this limit, we can’t apply Law 5 of limits (Section 1.4) because the limit of the denominator is 0. In fact, although the limit in Expression 1 exists, its value is not obvious because both numerator and 0 denominator approach 0 and is not defined. 0 5.8 P3
- INDETERMINATE FORM —TYPE 0/0 In general, if we have a limit of the form f ( x) lim x a g ( x) where both f(x) → 0 and g(x) → 0 as x → a, then this limit may or may not exist. 0 It is called an indeterminate form of type . 0 We met some limits of this type in Chapter 1. 5.8 P4
- INDETERMINATE FORMS For rational functions, we can cancel common factors: x −x 2 x( x − 1) lim 2 = lim x 1 x −1 x 1 ( x + 1)( x − 1) x 1 = lim = x 1 x +1 2 We used a geometric argument to show that: sin x lim =1 x 0 x 5.8 P5
- INDETERMINATE FORMS However, these methods do not work for limits such as Expression 1. Hence, in this section, we introduce a systematic method, known as l’Hospital’s Rule, for the evaluation of indeterminate forms. Another situation in which a limit is not obvious occurs when we look for a horizontal asymptote of F and need to evaluate the limit ln x lim x x −1 5.8 P6
- INDETERMINATE FORMS It isn’t obvious how to evaluate this limit because both numerator and denominator become large as x → ∞. There is a struggle between the two. If the numerator wins, the limit will be ∞. If the denominator wins, the answer will be 0. Alternatively, there may be some compromise—the answer may be some finite positive number. 5.8 P7
- INDETERMINATE FORM —TYPE ∞/∞ In general, if we have a limit of the form f ( x) lim x a g ( x) where both f(x) → ∞ (or – ∞) and g(x) → ∞ (or – ∞), then the limit may or may not exist. It is called an indeterminate form of type ∞/∞. 5.8 P8
- INDETERMINATE FORMS We saw in Section 1.6 that this type of limit can be evaluated for certain functions—including rational functions—by dividing the numerator and denominator by the highest power of x that occurs in the denominator. For instance, 1 1− 2 x −1 2 x 1− 0 1 lim 2 = lim = = x 2x + 1 x 1 2+0 2 2+ 2 x 5.8 P9
- INDETERMINATE FORMS This method, though, does not work for limits such as Expression 2. However, L’Hospital’s Rule also applies to this type of indeterminate form. 5.8 P10
- L’HOSPITAL’S RULE Suppose f and g are differentiable and g’(x) ≠ 0 on an open interval I that contains a (except possibly at a). Suppose lim f ( x) = 0 and lim g ( x) = 0 x a x a or that lim f ( x) = and lim g ( x) = x a x a In other words, we have an indeterminate form of 0 type or ∞/∞. 0 Then, f ( x) f '( x) lim = lim x a g ( x) x a g '( x ) if the limit on the right exists (or is ∞ or – ∞). 5.8 P11
- NOTE 1 L’Hospital’s Rule says that the limit of a quotient of functions is equal to the limit of the quotient of their derivatives—provided that the given conditions are satisfied. It is especially important to verify the conditions regarding the limits of f and g before using the rule. 5.8 P12
- NOTE 2 The rule is also valid for onesided limits and for limits at infinity or negative infinity. That is, ‘‘x → a’’ can be replaced by any of the symbols x → a+, x → a–, x →∞, or x → – ∞. 5.8 P13
- NOTE 3 For the special case in which f(a) = g(a) = 0, f ’ and g’ are continuous, and g’(a) ≠ 0, it is easy to see why the rule is true. 5.8 P14
- NOTE 3 In fact, using the alternative form of the definition of a derivative, we have: f ( x) − f (a) f ( x) − f (a) lim f '( x) f '(a ) x a x−a x−a lim = = = lim x a g '( x ) g '(a ) lim g ( x) − g (a ) x a g ( x) − g (a ) x a x−a x−a f ( x) − f (a) f ( x) = lim = lim x a g ( x) − g (a ) x a g ( x) The general version of l’Hospital’s Rule is more difficult; its proof can be found inAppendix B. 5.8 P15
- Example 1 Find lim ln x x 1 x −1 SOLUTION lim ln x = ln1 = 0 and lim( x − 1) = 0 x 1 x 1 Thus, we can apply l’Hospital’s Rule: d (ln x) ln x dx 1/ x 1 lim = lim = lim = lim = 1 x 1 x −1 x 1 d x 1 1 x 1 x ( x − 1) dx 5.8 P16
- Example 2 ex Calculate lim 2 x x SOLUTION We have lim e = lim x = x 2 and x x So, l’Hospital’s Rule gives: d x (e ) ex e x lim 2 = lim dx = lim x x x d 2 x 2x (x ) dx 5.8 P17
- Example 2 SOLUTION As ex → ∞ and 2x → ∞ as x → ∞, the limit on the right side is also indeterminate. However, a second application of l’Hospital’s Rule gives: ex ex ex lim 2 = lim = lim = x x x 2x x 2 5.8 P18
- Example 3 ln x Calculate lim 3 x x SOLUTION As ln x → ∞ and 3 as x x → ∞, l’Hospital’s Rule applies: ln x 1/ x lim 3 = lim 1 −2 / 3 x x x 3x Notice that the limit on the right side is now 0 indeterminate of type . 0 5.8 P19
- Example 3 SOLUTION However, instead of applying the rule a second time as we did in Example 2, we simplify the expression and see that a second application is unnecessary: ln x 1/ x 3 lim 3 = lim 1 −2 / 3 = lim 3 = 0 x x x 3x x x 5.8 P20
ADSENSE
CÓ THỂ BẠN MUỐN DOWNLOAD
Thêm tài liệu vào bộ sưu tập có sẵn:
Báo xấu
LAVA
AANETWORK
TRỢ GIÚP
HỖ TRỢ KHÁCH HÀNG
Chịu trách nhiệm nội dung:
Nguyễn Công Hà - Giám đốc Công ty TNHH TÀI LIỆU TRỰC TUYẾN VI NA
LIÊN HỆ
Địa chỉ: P402, 54A Nơ Trang Long, Phường 14, Q.Bình Thạnh, TP.HCM
Hotline: 093 303 0098
Email: support@tailieu.vn