Bài giảng môn Phương pháp kiểm tra và đánh giá học tập: Chapter 2 - Phan Thị Thu Nga

Chia sẻ: Kiếp Này Bình Yên | Ngày: | Loại File: PDF | Số trang:14

Thêm vào BST

Báo xấu

82
lượt xem 7
download

Download Vui lòng tải xuống để xem tài liệu đầy đủ

Language tests are chronologically classified according to four main approaches: the essay translation approach, the structuralist approach, the integrative approach, the communicative approach.

Chủ đề:

Bình luận(0) Đăng nhập để gửi bình luận!

Lưu

Nội dung Text: Bài giảng môn Phương pháp kiểm tra và đánh giá học tập: Chapter 2 - Phan Thị Thu Nga

Chapter 2 Approaches to language testing Language tests are chronologically classified according to four main approaches: (1) the essay translation approach; (2) the structuralist approach; (3) the integrative approach; and (4) the communicative approach
(1) the essay translation approach Characteristics: No special skill or expertise in testing Subjective judgment of teacher Essay writing, translation & grammatical analysis (comments about the language)
Disadvantages:  tests  a heavy literary and cultural bias  an aural/ oral component at the upper intermediate & advantage levels as something additional & not an integral part of the syllabus or examination
(2) the structuralist approach Language learning  chiefly concerned with the systematic acquisition of set of habits. Focusing the importance of contrastive analysis & the need to identify & measure learners’ mastery of separated elements of L2:phonology, vocabulary & grammar
Listening, speaking, reading & writing are separated from one another & it’s essential to test one skill at a time. The need for statistical measures of reliability & validity - important in testing multiple choice item
(3) the integrative approach involving the testing of language in context & concerned with the meaning and the total communicative effect of discourse. assessing the learners’ ability to use two or more skills simultaneously, or a global view of proficiency. involving functional language but not the use of functional language. Forms: cloze test & dictation
Cloze testing  Principle: the Gestalt theory of “closure”  Purpose: measuring the reader’s ability to decode ‘interrupted’ or ‘mutilated’ messages by making the most acceptable substitutions from all the contextual clues available
 Requirements: to fill in each blank in the text itself  Methods of scoring: one mark  acceptable answer; another  each exact answer. misspelling not be penalized measuring familiarity with the grammar of the language rather than reading
Evidence from research studies performance on cloze tests correlates highly with listening, writing & speaking close testing: a good indicator of general linguistic ability
linguistic knowledge, textual knowledge & knowledge of the world cloze tests: achievement, proficiency tests, classroom placement tests & diagnostic tests
Dictation Purpose: previously regarded solely as a means of measuring students’ skills of listening comprehension. Auditory discrimination, the auditory memory span, spelling, the recognition of sound segments, a familiarity with grammatical and lexical patterning of the language, and overall textual comprehension
good predicators of global language ability, but recent research has found that dictation tends to measure lower-order language skills- straightforward comprehension rather that high-order skills- inference.
(4) the communicative approach concerned primarily with how language is used in communication Communicative competence achieved without a considerable mastery of grammar resulting in an attempt to obtain different profiles of a learner’s performance in the language
The score obtained on a communicative test several measures of proficiency rather than simply one overall measure. Reflecting the culture of a particular country because of its emphasis on context and the use of authentic materials. Introducing the concept of qualitative modes of assessment in preference to quantitative ones