ARTICLES<br />
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 13 DECEMBER 2009 | DOI: 10.1038/NMAT2608<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Porous metal–organic-framework nanoscale<br />
carriers as a potential platform for drug<br />
delivery and imaging<br />
Patricia Horcajada1 *, Tamim Chalati2 , Christian Serre1 , Brigitte Gillet3 , Catherine Sebrie3 ,<br />
Tarek Baati1 , Jarrod F. Eubank1 , Daniela Heurtaux1 , Pascal Clayette4 , Christine Kreuz4 ,<br />
Jong-San Chang5 , Young Kyu Hwang5 , Veronique Marsaud2 , Phuong-Nhi Bories6 , Luc Cynober6 ,<br />
Sophie Gil7 , Gérard Férey1 , Patrick Couvreur2 and Ruxandra Gref2 *<br />
<br />
In the domain of health, one important challenge is the efficient delivery of drugs in the body using non-toxic nanocarriers. Most<br />
of the existing carrier materials show poor drug loading (usually less than 5 wt% of the transported drug versus the carrier<br />
material) and/or rapid release of the proportion of the drug that is simply adsorbed (or anchored) at the external surface of<br />
the nanocarrier. In this context, porous hybrid solids, with the ability to tune their structures and porosities for better drug<br />
interactions and high loadings, are well suited to serve as nanocarriers for delivery and imaging applications. Here we show<br />
that specific non-toxic porous iron(III)-based metal–organic frameworks with engineered cores and surfaces, as well as imaging<br />
properties, function as superior nanocarriers for efficient controlled delivery of challenging antitumoural and retroviral drugs<br />
(that is, busulfan, azidothymidine triphosphate, doxorubicin or cidofovir) against cancer and AIDS. In addition to their high<br />
loadings, they also potentially associate therapeutics and diagnostics, thus opening the way for theranostics, or personalized<br />
patient treatments.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
F<br />
or nanocarriers, the requirements for ensuring an efficient administration. To circumvent these problems, the strategy of the<br />
therapy are to (1) efficiently entrap drugs with high payloads, present paper (Fig. 1) was to take advantage of the character and<br />
(2) control the release and avoid the ‘burst effect’ (important performance of suitable iron(iii) carboxylate MOFs. Their non-<br />
release within the first minutes), (3) control matrix degradation, toxic nature and potential for nanoparticle synthesis (nanoMOFs),<br />
(4) offer the possibility to easily engineer its surface to control coupled with unusually large loadings of different drugs and<br />
in vivo fate and (5) be detectable by imaging techniques. Moreover, imaging properties, make them ideal candidates for a new valuable<br />
entering a new stage of molecular medicine requires the association solution in the field of drug-delivery nanocarriers.<br />
of therapeutics and diagnostics to make personalized patient MOFs result from the assembly, exclusively by strong bonds, of<br />
treatment a reality. A step forward aims at conceiving a nanocarrier inorganic clusters and easily tunable organic linkers (carboxylates,<br />
that could serve both as drug carrier and as diagnostic agent (satisfy imidazolates or phosphonates14 ). This huge family presents high<br />
criteria (4) and (5)), to evaluate drug distribution and treatment and regular porosities (φ up to 4.7 nm; pore volume up to<br />
efficiency (theranostics). 2.3 cm3 g−1 ) enabling, for instance, the entrapment of large<br />
Currently, for delivery, some materials are being used (for amounts of greenhouse gases18 . They can show simultaneously<br />
example, liposomes, nanoemulsions, nanoparticles or micelles; hydrophilic and hydrophobic entities, as well as tunable pore size<br />
refs 1–5) but are, for the most part, unsatisfactory; better routes and connectivities, which can be adapted to the physico-chemical<br />
are therefore necessary to address the limitations. Very recently, properties of each drug and its medical application19,20 . Moreover,<br />
our group6,7 (ibuprofen storage/long time release) and those the high structural flexibility of some MOFs (refs 21, 22) enables the<br />
of R. Morris8,9 (gas delivery of NO for antithrombosis and adaptation of their porosity to the shape of the hosted molecule.<br />
vasodilatation) and Lin10–13 (imaging) introduced a new pathway We have synthesized, in biologically and environmentally<br />
by using hybrid porous solids14 (or metal–organic frameworks favourable aqueous or ethanolic medium, some non-toxic iron(iii)<br />
(MOFs)) for this purpose. However, most of the materials described carboxylate MOFs (MIL-53, MIL-88A, MIL-88Bt, MIL-89, MIL-<br />
in these publications (that is, Co-, Ni- and Cr-based MOFs) were 100 and MIL-101_NH2 ; MIL = Materials of Institut Lavoisier;<br />
not compatible with biomedical and pharmaceutical applications, refs 23–27) and have adapted the synthesis conditions to obtain<br />
and, with few exceptions10–13,15–17 , they were not engineered as these materials as nanoparticles (see Methods and Supplementary<br />
nanoparticles to enable controlled drug release by intravenous Sections S1 and S7; Figs S1–S5 and S11–S12), which were<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
1 Institut<br />
Lavoisier (CNRS 8180) & Institut universitaire de France, Université de Versailles, 78035 Versailles Cedex, France, 2 Faculté de Pharmacie (CNRS<br />
8612), Université Paris-Sud, 92296 Châtenay-Malabry, France, 3 CNRS 2301, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette France and CNRS8081, Université PARIS-Sud 91405<br />
Orsay, France, 4 Laboratoire de Neurovirologie, SPI-BIO, CEA, 92260 Fontenay aux Roses Cedex, France, 5 Catalysis Center for Molecular Engineering, Korea<br />
Research Institute of Chemical Technology (KRICT), PO Box 107, Yusung, Daejeon 305-600, Korea, 6 Laboratoire de Biochimie—Hôpital<br />
Hôtel-Dieu—AP-HP 75004 Paris, France, 7 EA 2706, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Paris-Sud, 92296 Châtenay-Malabry, France.<br />
*e-mail: horcajada@chimie.uvsq.fr; ruxandra.gref@u-psud.fr.<br />
<br />
172 NATURE MATERIALS | VOL 9 | FEBRUARY 2010 | www.nature.com/naturematerials<br />
© 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.<br />
NATURE MATERIALS DOI: 10.1038/NMAT2608 ARTICLES<br />
<br />
<br />
CORONA<br />
Biodistribution ~ 200 nm<br />
Targeting<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
CORE<br />
Biodegradable porous iron carboxylates<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
MIL-53 MIL-88 MIL-100 MIL-101<br />
8Å 6–11 Å 24–29 Å 29–34 Å<br />
<br />
Controlled release of challenging drugs<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Busulfan<br />
<br />
<br />
Azidothimidine Doxorubicin<br />
Cidofovir triphosphate<br />
Imaging<br />
<br />
Figure 1 | Scheme of engineered core–corona porous iron carboxylates for drug delivery and imaging.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
200 nm<br />
100 nm<br />
200 nm<br />
<br />
<br />
MIL-100 MIL-88A MIL-88A-PEG<br />
<br />
Figure 2 | Scanning electron micrographs of MIL-100 (left), MIL-88A (centre) and PEGylated MIL-88A nanoparticles (right).<br />
<br />
characterized in terms of biocompatibility, degradability and case of MIL-88A (fumarate) and MIL-100 (trimesate), a major<br />
imaging properties (Figs 1 and 2). Their efficiency as drug carriers degradation occurred after seven days of incubation at 37 ◦ C. The<br />
was tested with four challenging anticancer or antiviral drugs nanoparticles lose their crystallinity and release large quantities<br />
(busulfan (Bu), azidothymidine triphosphate (AZT-TP), cidofovir of their ligands (72 and 58 wt% of the fumaric and trimesic<br />
(CDV) and doxorubicin (doxo)), which, except the latter, could acids, respectively), indicating a reasonable in vitro degradability<br />
not be successfully entrapped using existing nanocarriers (Table 1). of the MOF nanoparticles. Interestingly, in the case of MIL-<br />
Some cosmetic molecules, such as caffeine (liporeductor), urea 88A, the degradation products, iron and fumaric acid, are<br />
(hydrating agent), benzophenone 3 and benzophenone 4 (UVA endogenous (see Supplementrary Section S7), and show low toxicity<br />
and UVB filters) were also tested. For biological applications, the values (LD50 (Fe) = 30 g kg−1 , LD50 (fumaric acid) = 10.7 g kg−1 ;<br />
nanoMOF surfaces were engineered by coating with several relevant LD50 (trimesic acid) = 8.4 g kg−1 ) and LD50 (terephthalic acid)<br />
polymers28 (see Methods); this treatment prevented aggregation > 6.4 g kg−1 (refs 29–32).<br />
of the nanoparticles but did not improve the results. Finally, the The nanoMOF cytotoxicity, studied in vitro (MTT assay; ref 33)<br />
potential of these nanoMOFs as contrast agents is reported. on mouse macrophages (see Supplementary Section S8), was low<br />
The first step of the study was to evaluate the performances (57 ± 11 µg ml−1 for MIL-88A) and comparable with that of the<br />
of the pure nanosized iron carboxylates in terms of degradability currently available nanoparticulate systems34 . Acute in vivo toxicity<br />
and cytotoxicity. Their in vitro degradation under physiological experiments were then carried out after intravenous administration<br />
conditions (see Supplementary Fig. S10) shows that, in the of nanoMOFs in Wistar female rats (see Supplementary Section S7).<br />
<br />
NATURE MATERIALS | VOL 9 | FEBRUARY 2010 | www.nature.com/naturematerials 173<br />
© 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.<br />
ARTICLES NATURE MATERIALS DOI: 10.1038/NMAT2608<br />
<br />
Table 1 | Structure description, particle size, drug loading (wt%) and entrapment efficiency (below the drug loading values in<br />
parentheses, wt%) in several porous iron(III) carboxylate nanoparticles.<br />
<br />
MIL-89 MIL-88A MIL-100 MIL-101 _NH2 MIL-53<br />
<br />
Trimesic Amino<br />
Muconic Fumaric acid terephthalic Terephthalic<br />
acid O acid HO O<br />
acid NH acid<br />
Organic linker HO HO OH O O<br />
OH HO OH O 2<br />
O<br />
O O O HO OH<br />
O HO OH<br />
O<br />
<br />
<br />
Crystalline<br />
structure<br />
<br />
Flexibility Yes Yes No No Yes<br />
Pore size (Å) 11 6 25 (5.6) 29 (12) 8.6<br />
29 (8.6) 34 (16)<br />
Particle size (nm) 50–100 150* 200 120 350*<br />
Bu loading (efficiency) (%)<br />
13.4 × 3.5 9.8 8.0 25.5 14.3<br />
O O<br />
-<br />
s<br />
O O<br />
s amphiphilic (4.2) (3.3) (31.9) (17.9)<br />
O O<br />
<br />
AZT-TP loading<br />
(efficiency) (%) O OH<br />
OH P<br />
OH O<br />
O P O OH 11.9 × 9.1 0.60 21.2 42.0 0.24<br />
HO P -<br />
O O OH<br />
O hydrophilic (6.4) (85.5) (90.4) (2.8)<br />
N N<br />
N N<br />
NH2<br />
<br />
CDV loading<br />
(efficiency) (%)<br />
NH2<br />
10.8 × 7.7 14 2.6 16.1 41.9<br />
N -<br />
O<br />
N O<br />
hydrophilic (81) (12) (46.2) (68.1)<br />
HO P O<br />
HO OH<br />
Doxorubicin loading<br />
(efficiency)(%)<br />
O OH O OH<br />
OH 15.3 × 11.9 9.1<br />
- - - -<br />
hydrophobic (11.2)<br />
MeO O OH O<br />
O<br />
NH2<br />
HO<br />
Ibuprofen loading<br />
(efficiency) (%) 10 × 5 33 22<br />
- - -<br />
O hydrophobic (11.0) (7.3)<br />
OH<br />
Caffeine loading<br />
(efficiency) (%) 6.1 × 7.6 24.2 23.1<br />
CH3 - - -<br />
N N O amphiphilic (16.5) (15.7)<br />
N N<br />
CH3 CH3<br />
O<br />
<br />
Urea loading<br />
(efficiency) 4.1 × 3.1 69.2 63.5<br />
(%) O - - -<br />
hydrophilic (2.1) (1.9)<br />
C<br />
H2N NH2<br />
Benzophenone 4 loading<br />
(efficiency) (%)<br />
O OH 12.0 × 7.2 15.2 5<br />
- - -<br />
C hydrophilic (22.8) (7.5)<br />
O CH3<br />
SO3H<br />
Benzophenone 3 loading<br />
(efficiency)(%) 12.1 × 5.6 1.5<br />
OH O - - - -<br />
hydrophobic (74.0)<br />
O<br />
<br />
*Bimodal distribution of sizes, with micrometric particles.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
174 NATURE MATERIALS | VOL 9 | FEBRUARY 2010 | www.nature.com/naturematerials<br />
© 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.<br />
NATURE MATERIALS DOI: 10.1038/NMAT2608 ARTICLES<br />
100 as liposomes or polymeric nanoparticles, is not satisfactory because<br />
AZT-TP Doxo<br />
CDV loading never exceeds 5–6 wt% (ref. 38), rendering our search of<br />
efficient nanocarriers an attractive challenge.<br />
Bu was loaded in the preformed nanoMOFs by soaking in<br />
Released drug (%)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
saturated drug solutions (Supplementary Table S2, Fig. S18).<br />
Table 1 shows the maximum amounts of drug adsorbed in several<br />
50 porous iron carboxylates. The Bu loading in the rigid mesoporous<br />
MIL-100 may be considered as exceptionally high (25 wt%). This<br />
result is five times higher than the best system of polymer<br />
nanoparticles (5–6 wt%; ref. 38) and 60 times higher than with<br />
liposomes (0.4 wt%; refs 37, 39). Owing to their lower pore<br />
volumes, Bu entrapment in microporous flexible structures (MIL-<br />
0<br />
88A, MIL-53, MIL-89) is lower than for MIL-100, but significantly<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5 11 12 13 14 larger than for the existing materials. Consequently, the use of<br />
Time (days) porous iron carboxylates as nanocarriers could represent important<br />
progress for Bu therapy, especially because smaller amounts of<br />
Figure 3 | CDV (black), doxo (red) and AZT-TP (green) delivery under solids would be required to deliver the needed dose of this drug.<br />
simulated physiological conditions (PBS, 37 ◦ C) from MIL-100 Indeed, considering the actual intravenous dosage of Bu (Busilvex,<br />
nanoparticles. All experiments were carried out in quadruplicate. Bu solution in N ,N 0 -dimethylacetamide; ref. 40), the total amount<br />
of MIL-88A or MIL-100 to be administered would be around<br />
Three different loaded porous iron(iii) carboxylate nanoparticles 100 and 20 mg kg−1 d−1 , respectively, for four days. Moreover,<br />
were used. They were built up either from a hydrophilic aliphatic Bu-loaded nanoMOFs could avoid the use of toxic organic solvents<br />
linker, fumarate (MIL-88A), from a hydrophilic aromatic linker, (N ,N 0 -dimethylacetamide) during administration and reduce the<br />
trimesate (MIL-100), or from a hydrophobic aromatic linker, liver toxicity mentioned above (hepatic veno-occlusive disease37,39 )<br />
tetramethylterephthalate (MIL-88Bt) (see Methods). Doses up owing to the entrapment of Bu in its molecular form within<br />
to the highest possible injectable amounts were administrated the pores. We have verified on cell culture experiments that the<br />
(220 mg kg−1 for MIL-88A and MIL-100, and 110 mg kg−1 for nanoMOFs were able to release Bu in its active form. Studies on<br />
MIL-88Bt). Different indicators (the animal behaviour, body human leukaemia and human multiple myeloma cells in culture<br />
and organ weights and serum parameters) were evaluated up have shown that Bu has the same activity whether it is in its<br />
to three months after injection (see Supplementray Section S7; free form or entrapped in the nanoMOFs (see Supplementary<br />
Figs S13 and S14). Their comparison with control groups did Section S9; Fig. S19). In the same way, we have confirmed the<br />
not show significant differences between them, except a slight total absence of cytotoxicity of the empty MIL-100 nanoparticles<br />
increase in the spleen and liver weights, attributed to the fast in the same cell lines.<br />
sequestration by the reticuloendothelial organs of the nanoMOFs In addition to alkylating agents such as Bu, nucleoside analogues<br />
not protected by a PEG (polyethylene glycol) coating. As all are also of major importance in the treatment of cancer and<br />
the body organ weights were back to normality one to three viral infections. They include the monophosphorylated form of<br />
months after injection (see Supplementary Figs S13 and S14), the antiviral phosphonate cidofovir, and the triphosphorylated<br />
the phenomenon was fully reversible. The absence of immune or form of azidothymidine, which are the active forms of these<br />
inflammatory reactions after nanoparticle administration supports anti-cytomegalovirus and anti-HIV compounds, and doxorubicin,<br />
their lack of toxicity. Moreover, the absence of activation of one of the most effective agents in the treatment of breast cancer.<br />
cytochrome P-450 suggests a direct excretion of the polyacids, However, the clinical use of nucleoside analogues is limited by their<br />
in agreement with their high polarity. Finally, in vivo subacute poor stability in biological media, often resulting in short half-lives<br />
toxicity assays were carried out by injecting up to 150 mg of and low bioavailabilities37 , as well as sometimes partial resistance<br />
MIL-88A kg−1 d−1 during four consecutive days. No significant to the drug41 . The important hydrophilic character of nucleoside<br />
toxic effects were observed up to ten days after administration (see analogues also strongly limits their intracellular penetration owing<br />
Supplementary Figs S15–S17). to their low membrane permeability42,43 . Some nanocarriers were<br />
The non-toxicity of the iron nanoMOFs, proved above, led previously developed to circumvent these inconveniences, but show<br />
us to investigate their ability to entrap anticancer and antiviral poor efficiencies together with ‘burst effects’44 .<br />
drugs. Chemotherapy indeed plays a key role in the treatment The performance of iron carboxylates therefore indicated major<br />
of cancer in children. Thanks to its efficiency, three out of four promise for the entrapment of all the above important drugs<br />
children can now be cured. Nevertheless, 25% of paediatric cancer (Table 1). In the case of AZT-TP and CDV, this was achieved<br />
patients go uncured, and chemotherapy-induced long-term side by simply soaking the preformed dried nanoMOFs in aqueous<br />
effects justify the continued development of new strategies to solutions of the drugs. Even if the concentration of the drug in<br />
fight childhood cancer. Research in paediatric oncology is now the solution was low, the active molecules could be loaded with<br />
encouraged and supported by European legislation (Paediatric high efficiency (in most cases, higher than 80%); the nanoMOFs<br />
Use Marketing Authorization, PUMA) and new international act as remarkable molecular ‘sponges’. For instance, MIL-100<br />
organizations, such as the consortium Innovative Therapies for nanoparticles load up to 25, 21, 16 and 29 wt% of Bu, AZT-TP, CDV<br />
Children with Cancer (ITCC). and doxo, respectively. An unprecedented capacity of 42 wt% can be<br />
In this context, the amphiphilic antitumoural drug busulfan achieved for AZT-TP and CDV with MIL-101_NH2 nanoparticles<br />
(Bu) is widely used in combination high-dose chemotherapy (Table 1; Supplementary Section S10 and S11; Table S3–S5),<br />
regimes for leukaemias, especially in paediatrics, because it rep- compared with 1 wt% values reported in the literature for these<br />
resents a good alternative to total-body irradiation35,36 . However, drugs in usual nanocarriers41 .<br />
Bu possesses a poor stability in aqueous solution and an impor- A progressive release of the three active molecules (AZT-TP,<br />
tant hepatic toxicity due to its microcrystallization in the hepatic CDV and doxo) is observed using MIL-100 nanoparticles (Fig. 3),<br />
microvenous system (hepatic veno-occlusive diseases37 ). Moreover, with no ‘burst effect’. The comparison between kinetics of drug<br />
the current encapsulation of Bu in known drug nanocarriers, such delivery and the degradation profiles suggests that the delivery<br />
<br />
NATURE MATERIALS | VOL 9 | FEBRUARY 2010 | www.nature.com/naturematerials 175<br />
© 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.<br />
ARTICLES NATURE MATERIALS DOI: 10.1038/NMAT2608<br />
<br />
a d<br />
CONTROL 220 mg kg¬1 MILL-88A_nano<br />
<br />
dm<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
st<br />
<br />
li<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
b e<br />
dm<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
st<br />
li<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
c f<br />
dm<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
k<br />
s<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Figure 4 | Magnetic resonance images. The images were acquired with gradient echo (a, c, d, f) or spin echo (b, e) sequence of control rats (left; a–c) and<br />
rats injected with 220 mg kg−1 MIL-88A (right; d–f), in liver (a, b, d, e) and spleen (c, f) regions. 30 min after injection, product effect is observable on the<br />
liver and spleen. (dm, dorsal muscle; k. kidney; li, liver; s, spleen; st, stomach.)<br />
<br />
process is governed mainly by diffusion from the pores and/or Finally, we have investigated the potential of the nanoMOFs<br />
drug–matrix interactions and not by the MOF degradation. Indeed, as contrast agents. We first proved by Mössbauer spectroscopy<br />
the total delivery of AZT-TP occurred within 3 days, when only that the MOFs themselves (and not eventual iron oxide and/or<br />
approximately 10% of MIL-100 was degraded. Moreover, tests hydroxide degradation products) act as contrast agents. Magnetic<br />
carried out in nanoparticles with smaller pore size than the drug resonance imaging measurements have been made on Wistar female<br />
dimensions have shown very low drug capacities and ‘burst’ release rats 30 min after injection of 220, 44 and 22 mg kg−1 suspensions<br />
kinetics. This suggests that, in this last case, the drug was adsorbed of MIL-88A nanoparticles (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Section S14).<br />
only onto the external surface and not within the pores (see Both gradient echo and spin echo sequences show that the treated<br />
Supplementary Information, Fig. S20). organs are darker than the normal ones (Fig. 4d–f versus Fig. 4a–c.).<br />
The promising data obtained with AZT-TP in MIL-100 nanopar- The resulting aspects of the liver and the spleen are indeed different<br />
ticles incited us to evaluate, in vitro in human peripheral blood between control and treated rats (Supplementary Figs S21 and S22).<br />
mononuclear cells infected by HIV-1-LAI (see Supplementary Sec- Also, three months after injection, the liver and spleen returned to<br />
tion S10), the anti-HIV activity of AZT-TP. A significant anti-HIV a similar appearance to that of the untreated animals (results not<br />
activity was observed only for (AZT-TP)-charged nanoparticles shown). This is in accordance with the temporary accumulation of<br />
(about 90% inhibition of HIV replication) for a concentration of the nanoparticles in these organs, as discussed previously.<br />
200 nM in AZT or AZT-TP. In parallel, the empty nanoparticles The favourable in vivo detection of the iron carboxylate MOF<br />
demonstrated no cytotoxic effects, even at the highest tested dose nanoparticles makes them interesting candidates for contrast<br />
(10 µg ml−1 of nanoparticles). agents, and, to the best of our knowledge, this represents the<br />
From the above results, it is clear that porous iron(iii) first example for iron-based MOFs. However, some examples of<br />
carboxylates currently represent the best nanocarriers for the drug MOFs based on Gd (ref. 12) or Mn (ref. 14) as potential contrast<br />
release of important drugs. Their unprecedented encapsulation agents have been recently reported. The efficiency of our iron-<br />
capacities apply to a large number of challenging drugs, not based nanoMOFs is directly related to their relaxivity, in other<br />
only hydrophilic (AZT-TP, CDV, urea and benzophenone 4) but words their capacity to modify the relaxation times of the water<br />
also hydrophobic (doxorubicin, ibuprofen and benzophenone 3) protons in the surrounding medium when a magnetic field is<br />
and amphiphilic (busulfan and caffeine) molecules (Table 1; see applied. The higher the quantity and the mobility of the metal<br />
Supplementary Section S13; Table S6). The adaptive internal coordinated water in the first and second coordination spheres,<br />
microenvironment (for example, amphiphilic polar metal and the higher the relaxivity. In this sense, our MOF nanoparticles<br />
non-polar linker) of the pores of this family of solids could probably possess not only paramagnetic iron atoms in their matrix, but also<br />
explain the exceptional qualities of these porous materials. an interconnected porous network filled with metal coordinated<br />
<br />
176 NATURE MATERIALS | VOL 9 | FEBRUARY 2010 | www.nature.com/naturematerials<br />
© 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.<br />
NATURE MATERIALS DOI: 10.1038/NMAT2608 ARTICLES<br />
In most cases, the nanoparticles’ mean diameter, determined by both scanning<br />
Table 2 | Transversal (r2) relaxivities of MIL-88A and electron microscopy and quasi-elastic light scattering investigations, was lower than<br />
MIL-100 nanoparticles, PEGylated or not, measured at 9.4 T. 200 nm, compatible with the intravenous route of administration (see Table 1).<br />
The nanoparticle size distribution of MIL-53 and MIL-88A was bimodal, probably<br />
Fe (mmol l−1 ) PEG (wt%) r2 (s−1 mM−1 ) owing to the competition between nucleation and growth during the crystallization<br />
process and to an aggregation of the particles.<br />
MIL-88 A 0.428 0 56 To control crystal growth, PEG chains with only one terminal reactive group<br />
(amino or carboxyl) were added during the course of the synthesis process (see<br />
MIL-88 A + PEG 0.364 13.6 95<br />
Supplementary Section S2). Thus, PEG led to the formation of a superficial PEG<br />
MIL-100 0.187 0 73 ‘brush’ sterically protecting the nanoparticles from aggregation. Zeta-potential<br />
MIL-100 + PEG 0.15 13.3 92 measurements clearly indicated that neutral PEG chains were located at the surface<br />
of the nanoparticles. Zeta-potential values of uncoated MIL-100 (−14 mV) were<br />
shifted to almost neutral values (−2 mV) in the case of PEGylated MIL-100, and<br />
and/or free water molecules. Table 2 shows the relaxivity of the iron from 17 to 2 mV in the case of PEGylated MIL-88A. This is in accordance with<br />
previously reported data on PEG-coated nanoparticles2 .<br />
fumarate MOF (MIL-88A) nanoparticles under a 9.4 T magnetic Bound PEG could be removed only after particle degradation under acidic<br />
field. Relaxivity values r1 could not be measured, but r2 of MIL- conditions, supporting the fact that it was firmly bound to the nanoparticles<br />
88A nanoparticles are of the order of 50 s−1 mM−1 , which can through coordination of its amino or carboxyl end-group with the metal centres.<br />
be considered as sufficient for in vivo use45 . The relaxivity values Indeed, when PEG with two non-reactive monomethoxy end-groups was added<br />
are related not only to the iron content, but also to the size of to the reaction mixture, a negligible surface modification occurred. Thus, PEG was<br />
successfully bound to the nanoparticles’ surface, and PEG contents up to 17 wt%<br />
the nanoparticles. The PEGylated nanoparticles showed slightly were obtained, of the same order of magnitude as those described as being sufficient<br />
higher r2 values than the non-PEGylated ones. The PEG coating to ensure ‘stealth’ properties (see Supplementary Section S2).<br />
may modify the nanoparticle relaxivities in two opposite ways46 :<br />
increasing the size of individual nanoparticles and decreasing Received 16 December 2008; accepted 11 November 2009;<br />
their aggregation. These results show that the iron-based core is published online 13 December 2009<br />
responsible for the favourable relaxivities and imaging properties<br />
of the MOF nanoparticles. Their framework contains (1) water References<br />
1. Peer, D. et al. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy.<br />
molecules strongly coordinated to the Lewis acid metal sites, as well Nature Nanotech. 2, 751–760 (2007).<br />
as (2) free water molecules, probably in exchange with these bound 2. Couvreur, P., Gref, R., Andrieux, K. & Malvy, C. Nanotechnology for drug<br />
water molecules, diffusing through the interconnected pores. The delivery: Applications to cancer and autoimmune diseases. Prog. Solid State<br />
presence of this last type of water molecule should induce an effect Chem. 34, 231–235 (2006).<br />
on the relaxation times of the water protons, resulting in good 3. Gref, R. et al. Biodegradable long-circulating polymeric nanospheres. Science<br />
263, 1600–1603 (1994).<br />
imaging properties. 4. Gabizon, A. Stealth liposomes and tumor targeting: One step further in the<br />
In conclusion, our porous iron carboxylate nanoMOFs have quest for the magic bullet. Clin. Cancer Res. 7, 223–225 (2001).<br />
many advantages when used as non-toxic and biocompatible 5. Sheikh Hasan, A. et al. Effect of the microencapsulation of nanoparticles on the<br />
drug nanocarriers. In terms of synthesis, they are obtained in reduction of burst release. Int. J. Pharm. 344, 53–61 (2007).<br />
aqueous or ethanolic solutions, instead of using organic solvents, 6. Horcajada, P. et al. Metal–organic frameworks as efficient materials for drug<br />
delivery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 5974–5978 (2006).<br />
and provide an example of what ‘green’ technology can afford 7. Horcajada, P. et al. Flexible porous metal–organic frameworks for a controlled<br />
for biomedical applications. In the biomedical sense, they act as drug delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 6774–6780 (2008).<br />
molecular sponges, encapsulating drugs with different polarities, 8. Hinks, N. J., McKinlay, A. C., Xiao, B., Wheatley, P. S. & Morris, R. E.<br />
sizes and functional groups by immersion in corresponding Metal organic frameworks as NO delivery materials for biological applications.<br />
solutions. This simple entrapment method has been applied to Microporous Mesoporous Mater. doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.04.031 (2009)<br />
(in the press).<br />
previously challenging antitumoural and antiviral drugs, as well as 9. Xiao, B. et al. Chemically blockable transformation and ultraselective<br />
cosmetic agents. Progressive release was obtained under simulated low-pressure gas adsorption in a non-porous metal organic framework.<br />
physiological conditions. Moreover, anti-HIV activity of AZT-TP Nature Chem. 1, 289–294 (2009).<br />
loaded nanoMOFs has been proven. 10. Rieter, W. J., Pott, K. M., Taylor, K. M. L. & Lin, W. Nanoscale coordination<br />
polymers for platinum-based anticancer drug delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130,<br />
These results open new perspectives for improved treatment<br />
11584–11585 (2008).<br />
with anticancer and antiviral drugs and for the development 11. Rieter, W. J., Taylor, K. M. L., An, H. & Lin, W. Nanoscale metal–organic<br />
of adapted formulations in paediatrics (using Bu nanoMOFs). frameworks as potential multimodal contrast enhancing agents. J. Am.<br />
Finally, the iron-based cores are endowed with good relaxivities, Chem. Soc. 128, 9024–9025 (2006).<br />
which makes these nanoparticles candidates for magnetic resonance 12. Taylor, K. M. L., Jin, A. & Lin, W. Surfactant-assisted synthesis of nanoscale<br />
gadolinium metal–organic-framework for potential multimodal imaging.<br />
imaging (contrast) agents. These complementary properties might Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 7722–7725 (2008).<br />
open new opportunities to use nanoMOFs for the eventual goal 13. Taylor, K. M. L., Rieter, W. J. & Lin, W. Manganese-based nanoscale<br />
as theranostic agents. metal–organic frameworks for magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc.<br />
130, 14358–14359 (2008).<br />
Methods 14. Férey, G. Hybrid porous solids: Past, present, future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 37,<br />
The syntheses of nanoscale (Fig. 2) porous iron(iii) carboxylates (labelled MIL-n) 191–241 (2008).<br />
with different topologies and compositions (iron trans,trans-muconate (MIL-89; 15. Jhung, S. H. et al. Microwave synthesis of chromium terephthalate MIL-101<br />
refs 21–24)), fumarate (MIL-88A; refs 21–24), tetramethylterephthalate (MIL-88Bt; and its benzene sorption ability. Adv. Mater. 19, 121–124 (2007).<br />
refs 21–24), terephthalate (MIL-53; ref. 25), trimesate (MIL-100; ref. 26) and 16. Hermes, S. et al. Selective nucleation and growth of metal–organic<br />
aminoterephthalate (MIL-101 _NH2 ; ref. 27) were optimized by an appropriate open framework thin films on patterned COOH/CF3 -terminated<br />
choice of the reaction conditions (conventional solvothermal or microwave self-assembled monolayers on Au(111). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127,<br />
synthesis, solvent, additives, iron source, concentrations, energy, temperature and 13744–13745 (2005).<br />
time) (see supplementary Section S1). These porous iron(iii) carboxylates are built 17. Scherb, C. & Bein, T. Directing the structure of metal–organic frameworks by<br />
up from the assembly of either oxo-centred trimers of iron octahedra (MIL-88, oriented surface growth on an organic monolayer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47,<br />
MIL-89, MIL-100, MIL-101 _NH2 ) or chains of corner sharing octahedra (MIL-53) 5777–5779 (2008).<br />
and di- or tri-carboxylate linkers, leading either to microporous flexible solids 18. Llewellyn, P. L. et al. High uptakes of CO2 and CH4 in mesoporous<br />
(MIL-88, MIL-89, MIL-53) or mesoporous rigid frameworks (MIL-100, MIL-101 metal–organic-frameworks MIL-100 and MIL-101. Langmuir 24,<br />
_NH2 ) (Fig. 1). The structure and composition of the resulting nanoparticles were 7245–7250 (2008).<br />
analysed using X-ray powder diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis and infrared 19. Horcajada, P., Serre, C., Gref, R., Férey, G. & Couvreur, P. Nanoparticules<br />
spectroscopy. In the case of MIL-53, MIL-88A, MIL-89, MIL-100 and MIL-101 hybrides organiques inorganiques à base de carboxylates de fer, PCT<br />
_NH2 , the synthesis could be carried out in water or ethanol. applications PCT/FR2008/001366, 01 October 2008.<br />
<br />
<br />
NATURE MATERIALS | VOL 9 | FEBRUARY 2010 | www.nature.com/naturematerials 177<br />
© 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.<br />
ARTICLES NATURE MATERIALS DOI: 10.1038/NMAT2608<br />
<br />
20. Horcajada, P., Serre, C., Gref, R., Férey, G. & Couvreur, P. Solides 41. Thierry, A. R. et al. Modulation of doxorubicin resistance in multidrug-resistant<br />
hybrides organique–inorganique à surface modifiée, PCT applications cells by liposomes. FASEB J. 7, 572–579 (1993).<br />
PCT/FR2008/001367, 01 October 2008. 42. Loke, S. L. et al. Characterization of oligonucleotide transport into living cells.<br />
21. Férey, G. & Serre, C. Large breathing effects in three-dimensional porous Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 3474–3478 (1989).<br />
hybrid matter: Facts, analyses, rules and consequences. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 43. Kukhanova, M. et al. Design of anti-HIV compounds: From nucleoside<br />
1380–1399 (2009). to nucleoside 50 -triphosphate analogs. Problems and perspectives.<br />
22. Serre, C. et al. Role of solvent-host interactions that lead to very large swelling Curr. Pharm. Des. 6, 585–598 (2000).<br />
of hybrid frameworks. Science 315, 1828–w1831 (2007). 44. Hillaireau, H. et al. Encapsulation of antiviral nucleotide analogues<br />
23. Serre, C. et al. A route to the synthesis of trivalent transition-metal porous azidothymidine-triphosphate and cidofovir in poly(iso-butylcyanoacrylate)<br />
carboxylates with trimeric secondary building units. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, nanocapsules. Int. J. Pharm. 324, 37–42 (2006).<br />
6285–6289 (2004). 45. Roch, A. et al. Theory of proton relaxation induced by superparamagnetic<br />
24. Surblé, S. et al. A new isoreticular class of metal–organic-frameworks with the particles. J. Chem. Phys. 110, 5403–5411 (1999).<br />
MIL-88 topology. Chem. Commun. 3, 284–286 (2006). 46. Muller, R. N. et al. in The Chemistry of Contrast Agents in Medical Magnetic<br />
25. Whitfield, T. R., Wang, X., Liu, L. & Jacobson, A. J. Metal-organic frameworks Resonance Imaging (eds Merbach, A. E. & Tóth, É.) 417–435 (Wiley, 2001).<br />
based on iron oxide octahedral chains connected by benzenedicarboxylate<br />
dianions. Solid State Sci. 7, 1096–1103 (2005). Acknowledgements<br />
26. Horcajada, P. et al. Synthesis and catalytic properties of MIL-100(Fe), an We acknowledge E. Legenre, M. Belle, F. Kani, C. Bellanger and E. Jubeli for their<br />
iron(iii) carboxylate with large pores. Chem. Commun. 27, 2820–2822 (2007). help with the experiments. We are grateful to J-M. Greneche, H. Chacun, M. Apple,<br />
27. Bauer, S. et al. High-throughput assisted rationalization or the formation of C. Bories, H.Hillarieu, and O. David for their collaboration. We thank K. Storck,<br />
metal–organic framework in the iron(iii) aminoterephthalate solvothermal V. Huyot and R. Yousfi for their technical assistance with the AZT-TP experiments.<br />
system. Inorg. Chem. 47, 7568–7576 (2008). This work was partially supported by the CNRS, Université Paris Sud, Université de<br />
28. Gref, R. et al. The controlled intravenous delivery of drugs using PEG-coated Versailles Saint-Quentin, EU funding through the ERC-2007-209241-BioMOFs, ERC<br />
sterically stabilized nanospheres. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 16, 215–233 (1995). and KOCI through the Institutional Research Program of KRICT. KRICT’s authors<br />
29. Sheftel, V. O. Indirect Food Additives and Polymers: Migration and Toxicology thank You-Kyong Seo for his experimental assistance.<br />
148–154 (Lewis Publishers, 2000).<br />
30. (2008).<br />
31. (2008). P.H., nanoMOF synthesis, surface modification of nanoparticles, drug and cosmetic<br />
32. (2008). encapsulation tests, toxicity assays, degradation tests,in vivo magnetic resonance imaging;<br />
33. Mosmann, T. Rapid colourimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: C. Serre, nanoMOF synthesis, surface modification of nanoparticles, drug and cosmetic<br />
Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods 65, encapsulation tests, degradation tests, imaging applications; T.C., nanoMOF synthesis,<br />
55–63 (1983). PEG modification, drug encapsulation and delivery, in vitro toxicity assays, degradation<br />
34. Soma, C. E. et al. Drug delivery to resistance tumors: The potential of poly(alkyl tests, in vitro magnetic resonance imaging; B.G. and C. Sebrie, imaging applications;<br />
cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles. J. Control. Release 68, 283–289 (2000). T.B., in vivo toxicity assays, nanoMOF degradation tests, doxorubicin encapsulation and<br />
35. Vassal, G. et al. Is 600 mg m−2 the appropriate dosage of busulfan in children delivery; J.F.E., nanoMOF degradation tests; D.H., synthesis of nanoparticles of MIL-101<br />
undergoing bone marrow transplantation? Blood 79, 2475–2479 (1992). _NH2 ; P. Clayette and C.K., anti-HIV activity of MIL-100 nanoparticles; J.-S.C. and<br />
36. Vassal, G. et al. Pharmacokinetics of high-dose busulfan in children. Y.K.H., synthesis of nanoparticles of MIL-100 and MIL-53 in water; V.M., busulfan<br />
Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 24, 386–390 (1989). activity tests; P.-N.B. and L.C., liver function evaluation in the in vivo toxicity assays;<br />
37. Slattery, T. et al. Graft-rejection and toxicity following bone S.G., activity of Cyp-450 in the in vivo toxicity assays; G.F., nanoMOF synthesis, surface<br />
marrow transplantation in relation to busulfan pharmacokinetics. modification of nanoparticles; P. Couvreur, drug encapsulation and delivery, toxicity<br />
Bone Marrow Transplant. 16, 31–42 (1995). assays, surface modification of nanoparticles; R.G., drug encapsulation and delivery,<br />
38. Layre, A., Gref, R., Richard, J., Requier, D. & Couvreur, P. Nanoparticules toxicity assays, surface modification of nanoparticles, imaging applications.<br />
polymériques composites, FR 04 07569, 7 July 2004.<br />
39. Hassan, Z., Nilsson, C. & Hassan, M. Liposomal busulphan: Bioavailability and Additional information<br />
effect on bone marrow in mice. Bone Marrow Transplant. 22, 913–918 (1998). The authors declare no competing financial interests. Supplementary information<br />
40. Madden, T. et al. Pharmacokinetics of once-daily IV busulfan as part of accompanies this paper on www.nature.com/naturematerials. Reprints and permissions<br />
pretransplantation preparative regimens: A comparison with an every 6-hour information is available online at http://npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions.<br />
dosing schedule. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 13, 56–64 (2007). Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to P.H. or R.G.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
178 NATURE MATERIALS | VOL 9 | FEBRUARY 2010 | www.nature.com/naturematerials<br />
© 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.<br />