intTypePromotion=1
zunia.vn Tuyển sinh 2024 dành cho Gen-Z zunia.vn zunia.vn
ADSENSE

Đề tài nghiên cứu khoa học: Nghiên cứu về tình hình tăng huyết áp tại thị xã Đông Hà, tỉnh Quảng Trị năm 2008

Chia sẻ: Nguyễn Phương Hà Linh Linh | Ngày: | Loại File: PDF | Số trang:10

578
lượt xem
55
download
 
  Download Vui lòng tải xuống để xem tài liệu đầy đủ

Tuyển tập báo cáo nghiên cứu khoa học trường đại học huế đề tài: nghiên cứu về tình hình tăng huyết áp Tại thị xã Đông Hà, tỉnh Quảng Trị năm 2008...

Chủ đề:
Lưu

Nội dung Text: Đề tài nghiên cứu khoa học: Nghiên cứu về tình hình tăng huyết áp tại thị xã Đông Hà, tỉnh Quảng Trị năm 2008

  1. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, Hue University, N0 61, 2010 STUDY OF THE HYPERTENSION SITUATION AT DONGHA TOWN, QUANGTRI PROVINCE IN 2008 Le Thi Thu Trang,Tran Kim Phung Quang Tri Health Service SUMMARY Hypertension has been a leading risk factor of cardiovascular disease (CDV) and a main cause of deaths from heart complications as well. The prevalence rate of hypertension has been increasing throughout the world over and also in Vietnam, yet no research into this issue has ever been carried out in Quangtri. An investigation named "A Study of the hypertension situation at Dongha town, Quangtri in 2008" was conducted accordingly.The study aimed to investigate the rate of hypertension in Dongha, Quangtri and explore the relationship between hypertension and several CVD risk factors in Dongha, Quangtri. Study design: A cross-sectional investigation and analysis. Subjects: 461 men and women aged ≥ 25 years residing at Dongha, Quang Tri. Methods: All enrolled participants underwent measurements of height, weight, waist and BMI calculation, blood pressure, and were quantitatively tested for a fasting venous blood glucose in the morning, and lipid components. Evaluations were based on criteria issued by the WHO, NCEP ATPIII and the Vietnam national heart association. Results: The hypertension rate was 26.68% and increased with age, the age groups of 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64 and ≥ 65 accounted for 7.5%, 15.6%, 30.3%, 38.4% and  42.5% respectively. Risk factors related to hypertension included: overweight (OR = 2.19), android obesity (OR = 2.34), dyslipidemia of at least one lipid component (OR = 2.19), hypercholesterolemia (OR = 2.53), elevated plasma LDL-C (OR = 2.15), and hypertriglyceridemia (OR = 2.25). Diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose intolerance (FGI), and general raised blood glucose (BG) were all evidently correlated to hypertension. The rate of hypertension in those who had elevated levels of BG (with BG ≥ 6.1mmol/l) was 41/107 = 38.3%, those who were diabetic being 23/56 = 41%, and those who suffered from FGI being 18/41 = 35.3%. Conclusions: the high rate of hypertension was similar to other regions throughout the country, and the rate obviously increased with age, overweight, android obesity, metabolic dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and diabetes. 1. Introduction Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the cause of one third of all deaths in the world,and increasingly poses a health burden on the population. Hypertension (HT) has been a leading risk factor of CVD and a main cause of deaths from heart complications 481
  2. such as stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and renal failure. While lifespans, overweight and obesity have been increasing and socio-psychological events have begun to have stronger effects on people's lives, the prevalence rate of HT continued to rise in the population. Moreover, although risk factors of uncontrolled HT were identified, HT itself was insufficiently managed and treated in almost all patients, thus giving rise to the high rate of cardiovascular events in the majority of treated or untreated hypertensive persons. In Vietnam, the prevalence rate of HT was 27.2% in 2008, and understanding and management of HT were to a certain extent restricted. In our home province Quangtri, no investigation on HT has been carried out so far. Objectives of the study are to investigate the rate of hypertension in the population of Dongha, Quangtri and reveal the relationship between hypertension and several risk factors of CVD at Dongha, Quangtri. 2. Methods 2.1. Subjects: 461 men and women aging ≥ 25 years and residing at Dongha, Quangtri 2.2. Methods Design: cross-sectional investigation and analysis, simple random sampling. Diagnosis and classification of HT according to JNC VI. All enrolled participants underwent measurements of height, weight, waist and body mass index(BMI) calculation, and were quantitatively tested for morning fasting venous blood glucose, and lipid components. Evaluations were based on criteria issued by WHO, NCEP ATPIII, WPRO and the Vietnam national heart association. Collected data were statistically analysed. 3. Results 3.1. Rate of hypertension Table 1. General rate of Hypertension in Dongha to compare with other region and country Places n HT Percentage p Dongha, Quangtri,Vietnam (2008) 461 123 26.68 Khanhhoa, Vietnam (2004) [1] 856 204 23.83 > 0.05 Vietnam (2008) [5] 9797 2661 27.2 > 0.05 Prevalence rate of HT at Dongha was similar to other regions in Vietnam. 482
  3. Table 2. Hypertension classification Blood pressure (mm Hg) Dongha Vietnam p 278/461 6244/9797 Normal: < 130/< 85 > 0.05 (60.3%) (63.73%) 60/461 1260/9797 High normal: 130-139/85-89 > 0.05 (13%) (12.9%) 69/461 1346/9797 Stage 1: 140-159/90-99 > 0.05 (14.97%) (13.8%) 40/461 555/9797 Stage 2: 160-179/100- HT < 0.005 109 (8.68%) (5.7%) 14/461 325/9797 Stage 3:  180/ 110 > 0.05 (3.04%) (3.3%) 9797 461 Total (100%) (100%) Rates of HT in stages were the same as other places in Vietnam. 3.2. Relationship between HT and other cardiovascular risk factors 3.2.1. Relationship between HT and anthropometric risk factors Table 3. Gender Male Female p n 116 160 Normal < 0,05 Percentage (%) 55.24 63.75 N 30 32 High normal > 0,05 Percentage (%) 14.29 12.75 n 35 34 Stage 1 > 0,05 Percentage (%) 16.67 13.35 N 23 17 HT Stage 2 > 0,05 Percentage (%) 10.95 6.77 N 6 8 Stage 3 > 0,05 Percentage (%) 2.86 3.19 483
  4. N 64 59 Subtotal < 0,05 Percentage (%) 30.5 23.5 Total 210 251 HT was significantly higher in men than in women (30.5% vs. 23.5%) Table 4. Aging groups HT Age High Normal groups n % normal BP Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Subtotal (year) BP 78 25-34 93 20,2 8 (8.6%) 6 (6.5%) 0 1 7 (7.5%) (83.9%) 67 12 14 35-44 90 19,5 9 (10%) 1 1 (74.4%) (13.3%) (15.6%) 59 10 16 11 30 45-54 99 21,5 3 (59.6%) (10.1%) (16.1%) (11.1%) (30.3%) 19 46 16 14 38 55-64 99 21,5 5 (46.5%) (16.2%) (19.2%) (14.1%) (38.4%) 28 34 14  65 80 17,4 17 (21%) 16 (20%) 4 (17.5%) (35%) (42.5%) 60 278 40 Total 461 100% 69 (15%) 14 (3%) (60.3%) (8.7%) (13%) Dongha 1.82 (1.48-2.23) OR(95%CI) Vietnam 1.39 (1.176-1.592) Dongha
  5. 2 35.96 Dongha 3.8 (2.45-5.87) OR (95%CI) Vietnam 1.82 (1.656-1.988) Dongha < 0.001 p Vietnam 0,001 Overweight (BMI  23) was significantly associated with HT. Table 6. Android obesity HT Normal BP Total Android obesity 39 56 95 Normal 84 282 366 Total 123 338 461 2 12.63 OR (95%CI) 2.34 (1.46-3.37) P < 0.001 Android obesity was significantly associated with HT. 3.2.2. Relationship between HT and dyslipidemia Table 7. At least one abnormal lipid component HT Normal BP Total Yes 103 237 340 No 20 101 121 Total 123 338 461 2 8,64 Dongha 2.19 (1.30-3.71) OR (95%CI) Vietnam 8.31 (1.95-35.39) Dongha < 0.005 P Vietnam 0.004 Dyslipidemia of at least one component was significantly associated with HT. 485
  6. Table 8. Elevated total cholesterolemia HT Normal BP Total Yes 58 88 146 No 65 250 315 Total 123 338 461 2 18.59 Dongha 2.53 (1.66-3.87) OR (95%CI) Vietnam 2.28 (1.492-3.479) Dongha < 0.001 P Vietnam < 0.001 Hypercholesterolemia was significantly associated with HT Table 9. Elevated lower density lipoprotein – cholesterol(LDL-C) HT Normal BP Total Yes 40 62 102 No 83 276 359 Total 123 338 461 2 10.52 Dongha 2.15 (1.35-3.4) OR (95%CI) Vietnam 1.49 (1.145-1.936) Dongha < 0.005 P Vietnam 0.003 Elevated LDL-C was significantly associated with HT Table 10. Reduced high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) HT Normal BP Total Yes 56 141 179 No 67 197 246 Total 123 338 416 2 0.54 486
  7. Dongha 1.17 (0.77-1.77) OR (95%CI) Vietnam 1.19 (0.663-2.235) Dongha > 0.05 P Vietnam 0.59 Reduced HDL-C was not a risk factor of HT. Table 11. Elevated triglyceridemia HT Normal BP Total Yes 78 147 225 No 45 191 336 Total 123 338 461 2 14,33 Dongha 2.25 (1.48-3.43) OR (95%CI) Vietnam 1.55 (1.554-2.122) Dongha < 0.001 P Vietnam 0.008 Elevated triglyceridemia was significantly associated with HT 3.3. Relationship between hypertension with elevated blood glucose Table 12. Relationships between hypertension and diabetes (DM) and fasting glucose intolerance (FGI) DM and FGI DM FGI HT Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes 41 82 23 100 18 105 No 66 272 33 305 33 305 OR (95%CI) 2.06 (1.3÷3.25) 2.13(1.2÷3.76) 1.58 (0.68÷2.92) p < 0.005 < 0.05 > 0.05 HT was significantly correlated with elevated blood glucose (DM and FGI) and DM; but not with single FGI. Prevalence rates of HT in elevated blood glucose, DM and FGI persons were respectively 38.3%, 41% and 35.3%. 487
  8. 4. Discussions Prevalence the rate of HT in persons  25 years at Dongha (26.7%) was relatively similar to other regions in Vietnam. Rates of stage-1, -2 and -3 HT were 15%, 8.7% and 3% respectively, and similar to those in Vietnamese people [5]. Gender: HT was significantly higher in men than in women (30.5% vs. 23.5%), but there was no difference between the two in each stage of classification [1], [5]. Age: The rate of HT increased on aging, and age groups of 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64 and  65 respectively accounted for 7.5%, 15.6%, 30.3%, 38.4% and 42.5%. These figures were relatively similar to those in Pham Gia Khai's and Phan Long Nhon's (Binh Dinh) studies [5]. The rate of severe HT, likewise, increased with age (stage-1 HT was primarily seen in those < 45 years, while stage-2 HT in those > 45 years). The rate of HT was considerably high in working age groups. Especially in the still very young age group of 25-34, the rates of HT mounted up to 7.5%, not including 8.6% of which had high normal BP- which may cause injuries to target organs and progress to real HT. BMI: Overweight (BMI  23) was significantly associated with HT (OR = 3.8, 95%CI = 2.45-5.87). Android obesity: Android obesity was also significantly associated with HT. The rate of HT in those with android obesity was 39/95 = 41.05%, while in those without android obesity 84/366 = 22.95%. Sanjay Vikrant proved in his study [10] that HT was more likely detected in obese persons than in people with normal BMI, and the higher the BMI, the higher the rate of HT. Dyslipidemia: Dyslipidemia was significantly associated with HT. The rate of HT in those with dyslipidemia of at least one component was 30%, while in others with normal lipid levels 16.5%. The rate of HT in those with hypercholesterolemia was 58/146 = 39.7%, while in the others with normal cholesterolemia it was 65/315 = 20.6%. Kaplan M.N. suggested that cholesterolemia was often elevated in hypertensive persons, for hypercholesterolemia evidently injures the intima-dependent vasodilatory mechanism [7]. Rates of HT in those with and without elevated LDL-C were 40/102 = 39.2% and 83/359 = 23.1%, respectively. Reduced HDL-C was not a risk factor of HT. Rates of HT in those with and without reduced HDL-C were approximately the same (31.3% vs. 27.2%, respectively). Rates of HT in groups with hypertriglyceridemia and with normal 488
  9. triglyceridemia were 78//225 = 34.7% and 45/336 = 13.4% respectively. Diabetes mellitus and fasting glucose intolerance: Fasting blood glucose levels  6.1mmol/l were significantly associated with HT. The rate of HT in those with fasting blood glucose levels  6.1mmol/l was 41/107 = 38.3%, in diabetics being 23/56 = 41%, in those with FGI being 18/41 = 35.3%. Sanjay Vikrant [10] and Kaplan M.N. [7] supposed that insulin resistance and elevated blood glucose were related to HT. The NHANES III study reported 71% of diabetics had HT [7]. 5. Conclusions 5.1. Rate of HT was 26.68%. 5.2. Rates of HT in age groups of 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64 and  65 respectively accounted for 7.5%, 15.6%, 30.3%, 38.4% and 42.5%. 5.3. Risk factors associated with HT: Overweight (OR=3.8, 95%CI = 2.45-5.87, p
  10. 6. Burt VL, Whelton P, Roccella EJ,..., (1995) Prevalence of hypertension in the US adult population. Results from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, Hypertension, 1995 mar:25(3):305-13. 7. Kaplan MN, System Hypertension: Mechanism and diagnosis, Heart disease - chapter 37, 2005. 8. Lip G.Y.H, Hall J.E, Comprehensive Hypertension, Mosby Elsevier, (2007). 9. The Joint National Committee, The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of high blood pressure, (2004). 10. Vikrant S, Tiwari SC, Essential Hypertension - pathogenesis and pathophysiology, Journal, Indian Academy of Clinical Medicine vol.2, No.3: 2001, 140-161. 490
ADSENSE

CÓ THỂ BẠN MUỐN DOWNLOAD

 

Đồng bộ tài khoản
2=>2